&w=3840&q=100)
Q1 earnings, India-US trade talks outcome to drive mkt sentiments: Analysts
Markets may on Monday react to the quarterly results of three heavyweights - Reliance Industries, HDFC Bank and ICICI Bank, an expert said.
India's most valuable company Reliance Industries on Friday reported its highest-ever quarterly profit of Rs 26,994 crore for the June quarter, reflecting a growth of 78.3 per cent over the year-ago period, driven by consumer businesses and investment sales.
"All eyes will remain on the ongoing earnings season, with a series of major results lined up. Investors will first react to the results of three heavyweights Reliance, HDFC Bank, and ICICI Bank during early trades on Monday. In the sessions that follow, several prominent companies including Infosys, Dr Reddy's Laboratories, Bajaj Finance, Nestle India are scheduled to announce their quarterly results.
"Globally, market participants will monitor trade deal updates, which could influence FII flows and currency movements. At the same time, uncertainty persists as global markets recalibrate expectations for Federal Reserve rate cuts, amid sticky inflation and trade-related tensions," Ajit Mishra SVP, Research, Religare Broking Ltd, said.
Meanwhile, HDFC Bank on Saturday posted 1.31 per cent decline in its consolidated net profit to Rs 16,258 crore for the June 2025 quarter.
ICICI Bank reported a 15.9 per cent jump in consolidated net profit to Rs 13,558 crore for the quarter.
"As we step into a new week, the market is brimming with various domestic and global macroeconomic indicators that are expected to sustain its momentum. On the domestic front, investors will keep a close eye on the Q1 earnings of key companies such as Eternal, UltraTech Cement, Infosys, Bajaj Finance, Nestle among others, as they are scheduled to announce their financial results," Pravesh Gour, Senior Technical Analyst at Swastika Investmart Ltd, said.
India and the US teams concluded the fifth round of talks for the proposed bilateral trade agreement (BTA) in Washington on July 17. The negotiations were held for four days (July 14-17) in Washington.
These deliberations are important as both sides are looking at finalising an interim trade deal before August 1, which marks the end of the suspension period of Trump tariffs imposed on dozens of countries, including India (26 per cent).
Siddhartha Khemka, Head - Research, Wealth Management, Motilal Oswal Financial Services Ltd, said, the prolonged wait for the IndiaUS trade deal ahead of the looming August 1 tariff deadline, is keeping investors on the sidelines.
Investors will also track trading activity of Foreign Institutional Investors (FIIs) and movement of crude oil prices.
Last week, the BSE benchmark tumbled 742.74 points or 0.90 per cent, and the Nifty declined by 181.45 points or 0.72 per cent.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
12 minutes ago
- India.com
Not Mukesh Ambani, Akash Ambani or Anant Ambani, but this person owns India's most expensive car of Rs 1000000000, it is…, she is…
Mukesh Ambani is in headlines for his expensive Antilia house, cars and luxurious lifestyle. But he is not the owner of India's most expensive car despite having the world's best cars collections. Who Is Owner Of India's Most Expensive Car? According to a report by ABP Live, Nita Ambani owns the Audi A9 Chameleon, a luxury car estimated at Rs 100 crore. It is an ultra-exclusive vehicle and has color-shifting paint technology that can change colors electronically at the press of a button. It also gives a unique driving experience. Only 11 units of this cars are sold worldwide, the Audi A9 Chameleon is among the rarest and most innovative cars ever built. Its blend of cutting-edge design and sheer exclusivity makes it a symbol of both wealth and technological sophistication. Nita Ambani's Cars Collection The Audi A9 Chameleon is powered by a 4.0-litre V8 engine with an impressive 600 horsepower. The vehicle's two-door design spans five meters in length with better presence on the road. It is a unique car with a single-piece windshield and roof. It also has a design rarely seen in conventional luxury cars. It is equipped with next-generation technology available only in this model, the car embodies the pinnacle of modern automotive innovation. Nita Ambani's Cars Collection Rolls-Royce Phantom VIII EWB: This extended model is celebrated for its opulent interiors and a commanding V12 engine. Mercedes-Maybach S600 Guard: Engineered for maximum protection, this armored sedan is bulletproof and blast-resistant, offering top-tier security. Ferrari 812 Superfast: A high-performance sports car has a mighty V12 engine, delivering both speed and style. Bentley Continental Flying Spur: A refined grand tourer, known for its elegant design, advanced features, and robust engine performance. Rolls-Royce Cullinan: This ultra-luxurious SUV combines off-road capability with Rolls-Royce's signature comfort and power. BMW 7 Series 760Li Security (2004 model): Luxury sedan designed for discreet security gives protection and prestige.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
12 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Jane Street to resume trading: Arbitrage vs market manipulation explained
