PQ sticks with byelection candidate Alex Boissonneault despite his ‘error of youth'
Quebec Politics
By
QUEBEC — The Parti Québécois is standing by the candidate it has chosen for a byelection in the riding of Arthabaska despite his association in the past with a radical left movement and arrest in 2001.
In a statement published Tuesday on social media, PQ leader Paul St-Pierre Plamondon said the party's candidate for the byelection, former journalist Alex Boissonneault, was up front and disclosed the errors of his youth during the screening process to become candidate.
And the party decided to let him run despite the attacks of one of his opponents, the leader of the Quebec Conservative Party, Éric Duhaime, who questioned his character. Duhaime is also running in the yet-to-be-called byelection in the riding in central Quebec.
'Alex Boissonneault obviously indicated, in all transparency from the start, that he had been arrested at the age of 22 in 2001,' St-Pierre Plamondon said. 'Contrary to what Éric Duhaime has stated, he was never sentenced to prison but was followed in a community work program.'
Boissonneault, who until last week was the Radio-Canada Quebec City radio morning show host, was part of a radical left cell known as Germinal, which plotted to break open the fences set up by police in the Quebec City downtown to protect dignitaries during the 2001 Summit of the Americas.
He spent 40 days in prison before being sentenced to six months of community work. In 2011, he applied for an received a full pardon.
'His error of youth was to have had in his possession a smoke device, that is to say an object to produce smoke, but not a object to injure, St-Pierre Plamondon said. 'Contrary to what Duhaime said, he was never in possession of a weapon or steel balls.
'In fact, there was never any question of wanting to hurt anyone whatsoever with or without the device.'
St-Pierre Plamondon was reacting to comments made by Duhaime after the Boissonneault candidacy became public Monday. After initially welcoming Boissonneault as a fine person he was anxious to debate with, Duhaime issued a blistering statement about his past later in the evening.
'Was the Péquiste leader, Paul St-Pierre Plamondon, aware that his new candidate in Arthabaska was arrested for possession of explosives a few days before the Summit of the Americas?
'Is Mr. St-Pierre Plamondon at ease with a candidate arrested with hoodies, baseball bats, shields, sling shots and military equipment including smoke bombs, gas masks and steel balls (to be used as projectiles)?'
But St-Pierre Plamondon defended his decision to pick Boissonneault who grew up in the riding which includes the City of Victoriaville. The announcement of his candidacy will be made Wednesday morning in the riding.
'I note that he obtained a pardon in proper form in 2011 and that he has done exemplary work as a journalists for the last 18 years,' St-Pierre Plamondon wrote. 'He not only has an exemplary professional record, recognized by his peers and the greater public, but also an exemplary record as a citizen since this incident.'
St-Pierre Plamondon notes Radio-Canada was aware of Boissonneault's past when it hired him, first to work at parliament and later on Première Heure (the name of the Quebec City morning show).
Boissonneault's decision to seek a seat in the National Assembly took his colleagues by surprise. Until last Friday he was still hosting the morning show. Designed to diffuse Duhaime's accusations of the PQ parachuting in a candidate, Boissonneault was born in Saint-Ferdinand, a city in the riding of Arthabaska.
His arrival sets the stage for an intense three way battle for the riding between the PQ, Conservatives and Coalition Avenir Québec. The CAQ currently holds the riding but it was left vacant when the MNA, Eric Lefebvre, won a seat in the House of Commons with the Conservative Party in the April 28 federal election.
Premier François Legault has until September to call the byelection.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
4 days ago
- CTV News
The Québec solidaire candidate in Terrebonne switches to the Parti Québécois
Archives - Parti Québécois leader Paul St-Pierre Plamondon celebrates with candidate Catherine Gentilcore, second from left, after she won the by-election in Terrebonne on Monday, March 17, 2025. (The Canadian Press/Christinne Muschi) The candidate who represented Québec solidaire (QS) in the Terrebonne by-election, Nadia Poirier, is leaving the party to join the Parti Québécois (PQ). Poirier made the announcement on social media on Sunday, just over two months after the by-election, which PQ candidate Catherine Gentilcore easily won. A few days after the by-election, in which she finished fourth with 4.55 per cent of the vote, Poirier publicly lamented the lack of support from QS during the campaign. On Reddit, Poirier pointed out, among other things, that no QS MNAs had come to Terrebonne with her to campaign, except co-spokesperson Ruba Ghazal for a 'solidarity beer.' On Sunday, Poirier revealed that this was 'only the tip of the iceberg of what [she] criticizes the party for.' 'But since I prefer to wash my dirty laundry in private, I shared the rest of my grievances with them privately. The result remains the same: I am leaving Québec Solidaire,' she announced. Poirier justified her move to the PQ by saying that she had read the party's national platform and found 'particularly progressive elements, ideas that overlap with those of QS, refreshing proposals.' 'When you put aside the QS-PQ rivalry, you realize that we are not so far apart,' she wrote. Poirier stated that she will continue to campaign for independence. She also said she hopes for a 'sovereignist convergence' with a view to a third referendum. Poirier also ran for QS in Terrebonne in the 2022 general election. She finished third, behind the Coalition Avenir Québec and the PQ. This report by The Canadian Press was first published in French June 2, 2025.
