Starting your back-to-school shopping before more tariffs hit? You may not save by going early
This year, she's also been trying to shop more locally in light of Canada's trade war with the United States and President Donald Trump's tariff threats, including sweeping levies as high as 35 per cent on Canadian imports starting in August.
But avoiding American mega-chains has often been challenging in the back-to-school category.
'As much as I would like to boycott Amazon and Walmart, it's not always possible with three kids,' she said. 'Where we can, we shop locally. But sometimes we need to go to the big-box stores and shop their deals.'
Many Canadian parents expect to spend more on back-to-school shopping this year. And most of them are starting early by jumping on the flurry of summer sales from big-box brands, with some looking to cut costs in the face of economic headwinds and potential price hikes from the Canada-U.S. trade war.
But some financial advisers and retail strategists say parents and students are unlikely to save much by snapping up sharpened pencils, calculators and the like early, and may even end up spending more than if they'd waited.
A June report from Retail Council of Canada and Caddle, a rewards app, found that about 67 per cent of parents surveyed had either started or planned to start back-to-school shopping in late spring or early summer.
Surveys took place in May on Caddle's mobile platform and online panel across a representative randomized sample of 1,211 Canadian shoppers with children attending kindergarten to Grade 12 in the coming school year.
According to the report, the average spend per child was $600 to $750.
Concerns about possible price hikes or limited availability could be influencing shopping behaviour, according to the retail council's vice-president of member services and marketing, Santo Ligotti.
Opinion: What does it cost to raise a kid? That depends on how much parents earn
'Consumers may also be inclined to start earlier this year given the uncertainty around tariffs,' he said in an e-mail. 'Particularly following Trump's remarks about a potential 35-per-cent increase.'
This year, shoppers have also been inundated with promotions in the second week of July. The so-called 'Black Friday in summer' sales included Amazon.com Inc.'s Prime Day promotion from July 8 to 11, alongside deals from competitors that are playing catch-up.
The shopping event brought in US$24.1-billion in online spending across American retailers, a 30.3-per-cent spike year-over-year, Adobe Analytics said on Saturday.
The apparel category was expected to boast the biggest discounts, at 24 per cent, but back-to-school merchandise represented some of the biggest growth in sales, according to Adobe.
Online sales of backpacks and lunchboxes were set to grow 225 per cent during this promotional period compared to the daily average in June, Adobe said – the largest projected increase of any product category, despite not having the biggest discounts.
Canadian parents are actively seeking deals, with mass merchandisers such as Walmart Canada remaining the go-to starting point, according to the survey from retail council and Caddle.
Opinion: The dreaded B-word: It's time for kids (and parents) to stop avoiding boredom
The report found that 91 per cent of shoppers feel prices have increased and more than half said school supplies are significantly more expensive than in previous years.
Even so, parents are unlikely to save much, if at all, by starting early.
For starters, most retailers purchased inventory months ahead of back-to-school season and long before Mr. Trump's most recent round of tariff threats.
So, any new tariffs likely won't bump up back-to-school prices significantly from what they are now, according to Lisa Hutcheson, a retail consultant and managing partner at J.C. Williams Group.
'The inventory that they have now is the inventory they have for their future orders,' she said.
The same goes for items such as clothing and electronics. Much of the stock for back-to-school was 'front-end loaded' ahead of expected tariffs, which has helped stabilize prices, said Sylvain Golsse, national global trade leader at EY Canada.
If Mr. Trump's tariffs do go through, consumers may see some price increases as retailers try to offset future losses. 'If an iPhone was manufactured in China and imported into the U.S. first ... it's going to be more expensive for the Canadian importer to bring that same device into Canada,' he said, even if Canada hasn't imposed new tariffs.
'But I think they can't change [prices] drastically,' said Ms. Hutcheson. Instead, retailers may offset costs in other ways, such as by embracing automation to cut costs, she said. 'I don't think we're going to just see a 35-per-cent increase in pricing.'
That isn't to say that prices won't be pushed up eventually if Mr. Trump unleashes his latest tariff threats. But those are more likely to show up near the Christmas holiday season, said Mr. Golsse.
Students are finding it hard to get summer jobs – here's what else they can do
Still, retailers may be capitalizing on the uncertainty around tariffs by nudging people to turn 'wants into needs,' said Adam Chapman, a certified financial planner based in London, Ont.
At the end of the day, 'you're guessing at what you need; probably buying a lot more than what's required.'
Buying earlier often means duplicating or wasting money on items that aren't ultimately necessary, said Mr. Chapman.
'The best kind of controlled, condensed shopping for school supplies is actually after school starts,' he said. At that point, teachers provide checklists and students know what's required.
The retail council's survey also found that the vast majority of parents surveyed – more than 90 per cent – plan to shop in-store. But there may be back-to-school savings opportunities online, said Mr. Golsse, especially if your kids roam store aisles with you.