US-based trading firm Jane Street found itself at the centre of a regulatory storm in India, after the market watchdog accused it of manipulating index prices to boost profits at the expense of retail investors. On July 3, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) temporarily barred the firm from participating in its securities markets. The regulator alleged that Jane Street carried out a coordinated trading strategy that distorted prices in India's Bank Nifty index, misleading investors and profiting from the resulting volatility. Jane Street, which has denied any wrongdoing, is now challenging the order and has deposited more than ₹4,800 crore (around $560 million) into an escrow account and has resumed trading in the Indian market. The case has left some institutional investors unsettled and may even serve as a larger wake-up call for India's financial market, sparking debate between legal arbitrage and illegal market manipulation. Here's a closer look at what this means. What is Jane Street? Jane Street is a global quantitative trading firm that uses mathematical models and algorithms to trade rapidly and across markets. With operations in more than 45 countries and over 3,000 employees, it is one of the largest players on Wall Street. In 2023, the firm reportedly accounted for more than 10.4 per cent of North America's equity trading volume, up from 7.6 per cent in 2022, according to a report by the Financial Times. In India, the firm traded heavily in both the cash market, where investors buy and sell actual shares, and the derivatives market, where traders use instruments like options and futures to bet on future price movements. What is an arbitrage trading strategy? Arbitrage is a legal trading strategy that takes advantage of price differences in different markets. This means that if a stock is trading at slightly different prices across two exchanges, a trader can buy low in one market and sell high in another. In India, arbitrage often occurs between the cash market and derivatives market, where traders can simultaneously buy and sell related assets to lock in small, low-risk profits. Arbitrage is legal in India as long as these trades are based on existing inefficiencies and do not attempt to create false price movements. Arbitrage may even be beneficial as it can help align prices, thereby improving market efficiency, as former Sebi primary market board member V Raghunathan told CNBC. What is market manipulation? Market manipulation is illegal. It involves deliberately distorting prices or creating a misleading impression of market activity. This could include tactics like artificially inflating demand, moving prices without a valid economic reason, or placing trades solely to influence market outcomes. Difference between arbitrage and market manipulation The difference between arbitrage and manipulation lies in intent and impact. Arbitrage works within the natural functioning of markets, while manipulation seeks to interfere with it. The latter can often harm other investors in the process. What are Sebi's accusations against Jane Street? According to Sebi, Jane Street used multiple entities to carry out a coordinated trading strategy in the Bank Nifty index. The market regulator alleges that one entity bought large volumes of banking stocks in the early morning, which pushed up the index price. At the same time, another entity took positions in the derivatives market anticipating a fall in the index. Near the close of the trading day, particularly on expiry days when derivative contracts are settled, Jane Street is alleged to have sold off the earlier stock purchases in large volumes, pushing the index lower. This price drop, Sebi claims, boosted the profitability of the firm's bets on falling prices. This practice is known as 'marking the close', which is considered manipulative if it involves intentionally influencing prices during the final minutes of trading. Sebi argues that Jane Street's actions created an artificial and misleading appearance of market activity, which in turn caused retail investors to trade at distorted levels and suffer losses. Jane Street's response to Sebi allegation Jane Street has denied any manipulation, describing its actions as basic index arbitrage. The firm has not commented publicly but has indicated it intends to challenge the regulator's order. On July 14, Jane Street deposited ₹4,844 crore into an escrow account, a step that Sebi said was required while reviewing the firm's request to resume trading in Indian markets. Broader market reaction and regulatory concerns The episode has unsettled parts of the institutional investor community. Although Indian stock indices are near all-time highs, foreign institutional investors (FIIs) have become increasingly cautious, particularly around midcap and smallcap stocks, where valuations appear stretched and liquidity is thinner. Jignesh Desai, chief executive for institutional equities at Centrum Broking, told Business Standard, 'FIIs are looking for consistency and predictability in regulatory actions, especially around high-frequency and algorithmic trading. As long as Sebi maintains transparency and market stability, this episode