
Has Iron Dome been breached? Iran claims using ‘new method' to hit Israel; watch missiles in action
Iranian forces unleashed barrage of missiles on Israel early Monday, targeting major cities including Tel Aviv and Haifa, marking a dramatic escalation in tensions between the two regional powers.
The assault damaged residential areas and raised global concerns about the potential for a wider Middle Eastern conflict.
Powerful explosions shook Tel Aviv as Israel's defence systems intercepted Iranian missiles. Plumes of black smoke billowed into the sky over the coastal city.
Iran says 'new method' made attack more effective
Iran's Revolutionary Guards claimed to have employed a novel attack method that allegedly caused Israel's multi-layered defence systems to target each other.
"The initiatives and capabilities used in this operation, despite the comprehensive support of the United States and Western powers and the possession of the most up-to-date and newest defence technology, led to the successful and maximum hitting of the missiles on the targets in the occupied territories," it said.
They warned that future operations would be "more devastating, tougher, more precise, and more destructive."
"The arrogant dictator of Tehran has become a cowardly murderer who targets the civilian home front in Israel to deter the IDF from continuing the attack that is collapsing his capabilities," Defence Minister Israel Katz said in a statement. "The residents of Tehran will pay the price, and soon."
Israel's
Iron Dome
Israel's primary defence mechanism, the Iron Dome, along with other air defence systems, intercepted many of the incoming Iranian missiles.
Military officials reported an "80 to 90% success rate" in intercepting these threats, though they acknowledged that no defence system is completely impenetrable.
The Iron Dome is Israel's sophisticated air defence system, primarily designed to intercept and destroy short-range rockets, mortars, and drones. Developed by Rafael Advanced Defence Systems with American support, this defensive shield became operational in 2011 and has proven highly effective, with Israeli military officials reporting an impressive 80-90% success rate.
The system employs truck-mounted units that fire radar-guided missiles to neutralise incoming threats in mid-air. One of its notable features is its intelligent threat assessment capability - it can determine whether a rocket is headed toward a populated area and only intercepts those that pose a genuine threat, allowing others to land in unpopulated areas.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
24 minutes ago
- Indian Express
India does not have the economic leverage vis a vis the US that China does
Between December 2022 and July 2025, China accounted for about 47 per cent of all crude oil and 44 per cent of the coal exported by Russia, as against India's corresponding purchase shares of 38 per cent and 20 per cent. Despite that, US President Donald Trump has slapped India with a 25 per cent 'penalty' for buying Russian energy. This rate, to be effective from August 27, would take the total tariff on Indian goods imported into the US to 50 per cent. China has not only escaped such punishment, but has actually seen a lowering of the duty on its goods from 145 to 30 per cent since May 12. On Monday, Trump extended his trade truce with China for a further 90-day period till November 10. At the same time, his Treasury Secretary, Scott Bessent, has threatened additional 'secondary tariffs' on India if the outcome of Trump's Friday meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin isn't favourable. This blatantly divergent treatment, further eroding the credibility of the current Western sanctions regime, has significantly to do with relative economic leverage — China is seen to possess much more of it. The most visible demonstration of that was when, in early April, it imposed export restrictions on rare earth elements and magnets that are indispensable, whether for auto, aerospace, defence, semiconductor, renewable energy or consumer electronics manufacturing. China could use its virtual global monopoly over the mining and processing of these critical minerals to bring Trump to the negotiating table. Rare earths apart, China also played the trump card of being a massive buyer of US agricultural produce — from soyabean, cotton and coarse grains to beef, pork and poultry meat — sharply reducing the imports of these to signal its capacity for retaliation in any unilateral trade war. On the face of it, India does not have that sort of economic leverage. Barring, say, pharmaceutical products, much of what it exports to the US — readymade garments, gems and jewellery, frozen shrimps, basmati rice or even steel and aluminium — aren't items for which there are no alternative suppliers. Nor are Indian imports of California almonds comparable to the humongous quantities of Midwest US soyabean and corn that China was, until recently, sourcing to feed its swine and poultry birds. Given how much it stands to lose in any prolonged trade war — the worst-affected industries are also the most employment-intensive — the best approach for India to adopt is strategic patience. What the Indian foreign policy establishment and its trade negotiators should emphasise is the country's importance to global economic and regional stability, which aligns with the US's own long-term interests.


