Jersey: Hospital patients let down by Blue Islands' cancellations
David Thompson has a tumour on his right lung. He was travelling from Jersey to Southampton for a scan and biopsy to find out whether he has cancer when his flight was cancelled with less than an hour's notice.His flight was one of 29 between Jersey and Southampton which have been cancelled or delayed so far this year by Channel Islands airline Blue Islands.Mr Thompson said he managed to reschedule his medical appointments but was "fearful" it wouldn't be possible. He had cancer seven and a half years ago and said he knew with a disease like cancer "every day counts". Blue Islands said it was "truly sorry" a small number of patient hospital flights had been disrupted in recent weeks.
'Exception rather than norm'
A spokesperson from the airline said patient hospital travel was one of the most important services it provided for Jersey.The airline acknowledged the weekday morning flight from Jersey to Southampton was key to reaching hospital appointments.It said since the beginning of this year it had two cancellations on this service – one for technical reasons and one for crew sickness.Four more had been cancelled for weather reasons, the company said, and one when Jersey airport was closed due to a security alert.The airline said: "Although we know it will come as no consolation to those whose journeys and hospital visits were impacted, such events are the exception rather than the norm."
'Upset me a lot'
Jersey Hospital regularly sends patients to University Hospital Southampton for treatments it cannot provide on-island.When Mr Thompson's partner shared his experience with Blue Islands in a Facebook group, he was astonished by the number of people who replied with similar stories, dating back to 2018.Mr Thompson said it felt like the airline did not care.He said the cancellation cost him £140 in hotel and taxi costs, but what concerned him most was that he believed there were three other people on the flight due to have PET scans - for cancer diagnosis or monitoring.He said: "One of them was a really older gentleman so, for him, it would have been a hell of a long day. "When we were collecting the baggage from the baggage carousel, he shed a tear. "That upset me a lot."Mr Thompson is still waiting for the results of his PET scan and biopsy.
Four days after Mr Thompson's flight to Southampton was cancelled, Annette Jackson, travelling to get treatment for a degenerative eye condition, had a similar experience.She was booked on a 15:00 BST flight the afternoon before an appointment in Southampton when her flight was cancelled. She was put on a flight scheduled to leave three hours later, but it was delayed until 20:30 BST."I got to Southampton at 10 o'clock at night when I should have been there at 4 o'clock in the afternoon, very tired, very exhausted," she said.Mrs Jackson said Blue Islands claimed the flight was cancelled because of technical issues."They'd shoved us all on to the later flight, which was full and the same coming back," she said.Blue Islands said it did not cancel flights at the last minute due to passenger numbers.It said this not only impacted customers but came with significant financial costs.
'Very traumatic'
Mrs Jackson said it could be "very traumatic" to spend five hours in an airport because of her sight loss."Luckily, my husband was with me or else it would have been really bad because I can't see anything in bright light," she said.Mrs Jackson said she was "dreading" her next flight to the UK for another medical appointment in eight weeks' time.
The Jersey Consumer Council (JCC) said situations like this were "the tip of the iceberg" when it came to the way flight cancellations could impact people.Chairman Carl Walker said there had been growing problems in recent months, with increasing flight cancellations and postponements.As a result, the JCC has launched a survey for passengers to share their experiences of flying with Blue Islands. Mr Walker said UK and EU law meant passengers on UK and EU-based airlines could claim more than £200 compensation for cancellations, but equivalent law did not exist in the Channel Islands.He said because Blue Islands was a Channel Island airline, anybody using it was unprotected from a consumer perspective.Mr Walker said: "The government needs to change the law, it either needs to create its own compensation scheme for any airline based in the Channel Islands or it simply needs to try and extend the the UK Law to cover the Channel Islands."This really does need urgent attention."
