DMK allies' demand for more seats to be resolved through talks, says T.N. CM Stalin
Speaking to reporters during the launch of 'Tamil Nadu Under One Front' at Anna Arivalayam on Tuesday (July 1, 2025), he said new parties could join the DMK alliance under the current circumstances. 'When the situation arises, we will sit together and hold talks to include them,' he said, accompanied by Deputy Chief Minister and Youth Wing leader Udhayanidhi Stalin.
He said the DMK have been fully prepared for the elections for a long time. 'We have a goal of winning 200 seats. I hope we will exceed that number,' the Chief Minister said.
When asked about Union Home Minister Amit Shah's statement in Madurai that he would visit Tamil Nadu more frequently, Mr. Stalin said both Mr. Shah and Prime Minister Narendra Modi should visit the State more often.
'They have the habit of uttering lies during their visits to Tamil Nadu, and the people are aware of it. It will work in our favour during the elections. They should also not replace the Governor (R.N. Ravi), as he has caused more harm than good. He cannot win over the people, even if he tries to do something positive,' he said.
Regarding AIADMK leader Edappadi K. Palaniswami's plan to begin a public outreach campaign from July 7, Mr. Stalin said the DMK had launched its programme long ago, and the Opposition leader was beginning only now.
He said the Tamil Nadu Under One Front initiative would cover both the election campaign and the DMK's membership drive. 'We will also explain to the people the achievements of the DMK government,' he said.
When asked whether he would visit Mr. Palaniswami's house during the campaign, the Chief Minister said it would depend on the circumstances. 'We have shared responsibilities across the party. Depending on the situation, others may visit. If I happen to be in the area, I will certainly visit his house,' he said.
Top schemes
Mr. Stalin highlighted the Chief Minister's Breakfast Scheme, Magalir Urimai Thittam, and Magalir Vidiyal Payanam Scheme as the top three schemes of the DMK government. 'We have completed 60% of the Magalir Urimai Thittam. Many forms were not filled properly, so we plan to organise a camp in September,' he said.
The Chief Minister said the DMK aimed to enroll 30% of people in each constituency as party members. 'But in many places, our party leaders have promised to enroll 40% of the people,' he said.
Though the DMK's outreach includes engaging with members of the Opposition, Mr. Stalin emphasised that the party would not force anyone to join. 'We will leave it to them,' he said.
When asked about alleged wrongdoings by officials, particularly in custodial deaths, the Chief Minister said the government takes action whenever such issues are brought to its attention. 'Even today, we have taken action against (police) officials,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Papers hurled at Amit Shah, MPs stage protests in Lok Sabha
The Lok Sabha on Wednesday witnessed vigorous protests by the Opposition that nearly led to a scuffle between government ministers and senior Opposition leaders prompted the entry of 15 marshals, and forced Union home minister Amit Shah to change his seat during the introduction of three bills that seek to bar ministers, chief ministers or the Prime Minister from holding office after being arrested for serious crimes. A scrap of paper thrown in front of Union Home Minister Amit Shah in the Lok Sabha, in New Delhi on Wednesday.(PTI) When Shah tried to introduce the 130th constitution amendment bill and two other related bills at 2pm, a number of Opposition MPs, especially from Trinamool Congress (TMC), rushed to the Well to protest against the proposed law, even as a verbal duel started between the minister and some Opposition leaders over the merit of the bill. Soon, things took a turn for the worse. Congress leader KC Venugopal tore apart a copy of the bill as he accused the government of trying to target the Opposition. TMC's Kalyan Banerjee, who was standing in front of Shah, turned around and tried to use the home minister's microphone to oppose the bill. Soon, a few other TMC MPs came close to Shah and started throwing papers in front of the minister. Parliamentary affairs minister Kiren Rijiju, who was seated on the second row, rushed to stand between the protestors and Shah. Minister of state Ravneet Singh Bittu also came running down. Bittu later told HT that the Opposition committed a shameful act and even blamed the 'infighting' in the TMC for the aggravated situation that saw different leaders of TMC protesting in their own way. Bittu said, 'I rushed because I feared they might harm our home minister.' The TMC later alleged that some of the women MPs were 'assaulted' by Rijiju and Bittu. 'MP Mitali Bag confirmed this to the media. Also, Satabdi Roy was pushed and heckled,' a leader aware of the matter said. The Bharatiya Janata Party refuted these allegations. At 3 pm, when the House reassembled after an adjournment, Shah sat in the fourth row and introduced the bill amid another round of protests. At least 15 marshals also came inside the House and as soon as the protests restarted, they rushed to the well to protect the treasury bench. Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla sent them back as the Opposition raised objections over their deployment. The Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi, said, 'There is a lot of action going on about the new bill that the BJP is proposing. We are going back to medieval times when the king could just remove anybody at will. There's no concept of what an elected person is. He doesn't like your face, so he tells ED to put a case, and then a democratically elected person is wiped out within 30 days.' West Bengal chief minister Mamata Banerjee said, 'I condemn the 130th Constitutional Amendment Bill, proposed to be tabled, by the Government of India today. I condemn it as a step towards something that is more than a super- Emergency, a step to end the democratic era of India for ever. This draconian step comes as a death knell for democracy and federalism in India.' TMC's Mahua Moitra took jibes at Shah for sitting in a middle row. 'India watched how Amit Shah did not have courage to sit in his own seat to bring in his Unconstitutional Amendment. Even with 20 extra marshals protecting him, he cowardly sat in fourth row!' To be sure, when the Women's Reservation Bill was first introduced in the Rajya Sabha in 2010, similar protests had erupted in the Upper House. It is not the first time that a minister sat in a middle row to table a contentious bill to avoid any harm or escalation of protests.