'You're going to end up leaving with a heck of a lot more,' he said. 'They're getting excited … and you already think they need it, so then that excitement coming off them just entices you to spend because it's for education.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
8 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Republican senators caution Trump against firing Fed chair Jerome Powell
WASHINGTON (AP) — Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell is gaining some key backing on Capitol Hill from GOP senators who fear the repercussions if President Donald Trump follows through with threats to try and remove the politically independent central banker. As Trump seemingly waffled back and forth this week on trying to dismiss the Fed chair, some Republicans in Congress began to speak up and warn that such a move would be a mistake. Trump would potentially obliterate the Fed's independence from political influence and inject uncertainty into the foundations of the U.S. economy if he fires Powell. 'If anybody thinks it would be a good idea for the Fed to become another agency in the government subject to the president, they're making a huge mistake,' GOP North Carolina Sen. Thom Tillis said in a floor speech. The measure of support from GOP members of the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs showed how traditional Republicans are carefully navigating a presidency in which Trump often flirts with ideas — like steep tariffs or firing the Fed chair — that threaten to undermine confidence in the U.S. economy. Tillis, who recently decided not to seek reelection after clashing with Trump, later told The Associated Press that the economic fallout from Powell's firing would mostly hurt 'little guys like me that grew up in trailer parks that may have a few thousand dollars in a 401k.' He also pointed out that the underlying complaint that Trump has with the Fed — its reluctance to cut interest rates — is not controlled by Powell alone, but instead a 12-member committee. 'The markets expect an independent, central bank,' said GOP South Dakota Sen. Mike Rounds, who cautioned against firing Powell. 'And if they thought for a minute that he wasn't independent, it would cast a spell over the forecasts and the integrity of the decisions being made by the bank.' Still, plenty of other Republicans think that dismissing Powell is a fine idea. 'The most incompetent, worst Federal Reserve chairman in American history should resign,' said GOP Ohio Sen. Bernie Moreno. Trump said he was also encouraged to fire Powell during a meeting with about a dozen far-right House members Tuesday evening. Do presidents have authority to fire the Fed chair? House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., told reporters that he was 'unhappy with the leadership' at the Fed, but added 'I'm honestly not sure whether that executive authority exists' to fire Powell. House Financial Services Committee chair French Hill has underscored that presidents don't have the authority to fire the Fed chair, yet has also been sympathetic to Trump's complaints about Powell's leadership. He and other Republicans have also noted that Powell's term as chair is ending next year anyway, and Trump will have an opportunity to name a new chair then. When Congress started the Federal Reserve over 100 years ago, it insulated it from political pressure by stipulating that its governors and chair could only be fired 'for cause' — a higher bar than most political appointees. However, the Trump administration has maneuvered to meet that standard by accusing Powell of mishandling a $2.5 billion renovation project at the Fed's headquarters. 'When his initial attempts to bully Powell failed, Trump and Republicans in Congress suddenly decided to look into how much the Fed is spending on building renovations,' Sen. Elizabeth Warren, the top Democrat on the Senate Banking Committee, said in a speech Wednesday. 'Independence does not mean impunity and I have long pushed for more transparency and accountability at the Fed. But give me a break.' After Powell sent Congress a letter detailing parts of the renovation project, Sen. Tim Scott, the Senate Banking Committee chair, released a short statement saying Scott 'has continued to call for increased transparency and accountability at the Federal Reserve, and this letter is consistent with improving the communication and transparency he is seeking.' Avoiding a protracted legal battle Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. Regardless, it would be legally dubious to fire Powell over the renovation. 'That would be litigated and I don't see a reason, for cause or otherwise, to remove him,' Sen. John Kennedy, a Republican member of the Senate committee that oversees the Fed, told reporters this week. He added that he understood the president's 'frustration' with the Fed's reluctance to lower interest rates as it tries to tamp down inflation, saying, 'I get that, but I think it's very important the Federal Reserve remains independent.' Even those Republicans who argued that the president has grounds to fire Powell and piled criticism on the central banker conceded that it would still be a painful step. 'That's a decision the president will make, and he's being very deliberate about it,' said Moreno, the Ohio senator who called for Powell's resignation. 'But I don't think we should put the country through any of that.'
