Heatwaves getting worse? Scientists say answer is to cut out fossil fuels, fast
The study, conducted by scientists from World Weather Attribution (WWA), Climate Central, and the Red Cross Red Crescent Climate Centre, emphasises the growing risks posed by heat waves as global fossil fuel use continues, Anadolu Ajansi (AA) reported.
Between May 2024 and May 2025, some four billion people, about half of the global population, faced at least 30 additional days of extreme heat, defined as temperatures hotter than 90 per cent of historical observations for their regions, compared to a world without climate change.
The researchers also found that climate change increased the number of extreme heat days by at least twofold in 195 countries and territories. All 67 major heat events recorded in the last year were exacerbated by human-caused climate change.
'This study needs to be taken as another stark warning. Climate change is here, and it kills,' said Friederike Otto, co-lead of WWA and senior lecturer at Imperial College London.
'We know exactly how to stop heat waves from getting worse: restructure our energy systems to be more efficient and based on renewables, not fossil fuels.'
Mariam Zachariah, a researcher at Imperial College London, described the results as 'staggering,' noting that frequent, intense heat spells are linked to widespread impacts, including heat illnesses, deaths, crop losses, lowered productivity, and transport disruptions.
Roop Singh, head of Urban and Attribution at the Red Cross Red Crescent Climate Centre, emphasised the urgent need to scale up responses.
'We need better early warning systems, heat action plans, and long-term urban planning to meet the rising challenge,' Singh said.
Vice President for Science at Climate Central Kristina Dahl stressed that heat is the deadliest consequence of climate change.
'There is no place on Earth untouched by climate change, and we have the science to quantify how fossil fuel emissions are reshaping our daily temperatures and putting billions at risk,' she said.
The report calls for governments to strengthen heat action plans, increase monitoring and reporting of heat impacts, and prioritise long-term adaptation strategies. — Bernama-Anadolu
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
14 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Turkey's parliament passes contentious mining legislation
Members of the Turkish parliament vote during a session at the Grand National Assembly of Turkey in Ankara. (EPA Images pic) ISTANBUL : Turkey's parliament on Saturday passed a controversial bill that opens certain agricultural lands, including olive groves, to mining activities, local media reported, despite widespread opposition. The bill, part of a broader package proposed by president Recep Tayyip Erdogan's ruling AKP party, sparked protests from opposition parties and environmental groups. Farmers from across Turkey have gathered outside parliament over the past two weeks, urging the government to withdraw the draft, with some starting a hunger strike this week. Parliamentary debate on Saturday led to tensions between ruling AKP and main opposition CHP lawmakers, who spoke out against the expropriation of olive groves for mining activities, private NTV television reported. On Friday, Ali Mahir Basarir of the CHP accused parliament of acting like CEO of energy companies. 'The entire parliament has become CEO of five companies,' he said. '(Farmers) are on hunger strike, therefore, we will continue to resist' against the draft, he added. In 2023, local villagers and environmental activists occupied Akbelen forest, inland from the well-known Aegean resort town of Bodrum, to defend it from an energy company that runs a nearby coal mine. At the time, Erdogan dismissed protesters as 'marginals', saying new coal basins were needed for the country's power plants as existing reserves were close to depletion. Turkey ratified the Paris Climate Agreement in 2021. Activists say Turkey has enormous renewable energy potential and does not need to rely on coal to produce electricity.
Malay Mail
20 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Malaysia's climate obligations can no longer wait — Sheila Ramalingam
JULY 27 — On July 23, 2025, the International Court of Justice ('ICJ') issued a landmark Advisory Opinion affirming that States have clear legal obligations under international law to address climate change. These obligations include preventing significant environmental harm, co-operating internationally, and upholding fundamental human rights, including the right to life, health, and a clean, healthy, and sustainable environment not just for current, but also for future generations. This Advisory Opinion builds upon existing commitments under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change ('UNFCCC') and the Paris Agreement, making it clear that these are not just moral aspirations but legally binding standards that require States to act with due diligence and ambition. The ICJ also noted that climate change disproportionately affects the poor, indigenous communities, women, and youth, and reaffirmed that States cannot ignore these risks without legal consequence. In this context, Malaysia's efforts to date reflect progress but remain insufficient. While we have adopted policy-level frameworks such as the National Policy on Climate Change 2.0 (NPCC 2.0) and the National Energy Policy 2022-2040, these important documents do not carry legal force and lack binding targets or enforcement mechanisms. Their success ultimately depends on complementary legislation that ensures coherence, accountability, and implementation across sectors. A comprehensive Climate Change Act would not only enhance policy coherence and accountability but also reinforce investor confidence, enable just transitions, and protect vulnerable communities from the adverse impacts of climate change. — Bernama pic Meanwhile, our existing environmental laws such as the Environmental Quality Act 1974 and the Renewable Energy Act 2011 are outdated and insufficient, lacking any explicit integration of climate change mitigation or adaptation obligations. There have been recent legislative developments worth noting. The Energy Efficiency and Conservation Act 2024 introduces important requirements for large energy consumers and the public sector to optimise energy use, while the proposed Carbon Capture, Utilisation and Storage (CCUS) Bill 2025 signals an encouraging step towards industrial decarbonisation. However, these laws are sector-specific and operate in silos. The ICJ has made it clear that States must take domestic action sufficient to realise their Nationally Determined Contributions ('NDCs') under the Paris Agreement, and do so with transparency, urgency, and long-term planning. At present, Malaysia has no legal mechanism to monitor, verify, or enforce its NDCs. Without such a mechanism, we risk falling short of our international obligations and delaying the structural transformations urgently needed. That said, Malaysia has the policy foundation, technical expertise, and