‘서해피격' 유족 면담 의향 묻자 이종석 '검토하겠다'
이종석 국가정보원장 후보자는 19일 '서해 공무원 피격 사건' 유가족이 요청할 경우 면담을 검토해보겠다는 입장을 밝혔다.
이 후보자는 이날 오후 진행된 비공개 인사청문회 이후 '서해 피격' 피해자 유가족과 면담 의향을 묻는 기자들의 질의에 "필요하면 뵈어야겠다. 검토를 해보겠다"고 답했다.
2020년 9월 서해에서 북한군의 총격에 숨진 해양수산부 공무원 이대준 씨의 친형인 이래진 씨는 이 후보자의 인사청문회를 앞두고 "이종석 국정원장이 취임하면, 비공개도 좋으니 한번 뵙고 싶다"고 코리아헤럴드에 전한 바 있다.
이 후보자는 취임 후 서해 피살 공무원과 동해 귀순 어민 강제 북송 사건과 관련해 2022년 진행된 국정원 내부 감찰이 적절한지 점검하겠다는 의사도 밝혔다.
이 후보자는 당시 국정원 내부 감찰은 "전직 국정원장들에 대해 형사 문제나 권력 남용 문제가 아닌, 정책적 판단에 의해 이뤄진 것이기 때문에 굉장히 불행한 사건"이라면서, "복귀하고 천천히 정리를 해야되지 않을까 생각한다"고 했다.
이 후보자는 12.3 비상계엄 사태에 국정원이 얽힌 부분에 대해서도 들여다보겠다고 했다.
이 후보자는 "특검 과정에서 국정원에도 일부 조사가 들어올텐데, 국정원이 걸려있는 것들에 대해 당연히 살펴볼 생각이다"고 말했다. 그러면서 "다만 그것이 감찰이 될지, 어떤 성격이 될지는 예단하기 어렵다"고 덧붙였다.
앞서 같은 날 오전에 열린 공개 인사청문회에서 이기헌 더불어민주당 의원은 문재인 정부 당시 박지원·서훈 국정원장에 대한 형사 고발로 이어진 국정원 내부 감찰이 "있을 수 없는 일"이라고 목소리를 높이며, 경위를 밝힐 필요성에 대한 이 후보자의 입장을 물었다.
이에 이 후보자는 "국정원 내부 조직과 관련 돼 있고 전직 원장과 관련 돼 있는 사건이라 상당히 깊이 살펴보겠단 의사 표시를 했고, 앞으로 그렇게 하겠다"고 답했다.
이성권 국민의힘 정보위원회 간사는 이 후보자가 서해 공무원 피격 사건에 대한 입장 표명을 회피했다고 지적했다.
이 간사는 "이 후보자에게 서해 공무원 피격 관련해 물으니 '모른다'고 답했다"면서 "대북전문가인데 그 일을 하지 않아서 답변을 못 한다는 것은 말이 안 된다"고 꼬집었다.
18일 국회에 낸 인사청문 자료에서 이 후보자는 서해 피격·강제 북송 사건에 대한 입장을 묻는 질의에 "세종연구소 연구원으로 재직하던 시기에 발생한 사건으로 정확한 사실관계를 알지 못한다"면서, "국정원장으로 취임하게 된다면 관련 내용을 살펴보겠다"고 답했다.
이 후보자의 인사청문회 보고서 채택을 위한 국회 정보위 전체회의는 20일 열린다.
(arin@heraldcorp.com)
Spy chief nominee grilled over his perceptions of North Korea
Lee Jong-seok, the nominee to be the director of the National Intelligence Service, faced scrutiny over his past acquaintance with a former deputy governor convicted over illegal cash transfers to North Korea at his confirmation hearing Thursday.
At the hearing, Lee was asked about his past ties to former Gyeonggi Province Deputy Gov. Lee Hwa-young, who served when President Lee Jae Myung was governor of the province. The former deputy gov. was sentenced to 7 years and 8 months in prison for a 2019-20 scheme to transfer funds to the North.
Prosecutors allege that the president, when he was governor, used the undergarment maker Ssangbangwool to send $8 million to North Korea. Lee has consistently denied any wrongdoing or involvement in the case.