Winnipeg Free Press
8 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Inside the high-stakes battle to win a New York City casino license
NEW YORK (AP) — A Caesars Palace casino in the heart of Times Square. A sprawling gambling hall along Coney Island's iconic boardwalk. A Hard Rock casino complex next to the home stadium of baseball's New York Mets. Eight projects are bidding for a state license to operate a casino in the lucrative New York City market, each dangling the prospect of generational investment in America's largest metropolitan region. But one — a Bally's casino proposed on a Bronx golf course once run by President Donald Trump's company — may have already run out of luck, after city lawmakers denied it a key approval this week. All of the proposed casinos, in application materials submitted in recent days, promise to create thousands of new jobs, flashy new community amenities in the form of hotels, shops, restaurants and entertainment venues and billions of dollars a year in taxable gambling revenues for the state's coffers. How realistic those promises are, though, is an open question, given the proliferation of casinos in the northeast and the explosion of online gambling in recent years, casino experts say. Gambling industry spending big, but some locals aren't sold The arrival of full-fledged casino resorts in New York City has been years in the making. The gambling industry spent mightily to secure approval from New York voters in a referendum authorizing the licensing of up to seven full casinos with live table games back in 2013. But the state initially allowed upstate venues a head start. The state's Gaming Commission says it hopes to finally award up to three downstate licenses in December. But before then, community advisory committees appointed by lawmakers and local officials will weigh community opinions of each plan. Nearly all the casino proposals face some degree of local push back. On Monday, the New York City Council denied Bally's a needed rezoning change following local resident concerns about the environmental impact of its $4 billion proposal, which also calls for a 500-room hotel and a 2,000-seat event center. Bally's, which bought the former Trump Links course in 2023, had promised to pay Trump another $115 million if it were to secure a casino license, though that was not among the objections voiced by the Democratic majority on the council nor the Republican lawmaker representing the Bronx district. Spokespersons for Bally's declined to comment on the future of the project this week. Not surprisingly, the debate over the proposed Times Square casino has taken center stage, with supporters and opponents recently holding dueling rallies in the Crossroads of the World. Among the prominent groups opposed to the $5.4 billion plan is the Broadway League, a trade group representing America's performing arts theaters. It says a casino would draw patrons away from neighborhood businesses and threaten a theater industry still reeling from the COVID-19 pandemic. The project's backers have countered that the plan, which calls for renovating a skyscraper that currently houses the Minskoff Theatre, home of long-running 'The Lion King' musical, will actually boost demand for Broadway tickets. The developers, which have also enlisted Jay-Z's Roc Nation to curate their entertainment offerings, promise $250 million in community projects, including a public safety plan designed by former NYPD Commissioner Bill Bratton and a multimillion-dollar civil rights museum that helped earn an endorsement from the Rev. Al Sharpton. The two other casinos proposed in Manhattan — one for its West Side and another on its East Side — could face similar headwinds, given their proximity to residential neighborhoods, according to casino experts. But the proposed West Side resort, near the Jacob K. Javits Convention Center and the Lincoln Tunnel to New Jersey, could reel in business travelers and convention attendees, if it can win over locals, said Soojin Ha, a lecturer at Cornell University's business school. Meanwhile in Brooklyn, organizers of the quirky Mermaid Parade are among those leading the charge against a Coney Island casino, arguing the plan would remove large chunks of the boardwalk's iconic amusement rides and block access to the public beach. New York market could support 3 casinos, expert says Since the 2013 referendum, four full casinos have opened in New York, though all of them are located upstate, miles away from Manhattan. The state also has nine gambling halls offering slot machines and other electronic gambling machines but no live table games. Some three hours drive north of Manhattan are the Native American tribe-owned Mohegan Sun and Foxwoods casinos in Connecticut. Two hours south are the New Jersey shore casinos of Atlantic City, and less than two hours due west in Pennsylvania is the tribe-owned Wind Creek Casino at the former site of Bethlehem Steel. Despite the competition from seemingly all corners, New York City's dense market could sustain three gambling halls, depending on where they're located, suggests John Holden, a business professor at Indiana University who specializes in gambling law. 'We typically see fairly rosy revenue projections put out by the gaming industry, but the New York City market is really without comparison,' he said. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. The state could hedge its bets by awarding two of the three licenses to proven winners: the racinos — slot parlors built alongside horse racing tracks — that have been successfully operating for years in the New York City area, said Alan Woinski, a New Jersey-based gambling consultant. MGM Resorts is proposing a $2.3 billion expansion of the Empire City Casino at Yonkers Raceway. Resorts World, owned by Malaysian casino giant Genting, is proposing a $5.5 billion investment to its gaming facility at the Aqueduct Racetrack in Queens. Those expansions, Woinski noted, could be rolled out in a matter of months, meaning the state wouldn't have to wait years for the construction of a wholly new site to start reaping the financial windfall. ___ Follow Philip Marcelo at
Winnipeg Free Press
8 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
State Department layoffs affect key Trump priorities like intelligence, energy and China
