logo
Thailand's Gas Gamble: How Policy Missteps and Private Gains Drive Up Power Bills

Thailand's Gas Gamble: How Policy Missteps and Private Gains Drive Up Power Bills

A bolt of lightning strikes the outskirts of Bangkok as the city skyline is pictured from the King Power Mahanakhon skyscraper in Bangkok on October 22, 2021.In a nation where more than two-thirds of electricity is generated by gas-fired plants, Thailand's deepening reliance on expensive liquefied natural gas (LNG) imports is not just an energy strategy—it's a growing burden on its people. As global LNG prices spike and domestic gas output dwindles, questions are mounting over whether energy policy mismanagement and elite profiteering have come at the expense of the average
Thai household.
At the center of this complex web lies Gulf Energy Development Public Company Ltd.,
a powerful conglomerate helmed by Thailand's richest man, Sarath Ratanavadi. Together with the state-owned PTT Group, Gulf has secured long-term rights to import, store, and distribute LNG under lucrative government contracts. And while energy
prices for consumers rise, so too do the profits of these well-connected corporate giants. The Cost of Policy Paralysis
The roots of the crisis trace back to delays and dysfunction in the management of Thailand's domestic gas fields. The Erawan and Bongkot concessions in the Gulf of Thailand—once key pillars of the country's energy independence—saw production plummet following administrative upheavals. Chevron, which had operated Erawan since 1981, was ousted in 2021 in favor of a state-backed bidder, PTTEP. The handover
was anything but smooth. By 2022, output from Erawan had dropped by over 50%.
Despite promises from successive energy ministers to fast-track exploration and development, a combination of bureaucratic gridlock and deliberate policy choices has led Thailand to import nearly a third of its gas as LNG, compared to under 5% in 2011. These LNG imports are often priced at two to seven times more than domestically produced gas. In 2022, LNG hit a jaw-dropping $38.66 per million BTU,
while Thai-sourced gas was only $5.51.
The Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA) reports that LNG imports surged 34% in 2023 alone. The financial toll on Thailand's state utility, EGAT, has been staggering—losses of 150 billion baht ($4.3 billion) between late 2021 and the
end of 2022. A Tale of Two Winners: Gulf and PTT
Gulf Development, once a challenger to PTT's monopoly, now appears to be its most strategic partner. The two firms jointly operate the Gulf MTP LNG Terminal, one of the country's main LNG import facilities. The terminal's capacity is set to double from
5 to 10.8 million tons annually.
Gulf was granted its import license in 2020, becoming only the second private player after EGAT. Since then, the firm has expanded its influence across the LNG supply chain—from procurement to regasification to pipeline distribution. Critics argue that the system has been gamed to benefit a handful of actors. Two senior officials within the Energy Regulatory Commission (ERC), which oversees procurement policy, previously held advisory or executive roles at Gulf and PTT. The appearance of conflict of interest has eroded public trust in regulatory oversight. "This is a classic case of regulatory capture," said an IEEFA analyst who requested anonymity. "You have regulators with corporate ties making decisions that steer the country toward imported gas, which just happens to benefit their former—or future—
employers." The Public Pays the Price
The fallout is increasingly visible in Thai households and businesses. Electricity prices have remained elevated despite a fall in global LNG prices in 2024. EGAT, which purchases over 85% of Gulf's power output, absorbs the higher input costs, eventually
passing them down to consumers.
Small businesses, already recovering from the pandemic, have seen utility bills cut into margins. Rural provinces have protested rolling blackouts and unaffordable tariffs. Meanwhile, Gulf's profits have soared, bolstered by long-term contracts and a
guaranteed buyer in EGAT.
The government's response has been muted. While officials acknowledge rising costs, they continue to cite energy "security" and global volatility as justification for their
reliance on LNG.
Yet, a growing chorus of energy economists and civil society groups argue that the crisis is self-inflicted. "Thailand had the resources," said Dr. Nakornthap, a respected energy expert. "What it lacked was the political will and administrative competence to develop
them." What Lies Ahead
With elections on the horizon and household discontent simmering, energy policy is emerging as a political flashpoint. Some opposition leaders are calling for a full audit of LNG contracts and regulatory appointments. Others propose reforms that would
prioritize domestic exploration and overhaul procurement transparency.
As the Thai people pay for these missteps at the meter, the broader lesson may echo beyond Bangkok: in energy policy, inaction and insider influence can be just as costly
as imported gas
© Copyright IBTimes 2024. All rights reserved.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Thailand: Is the military preparing another coup? – DW – 08/13/2025
Thailand: Is the military preparing another coup? – DW – 08/13/2025

