
Tune out the noise and trust the plan: Investing in uncertain times
This was one of the largest two day falls ever seen, the fifth worst since the German defeat of France in 1940 during World War Two1. The fall was that dramatic, it sits alongside other historic era defining moments in recent history. Before bottoming out, the S&P 500 fell by around 20%1.
You would think it would take some time to recover from such a fall. However, would it surprise you to know that over the whole of the second quarter, April, May and June, global stock markets have actually increased in value, to the tune of 5.13%?
UK investors might not have seen all of that profit since sterling has strengthened against the dollar, but overall, markets have been positive. Even after factoring in the April turbulence, the S&P 500 was hitting historic highs every day towards the end of June.
Surely we are living in unprecedented times? Nothing like this could have been seen before? Again, the answer is a surprising 'no.'
Despite these dramatic falls, the Volatility Index (VIX) that measures the fluctuations in the S&P 500 stood at 52.3% on April 8th. Elevated, yes. But not out of the ordinary.
After all, the index stood at 82.7% in March 2020 with the start of Covid lockdowns and 80.9% in 2008 at the start of the Great Financial Crisis1.
(Image: Neil Burns. Photo by Ross Johnston/Newsline Media)
Increased volatility reflects the markets adjusting to latest information, and the tariffs announced by President Trump on Liberation Day were initially much higher than markets had expected. After a bit of shuffling around, the VIX measure by the end of June had dropped to 16.7%. This is well below the over 30-year average since 1990 of 19.5%1.
Markets may appear relatively calm at the moment – could this be a calm before the storm? Potentially. Is there a lesson to be learned here? Firstly, volatility is scary. No-one really enjoys seeing the value of their ISAs or pension funds drop like a stone over a few days.
But much like a trip to the dentist, we probably should see periods of volatility as something to be expected and endured because we know it will be alright in the long run.
The most important lesson that should be learned is one that has been noted many times in the past.
Dramatic market recoveries tend to very quickly follow after major falls. Trying to time the market may be risky approach, as it can lead investors to miss some of the best days of market performance – potentially harming long-term returns.
A study by Fidelity2 in January 2022 found that staying fully invested in the FTSE All-Share index from January 2017 resulted in a return of 6.30%. Missing even only the 10 best days over that period dropped the return to 2.16%, and sitting on the sidelines for any longer meant losing money. None of us have a functioning crystal ball.
Prior to 2022, Retail Prices Index inflation of over 5% a year was last seen in 1990 when it was 9.3%3. Relatively low inflation for over 30 years has tended to hide the effects of rising prices. Slow increases become almost imperceptible. Just look at how everyone felt the pain of the Cost of Living Crisis when inflation hit 13.4% in 2022. It certainly came as a shock to most.
Even over shorter times, low inflation can catch out your long-term spending power. Over 20 years from 2003, the value of the £1 in your pocket dropped to 58p.
Keeping the money in the bank wouldn't have been enough to stop your money dropping in value. On average, the £1 would have been worth 87p by 20234.
Human nature tends to focus on the immediate and short-term risks that stare us in the face.
This is the volatility that we see in stock markets, and by focusing on tomorrow, we can miss the positives that come next week, next month or next year. Slow risks, like inflation, we can ignore and adjust to, even if that means we are eventually worse off. We need to ask ourselves, 'which is the greater risk to my financial wellbeing?'.
The UK Government also seems to agree. The Chancellor has floated the idea of limiting the amount that can be saved in cash ISAs to encourage a greater take up of stocks and shares.
They know the long-term dangers of apparent stability and security.
Setting realistic and achievable investment goals, building a robust and sensible plan and then switching off from the daily noise is often the best course of action.
Knowing you can ignore the chatter and focus on the long term can be quite therapeutic, and talking to a qualified financial planner can help you to design your own financial future.
Neil Burns is Associate Financial Planner based in Acumen's Glasgow office.
Acumen Financial Planning is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. FCA number 218745.
The content of this article should not be regarded as advice. When considering Investments, independent financial advice should be sought.
Footnotes
1. Dimensional - Midyear Review: Stocks' Climb Is Challenged During Volatile First Half: Jul 03, 2025
2. Fidelity – When Doing Nothing is Best
3. Dimensional – Matrix Book 2024
4. Acumen Financial Planning internal research
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
4 minutes ago
- The Independent
AriZona Iced Tea is considering raising its prices for the first time in almost 30 years
AriZona Iced Tea is considering raising the price of its signature "Big Cans" for the first time in nearly 30 years. The potential price increase is a direct result of Donald Trump 's 50 percent tariff on aluminum imports. Co-founder Don Vultaggio expressed strong reluctance to abandon the $0.99 price point, which has been maintained since 1997, emphasizing customer loyalty. The company imports 20 percent of its aluminum from Canada, and the tariffs are expected to drive up costs for both imported and domestic materials. Industry groups and political figures have criticized the tariffs, warning of their detrimental impact on American manufacturers and consumers.