Montreal Gazette
6 days ago
- Montreal Gazette
Libman: Referendum pledge puts PQ leader in a bind
Last week's Léger poll on provincial sovereignty in Canada contained an eye-popping revelation: Among all provinces, Quebec had the greatest proportion of respondents 'opposed' to separation, at 59 per cent. Support for sovereignty was tagged at 33 per cent, near where it's been hovering for years. It's lower than support in Manitoba/Saskatchewan and well behind the 41 per cent in Alberta. Ontario was at 31 per cent. Having the highest number against sovereignty was explained by the fact that most Quebecers are already decided on the question, while in other provinces there were more who didn't answer. With a Quebec election next year, this is a warning light on Parti Québécois Leader Paul St-Pierre Plamondon's dashboard, putting him in a tight spot. After the separatist party suffered its worst defeat in its history, reduced to just three seats, PSPP had to consolidate the PQ base — and he defiantly committed to holding a sovereignty referendum in his first term if elected. Despite being numerically marginalized in the National Assembly, the PQ MNAs were able to generate catchy headlines, like refusing to swear allegiance to the King in the oath of office, which was subsequently changed. As voters grew weary of François Legault and his Coalition Avenir Québec government, combined with a weakened and leaderless Liberal party, the PQ suddenly found itself leading in polls as the default option where Quebecers were parking their vote, and has led ever since. The commitment to a sovereignty referendum, however, could become the PQ's biggest hurdle in transforming its current lead into a victory in next year's election. We're entering an unpredictable political maze now in Quebec, with polls containing many ifs, ands or buts: The CAQ is seemingly in free fall. Will Legault be pushed to resign, with the hope for a momentous turnaround like the federal Liberals? The Quebec Liberal Party support among francophone voters is only 10 per cent. Will its new leader — to be chosen in two weeks — be able to change that? The PQ leads the polls with 33 per cent support, but 30 per cent of its own voters are against separation — and only 24 per cent of Quebecers think PSPP would make the best premier. PSPP has had a fairly easy ride so far in opposition, left free to launch his attacks. But as federal Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre has learned, that's different from positioning yourself as leader of a government. And the leadership question will only draw more attention as the election comes into sharper focus. Just last week PSPP was on the defensive for taking the populist position that Quebec should lower its carbon pricing — then was pressured to answer to environmental concerns and where he would account for the $1.5-billion shortfall in government revenues. PSPP generated more headlines this week with a motion calling to cut ties with the monarchy, criticizing what many saw as an archaic spectacle in Ottawa and ridiculing the notion that having King Charles read the throne speech would impress U.S. President Donald Trump as an expression of Canadian sovereignty. Many, particularly Quebecers, believe that clinging to the monarchy is a wasteful expense in this day and age. But calling the monarchy hostile toward Quebec and francophones, which PSPP also levelled at Mark Carney, comes across as foolish rhetorical excess. In the recent federal election, a majority of Quebec voters saw Carney as the adult in the room. They want stability and poise during these uncertain times with Trump in the White House. The turbulent prospect of another Quebec sovereignty referendum would bring the opposite. Once chosen, the next Quebec Liberal leader should immediately start hounding PSPP on if and when he would call a referendum, which most Quebecers decidedly don't want. Will he back down, or will the PQ's raison d'être again become its biggest obstacle to power?
