Marriage psychologist reveals the no. 1 sign of a future separation — with 94% accuracy
If you want to know whether your marriage is heading for Splitsville, don't check your partner's phone — check their face.
A one-sided mouth raise — that subtle smirk of superiority — might just be the number one red flag for divorce, according to renowned psychologist Dr. John Gottman, founder of the Gottman Institute and mastermind behind one of the most extensive marriage studies ever conducted.
His research, which was recently dissected on the hit Unplanned Podcast, found that four nasty little habits — criticism, contempt, defensiveness and stonewalling — are deemed the 'Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse' when it comes to dooming relationships.
4 Think your spouse's smug little smirk is harmless? Think again — that one-sided mouth raise could be the biggest red flag for divorce, says famed psychologist Dr. John Gottman, founder of the Gottman Institute and the brains behind one of the largest marriage studies ever.
JustLife – stock.adobe.com
But it's contempt, experts warn, that is the true kiss of death.
'Dr. John Gottman is a marriage and family counsellor, and he did the largest marriage experiment ever done,' body language expert Vanessa Van Edwards recently told hosts Matt and Abbey Howard.
'He brought couples into his lab, and if one member of the couple shows a one-sided mouth raise towards the other, he can tell you if they're going to get divorced — because he's looking for contempt,' she continued.
And he knows his stuff. 'Gottman could predict divorce with an astonishing 93.6% accuracy,' Van Edwards added.
Contempt, Van Edwards explained, is the most corrosive of all the emotional saboteurs.
'Fear comes in a burst, and then you calm down. Happiness comes, and then you go back to normal. Anger comes, and then you calm down,' she said.
4 Dr. Gottman's research — spotlighted on the buzzy Unplanned Podcast — warns of four marriage wreckers so toxic they've earned the nickname 'Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse': criticism, contempt, defensiveness and stonewalling.
zinkevych – stock.adobe.com
'But not contempt. If you feel scorn or disdain for someone else, and if it is not addressed, it festers and it grows.'
She went on, noting, 'That is why at the end of a marriage you have two people who can't even look at each other.'
Van Edwards suggests that if you catch a whiff of contempt — either from yourself or your partner — it's time to tackle it head-on.
'Ask, 'What's going on? Are you okay? What are you feeling? I want to be here for it.' Because then you're giving air to whatever that contempt is so that it can be addressed,' she said.
'And then you can either fix it or become the enemy against it.'
She also believes many couples get stuck in endless loops of the same three arguments — they just don't realize it.
4 If contempt creeps in — whether it's from you or your better half — body language guru Vanessa Van Edwards says it's a red alert: time to shut it down before it blows up.
eakgrungenerd – stock.adobe.com
'You have to sit with your partner and figure out what are your basic root-level three arguments,' she advised.
'That way, when you're in an argument, even if you feel like you still disagree, you can say 'this is argument number 2 — we're in a stalemate on this one.''
Clinical psychologist Dr. David M. Schneer backed up Gottman's findings in a 2019 article, writing, 'Disgust and contempt are to a relationship what gasoline and matches are to a fire.'
He cited telltale signs like eye-rolling, mouth crimping — even subtle fidgeting, like picking at clothes or cleaning fingers mid-convo — as silent signals of disdain.
4 Clinical psychologist Dr. David M. Schneer doubled down on Gottman's theory in a 2019 piece, saying disgust and contempt in a relationship are like tossing gasoline on a fire.
bongkarn – stock.adobe.com
Schneer dubbed this move 'The Lint Picker,' a behavior he says screams contempt louder than words ever could.
So, how do you douse the flames before they torch your love life?
Schneer recommends cracking a joke, switching the topic to something you both enjoy, or simply walking away to cool off if the situation gets too toxic.