DW

time7 days ago

  • DW

Thailand: Is the military preparing another coup? – DW – 08/13/2025

The recent border clashes with Cambodia have left Thailand's politics in chaos while boosting the already immense power of its military leaders. The border conflict between Thailand and Cambodia has strengthened the hand of the pro-junta leaders in Bangkok at the expense of the civilian government. Thailand has experienced at least 12 military coups since 1931, and the army has long been a dominant force in politics. After the 2014 coup, a junta ruled the country until a civilian government returned following the 2023 elections. And while another coup may not be imminent at the moment, the military seems to be expanding its already immense influence in the wake of the latest border clashes. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Tensions with Cambodia have been simmering for more than a year but flared in April, when a Cambodian soldier was killed during a brief skirmish with Thai troops along the border. On July 24, after Thai soldiers were injured by a landmine, five days of fighting left over 40 people dead and hundreds wounded on both sides. The two nations agreed on a ceasefire at the end of the month. The conflict has "effectively given the Thai military free rein to operate with little civilian oversight, which was already minimal to begin with," Napon Jatusripitak, visiting fellow at Singapore's ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute, told DW. The 2023 general election ended with the Move Forward party poised to take power in Thailand. However, post-election negotiations saw the second-placed Pheu Thai party form an unexpected coalition with its former adversaries, including the militarist United Thai Nation Party of former junta leader Prayuth Chan-ocha. The coalition was unpopular from the start, but it only began to unravel during the latest hostilities with Cambodia. In June, then-Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra sought to de-escalate tensions with a telephone call to Cambodia's Senate president and former prime minister Hun Sen. During the call, the 38-year-old Thai prime minister addressed Hun Sen, who was then nearing his 73d birthday, as "uncle" and professed love and respect for the veteran leader. She also appeared to criticize her own army's actions and hinted that some of the Thai generals were using the conflict for political purposes. Hun Sen soon leaked the recording of the call in what could be seen as an attempt to weaken Thailand during the border crisis. The fallout in Thailand was swift. The conservative Bhumjaithai party quit the coalition, and Paetongtarn's Pheu Thai party faced accusations of treason. In June, General Nattaphon Narkphanit of the United Thai Nation Party became acting defense minister, while generals have also captured some other key posts. The prime minister was suspended by the Constitutional Court in early July, pending trial. Paetongtarn Shinawatra is the daughter of former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra, ousted by the military in 2006, and the niece of Yingluck Shinawatra, who removed in the 2014 coup. The shift has "effectively handed the defense ministry to the military to run as the generals see fit," Thitinan Pongsudhirak, senior fellow at the Institute of Security and International Studies at Chulalongkorn University, told DW. This is especially evident in Thailand's border regions, which "have long been effectively under martial law… giving soldiers control over border policy and limiting civilian control," Paul Chambers, a Thailand expert, wrote in Fulcrum, an online publication issued by ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute, last week. According to Chambers, the army has consistently undermined civilian-led de-escalation efforts since January. When Thai soldiers were injured by Cambodian-laid landmines in mid-July, General Boonsin, commander of the Thai Second Army Region, openly stated that retaliation was necessary and that "there is no need to wait for orders from the government." Analysts told DW that the Thai military was riding a surge of public nationalism, with celebrities and politicians harassed on social media with accusations of not being patriotic enough. A poll published by the National Institute of Development Administration last week found that Thais trust the military the most in protecting the national interest and resolving the conflict with Cambodia. Only 15% of respondents said they had any level of trust in the civilian government over these matters. The ceasefire with Cambodia came after US President Donald Trump warned both Bangkok and Phnom Penh they would face stiff export tariffs unless they halted hostilities. Truce talks were mediated by Malaysia, the current chair of ASEAN, but the agreement has been only partially upheld. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video With the military in charge "the ceasefire agreement remains fragile," said Thitinan from the Bangkok-based Chulalongkorn University. Cambodia is expected to continue pushing for international involvement to boost domestic support, while the Thai army is likely to mount a "heavy-handed" response and risks further escalation, Thitinan warned. The future of the Thai government may hinge on upcoming court rulings concerning Paetongtarn Shinawatra and her father, Thaksin, the main powerbroker of the Pheu Thai party. The Constitutional Court is expected to decide whether to ban Paetongtarn from politics by early September, while Thaksin faces imprisonment for alleged royal defamation. A political collapse of the Shinawatra clan and the Pheu Thai, central to Thai politics since the 1990s, would strengthen conservative and militarist factions, analysts say. "The party is unready to face the electorate but may also find it increasingly untenable to continue in office without making further compromises with its conservative allies in the coalition," Ken Lohatepanont, a PhD candidate at the University of Michigan, told DW. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The crisis makes "more plausible" the return of former junta leader Prayut Chan-ocha, who ruled between 2014 and 2023, Lohatepanont said. Prayut's United Thai Nation Party currently keeps the coalition afloat, and his comeback could be the price Pheu Thai pays to avoid an election it is likely to lose. And even if the election is called, the clashes have boosted the popularity of the military and its allies. Another coup is "unlikely but never off the table, especially as the military is resurgent in view of the border conflict," Thitinan said.