Montreal Gazette
6 days ago
- Montreal Gazette
Freed: The King, the Donald and the future of Quebec
The big surprise about our visit from the 'King of Canada' was that Quebecers didn't care. Sure, the usual nationalist suspects went on about the 'insult to democracy.' But most Quebecers yawned and shrugged. In short, they acted like Canadians, 83 per cent of whom said they 'didn't care' about King Charles's visit (while Quebecers polled 90 per cent). In fact, most Canadians would like to dump the monarchy. But for that we'd have to reopen the dreaded Constitution: a Pandora's box that would quickly have every province demanding something in exchange. Alberta would want a pipeline in every home, Quebec the exclusive world rights to the words 'distinct' and 'special.' Ontario would demand recognition as the official 'centre of the universe' and B.C. a guarantee it can keep complaining about housing prices, while sipping $8 lattes. Negotiations would continue until shortly after the death of the universe. So instead of going there, we all just shrugged at the King's visit. But the francophone shrug seems part of a larger recent shrug about Quebec nationalism in general. How? Let's connect some dots. First dot: In the recent election, Quebecers single-handedly saved the Liberals. They saw the only election issue as TrumpAmerica, with a Carney-united strong Canada as their best defence. That's why Quebec originally joined Canada. As Father-of-Confederation George-Étienne Cartier put it, 'Quebec must join' Confederation 'or be absorbed' by America. For proof Cartier was right, visit New England, where you'll see names like Lavoy (formerly Lavoie), Wallet (Ouellet) and Packet (Paquette). Their owners often don't know their names were once French. As Quebecers grow closer to Canada, it's a bad time to promise a Quebec referendum, as PQ Leader Paul St-Pierre Plamondon keeps doing. In a recent poll, even one-third of PQ voters said they were 'not in favour' of Quebec sovereignty. Let alone young Quebecers. In another recent poll, 80 per cent of francophones under 35 were 'proud to live in Canada,' while young people in English Canada polled 74 per cent. Young Quebecers are now bigger Canadian nationalists than young English Canadians. The only place separatism is rising is Alberta. Will young Québécois someday fly en masse to Calgary, waving maple leafs and begging Albertans to stay in Canada? So what's behind these changes? Second dot: Recent generations of Quebecers have lived different experiences than their nationalist elders. Their parents and grandparents felt kept down by English Canada and some may still hold a grudge, including our premier. But younger Quebecers have grown up with francophones running Quebec (while we anglos feel like a threatened minority). These young francophones have no personal resentment pushing them toward independence. They don't even have any interest in it. Many travel and work in Canada, especially out West, and feel as comfortable there as I did at their age. Like young people everywhere, they also love the English-dominated internet, video games and Taylor Swift, but they also love popular French Quebec shows like La Voix. You can see how older nationalists might worry about this dual attachment. As a woman at a French book launch told me: 'I'm much less nationalist than when I was young, but my three kids — forget it! If I even say the word independence, they think I'm a fossil.' I sometimes wonder if the urgency some older nationalists feel for sovereignty is because they don't trust their kids to follow. It's easier for cabinet ministers to beat up on English guitar-string labels than tell their kids to stop speaking English. Like kids everywhere, they'd probably just do the opposite. Third dot: Recent generations of francophones have gone to school with the whole planet. When I grew up, most immigrants went to English schools because they couldn't get into French Catholic ones. So francophones were rarely exposed to them. But today's post-Bill 101 francophones have shared classes with the world — including students in turbans and hijabs — and you see them all socializing together on The Main at night. Quebec will always have periodic waves of nationalism to protect its language, but currently French is doing well, despite its doomsayers. So younger francophones seem confident about themselves and their language, within Canada. Last dot: All of the above is partly why Quebec Liberals are neck-and-neck with the PQ in polls and way ahead of Legault's CAQ. Quebec sometimes moves in giant swerves, or quiet revolutions — and we may be on the cusp of one, set off bizarrely by, yes, Donald Trump. Still, you can never predict long-term politics (see America), so I'm not making promises. Perhaps an unpopular Legault will quit and be replaced by someone more appealing? Or the PQ will drop its referendum pledge and risk a sovereignist hardliner rebellion? Maybe Trump will suddenly outlaw french fries, french toast and french kisses in America, provoking a new wave of French Quebec nationalism. Who can say, but for now the ground is ripe for another Quebec swerve, perhaps away from independence. Trump has already changed the arc of current Canadian history. He may yet do the same for Quebec, ending an era of 'Le Québec aux Québécois!' and starting one of 'Le Québec pour un Canada Uni!'