Love may be blind, but contempt? It's written all over your face.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
6 minutes ago
- CBS News
GOP leaders cite L.A. immigration protests to push for quick passage of Trump's "big, beautiful bill"
Washington — The White House and Republican leaders in Congress are urging lawmakers to quickly get behind the centerpiece of President Trump's legislative agenda, saying the ongoing immigration protests in Los Angeles adds urgency to the push to secure additional resources for border security. House Speaker Mike Johnson said on X on Monday that the legislation, which addresses Mr. Trump's tax, energy and immigration priorities, "provides the ESSENTIAL funding needed to secure our nation[']s borders." Republicans call the legislation the "one big, beautiful bill." "The lawlessness happening in LA is ANOTHER reason why we need to pass the One Big Beautiful Bill IMMEDIATELY," Johnson said, pledging that Congress will support Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents who he said are "fighting to keep Americans safe against illegal aliens AND the radical left." White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt shared a similar message earlier Monday, saying the scenes unfolding in some areas of Los Angeles "prove that we desperately need more immigration enforcement personnel and resources." "America must reverse the invasion unleashed by Joe Biden of millions of unvetted illegal aliens into our country," Leavitt said in a post on X. "That's why President Trump's One Big, Beautiful Bill funds at least one million annual removals and hires 10,000 new ICE personnel, 5,000 new customs officers, and 3,000 new Border Patrol agents." Speaker of the House Mike Johnson holds a press conference after the House narrowly passed a bill forwarding President Trump's agenda at the U.S. Capitol on May 22, 2025, in Washington, legislation is now in the hands of the Senate after the House narrowly approved it last month following weeks of intraparty disagreement over its components. Though the bulk of the funding allocated in the legislation goes toward tax cuts, it also includes resources aimed at bolstering border security and defense. It provides $46.5 billion for the border wall, $4.1 billion to hire Border Patrol agents and other personnel and more than $2 billion for signing and retention bonuses for agents. It also imposes an additional $1,000 fee for people who are filing for asylum in the U.S. The disagreement among Republicans over the bill has largely centered on cuts meant to offset the bill's spending, including restrictions to Medicaid. In the House's razor-thin GOP majority, the disagreements threatened to tank the bill's progress at every stage. And as the bill moved to the Senate for consideration last week, Johnson warned the upper chamber against making significant changes that would throw off the delicate balance. Senate Republicans initially voiced support for separating the complicated tax components and border security provisions into two separate bills to deliver Mr. Trump a victory on immigration early on in his tenure. But House Republicans opposed the approach, expressing doubts that the president's agenda could pass through the narrow GOP majority in the lower chamber in separate parts. Senate Republicans are now seeking to amend the House-passed bill, sending it back to the House for approval with a goal of getting the legislation to the president's desk by the July 4 holiday. And with a 53-seat majority, the upper chamber can afford to lose just three Republicans. Last week, opposition from Elon Musk threatened to throw a wrench into the legislation's progress, after he stoked concerns by fiscal hawks about the bill's impact on the deficit. The episode, which began with Musk calling the bill "a disgusting abomination," erupted into a dramatic and public feud between Musk and the president last week. But the dispute did not appear to spark significant new opposition the the bill in Congress. The urgency expressed Monday surrounding securing additional border resources comes as Mr. Trump called for the National Guard to enforce order in the L.A. area amid protests over activity by ICE, prompting a clash with California Gov. Gavin Newsom. Newsom warned that the move would inflame the situation, while urging that there is no shortage of law enforcement. The governor indicated late Sunday that his office plans to sue the Trump administration over Mr. Trump's move. Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem defended the president's move on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan" Sunday, claiming Newsom "has proven that he makes bad decisions." "The president knows that [Newsom] makes bad decisions, and that's why the president chose the safety of this community over waiting for Gov. Newsom to get some sanity," Noem added.
Daily Mail
8 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Woman on first date with man who put seven police officers in hospital after high speed chase 'wishes it had never happened'
The woman who found herself on a horror first date with a man who put seven police officers in hospital after a high speed motorway chase 'wishes it had never happened'. Mother-of-two Courtney Redfern, 27, was being driven home on April 9 in Gateshead, Tyne by Mazyar Azarbonyad, 20, in his BMW Five Series when officers attempted to pull him over due to a faulty rear light. Despite Courtney's protests, Iranian-born Azarbonyad - who had no licence or insurance - put his foot down and led police on a terrifying high speed pursuit through Gateshead and onto the A1M towards Newcastle. Supported from above by the force helicopter, four police cars performed a tactical stop manoeuvre, boxing in Azarbonyad's car and bringing it to a halt. But seconds later an unmarked police Volvo slammed into the cars at 80mph, unaware they were stationary in the carriageway and causing a scene described as 'carnage' by witnesses. Caught in the centre of it was Courtney, who like her date, miraculously escaped without any major injuries. A source close to the 27-year-old today revealed that she wishes she had never been a part of the nightmare collision. "[Courtney] wishes that it had never happened. She was caught up in this through no fault of her own,' they told The Mirror. The newspaper also reported today that Courtney had only met Azarbonyad the day before the horrific smash in April and that he had 'panicked' when she told him that she had drugs in her possession. Another source close to Courtney last month told MailOnline that she and her family had been left 'traumatised' by the ordeal. They said: 'It was a first date and no one could have expected an outcome like that from what should have been an ordinary evening out. 'It's fortunate that no one was killed when looking at the wreckage left behind, it was all anyone who saw it could talk about. 'She's recovering but it was obviously a major shock.' It was also reported today that Courtney had only met Azarbonyad (above) the day before the horrific smash on April 9 and that he 'panicked' when she told him that she had drugs on her Courtney was arrested alongside Azarbonyad on suspicion of aiding and abetting dangerous driving at the time. The young mum from Newcastle was told she would face no further action, but later accepted a police caution for possession of cannabis for personal use. Gym-goer Courtney, who in the past has run a pub in the Gateshead area, is not believed to have continued to see Azarbonyad after the collision. At a hearing at Newcastle Crown Court on May 25 Azarbonyad simply laughed when asked whether he was still in touch with his date from the disastrous night of April 9. Earlier this month Azarbonyad pleaded guilty to dangerous driving, two counts of failing to stop, having no licence and driving with no insurance. He was jailed for 14 months with a three years and seven months road ban. The maximum sentence for dangerous driving is two years. Judge Gittins said Azarbonyad's speed reached a 'hair raising' level, adding: 'It is nothing short of a miracle that no one was more seriously injured or that there were not multiple fatalities. 'It is difficult to imagine a worse single offence of dangerous driving without serious injury or death being caused.' Prosecutor Jolyon Perks told the court it was 'truly remarkable' nobody was seriously injured. Mr Perks added: 'He was pursued by a number of police vehicles with lights illuminated. Judge Gittins said Azarbonyad's speed reached a 'hair raising' level and that it was 'nothing short of a miracle' that there were not multiple fatalities 'The lead police pursuit vehicle had dash cam footage which showed the defendant travelling in excess of 100mph and them approaching speeds of 120mph in an attempt to get away from the police. 'As the defendant apporached the junction of the A186 he chose to abandon his attempt to escape but rapidly decelerated from 119mph to a complete stop in the middle of the carriageway. 'As a consequence the pursuing police vehicles were forced to emergency brake in an unsuccessful attempt to avoid serious collision. 'The collision was captured on CCTV footage from a police air support helicopter.' The court heard that despite the devastation he caused on April 9, Azarbonyad was back behind the wheel on April 11, 12, 13, 15 and 16, which he claimed was essential for him to get to work. Penny Hall, defending, said Azarbonyad travelled from Iran to the UK with his uncle, who he lost contact with during the journey and has not seen any of his family since. Miss Hall said Azarbonyad spent time in the care system until he reached 18 when he was assisted with getting a tenancy for his home, which he will lose if he goes to prison and has no real support. Azarbonyad, who came to the UK from Iran aged 14, was granted leave to remain as a refugee.