WASHINGTON (AP) — One employee coordinated intelligence activities. Another worked to leverage U.S. energy interests abroad. And a third was an expert on strategic competition with China. They are just some of the more than 1,300 State Department employees fired last week, eliminating hundreds of years of institutional knowledge and experience. The move has stunned America's diplomatic workforce, not only as their careers abruptly end but as they wonder who — if anyone — will fill in on what they call critical work to keep the U.S. safe and competitive on the world stage. Many of the positions and offices 'abolished' Friday under Secretary of State Marco Rubio's dramatic reorganization plan overlap with priorities President Donald Trump has laid out for his second term, such as combating visa fraud and countering China. Other cuts could have wide impact on everyday life, including processing Americans' passport applications. Trump administration officials have defended the mass dismissals, saying they are overdue and necessary to make the department leaner and more efficient. Where the State Department cuts are hitting Among the employees laid off are more than 100 people who worked in the Bureau of Consular Affairs, which is self-funded from passport and visa fees. That includes half of a team that investigated passport fraud and 23 people who oversaw contracts to provide American citizen services, including processing passport applications, in the U.S. and abroad, according to a list compiled by current and former foreign service officers and sent to Congress this week. Others fired included experts responsible for dealing with visa fraud and money laundering in Russia and Eastern Europe as well as transnational criminal organizations and migrant worker visa fraud in Mexico and Central America. A small team that had worked on multilateral engagements in the Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, including supporting Rubio's trip to Malaysia last week, also were fired as Rubio was flying back to Washington from Kuala Lumpur, according to the list. A handful of employees said their small office was eliminated even though it was doing work on immigration that the administration had deemed a priority. They thought their jobs were safe, and several were on vacation when the notices started rolling in. 'It came out of the blue, and there's no one left to do what we were doing,' said one of the laid-off employees, who has more than 30 years of experience. Fired employees speak out about their work In interviews with The Associated Press, more than half a dozen employees who got notice to clear out their desks described their work as crucial. For some, the government spent tens of thousands of dollars investing in their language skills, providing training or moving them and their families from one overseas posting to another. They spoke on the condition of anonymity, fearing reprisal from the agency where they remain on the payroll until September. 'The American people aren't getting all of the facts about what the department has done,' said a civil service officer working in intelligence who was fired last week. The person said the intelligence work their team had been doing has now been transferred to an office that doesn't have the capacity to handle the sensitive material and coordination required. One senior official, who was fired after 26 years in the foreign service, said their office was working to maintain U.S. energy dominance abroad. Rubio testified at his confirmation hearing earlier this year that energy would be 'a centerpiece of our foreign policy.' 'The fact that they got rid of all the energy experts who would promote oil and gas sales overseas clearly undermines everything that they're saying,' the official said. At least seven intelligence analysts who specialized in Russia and Ukraine issues, as well as five fluent Chinese speakers, also were let go, according to two of the employees. A staffer focused on strategic competition with China said the decision to lay off staff who had institutional and cultural knowledge of China and spoke the language could leave the U.S. exposed. He added that Rubio had recently labeled the country as 'the most significant long-term risk to the United States.' The State Department says it needs to be nimble Although the dismissals were less severe than many feared, they're a major concern for staffers being tasked with additional duties to make up for losses in key areas like intelligence and research, consular affairs, diplomatic security, energy, and international and educational organizations. Before a panel of deeply skeptical Democratic lawmakers, Michael Rigas, the State Department official who sent employees the layoff notices, tried Wednesday to allay concerns that the cuts would have a devastating impact on U.S. diplomacy. He denied allegations that the layoffs were conducted in a haphazard and irresponsible manner to the detriment of national security. Rigas, deputy secretary of state for management, made the case to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee that the department with more than 76,000 employees worldwide had grown exponentially and that a massive reorganization was needed to keep it relevant and nimble to respond to foreign crises and policy challenges. The department 'became large and began to lose its way,' becoming 'ineffectual bureaucratically,' spokesperson Tammy Bruce told reporters Wednesday. She added that it wasn't 'the fault of the people who were in those seats, but the structure itself.' Rigas said those laid off Friday are on administrative leave — foreign service officers for 120 days, and civil servants for 20 days — and they could have the opportunity to apply for other positions once a government-wide hiring freeze is lifted. Booker confronts Trump administration official Some senators were not buying Rigas' argument, and sharp disagreements erupted into a shouting match after New Jersey Democrat Cory Booker accused Rigas of lying to lawmakers this week over the extent of the staff reductions. Booker was visibly angry as he wielded a list of what he said were misstatements, half-truths or lies in Rigas' testimony before the House Foreign Affairs Committee a day earlier about the firings. 'I don't trust you, Mr. Rigas,' Booker said. 'Your statements lack veracity.' 'This is outrageous,' Rigas replied as he tried to respond over multiple interruptions from Booker. Booker's list resembled the one compiled by current and former foreign service officers identifying certain eliminated positions that Rigas said had been largely spared. 'Sir, you have not been truthful,' Booker said. 'I have watched you lie to this committee, I have watched you lie to the House committee.' ___ Amiri reported from New York.