The NIS director nominee and the former deputy governor had worked together at the inter-Korean peace committee at the Gyeonggi Provincial Office since 2018. The nominee said he knew the former deputy governor strictly in a professional capacity and that he had no knowledge of the scheme at all.
When asked about his past public remarks opposing the introduction of THAAD, the US antiballistic missile defense system and GSOMIA, the intelligence-sharing framework with Japan, the nominee said he believes that those were "things that are already agreed upon and should be complied with."
Lee said that the foundation of South Korea's security is its alliance with the US. "That is the stance of the Lee Jae Myung administration, and I believe the same," he said.
In response to The Korea Herald's question after the confirmation hearing, Lee said that he would be open to meeting with the bereaved family of a South Korean fisheries official who was shot dead by North Korean troops at sea in September 2020.
"I have not yet looked into the matter, but I would consider it," the nominee said.
In Wednesday's prehearing brief, seen exclusively by The Korea Herald, Lee said if he is appointed as the director, he would "look into" the shooting murder of the South Korean official. He was responding to a lawmaker's question about his stance on the case.
In 2022, the NIS filed a criminal complaint against its former director Park Jie-won, who is now a Democratic Party of Korea lawmaker, for allegedly destroying the spy agency's confidential materials related to the South Korean official's death. Park denies all allegations.
The criminal trial for Park and other high-level officials at the time is ongoing.
In the prehearing brief, Lee also denied the accusations that he was lenient toward North Korea. "I absolutely cannot agree with the claims that I am pro-North Korea only because I have studied North Korea and the Korean Peninsula in depth," he said.
Lee served as minister of inter-Korean affairs under the late former liberal President Roh Moo-hyun in 2006.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
![[Editorial] Brains before algorithms](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fall-logos-bucket.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fkoreaherald.com.png&w=48&q=75){kind=small}
Korea Herald
2 hours ago
- Korea Herald
[Editorial] Brains before algorithms
South Korea's push for AI leadership must confront the challenge of retaining talent South Korea has declared its ambition to become one of the world's top three powers in artificial intelligence. The goal is bold, the funding substantial: President Lee Jae Myung has pledged 100 trillion won ($72.5 billion) to the sector. Earlier this week, Lee appointed Ha Jung-woo, a respected AI researcher formerly at Naver, as the country's first senior presidential secretary for AI policy. A sweeping initiative, backed by public and private investment, is beginning to take shape. Alongside infrastructure plans such as a major AI data center in Ulsan co-funded by SK Group and Amazon Web Services, Lee's initiative signals a serious — if belated — push to catch up in the global AI race. But lofty goals and generous budgets alone do not make an AI powerhouse. Without the talent to match its vision, South Korea risks building a hollow structure: well-funded, well-planned and ultimately weakened by the steady loss of its brightest minds. The warning signs are clear. According to the Korea Chamber of Commerce and Industry, South Korea ranks 35th out of 38 OECD countries in net AI talent mobility. For every 10,000 residents, 0.36 more AI professionals leave the country than arrive. This widening 'brain deficit' threatens the very foundation of Lee's AI strategy. The trend is not confined to AI. Across science and technology fields, more Korean professionals are seeking careers abroad, while fewer foreign experts are choosing to relocate to South Korea. The KCCI analysis also shows that the country's innovation pipeline is faltering: fewer international research partnerships, declining venture investment and a generation of STEM graduates opting for medical school or emigration over startups and R&D. This is not simply about money. Young Korean scientists and engineers are drawn to countries where advancement is based on merit, not seniority. They want flexible work environments, robust research infrastructure and room to take intellectual risks. Yet at home, they face rigid institutional norms: a 52-hour workweek cap, seniority-based pay and limited opportunities for global collaboration — all of which hamper South Korea's ability to attract and retain top-tier talent. The financial cost of this exodus is high. Each college graduate who leaves to work abroad represents more than 550 million won in lost public investment and future tax revenue. The long-term damage is even greater. As the scientific workforce erodes, the innovations South Korea hopes will define its economic future could stall before they begin. The government's investment in AI infrastructure is a necessary step. Ha Jung-woo's appointment and his advocacy for a sovereign AI trained on Korean language and culture show strategic insight into the risks of overdependence on foreign platforms. But infrastructure must be matched by reforms that address the root causes of the brain drain. The task ahead is not just to slow the outflow, but to reverse it. South Korea needs a comprehensive 'brain gain' strategy that builds a national ecosystem where talent can thrive. This includes more flexible labor rules, performance-based rewards and stronger support for research and innovation. It also means creating meaningful incentives for foreign experts to come, and to stay, through streamlined visas, tax benefits and improved housing and education options. By the end of 2025, South Korea is expected to face a shortfall of nearly 15,000 AI professionals. And in an era when AI capability is closely tied to national security, economic competitiveness and global standing, there is little margin for error. South Korea has the financial resources, political resolve and technological foundation to lead in AI. But success will depend less on the amount invested and more on the country's ability to cultivate — and retain — the people who will drive that future forward. In the AI age, it is not the machines but the minds that matter most.