institutional capacity to lead. The next logical and necessary step is to translate this intent into enforceable law. A comprehensive Climate Change Act would not only enhance policy coherence and accountability but also reinforce investor confidence, enable just transitions, and protect vulnerable communities from the adverse impacts of climate change. In this regard, there was a proposed framework for a Climate Change Act. However, there is limited public information about its scope, timeline, or current status. In light of the ICJ's Advisory Opinion, it is imperative that this proposal be reviewed, finalised, and prioritised. What is urgently needed is an overarching Climate Change Act, a legislative framework that integrates adaptation and mitigation strategies, mandates periodic carbon budgeting, ensures independent oversight, and holds all sectors to account for emission reduction goals through climate accountability mechanisms. Such an Act would harmonise Malaysia's international commitments with domestic action, in line with global best practices and recent judicial pronouncements. A strong, science-based and legally enforceable framework is not just timely, but necessary, to ensure Malaysia's compliance with its duties under international law and to avoid future liability. The government is respectfully urged to prioritise this critical legislation. Climate action is now a matter of legal obligation, and Malaysia cannot afford to wait. * Dr Sheila Ramalingam is the Deputy Executive Director of UMLEAD, International Institute of Public Policy and Management (INPUMA), and Senior Lecturer, Faculty of Law, Universiti Malaya. She may be reached at [email protected] ** This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
Malay Mail
a day ago
- Malay Mail
ICJ climate ruling not binding — but a powerful ‘shield and sword' for global justice and climate-vulnerable nations
PARIS, July 26 — The world's top court may not be able to compel polluting states to halt planet-warming emissions, but experts say its momentous climate decision gives potent legal and political firepower to countries and campaigners on the frontlines. An advisory opinion like the one issued by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) this week is not binding and so is not directly enforceable, but that does not mean it has no weight. By saying that all countries were firmly bound to a swathe of legal obligations under existing laws and treaties, experts say the ruling will influence courts, climate negotiations and policy decisions across the world. The ICJ 'couldn't have been clearer' on the binding nature of a range of climate duties, said Cesar Rodriguez-Garavito, Professor of Law and Director of the Climate Law Accelerator at New York University. He said the ruling, which was responding to questions on countries' climate responsibilities from the UN General Assembly, was 'as strong as we could have imagined'. 'The consensus among the judges is fully behind the conclusion that international law establishes clear and binding obligations for states not to cause massive harm to the environment in general and not to harm the climate system in particular,' he told AFP. Schoolchildren from the Suango Mele primary and secondary school, located in the village of Mele, north of the Vanuatu capital of Port Vila, hold signs as they pose for a photograph on July 24, 2025. — AFP pic These included ensuring national climate plans reflect the highest possible ambition to stay within the Paris agreement's safer global warming cap of 1.5C above pre-industrial times — a level that the world could reach this decade. If those obligations are not met, the court said states may be obliged to repair damaged infrastructure or ecosystems — and if that is not possible, they could face compensation claims. This will ripple into future litigation, said Markus Gehring, professor of European and international law at the University of Cambridge. 'We are a far cry from a contentious case between two countries, where someone is demanding liability for past and present climate change damage, but in theory, the court lays out an avenue towards such claims,' he said. Climate activists and campaigners demonstrate outside the International Court of Justice (ICJ) ahead of the reading of an advisory opinion that is likely to determine the course of future climate action across the world, The Hague July 23, 2025. — Reuters pic 'Wrongful act' Major petrostates like the United States may take little heed of the court's warning that expanding production of oil, gas and coal could constitute an 'internationally wrongful act'. But Gehring said countries could choose to ignore ICJ advisory opinions 'at their peril'. He cited the court's 2019 advice that the United Kingdom should end its occupation of the Chagos islands. After Britain initially rejected the ruling, a UN General Assembly resolution demanded it cede the islands to Mauritius, which it eventually did in 2024. Gehring said that while the court's climate decision is not directly binding on individual states, it would be indirectly binding through subsequent domestic or international court action and through UN institutions. The move by US President Donald Trump to withdraw from the Paris deal also would be unlikely to absolve the country from its duties, Gehring added, because the obligation to address climate change is now 'crystal clear in international law'. 'So even leaving the Paris Agreement and the climate treaty regime does not eliminate those obligations,' he said. ICJ judge Sarah Cleveland said countries' 'significant responsibilities' to protect the climate system may also affect interpretation of international investment law. Schoolchildren from the Suango Mele primary and secondary school, located in the village of Mele, north of the Vanuatu capital of Port Vila, hold signs as they pose for a photograph on July 24, 2025. — AFP pic 'Shield and sword' The ruling was 'a decisive legal vindication' for Vanuatu — which spearheaded the push for an ICJ opinion — the country said in a legal analysis of the decision. The Pacific island nation, which is at risk from rising seas, said the court's conclusions would strengthen its hand in global climate negotiations, helping it demand greater climate ambition and attract financial support for countries suffering climate loss and damage. It could also open the way for legal action against countries and possibly companies that have by their actions and omissions caused climate harm, the statement said. 'For Vanuatu, the opinion is both shield and sword: a shield affirming its right to survival and a sword compelling the world's major emitters to act in line with science and justice,' it added. Manuel Pulgar-Vidal, former president of the UN COP20 climate conference in Peru and now WWF Global Climate and Energy lead, said he expects the ICJ ruling to 'move the needle strongly'. 'The timing is so fantastic because we are in difficult times in the climate debate, so to have that opinion in the current time, it is showing that we should never lose our hope,' he told AFP. — AFP