Mint
24 minutes ago
- Mint
How Trump can win at the Alaska summit
Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin's summit in Alaska on Friday bodes ill for Ukraine. It looks as if Mr. Trump might reward Russia's aggression by trying to force Ukraine to cede up to 20% of its territory to Moscow. That's quite a prize for waging a war that has resulted in the death of as many as 100,000 Ukrainian soldiers, the slaughter of more than 13,000 civilians, the savagery of occupation, the kidnapping of tens of thousands of Ukrainian children and half a trillion dollars' worth of damage to the country's cities and industry. But if Mr. Trump instead tries to live up to his self-assessment as a shrewd negotiator, he should be prepared to respond to Mr. Putin's ultimatum. The Russian president's demands will go something like this: In addition to guaranteeing Russia's control of Crimea and the Donbas region, before considering a cease-fire, Russia also must be satisfied that the root causes of this conflict have been resolved. Which means Ukraine agrees to 'permanent neutrality," the end of Western military assistance, a drastic reduction in Ukrainian armed forces and the end of the military draft, and the 'de-Nazification" of the Kyiv regime, starting with the removal of Volodymyr Zelensky's government. If these conditions aren't met, Mr. Putin will argue, Russia has everything it needs to stay in the 'long war": The patriotic Russian people support the defense of the motherland. Despite the West's sanctions, the economy is solid. War expenses, although large, are manageable. And volunteers are joining the war effort in droves. Mr. Putin will claim he has enough money and soldiers, as well as drones and missiles, to secure victory. Meanwhile, America will have another 'endless war" on its hands. Rather than challenging Mr. Putin on the fraudulent 'root" causes of the war or delving into the military and territorial nitty-gritty of a potential cease-fire, Mr. Trump ought to convey a key point: Time isn't on Russia's side. This fact collapses Mr. Putin's strategy of outlasting the West. What used to look like a marathon is turning into a sprint—and the West intends to win the race. Mr. Trump should make this clear: Russia is losing soldiers. Some 30,000 of them get killed or seriously wounded every month. These are huge numbers—about a million since February 2022. Mr. Putin is giving out sign-up bonuses that are higher than the average national annual salary, but the number of first-time volunteers might be dipping below the replacement. An estimated 200,000 criminals have been 'persuaded" to 'volunteer." Mr. Putin broke his promise not to send raw draftees into combat. Eighteen-year-old Russians were killed or taken prisoner or went missing after Ukraine's incursion in the Kursk region last year. Russia is also losing at least $300 million a day on this war. It's eating up about 40% of government spending and 7% or 8% of gross domestic product. Oil and gas revenue, half the Russian budget, are down by 28% from last July and the lowest since January 2023. The latest European Union sanctions on uninsured 'grey fleet" older vessels that transport Russian oil and the EU's ban on petroleum products based on Russian crude exports will further squeeze Moscow's finances. Russia isn't out of money, but it's running out of cash. No one, including its Chinese 'friends without limits," will buy its debt. Its only reliable source of money is the National Welfare Fund, where Mr. Putin has been storing profits from oil sold above the 'planned prices" since 2008. The fund's liquid resources are down from $117 billion in 2021 to $35 billion this May. If Brent crude falls to $55 dollars a barrel, the fund will run out in a few months. Central Bank of Russia experts say this a 'crisis scenario." The Russian Finance Ministry reports a 20% increase in year-on-year government expenditures, and Moscow can't count on its economy to help. GDP surged between 2023 and 2024 after Mr. Putin threw trillions of rubles at the military-industrial complex. Now the country faces stagflation. Mr. Putin will be lucky if the economy grows above 1%. The official inflation number is 9%, but some staples have been affected much more severely. It's hard on the Russian poor, who make up almost half of the population. Prices for potatoes are up 62% from last year, butter 35% and bread 18%. To boost the economy, the central bank in the past two months has cut the interest rate from 21% to 18%, but no one thinks that will work. At the St. Petersburg Economic Forum in June, the head of the central bank said national economic resources are 'practically exhausted." As the people's support, why are the courts' sentences for 'political" offenses longer than those in the post-Stalin Soviet Union? Why have authorities arrested so far this year about 100 high-ranking officials on corruption charges? Why can an internet post land somebody behind bars for years? Why's it a crime merely to surf the net for alternative sources of information? Why did Mr. Putin ban Facebook and Instagram? Is WhatsApp next? And why are schoolchildren encouraged to inform on their teachers? If Mr. Trump confronts Mr. Putin like this, their summit will be contentious and short, with no agreement at the end. Yet the meeting won't be for naught. Telling Mr. Putin that the West will capitalize on Russia's economic and financial vulnerabilities while expanding assistance to Ukraine may push the Russian leader to consider an alternative strategy to ultimatums and stonewalling. Mr. Aron is author most recently of 'Riding the Tiger: Vladimir Putin's Russia and the Uses of War."


News18
an hour ago
- News18
Israeli military attacks Hezbollah terror targets in South Lebanon
Tel Aviv [Israel], August 15 (ANI/TPS): The IDF (Israel Defence Forces) attacked several underground routes of the Hezbollah terrorist organisation in South Lebanon on Thursday evening. 'The presence of the infrastructure that was attacked was a violation of the understandings between Israel and Lebanon," said the IDF will continue to act to remove any threat to the State of IsraelThe Upper Galilee Regional Council reported that a series of attacks began in the Lebanese sector, with an emphasis on the eastern sector, as part of what it called 'enforcement efforts." (ANI/TPS)