![[Lee Byung-jong] President Lee's pragmatic diplomacy](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwimg.heraldcorp.com%2Fnews%2Fcms%2F2025%2F06%2F19%2Fnews-p.v1.20250619.e28f3fe356a24854bdece6b379c122c6_T1.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
Korea Herald
2 hours ago
- Korea Herald
[Lee Byung-jong] President Lee's pragmatic diplomacy
Less than two weeks into office, President Lee Jae Myung is already busy shaping a new course for South Korea's foreign policy — one he describes as 'pragmatic diplomacy.' His packed diplomatic calendar signals both urgency and ambition. Earlier this week, he attended the G7 summit in Canada at the invitation of the host, marking South Korea's return to global diplomacy after six months of absence during the country's turbulent leadership transition. Later this month, he is scheduled to travel to the Netherlands to participate in the NATO summit as a representative of the alliance's Indo-Pacific partners. Despite criticism over the rushed pace and pending domestic challenges, Lee is determined to reestablish South Korea as a central player on the global stage. 'Democratic Korea is back,' declared national security adviser Wi Sung-lac. Still, many are asking: What does 'pragmatic diplomacy' actually mean in practice? Lee's approach marks a distinct departure from the 'values-based diplomacy' of his predecessor, Yoon Suk Yeol, who prioritized alliances with countries sharing democratic values. In contrast, Lee's strategy is rooted in flexibility and realpolitik — prioritizing economic interests and strategic outcomes over ideological alignment. In today's volatile geopolitical environment, with mounting tensions among global powers, Lee seems to be betting that ideological rigidity is a liability, not an asset. While the full contours of Lee's diplomatic doctrine are still emerging, his initial moves offer important clues. The order of his phone calls to world leaders in his first days in office has been particularly telling. As expected, his first call was to US President Donald Trump — a nod to the enduring importance of the South Korea-US alliance, especially on issues of trade and security. The 20-minute call reaffirmed the long-standing priority Korean presidents place on their alliance with Washington. More surprising was his second phone call — to Japanese Prime Minister Ishiba Shigeru. Coming from a liberal background, Lee had been expected by some to reach out to China's Xi Jinping next, following the pattern of previous liberal leaders like President Moon Jae-in. Lee has, in the past, been critical of Japan's stance on historical issues, leading many to doubt whether he would prioritize Tokyo early on. However, this decision was widely interpreted as a signal of Lee's practical mindset and willingness to improve ties with Japan despite lingering historical grievances. Lee's third call to Xi Jinping was hardly unexpected, given that China remains South Korea's largest trading partner. But his fourth and fifth calls did raise eyebrows: He spoke with the leaders of the Czech Republic and Vietnam, countries often overlooked in the early stages of diplomatic outreach by past presidents. His rationale, again, was pragmatic. The Czech Republic recently awarded a 26 trillion-won nuclear power plant construction deal to a South Korean bid — a hard-won contract that edged out fierce competition from France. Lee's outreach aims to solidify that economic relationship and possibly expand it. Vietnam, meanwhile, is South Korea's third-largest trading partner and