Pro-Israel hackers destroy $90 million in Iran crypto exchange breach, analytics firm says
Iran's largest cryptocurrency exchange, Nobitex, was hacked for more than $90 million Wednesday, according to blockchain analytics firm Elliptic.
The funds were drained from platform wallets into addresses bearing anti-government messages explicitly referencing Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, or IRGC, pointing to a politically motivated cyberattack, Elliptic said.
Pro-Israel hacking group Gonjeshke Darande, or "Predatory Sparrow," claimed responsibility for the attack and said it would release the exchange's source code. Elliptic said the exchange was offline at the time of its post.
Predatory Sparrow also claimed credit for a separate cyberattack on Iran's state-owned Bank Sepah this week.
Fighting erupted between Israel and Iran on Friday and the countries have continued to trade missile fire. Iran supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei threatened the U.S. with "irreparable damage" Wednesday in response to President Donald Trump's demand that the country surrender.
Though the stolen assets have not been conclusively attributed to the group, Elliptic noted that the funds were sent to cryptographic addresses the hackers likely cannot control — suggesting the money was intentionally destroyed as a symbolic act rather than stolen for profit.
Elliptic's research linked the exchange to Iran's IRGC, a powerful branch of the military designated as a terrorist organization by the United States, United Kingdom, European Union, and Canada.
Past investigations have connected the platform to sanctioned IRGC-linked ransomware operatives and individuals close to Khamenei.
Blockchain data also shows activity between the Nobitex exchange and wallets associated with Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, and the Houthis.
Elliptic said it's continuing to monitor virtual asset flows tied to Iranian entities and has updated its compliance tools to reflect emerging threats in the region's crypto ecosystem.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
20 minutes ago
- The Hill
Iran mission to UN: No official has asked to ‘grovel' at White House gates
Iran's diplomatic envoy to the United Nations denied President Trump's claim Wednesday that Tehran has sought negotiations with the White House to end its conflict with Israel, blasting Trump as a 'has-been warmonger.' 'No Iranian official has ever asked to grovel at the gates of the White House,' Iran's mission to the U.N. posted Wednesday on the social platform X. 'Iran does NOT negotiate under duress, shall NOT accept peace under duress, and certainly NOT with a has-been warmonger clinging to relevance.' 'Iran shall respond to any threat with a counter-threat, and to any action with reciprocal measures,' the post added. Trump told reporters during an event at the White House shortly before the post that Iranian officials reached out to him because they 'want to negotiate.' 'They've suggested they come to the White House — that is courageous, but you know it is not easy for them to do,' the president said. 'I said, 'Why didn't you negotiate with me before all this death and destruction?'' 'We may meet; I don't know,' he added. The White House didn't immediately respond to The Hill's request for comment on the social media post from Iran's Mission to the U.N. Trump wouldn't elaborate on what's next as the U.S. reportedly weighs joining Israel's campaign to crush Iran's nuclear endeavors. 'I don't know how much longer it is going to go on; they are totally defenseless,' he said outside the White House. Israel's surprise strike on Iran's military and nuclear facilities Thursday derailed what was expected to be another round of negotiations over the weekend in the U.S.'s nuclear talks with Tehran. While the president has vowed to stop Iran Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's regime from developing a nuclear weapon, Iran maintains that its uranium enrichment program is for civilian purposes. Trump told reporters Wednesday that the U.S. had given Iran 60 days to hash out an agreement, but the deadline expired just before Israel took aim at its Middle Eastern adversary. 'Remember 60 days — 61 is going to become a very famous number,' he said. 'One helluva hit, that first hit.' 'Not sustainable to be honest; it ended on the first night,' he added.