Three Thai soldiers injured by landmine on Cambodian border – DW – 08/09/2025
Three Thai soldiers injured by landmine on Cambodian border – DW – 08/09/2025

DW

time09-08-2025

  • DW

Three Thai soldiers injured by landmine on Cambodian border – DW – 08/09/2025

The incident occured only days after an agreement to extend a ceasefire that ended the recent deadly conflict between the Southeast Asian neighbors. Three Thai soldiers have been wounded after one stepped on a landmine in territory along the border with Cambodia, the Thai army announced on Saturday. The incident comes just days after the two countries agreed to extend the ceasefire that ended a brief armed conflict, which were their deadliest clashes in decades. One soldier suffered a severe leg injury, another was wounded in the back and arm, and the third experienced extreme pressure damage to the ear during the incident in northeastern Thailand's Sisaket province. "It clearly demonstrates to both domestic and international society that the use of concealed weapons in border areas continues to exist, constituting a clear violation of the Ottawa Convention by the Cambodian side," the army's statement said. After Saturday's blast, the Thai army statement, citing its spokesperson Maj. Gen. Winthai Suvaree, said that Saturday's mine explosion constituted "a significant obstacle to the implementation of ceasefire measures and peaceful resolution of problems." The Cambodian Mine Action and Victim Assistance Authority, a government body, issued a statement denying that any new mines had been laid. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video "We have not, and will not, plant new land mines," said the statement, noting that Cambodia is a party to the Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Treaty Convention, "and has an internationally recognized record of removing, not deploying, these indiscriminate weapons." It noted that Cambodia has cleared more than 1 million mines and nearly 3 million other pieces of unexploded ordnance left over from more than three decades of war and civil unrest that began in 1970. A five-day conflict between Thailand and Cambodia killed at least 43 people in a flare-up of a long-running dispute over ancient border temples. The clashes, involving jets, artillery, rockets and infantry battles, ended on July 29 with a ceasefire, after cajoling by US President Donald Trump. A meeting of defense officials in Kuala Lumpur finished on Thursday with a deal to extend the ceasefire. Tensions had simmered since May this year when a Cambodian soldier was shot dead by Thai troops in a brief fracas in another contested border area. The escalating dispute was marked by border crossing restrictions and cross-border boycotts along with bans of goods and services before fighting broke out. The Ottawa Convention, also called the Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Treaty, is an international agreement banning the weapons' use, and both Thailand and Cambodia have committed to it. A statement from Thailand's foreign ministry said the incident confirmed the Thai army's findings "that new land mines are being laid in blatant violation of international law." It also noted this was the third such incident in less than a month. Cambodia had suggested that two earlier explosions last month wounding Thai soldiers might be land mines from past conflicts.