is unlikely to deter long-term foreign capital.' Read the full interview here. Meanwhile, K P Krishnan, honorary senior fellow at the Isaac Centre for Public Policy, has pointed out that the outcome of this case will matter not just for Jane Street but for how India defines and regulates complex trading in its increasingly sophisticated markets. What does this crackdown mean? The Jane Street case has raised critical questions about how modern financial markets operate — and how regulators balance market growth and activity with investor protection. Sebi recently reported that 91 per cent of retail traders lost money in the derivatives market last year, with total losses exceeding ₹1 trillion. While these losses cannot be attributed to any single firm, the contrast between large institutional profits and widespread retail losses has renewed concerns about market fairness. Sebi's intervention in this case could mark a turning point in how such strategies are policed.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
12 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Sebi's AMC-family office plan sparks concerns over regulation and parity
Sebi's plan to let AMCs manage non-broad-based pooled funds without PMS licences has sparked debate over regulatory parity, competitive fairness, and market safeguards New Delhi The Securities and Exchange Board of India's (Sebi's) recent proposal to permit asset management companies (AMCs) to manage family office funds has stirred debate, with concerns surfacing around regulatory overlap and market parity. On July 7, Sebi released a consultation paper suggesting major relaxations to existing regulations. The key proposal includes allowing AMCs to manage non-broad-based pooled funds—such as family offices and certain offshore vehicles—without obtaining a separate portfolio management services (PMS) licence, provided strict checks and balances are implemented. 'If AMCs are allowed to offer segregated mandates to large clients under a new category, the lines between PMS and mutual funds (MFs) will blur further. This raises regulatory parity questions,' said Sonam Srivastava, founder and fund manager at Wright Research PMS. She argued that PMS managers operate under stricter minimum investment thresholds, compliance costs, and client suitability obligations. 'If AMCs are allowed to offer similar services under the MF umbrella but with lighter-touch regulation or brand-driven advantages, it could lead to competitive imbalance and arbitrage,' she added. Uneven playing field and a new revenue stream Until now, AMCs interested in offering management and advisory services to such funds were required to hold a PMS licence, a layer of regulation the AMC sector contended created an uneven playing field compared to other intermediaries. Sebi's latest proposal opens up a new revenue stream for the domestic mutual fund industry, which handles assets worth Rs 75 trillion. 'The proposals could enable AMCs to engage with a wider spectrum of pooled vehicles which are non-broad-based, such as family offices or select offshore funds, which were earlier outside the regulatory scope,' said Swarup Mohanty, vice-chairman and chief executive officer, Mirae Asset Investment Managers (India). Safeguards, definitions and structural implications Under the proposal, non-broad-based funds are defined as those with fewer than 20 investors, or where a single investor holds more than 25 per cent of the corpus. Sebi has outlined safeguards to address potential conflicts of interest, including caps on fee differentials, resource allocation norms, and clear firewalls between mutual fund and private mandates. Pradeep Gupta, executive director and head of investments at Lighthouse Canton India, said a new set of investors would benefit from an experienced and well-resourced buy-side investment architecture that has proven itself across multiple market cycles. Market structure, HNIs and the competitive landscape A recent Jefferies report indicated that the high-net-worth investor (HNI) segment is already crowded, with revenue streams layered through various commissions and fees. Professional wealth managers now oversee assets exceeding Rs 65 trillion, and the space is witnessing strong competitive momentum for deepening service offerings. The report noted a likely trend towards advisory-led models as wealth managers look to tap larger-ticket clients. Despite concerns over increased competition, several PMS managers believe their established expertise in serving ultra-HNI requirements will remain a key differentiator. Divam Sharma, co-founder and fund manager at Green Portfolio PMS, said AMCs entering this space will heighten overall competition, but will also be subject to tighter controls on fees and operations. 'We've already built the systems and expertise needed for personalised, complex wealth solutions, so most family offices will continue to seek out hands-on, bespoke service,' he added. To allay concerns, Sebi has proposed permitting ancillary activities for AMCs, including fund distribution and global marketing. Public comments on the consultation paper are open until July 28, with market participants expecting a final framework before the end of the year.