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US Plans to Ease Capital Rule Limiting Banks Treasury Trades
(Bloomberg) -- The top US bank regulators plan to reduce a key capital buffer by up to 1.5 percentage points for the biggest lenders after concerns that it constrained their trading in the $29 trillion Treasuries market. Security Concerns Hit Some of the World's 'Most Livable Cities' JFK AirTrain Cuts Fares 50% This Summer to Lure Riders Off Roads How E-Scooters Conquered (Most of) Europe Taser-Maker Axon Triggers a NIMBY Backlash in its Hometown The Federal Reserve, Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency are focusing on what's known as the enhanced supplementary leverage ratio, according to people briefed on the discussions. This rule applies to the largest US banks, including JPMorgan Chase & Co., Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Morgan Stanley. The proposal would lower a bank holding company's capital requirement under the eSLR to a range of 3.5% to 4.5%, down from the current 5%, according to the people, who didn't want to be identified discussing nonpublic information. The firms' banking subsidiaries would also likely see their requirement reduced to the same range, down from the current 6%, the people said. The revisions resemble those from 2018, when President Donald Trump's regulators sought to 'tailor' the eSLR calculation that applied to US global systemically important banks, according to the people familiar with the matter. The people said the proposal's language could still change. The KBW Bank Index rose on Wednesday after Bloomberg's report and was up 2% at 1:13 p.m. in New York. Shares of JPMorgan climbed as much as 3%, while Wells Fargo rose as much as 2.9%. The proposal will look to change the overall ratio rather than exclude specific assets like Treasuries, as some observers had predicted. Still, it's expected to ask for public comment on whether the agencies should carve out Treasuries from the calculation, the people said. The Fed said Tuesday it plans to meet on June 25 to discuss the plan. On Wednesday, the FDIC said it will hold a June 26 meeting on the enhanced version of the SLR — which went into effect in 2018. Representatives for the Fed, FDIC and OCC declined to comment. Fed Chair Jerome Powell and other officials supported possible revisions to the supplementary leverage ratio standards in a bid to bolster banks' roles as intermediaries in the market. In February, he told the House Financial Services Committee that he had been 'somewhat concerned about the levels of liquidity in the Treasury market' for a long time. In April, President Donald Trump's tariffs rattled the markets, sharpening investors' focus on the SLR standards. The industry has said the rule, which requires large lenders to hold capital against their investments in Treasuries, crimps their ability to add to those securities in times of volatility, as they are treated in line with much riskier assets. The SLR's applicability to Treasuries was suspended during the Covid crisis, but it has since been reinstated. Leverage ratios are intended to act as a 'backstop' to risk-based capital requirements, Michelle Bowman, the Fed's vice chair for supervision, said earlier this month. 'When leverage ratios become the binding capital constraint at an excessive level, they can create market distortions,' she added. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has pointed to estimates that tweaking the rule could reduce Treasury yields by tens of basis points. Still, it's unclear whether easing the leverage ratio would encourage banks to buy more Treasuries, said Jeremy Kress, a former Fed bank-policy attorney who now teaches business law at the University of Michigan. 'When regulators temporarily excluded Treasuries from the leverage ratio in 2020, most banks chose not to take advantage of this exclusion because doing so would have triggered restrictions on their ability to pay dividends and buy back shares,' Kress said. 'This experience suggests that if banks get additional balance sheet capacity from leverage ratio changes, they're more likely to use it for capital distributions to shareholders rather than for Treasury market intermediation.' Graham Steele, another Fed alumnus who served as a Biden-era Treasury official, says there are more targeted solutions that could help the Treasury market issues. 'Unfortunately, the deregulation being contemplated won't remedy the situation; it will just make the financial system more fragile,' Steele said. --With assistance from Christopher Anstey. (Updates with share prices in fifth paragraph.) Ken Griffin on Trump, Harvard and Why Novice Investors Won't Beat the Pros Is Mark Cuban the Loudmouth Billionaire that Democrats Need for 2028? How a Tiny Middleman Could Access Two-Factor Login Codes From Tech Giants American Mid: Hampton Inn's Good-Enough Formula for World Domination The Spying Scandal Rocking the World of HR Software ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Says Iran Missed Chance of Deal, Stays Vague on US Strike
(Bloomberg) -- President Donald Trump said Iran squandered the chance to make a deal over its nuclear enrichment, but declined to say whether the US plans to join Israel's offensive aimed at destroying the program. Security Concerns Hit Some of the World's 'Most Livable Cities' JFK AirTrain Cuts Fares 50% This Summer to Lure Riders Off Roads How E-Scooters Conquered (Most of) Europe Taser-Maker Axon Triggers a NIMBY Backlash in its Hometown 'I may do it. I may not do it,' Trump told reporters Wednesday at the White House when asked if he is moving closer to bombing Iran. 'I mean, nobody knows what I'm going to do.' Iran had been in negotiations with the US over its nuclear program for weeks, and had a further meeting scheduled, when Israel attacked Friday. The two Mideast nations have since traded missile strikes and escalating rhetoric — Israeli leaders threatening to topple the Islamic Republic, and their Iranian counterparts vowing defiance and retaliation — while the Trump administration weighs how deeply to get involved in its ally's war. Trump's ambiguous comments add a new layer of tension to the deepening Israel-Iran clash. The president, who has campaigned for a decade in opposition to American wars in the Middle East, also faces a tense divide among his supporters over whether the US should enter the fray. America has so far limited its participation to helping Israel defend itself against Iranian missile and drone launches. Trump said he encouraged Benjamin Netanyahu in a call Tuesday to 'keep going' with his offensive operations, adding that he gave the Israeli premier no indication that US forces would participate in the attacks. But the US is seen as being able to provide military firepower necessary to destroy Iran's underground enrichment facility at Fordow, which analysts say Israel is unable to do alone. Iran has warned it can hit American bases across the region, where tens of thousands of troops are stationed, if the US joins the Israeli attack. Trump didn't close the door to a resumption of nuclear talks — he said Iran had sought a meeting, a claim Tehran disputed — but downplayed the likelihood they would bear fruit. 