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
HC suspends conviction of Abbas Ansari in hate speech case: ‘refusal to do so also amounts to injustice to his electorate'
The Allahabad High Court on Wednesday suspended the conviction of Abbas Ansari, the son of gangster-politician Mukhtar Abbas Ansari, in a three-year-old hate speech case, saying 'refusal to stay his conviction amounts to injustice not only to him but also to the electorate which elected him'. Abbas Ansari, who was elected from the Mau Assembly seat in 2022 Uttar Pradesh elections, was sentenced to two years of rigorous imprisonment in May this year, leading to his disqualification from the membership of the House. The 33-year-old was booked on March 3, 2022, for his campaign speech in which he had allegedly threatened to 'teach a lesson' to the administrative officials of Mau after the elections. On May 31 this year, a court in Mau convicted him and sentenced him to two years of imprisonment, leading to his disqualification from the UP Assembly. He then challenged the order in the sessions court, which on July 5 stayed the sentence but declined to stay the conviction. He then appealed in the Allahabad High Court. In his order, Justice Sameer Jain of the Allahabad High Court cited the 2024 Supreme Court order against disqualifaction of Congress leader Rahul Gandhi (Rahul Gandhi Vs Purnesh Ishwarbhai Modi, 2024), saying 'disqualification of a person not only affect the right of public representative to continue in the public life but also affect the right of electorate who have elected him to represent their constituency'. '… (Abbas Ansari) was a sitting MLA and at the time of election he was delivering the speech, and although being an MLA, he should restraint himself but merely on delivering such speech… refusal to stay his conviction in view of this Court amounts to injustice not only to the revisionist (Ansari) but also to the electorate who elected him. It appears, while refusing the prayer to stay the conviction, appellate court (sessions court) did not consider this aspect,' the order stated. 'Further, non-suspending the conviction… indicates far-reaching consequences… He not only remained disqualified, but also remained disqualified to contest the future election,' the court said. The order further stated that the purpose of the introduction of Section 8 of the Representation of the People Act 'is to resolve the issue of criminalisation of politics and to depoliticising criminality.' '…but while deciding the issue at hand, it is also necessary to consider the other facts and circumstances of the case like what are the actual allegations against the person who has been disqualified due to his conviction and whether his criminal antecedents of such nature which threatens the very idea of democracy,' Justice Jain added in the order. Setting aside the July order of the sessions court, Justice Jain in his order said: 'Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case including the political background of the revisionist and his family, facts of the present case and his criminal antecedents, this Court is of the view that it is not a case in which prayer to suspend the conviction of the revisionist should be refused.' '…the impugned order dated 5.7.2025 passed by learned appellate court is illegal and is liable to be set aside… The conviction order passed by trial court against the revisionist (Abbas Ansari) shall remain suspended during the pendency of his appeal before the appellate court,' the High Court ordered, adding, 'the instant revision filed by revisionist (Abbas Ansari) stands allowed'. The High Court also made it clear that the observation made by his court was only for the purpose whether the conviction order can be stayed or not during the pendency of the appeal. 'The appellate court shall not be influenced from any observation made in this order and shall decide the appeal of the revisionist independently in accordance with law,' the High Court added. In his revision petition filed in the High Court, Abbas Ansari submitted that due to the conviction order passed by the trial court, he has been disqualified as a sitting MLA, and therefore, the case fell under the category of 'rare and exceptional' cases. He argued that the appellate (sessions) court should have stayed his conviction order, but the 'learned appellate court refused to stay the conviction and therefore committed gross illegality'. He also submitted that due to the refusal of the appellate court in granting a stay on his conviction, his entire political career was adversely affected. He also added that due to his conviction, he has also been disqualified from contesting elections for six years. In his petition before the High Court, Ansari stated that out of 11 cases, proceedings of three cases have been quashed, including a case related to the UP Gangsters Act, and in another case he was convicted, but granted bail, and his appeal is pending. The counsel appearing on behalf of the UP governmnent vehemently opposed his plea and submitted that Ansari committed offences under sections 171 F, 153A and 189 of the IPC, and 'considering the entire evidence produced by prosecution, prima facie, it cannot be said that the trial court wrongly convicted him'. Abbas's younger brother, Umar Ansari, who is also an accused in the same case, is pending in the court.
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
EPS: Didn't DMK know CPR was from RSS when it allied with BJP?
Vellore: AIADMK general secretary Edappadi K Palaniswami questioned the stance of DMK MP Kanimozhi that the party will not support BJP-led NDA's vice president candidate C P Radhakrishnan as he belongs to RSS. At a meet at Walajah, Sholinghur, in Ranipet district, EPS asked, "Didn't DMK know that Radhakrishnan had an RSS background when it aligned with BJP earlier? Back then, Radhakrishnan contested as DMK alliance's candidate. When convenient, DMK changes its stand. In fact, DMK campaigned for Radhakrishnan and helped him win. Let them not forget that." EPS alleged that DMK will do anything to remain in power. "They (DMK) will even sign a bond of slavery. Even if they don't vote for C P Radhakrishnan, they must not speak ill of him. Shouldn't we feel proud that a Tamilian holds a high national post," he asked. You Can Also Check: Chennai AQI | Weather in Chennai | Bank Holidays in Chennai | Public Holidays in Chennai | Gold Rates Today in Chennai | Silver Rates Today in Chennai He said DMK's attitude was that of, 'Let the poor suffer, as long as our families survive.' The prices of rice, dal, oil, and groceries have all risen sharply, he said. "During AIADMK regime, we kept inflation under control. To check rising prices, we created a price stabilisation fund of 100crore. With this, we procured goods from neighbouring states where they were cheaper and supplied them through cooperative societies in TN," he said. Building materials have become so costly that the poor can no longer dream of building houses, said EPS, adding, "But DMK has no concern." Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.