the leading destination for Korean foreign investment, making it a natural choice for early engagement. The sequence of these conversations echoes one of Lee's key refrains: 'The economy is security, and security is the economy.' His decision to attend the G7 and NATO summits underscores this philosophy. At the G7, discussions focused heavily on global trade friction — particularly the fallout from President Trump's protectionist tariffs. With trade accounting for 80 percent of South Korea's GDP, these are matters Seoul cannot afford to ignore. His participation in the NATO summit is more delicate. Lee had previously expressed reservations about Korea getting too involved in European security matters, especially the war in Ukraine. However, Europe is now a growing market for South Korean defense exports. From that angle, attending the NATO meeting is less about ideology and more about ensuring access to new economic opportunities. But Lee's pragmatic diplomacy will soon face its toughest challenge: North Korea. A purely practical foreign policy could falter if Lee reverts to the liberal camp's traditional approach of engagement with Pyongyang at the expense of alignment with key allies. President Moon Jae-in, for example, pursued such a strategy, which strained Seoul's trilateral coordination with Washington and Tokyo. That fragile alliance, revitalized under President Yoon, President Biden, and former Japanese Prime Minister Kishida in the 2023 Camp David summit, could be tested once more — especially now that all three leaders have exited the political stage. Despite his calls for pragmatic diplomacy, Lee may find himself pulled back toward a more ideological, nationalistic foreign policy. Personnel choices offer early signs of this tension. National security adviser Wi Sung-lac is widely viewed as an advocate of strong alliances, particularly with the US and other democratic partners. But Lee's pick for National Intelligence Service chief, Lee Jong-seok — a former Unification Minister — is a well-known proponent of an independent foreign policy that places inter-Korean relations above external alliances. These two key advisers, representing opposing schools of thought, could end up pulling President Lee in divergent directions, risking confusion and inconsistency in policy execution. In short, President Lee's diplomatic approach shows promise in its economic focus and global engagement. His outreach to non-traditional partners and participation in key summits signal an intent to broaden South Korea's international standing. But this pragmatic posture will only succeed if it can maintain consistency and resist being derailed by ideological pulls — especially when it comes to North Korea. The balancing act between idealism and realism, between national pride and global cooperation, will define the credibility and effectiveness of Lee's foreign policy in the years to come.
Korea Herald
7 hours ago
- Korea Herald
‘서해피격' 유족 면담 의향 묻자 이종석 '검토하겠다'
이종석 국가정보원장 후보자는 19일 '서해 공무원 피격 사건' 유가족이 요청할 경우 면담을 검토해보겠다는 입장을 밝혔다. 이 후보자는 이날 오후 진행된 비공개 인사청문회 이후 '서해 피격' 피해자 유가족과 면담 의향을 묻는 기자들의 질의에 "필요하면 뵈어야겠다. 검토를 해보겠다"고 답했다. 2020년 9월 서해에서 북한군의 총격에 숨진 해양수산부 공무원 이대준 씨의 친형인 이래진 씨는 이 후보자의 인사청문회를 앞두고 "이종석 국정원장이 취임하면, 비공개도 좋으니 한번 뵙고 싶다"고 코리아헤럴드에 전한 바 있다. 이 후보자는 취임 후 서해 피살 공무원과 동해 귀순 어민 강제 북송 사건과 관련해 2022년 진행된 국정원 내부 감찰이 적절한지 점검하겠다는 의사도 밝혔다. 이 후보자는 당시 국정원 내부 감찰은 "전직 국정원장들에 대해 형사 문제나 권력 남용 문제가 아닌, 정책적 판단에 의해 이뤄진 것이기 때문에 굉장히 불행한 사건"이라면서, "복귀하고 천천히 정리를 해야되지 않을까 생각한다"고 했다. 이 후보자는 12.3 비상계엄 사태에 국정원이 얽힌 부분에 대해서도 들여다보겠다고 했다. 