Times
2 hours ago
- Times
Trump extends deadline for higher tariffs on China by 90 days
President Trump has extended a deadline for higher tariffs on Chinese goods by 90 days, a White House official said on Monday. Tariffs on China were due to return to triple-digit rates on Tuesday, in a move that threatened to cause turmoil for global supply chains. However, the president has allowed for further negotiations and a potential meeting with China's President Xi after signing an executive order. The order prevents US tariffs on Chinese goods from rising to 145 per cent. An escalation of trade tensions earlier this year rocked global financial markets, as US tariffs on Chinese imports reached 145 per cent in April, and China restricted access to critical materials for US manufacturers. In May, the two sides reached a 90-day truce, under which tariffs on imports from China were lowered to 30 per cent, while China lowered its rate on US imports to 10 per cent and resumed rare earth exports. Last month, top US and Chinese officials met in Stockholm for talks aimed at resolving the trade war between the world's top two economies. Trump said that Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, 'felt very good about the meeting'. However, no further breakthroughs or extensions to the tariff deadline were confirmed. Trump says he has a 'very good relationship' with China's President Xi XINHUA/ALAMY On Monday, Trump told a press conference: 'They've been dealing quite nicely. The relationship is very good with President Xi and myself.' • Can China outmuscle Trump to become the world's superpower? The president pushed for additional concessions on Sunday, urging China to quadruple its soybean purchases. However, analysts questioned the feasibility of any such deal. Trump did not repeat the demand on Monday. Washington has also been pressing Beijing to stop buying Russian oil, with Trump threatening to impose secondary tariffs on China. Ryan Majerus, partner in the international trade team at King & Spalding and a former US trade official, said the 90-day extension 'will undoubtedly lower anxiety on both sides as talks continue, and as the US and China work toward a framework deal in the fall'. He added: 'I'm certain investment commitments will factor into any potential deal, and the extension gives them more time to try and work through some of the longstanding trade concerns.' Trump also said on Monday that he would not impose tariffs on gold, ending days of speculation that the metal could be caught up in the global trade war. US Customs and Border Protection had posted a ruling on its website on Friday saying that Washington could place the most widely traded gold bullion bars in the US under country-specific import tariffs.


The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Why Peak China may finally have arrived
Proclamations about the inevitability of China's dominance of the global economic system, or the so-called Chinese century, were made long before Donald Trump's attempts to stymie its trade with the US. Common concerns about coercive politics and human rights aside, some notions of China as an unstoppable economic, technological and military behemoth sit alongside others focused more on an increasingly sclerotic, over- centralised political economy, that depends on wasteful economic stimulus, and features poor governance and institutions. The fusion of these notions suggests that we may already have reached 'peak China'. At the time of the 2008 financial crisis, China's official, and probably exaggerated, GDP was about $14tn (£10.4tn), or about a third of that of the US. By 2021, it had risen to three-quarters of America's $23.7tn, and there was widespread talk about in which year of the 2020s China would overtake the US. By 2024, however, China's $18tn economy had fallen back to just over 62% of the almost $30tn of the US. In GDP per head terms, China is still no more than 20% of the US. A rising China uniquely lifted its share of global GDP between 2000 and 2021 from 3.5% to 18.5%, but since then it has slipped back to about 16.5%. There is no question that China's rise is at least stalling. The working age and total population are now in relentless decline. The urbanisation rate, just over 60%, is flattening out. Productivity growth has stalled. The long surge in China's share of global manufacturing exports and production has levelled off, and the external environment for China is now much harder and more hostile. A 90-day pause in the US-China tariff war is due to expire on Tuesday, and it is unclear whether it will be extended. Part of the problem is that China has reached the end of extrapolation. The past really is another country. Some of its growth engines could only ever fire once: for example, enrolling children in primary and secondary schools; improving basic healthcare; reaping the demographic dividend of falling dependency rates; and moving people from the countryside to higher-productivity, urban jobs. Some growth also flowed from a number of highly effective policy initiatives such as those captured by the era of reform and opening-up, inspired by Deng Xiaoping: joining the World Trade Organization; creating a genuine market in housing, and exploiting globalisation. None of these can happen again. China's growth model, moreover, based on unrealistically high growth targets and uniquely high investment and savings rates, is becoming swamped by stagnant productivity, debt service difficulties and misallocation of capital. At the Central Economic Work Conference in December last year, China's premier, Li Qiang, summarised his country's condition by saying candidly that the foundation for sustained economic recovery and growth was not strong, demand was weak, and there were pressures on job creation and 'fiscal difficulties' among several local governments. Although consumption has been made a top priority, actual policy measures to make it so have been underwhelming, partly because redistributing economic power to companies and citizens also entails changes in political power, which are anathema to the Communist party. The structural downturn in the property sector, which at one stage accounted for more than a quarter of the economy, is likely to shrink for the foreseeable future, dogged by lower rates of household formation and smaller cohorts of first-time buyers, linked to demographics as well as a chronic oversupply of unsold and uncompleted real estate. The government has softened its approach to private enterprises and approved a new private economy promotion law to bolster AI, technology clusters and hubs, and reduce regulatory barriers. Low business confidence, though, is not really about regulations but about political interference, and weak demand and profits. The super-globalisation from which China benefited is pretty much over, and the world's biggest export nation is now confronted by a fragmenting and fracturing trade and investment environment in which commerce within blocs is holding up better than trade between them. China's bloc includes a majority of the world's population, but very small proportions of world GDP, investment and wealth. At the same time, developed and middle-income economies, as well as emerging nations, are pushing back against what they perceive to be predatory trade policies by a mercantilist China. Peak China does not stem from doubts about China's industrial prowess and pedigree. It is, though, about two things that can be simultaneously true: China can have world-class companies and trendsetters such as Alibaba, Tencent, BYD, CATL, Huawei and DeepSeek, as well as an economy with systemic imbalances, debt capacity limits, and political and economic contradictions. Put another way, China has islands of technological excellence and leadership in a sea of macroeconomic turbulence and trouble. This characterised Peak Japan 40 years ago, and China is shaping up for the encore. George Magnus is a research associate at Oxford University's China Centre and at Soas University of London. He is the author of Red Flags: Why Xi's China is in Jeopardy