'It isn't acceptable'
In 2020, Jersey's government loaned Blue Islands £10m to be paid back over six years.Part of this agreement was to help the airline keep providing islanders with "access to essential medical care".Mr Thompson said the government should be doing something to make sure people could rely on the service, and to make sure the money the health service spent on patient flights to Southampton was not wasted."It isn't acceptable," he said.He said: "It's not about me, it's about everybody who needs that treatment in Southampton, they deserve better than this... because in a lot of cases it can be the difference."The BBC has approached the Government of Jersey for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Channel 10 star Barry Du Bois reveals the emotional moment he was told he had 'three months to live' amid ongoing cancer battle
Barry Du Bois has revealed how he remains optimistic during his ongoing cancer battle. The former Living Room host, 63, penned an emotional essay for The Gold Coast Bulletin on Tuesday in which he opened up about his journey of trauma, depression and incurable cancer. The Sydney-born presenter revealed how each painful chapter has helped him develop the positive mindset that keeps him going today. 'I was sitting in a cold, unfamiliar consult room at the hospital, my wife's hand holding mine... Then a doctor who had known me for only a few hours looked me in the eye and told me I had three months to live,' he wrote. But instead of accepting that grim prognosis, Barry leaned on something far stronger - his own lived experience. From A-list scandals and red carpet mishaps to exclusive pictures and viral moments, subscribe to the DailyMail's new showbiz newsletter to stay in the loop. 'They were unaware I'd already been through things that break most people,' he added. From falling 14 metres off a roof and breaking his back, to enduring years of IVF heartbreak with wife Leonie - including a devastating miscarriage - Barry has known profound physical and emotional pain. He said he felt 'lost and empty' because 'anyone that loved me was being punished.' Two weeks after their miscarriage, Leonie was diagnosed with cervical cancer. And while she stayed strong during treatment, Barry spiralled into depression. 'I avoided conversation and started a continual negative conversation with myself that took me into the darkness… Depression is a lonely state and I refused to share my pain. I saw it as a weakness,' he wrote. But it was Leonie who helped him find his way back. Barry said his wife helped him find 'purpose, connection and a sense of belonging' again. He credits that period of reflection and emotional healing for giving him the strength to fight back when he was diagnosed with Plasmacytoma Myeloma - a rare and incurable cancer of the immune system - in 2017. Barry said his wife Leonie helped him find 'purpose, connection and a sense of belonging' again. Pictured Barry and Leonie with their twins Bennett and Arabella 'So when I got my diagnosis - incurable cancer, three months to live - I didn't fall apart... I knew that from leaning into the previous adversities of life I had the resilience to give the fight of my life.' He now focuses daily on the things he can control: Mindset, nutrition, movement and connection. It comes after Barry offered a heartfelt update amid his ongoing cancer battle. He took to social media in March to reflect on his years-long battle with Plasmacytoma Myeloma. In an emotional post, Barry shared a candid beachside photo of himself smiling and relaxed while sitting barefoot on the sand, dressed casually in a white t-shirt and matching white shorts. Alongside the image, Barry also posted a poignant photo of a blue surgical glove with the handwritten words: 'Just because you're struggling doesn't mean you're failing.'
The Sun
3 hours ago
- The Sun
More Brits developing cancer than ever before but survival rates have doubled since 70s
MORE Brits are developing cancer than ever before but we are twice as likely to survive the disease than patients in the 1970s, a report shows. Cancer Research UK studied 50 years of data and found tumour rates increased by nearly half – 48 per cent – between 1973 and 2023. 1 There are now 607 cases per 100,000 people per year, compared to 413 per 100,000 then. Cancer has become more common as people live longer and the risk rises with age, but cases are now increasing fastest in younger people. Scientists are investigating whether unhealthy lifestyles now are driving up the disease further. Meanwhile, treatment advances mean cancer is less deadly than ever, with the death rate tumbling from 328 per 100,000 to 252. The proportion of people who survive 10 years or more after diagnosis has doubled from 24 to 50 per cent. Michelle Mitchell, chief of Cancer Research UK, said: 'It's fantastic to see that thanks to research, cancer death rates have drastically reduced over the last 50 years, and survival has doubled. 'However, there is more that can be done. 'This report highlights that over 460 people die from cancer every day in the UK, and too many cases are diagnosed at a late stage. 'If we want to change that, we need bold action from the UK government and the upcoming National Cancer Plan for England must improve cancer survival and transform cancer services.' The Cancer in the UK report warned that there has been almost no improvement to early diagnosis in the past 10 years. If I had access to more information on breast health when I was younger, I may have caught my symptoms earlier Nearly half of cases are still diagnosed in the later stages three and four, when a cure is much less likely. CRUK said: 'The Government must make a concerted effort to reduce the number of people diagnosed with cancer at a later stage, with a focus on cancers that would lead to the greatest benefit in survival such as lung and bowel.' What does it mean to be 'in remission' after cancer? Hearing 'remission' after receiving cancer treatment is good news. Being 'in remission' after cancer means that there are no signs or symptoms of cancer detectable in the body with the use of scans or blood tests. The person show no signs directly related to the cancer either. It can be partial or complete - even with the latter, it does not mean the cancer is cured. 'Cured' is not a term doctors would like to use, because they cannot guarantee there are zero cancer cells in the body. Regular follow-up appointments and monitoring are essential to watch out for a possible return of the cancer. People might need to take medication to keep their cancer at bay, for example hormone treatments. Remission indicates that the cancer has responded to treatment and is currently under control. Partial remission: Some, but not all, signs and symptoms of cancer have disappeared. Complete remission: All signs and symptoms of cancer are gone, although this does not necessarily mean that the cancer has been cured.