'I said it's very late to be talking,' the president said. 'There's a big difference between now and a week ago.' The comments were Trump's first substantive remarks since meeting Tuesday with his National Security Council, where the US's options were discussed. He spoke to reporters on the South Lawn of the White House, where workers were installing a giant flagpole outside the executive mansion's diplomatic entrance. Hours earlier he'd demanded 'UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER' from Iran in a social media post. Since Israel's strikes started, Iran has fired 400 ballistic missiles and hundreds of drones at Israel, killing 24 people and injuring more than 800, according to the Israeli government. At least 224 Iranians have been killed by Israel's attacks. Iran has hit targets including a key oil refinery in the port of Haifa that was forced to shut down. 'The Americans should know that the Iranian nation is not one to surrender,' Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said in a statement published on his official website Wednesday. 'Any military incursion by the United States will undoubtedly result in irreparable damage.' Out of Patience 'Good luck,' Trump said when asked for his response. 'We cannot let Iran get a nuclear weapon. I've been saying it for a long time. I mean it more now than I ever mentioned.' Dennis Ross, who served as President Bill Clinton's Middle East envoy and just returned from a trip to the region, said the Iranian regime is likely looking for an off-ramp from the current conflict despite the bellicose comments from Khamenei. Its top priority is survival, followed by avoiding a direct conflict with the US, said Ross, who's now a fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. 'When they feel profoundly threatened, they will make concessions. They certainly feel vulnerable and threatened right now.' Iran's missile and drone launches against Israel appeared to be subsiding Wednesday evening, although the reason wasn't immediately clear. While the Israeli army earlier said it had destroyed around one-third of Iran's missile launchers, Tehran still possesses thousands of ballistic missiles that can reach Israel, National Security Adviser Tzachi Hanegbi said Monday. Trump said the Iranian government had contacted the US about the conflict and even proposed a White House meeting to settle the matter, yet he said his patience with the Islamic Republic had 'already run out.' Iran's mission to the United Nations denied that claim in an X post Wednesday, saying 'No Iranian official has ever asked to grovel at the gates of the White House.' The question of whether to strike Iran has the potential to cause domestic political headaches for Trump, whose base is split between isolationists and traditional conservative interventionists. Supporters of both political parties oppose the US joining Israel's attack on Iran by clear majorities, a YouGov survey found. Trump said his bottom line remains that 'Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon' and 'it's not a question of anything else.' During his first term, Trump withdrew from an agreement aimed at curtailing Iran's atomic program, which the US and other world powers had spent years negotiating. Republican hawks have been supportive of military action against Iran, but Trump has faced pressure from some of his isolationist supporters to take a more measured approach. 'We have all been very vocal for days now urging, 'Let's be America First. Let's stay out,' Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene said Tuesday on CNN. During a breakfast Wednesday hosted by the Christian Science Monitor, longtime Trump ally Steve Bannon said Trump's supporters want him to focus on issues most important to his base, like cracking down on immigration. But Bannon said that if the president has more information that backs the case for intervention 'and makes that case to the American people, the MAGA movement will support President Trump.' Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, appearing before the Senate Armed Services Committee on Wednesday, declined to answer directly whether Trump had asked the Pentagon to provide options for striking Iran. Hegseth said that 'maximum force protection at all times is being maintained' for US troops stationed in the region, and said that 'the president has options and is informed of what those options might be, and what the ramifications of those options might be.' The US has continued building its military presence in the region. The USS Ford carrier strike group is set to depart next week on a regularly scheduled deployment, initially in the European theater, according to a US official. Meanwhile, the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency said the location of Iran's near-bomb-grade stockpile of enriched uranium cannot currently be verified. IAEA Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi said Wednesday the whereabouts of the material are now unclear, given Tehran warned him the stockpile could be moved in the event of an Israeli attack. The agency continues to see no indication of significant damage to Iran's Fordow nuclear site, he added. --With assistance from Skylar Woodhouse, Akayla Gardner, Courtney McBride and Eric Martin. (Updates with further details throughout.) Ken Griffin on Trump, Harvard and Why Novice Investors Won't Beat the Pros Is Mark Cuban the Loudmouth Billionaire that Democrats Need for 2028? How a Tiny Middleman Could Access Two-Factor Login Codes From Tech Giants American Mid: Hampton Inn's Good-Enough Formula for World Domination The Spying Scandal Rocking the World of HR Software ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