이 후보자는 "특검 과정에서 국정원에도 일부 조사가 들어올텐데, 국정원이 걸려있는 것들에 대해 당연히 살펴볼 생각이다"고 말했다. 그러면서 "다만 그것이 감찰이 될지, 어떤 성격이 될지는 예단하기 어렵다"고 덧붙였다. 앞서 같은 날 오전에 열린 공개 인사청문회에서 이기헌 더불어민주당 의원은 문재인 정부 당시 박지원·서훈 국정원장에 대한 형사 고발로 이어진 국정원 내부 감찰이 "있을 수 없는 일"이라고 목소리를 높이며, 경위를 밝힐 필요성에 대한 이 후보자의 입장을 물었다. 이에 이 후보자는 "국정원 내부 조직과 관련 돼 있고 전직 원장과 관련 돼 있는 사건이라 상당히 깊이 살펴보겠단 의사 표시를 했고, 앞으로 그렇게 하겠다"고 답했다. 이성권 국민의힘 정보위원회 간사는 이 후보자가 서해 공무원 피격 사건에 대한 입장 표명을 회피했다고 지적했다. 이 간사는 "이 후보자에게 서해 공무원 피격 관련해 물으니 '모른다'고 답했다"면서 "대북전문가인데 그 일을 하지 않아서 답변을 못 한다는 것은 말이 안 된다"고 꼬집었다. 18일 국회에 낸 인사청문 자료에서 이 후보자는 서해 피격·강제 북송 사건에 대한 입장을 묻는 질의에 "세종연구소 연구원으로 재직하던 시기에 발생한 사건으로 정확한 사실관계를 알지 못한다"면서, "국정원장으로 취임하게 된다면 관련 내용을 살펴보겠다"고 답했다. 이 후보자의 인사청문회 보고서 채택을 위한 국회 정보위 전체회의는 20일 열린다. (arin@ Spy chief nominee grilled over his perceptions of North Korea Lee Jong-seok, the nominee to be the director of the National Intelligence Service, faced scrutiny over his past acquaintance with a former deputy governor convicted over illegal cash transfers to North Korea at his confirmation hearing Thursday. At the hearing, Lee was asked about his past ties to former Gyeonggi Province Deputy Gov. Lee Hwa-young, who served when President Lee Jae Myung was governor of the province. The former deputy gov. was sentenced to 7 years and 8 months in prison for a 2019-20 scheme to transfer funds to the North. Prosecutors allege that the president, when he was governor, used the undergarment maker Ssangbangwool to send $8 million to North Korea. Lee has consistently denied any wrongdoing or involvement in the case. The NIS director nominee and the former deputy governor had worked together at the inter-Korean peace committee at the Gyeonggi Provincial Office since 2018. The nominee said he knew the former deputy governor strictly in a professional capacity and that he had no knowledge of the scheme at all. When asked about his past public remarks opposing the introduction of THAAD, the US antiballistic missile defense system and GSOMIA, the intelligence-sharing framework with Japan, the nominee said he believes that those were "things that are already agreed upon and should be complied with." Lee said that the foundation of South Korea's security is its alliance with the US. "That is the stance of the Lee Jae Myung administration, and I believe the same," he said. In response to The Korea Herald's question after the confirmation hearing, Lee said that he would be open to meeting with the bereaved family of a South Korean fisheries official who was shot dead by North Korean troops at sea in September 2020. "I have not yet looked into the matter, but I would consider it," the nominee said. In Wednesday's prehearing brief, seen exclusively by The Korea Herald, Lee said if he is appointed as the director, he would "look into" the shooting murder of the South Korean official. He was responding to a lawmaker's question about his stance on the case. In 2022, the NIS filed a criminal complaint against its former director Park Jie-won, who is now a Democratic Party of Korea lawmaker, for allegedly destroying the spy agency's confidential materials related to the South Korean official's death. Park denies all allegations. The criminal trial for Park and other high-level officials at the time is ongoing. In the prehearing brief, Lee also denied the accusations that he was lenient toward North Korea. "I absolutely cannot agree with the claims that I am pro-North Korea only because I have studied North Korea and the Korean Peninsula in depth," he said. Lee served as minister of inter-Korean affairs under the late former liberal President Roh Moo-hyun in 2006.