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Experts reveal what's driving explosion in under 50s cancer cases - as landmark study shows 23 per cent surge since the 90s
Cancer deaths have fallen by more than a fifth over the past 50 years—but diagnoses have soared with cases in younger adults driving the trend, a landmark study reveals. Experts say the spike in diagnoses is being fuelled in part by lifestyle factors—including smoking, obesity and poor diet—which remain among the leading causes. The analysis, from Cancer Research UK, is the first to examine 50 years of NHS cancer data, revealing striking progress—but also alarming new trends. The data reveals that although survival rates have improved dramatically since the 1970s, the risk of developing cancer has risen just as sharply. In 1973, around 328 in every 100,000 people died from the disease. By 2023, that figure had fallen to 252—a 22 per cent drop—thanks to earlier diagnosis and better treatments. But over the same period, the number of people developing cancer has soared by almost 50 per cent. Incidence rates have climbed from 413 to 607 per 100,000 people, with some of the sharpest rises seen in under 50s. Among those aged 20 to 49, rates are up by 23 per cent since the early 1990s. Scientists are still trying to explore the factors behind the rise in early onset cancers, with some suggesting modern diets and exposure to substances like microplastics, or a combination of several triggers, could be to blame. Speaking this week at the American Society of Clinical Oncology conference in Chicago —the world's biggest cancer conference—experts also cautioned that poor lifestyle was likely the driving factor. Presenting research on the key factors influencing the surge in colon cancer cases among people in their 20s, 30s and 40s, Dr Jessica Paulus a senior director of research at Ontada, said obesity was far higher among early-onset patients than 'average age'. Of the 14,611 young patients tracked in the study, more than a third were obese at time of diagnosis. 'Interestingly, distress thermometer data also showed early-onset patients were more likely to report high or moderate distress' at time of diagnosis compared to older patients, she added. This thermometer is a tool health professionals ask patients to use to self-report feelings or issues, such as financial concerns, pain, fatigue and worry. But drinking, physical inactivity and poor diet too plays a 'huge' role too, Professor Neil Iyengar, an expert in breast oncology and the impact of lifestyle factors on cancer at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre in New York, said. He told MailOnline: 'The link between obesity and several forms of cancer is already well-established, but this data is mostly from older people. 'Obesity rates are accelerating in young people. 'But having too much fat—even if you have a normal body weight or body mass index—also increases the risk of developing cancer. 'It's never too early to start good eating and exercise patterns. 'We need to start thinking of some foods and high-sugar beverages in a similar way that we think about smoking: unnecessary, addictive, and harmful.' Other experts, however, cautioned that tobacco was likely not behind the rise in younger cancer cases. Professor Paul Pharoah, an expert in cancer epidemiology at Cedars-Sinai Medical Centre in Los Angeles told MailOnline: 'Incidence of the one major smoking related cancer, lung cancer, has come down in all age groups in men. 'In women, lung cancer incidence has fallen in younger women since 1990, but continues to increase in older women.' He added: 'Screening is also unlikely to be a cause of the difference between younger and older people, as the screening programmes implemented by the NHS since 1990 would be more likely to increase incidence in older individuals.' While cancer survival in England and Wales has doubled since the 1970s, progress has slowed sharply over the past decade. The report found that survival improved three to five times faster in earlier decades than it has since 2010. And despite the gains, the UK continues to lag behind comparable countries on key cancer outcomes. Late diagnosis remains a major issue. Only 54 per cent of cancers in England are diagnosed at stage one or two—the earliest phases, when tumours are usually small, haven't spread far, and are most treatable. That figure has barely improved in the last ten years. Cancer Research UK's chief executive, Michelle Mitchell, said: 'It's fantastic to see that thanks to research, cancer death rates have drastically reduced and survival has doubled. 'But more than 460 people are still dying from cancer every day in the UK. Too many cases are still being diagnosed too late.' The report also highlights the leading preventable causes of cancer. Smoking remains the biggest risk factor, but obesity—now linked to 13 different types of the disease—is rising rapidly. Other contributors include drinking, poor diet, sunbeds, lack of exercise and failure to protect skin from the sun. Cancer Research UK is urging the Government to act swiftly and decisively in its upcoming National Cancer Plan for England. It is calling for earlier diagnosis, faster access to tests, better GP referrals and a national lung cancer screening programme—arguing that these steps could save thousands of lives. Mitchell added: 'If this plan is done right, it could transform cancer care in this country and ensure people affected by cancer live longer, better lives.'