Why is India reaching out to Syria's new government? – DW – 08/07/2025
Why is India reaching out to Syria's new government? – DW – 08/07/2025

DW

time07-08-2025

  • DW

Why is India reaching out to Syria's new government? – DW – 08/07/2025

India is joining the US and Turkey in recognizing the interim leadership of Syria as the war-torn country seeks to rebuild after 13 years of civil war. India reached out to Syria's provisional government in late July by sending its first official delegation to Damascus in order to understand the interim government's plans and priorities. M Suresh Kumar, a joint secretary in India's Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), met with senior officials, including Syrian Foreign Minister Asaad Hassan Al-Shaibani, underscoring India's interest in sustaining robust relations irrespective of Syria's internal political transitions. Among other issues, the meetings focused on enhancing health cooperation, technical and educational collaboration and laying the groundwork for humanitarian assistance and future reconstruction efforts. In December, Syria's dictator Bashar Assad was toppled by a coalition of rebel groups, primarily led Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) and supported by the Syrian National Army (SNA) and other Turkish-backed factions. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Syria, which is now under the interim leadership of former HTS leader Ahmed al-Sharaa, has secured the support of many regional powers, including Saudi Arabia, Turkey, the UAE and Qatar — as well as international powers such as the United States. Experts and diplomats told DW that India's outreach to Syria's interim government helps ensure it is not sidelined in the reconstruction of the war-torn country. Md. Muddassir Quamar, associate professor at the centre for West Asian Studies in Delhi's Jawaharlal Nehru University, said India's outreach reinforces its image as a non-aligned power willing to engage with diverse regimes to promote stability. "Notably, India's regional friends, Saudi Arabia and the UAE, have extended vital support to Syria in this crucial time of transition, and this can help India in its engagements," Quamar told DW, adding this development showcases India's newfound boldness in its international relations. "Syria is also emerging as a major pawn in relations between Turkey and Israel, which makes it strategically important for India's regional interests," said Quamar. "India has a stake in the future of Syria for energy, economic and strategic factors and it is indeed important to develop a cautious engagement with the new government." Quamar noted that a stable Syria ensures secure trade routes and energy corridors critical to India's economy — particularly as it deepens ties with Gulf states and navigates tensions involving Iran. Syria has seen several waves of sectarian violence since the new government took over. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Shanthie Mariet D'Souza, president of Mantraya, an independent research forum, said India has multiple strategic interests in Syria, including safeguarding the interests of remaining Indians and this can be done only when it maintains ties with the new regime. "The new regime is still facing a lot of instability, and any assistance in the form of reconstruction and humanitarian assistance would be welcomed by it," D'Souza told DW. "Moreover, India's engagement with the new regime is also a step towards strengthening regional stability so that the new regime can be empowered to prevent Syria from becoming a haven for extremist groups," D'Souza told DW. She noted that by establishing an early relationship with post-Assad Syria, India protects its interests and reduces the risk of a strategic vacuum that could be exploited by others. Since the fall of the Assad regime, many other countries have factored Syria's new reality into their policies — including countries that maintained links with the regime, as well as those that sought its downfall. Many were guided by their core interests of stability, influence and regional security. "India, on the other hand, insisted on a rather ambivalent 'Syrian-led' process," said D'Souza. "The visit represents India's acknowledgement that the Assad era in Syria is over, and it needs to reframe a policy of engagement with the new regime, which represents a new power center." She pointed out that India's recent outreach to Syria's interim leadership resembles New Delhi's pragmatic shift in Afghanistan, where it has stepped up its outreach with the Taliban rulers after two decades of supporting the previous republican government. Officials in India's Ministry of External Affairs have pointed out that India's decision to maintain its embassy in Damascus throughout the Syrian civil war — even with reduced staff — demonstrated its long-term strategic thinking. "India has always had good relations with Syria and its people even in a historic and civilizational context. India has always supported a Syrian- led solution through dialogue and diplomacy," Anil Trigunayat, a former Indian diplomat, told DW. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video As head of the West Asia experts' group at the Vivekananda International Foundation, a New Delhi-based think tank, Trigunayat said that India's ties with Syria are part of a bilateral relationship like any other that it pursues. "Iran is on a weak wicket in Syria but Turkey's hold over Al Sharaa is significant but he is also smartly looking to engage with other powers including India along with Western and Arab states," he said, referring to Syria's interim leader, Ahmed al-Sharaa. "Likewise, India must engage with all partners in west Asia including Syria — vacuum or not."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store