Daily Mail
8 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Final days of little boy with 'killer grandparents' before they 'murdered him while his mother was upstairs' is shown to jury
The final days of a two-year-old boy who was allegedly murdered by his grandparents while his mother was upstairs have been shown to a jury. Ethan Ives-Griffiths was caught on camera with his grandparents at Broughton Retail Park on August 13, 2021, just days before he collapsed and died. The toddler can be seen sitting in the child seat of a shopping trolley, which is being pushed along. Ethan was described as being 'severely underweight and covered in bruises' when he was found injured at the family home and later died on August 16, 2021. The young boy was taken from his grandparents' house in Garden City, North Wales, to Liverpool's Alder Hey hospital but died from 'catastrophic' head injuries. Michael Ives, 47, and Kerry Ives, 46, are on trial accused of murder, causing or allowing the death of a child and cruelty to a child - which they deny. They blamed Ethan's mother, Shannon Ives, 28, but the prosecution said she was out of the room and not responsible for the fatal injuries. Ms Ives, 28, is charged with causing or allowing the death of a child and cruelty to a child. She also denies the charges. Today, jurors at Mold Crown Court heard messages had been exchanged between Ethan's mother and social workers in the weeks prior to his death. Ms Ives had been informed by a Flintshire social worker that Ethan would need to be seen every ten days because he was placed on the child protection register on July 6. Jurors were shown CCTV footage of a visit to the house by a social worker on August 5, 2021. In evidence, DC Lee Harshey-Jones of North Wales Police's major incident team outlined phone messages between the Ives family. He told the jury that in one Shannon Ives had complained her son 'just won't listen, as usual'. DC Harshey-Jones was also questioned by the prosecutor about a text allegedly from Shannon Ives to a health visitor on August 13, 2021, claiming Ethan was 'really poorly, I can't leave him.' After this text, CCTV at the family home showed him placed in a car seat. The car was then seen at a retail park. The jury heard details of text messages sent by members of the Ives family to each other. In one, Kerry Ives claimed they had been called 'child beaters'. Kerry Ives also wrote in a message: 'I used to get hit every day by my mum and dad.' The jury were also shown footage of two older children being allowed to hit him on the head while his grandfather watched. It also showed another child put his foot on the two-year-old's head while they were on a trampoline and Mr Ives turn a hosepipe on him for eight seconds as he lay face down on the trampoline. Opening the case last week, prosecuting KC Caroline Rees told the jury that Ethan was two years and three months old when he died in a Liverpool hospital on August 16, 2021. 'Ethan, come on,' a male voice was heard saying during a 999 call to the ambulance service. The recording was played to the jury. His grandmother had claimed: 'He's been watching telly and fell to the floor. His body has gone all limp.' He was described as a quiet boy and, as a result of neglect, 'painfully thin.' The youngster's time at his grandparents' home was 'thoroughly miserable,' the KC alleged. 'He was targeted by the defendants as an object of abuse and neglect.' Ethan had collapsed at the family home on the night of August 14, 2021. The grandparents were in the room, the jury heard. A post-mortem examination showed Ethan had 40 different injuries on his body, including a swollen brain and numerous trauma injuries to his head and abdomen, the court heard. There were cuts, grazes and bruises, the prosecution said. Another doctor felt the combination of injuries was consistent with 'shaken baby syndrome.' A CT scan showed a significant bleed on the brain, the prosecutor said. The prosecutor alleged Ethan was 'shown vanishingly little care by Kerry and Shannon and experienced casual brutality'. The trial judge Mr Justice Griffiths told the jury: 'You must keep an open mind until the very end of the case.'
