
Beyond Trump's film tariffs: Is Hollywood really in decline? – DW – 05/27/2025
Fewer films are being made in the US. But will tariffs alone bring back productions to LA in the face of a more globalized industry?
When Donald Trump announced plans to impose a 100% tariff on any film "produced in foreign lands," a globalized US film industry began to panic.
Shares in major production companies like Netflix and Disney immediately fell due to an assumed rise in costs when productions can no longer profit from cheaper overseas locations.
In recent decades, American films and TV series have benefited from generous tax incentives for shooting in Europe, Canada or Australia, making Hollywood locations comparatively expensive.
At the same time, the film and content industry has become highly decentralized, with international co-productions able to share resources and access funding across multiple countries.
Trump pushes levy on foreign-made films
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Stars deride tariffs proposal in Cannes
While lacking detail about whether the tariffs will only apply to "movies" or also TV series, Trump's threat to heavily tax foreign content within the massive US market was widely criticized during last week's Cannes Film Festival.
American director Wes Anderson, in Cannes to launch his new film "The Phoenician Scheme," wondered how the tariffs could ever work when applied to intellectual property as opposed to physical goods.
"Can you hold up the movie in customs? It doesn't ship that way," the filmmaker said at a press conference.
Oscar-winning actor Robert De Niro, who accepted an honorary Palme d'Or in Cannes, said of Trump's film sanctions: "You can't put a price on creativity, but apparently you can put a tariff on it."
Meanwhile, Vivek Ranjan Agnihotri, an Indian actor, filmmaker and Bollywood star, said on social media that a 100% tariff on foreign movies could mean that "India's struggling film industry will collapse entirely."
Is Hollywood's decline overstated?
In a post on Truth Social announcing the film tariffs, Donald Trump claimed that "the movie industry in America is dying a very fast death."
On-location filming in Hollywood has declined around 34% in the last five years, according to Film LA, a film industry publication.
While many film workers have lost their jobs as a result, the slowdown isn't only due to incentives to shoot in foreign locations. The COVID-19 pandemic, a global economic downturn and a months-long strike by actors and writers in 2023 have also caused Hollywood to grind to a halt.
The actors' and writers' strikes of 2023 had a significant economic impact on Hollywood Image:As budgets tighten, films might not be made without co-productions that take advantage of incentives in foreign regions, says Stephen Luby, a lecturer in film at the Victorian College of the Arts in Australia.
"US productions which have taken advantage of tax incentives in places like Australia to make their films offshore, do so because the films are less expensive to make that way," he told DW. "Perhaps they may not get made without pursuing this pathway."
While actor-director Mel Gibson is helping to advise Trump on the tariffs and ways to "make Hollywood great again," his latest film, "The Resurrection of the Christ," will be shot in Rome and across southern Italy.
There is currently a slight US trade deficit in entertainment content, meaning more is imported than exported — $27.7 billion (€24.35 billion) versus $24.3 billion in 2023.
But according to Jean Chalaby, a professor of sociology at the University of London, this balance is driven by streamers like Netflix who do not officially export US-made content like "Stranger Things," but distribute it internationally via their own US-based platform.
Meanwhile, hit series like "Adolescence" and "Squid Game" that are acquired from overseas are counted as imports, even if they are US assets that earn Netflix "hundreds of millions of dollars" in subscription fees, Chalaby noted in an article for The Conversation.
"The US-based entertainment industry has never been so dominant globally," he added, despite the trade deficit.
The US also remains the world's largest film and TV exporter, even as Hollywood faces more competition from content hubs like South Korea.
"If implemented, these tariffs will certainly have far-reaching consequences for the film and TV industry," Chalaby concluded. "But they are unlikely to make anyone more prosperous."
'Squid Game' made a lot of money for US-based Netflix, yet much of the production was outsourced to South Korea Image: Yonhap/picture alliance
Tariffs could mark a content trade war
Sections of the local film industry support Trump's intention to bring productions back to the US, including the union representing actors, the Screen Actors Guild–American Federation of Television and Radio Artists.
So too the Motion Picture Association (MPA), a US film industry group that represents studios from Disney to Netflix, Paramount, Universal and Warner Bros, agrees that more content should be made in the US and supports the principle of tariffs. MPA wants to weaken the local content quotas and tax incentives that attract productions to other countries.
In February, when Trump announced his broader tariffs, he singled out protectionism in the EU film market, where US streamers are required to include at least 30% of European content in their programming within EU member states.
Under the EU's Audiovisual Media Services Directive, these states can also demand that the likes of Netflix and Disney be obliged to fund local productions — which the streaming giants have tried to avoid through legal action.
Others in Hollywood question Trump's tariffs logic, and his commitment.
"The tariff thing, that's not going to happen right? That man changes his mind 50 times," said US director Richard Linklater in Cannes at the opening of his film "Nouvelle Vague."
At that same press conference, the discussion surrounding Trump's tariffs led Zoey Deutch, who stars in Linklater's film that was shot in Paris, to praise Hollywood's history and culture: "It would be nice to make more movies in Los Angeles," she said, almost nostalgically. "I just finished doing a movie there and it was magical."
Edited by: Elizabeth Grenier
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


DW
3 hours ago
- DW
Mexico holds controversial vote to elect judges – DW – 06/02/2025
Mexico became the first nation in the world to hold an election for the judicial system. Turnout appeared to be low as many voters struggled to choose from hundreds of largely unknown candidates. Mexico held its first judicial elections Sunday, making it the only nation in the world to select judges and magistrates by popular vote. Supporters of the controversial election believe this is needed to overhaul its judicial system known for corruption and inefficiency. But critics say the vote will politicize the judiciary in a country plagued by crime and gang violence. President Claudia Sheinbaum has staunchly defended the decision to hold these elections. The elections were championed by her predecessor and mentor, former president Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador. "Those who want the regime of corruption and privileges in the judiciary to continue say this election is rigged. Or they also say it's so a political party can take over the Supreme Court. Nothing could be further from the truth," she said in a video message. Opponents of the vote marched in Mexico City, chanting slogans like "hands off our democracy" and "no to electoral fraud." "It was the last counterweight we had against the totalitarianism of the executive branch," 58-year-old Ismael Novela told AFP news agency about the judiciary. Tough task for voters Voters had to elect around 880 federal judges — including Supreme Court justices — as well as hundreds of local judges and magistrates. Another election for the remaining judicial positions will be held in 2027. Turnout appeared to be low as many voters struggled to choose from hundreds of largely unknown candidates. "We are not very prepared. I think we need more information," Lucia Calderon, a 63-year-old university teacher told AFP. Some voters said they felt pressurized to vote, while others said they felt disillusioned with the corrupt system. "I'm not interested (in voting). Parties and their messages — they come and they go. It's all the same," Raul Bernal, a factory worker told the AP news agency. Rights group Defensorxs said it considered around 20 candidates "high risk," including Silvia Delgado, a former lawyer for the Sinaloa Cartel co-founder Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman. Hundreds of thousands displaced by gang violence in Mexico To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Edited by: Srinivas Mazumdaru


DW
16 hours ago
- DW
Bangladesh: Exiled ex-PM Sheikh Hasina on trial – DW – 06/01/2025
Bangladeshi prosecutors have accused former leader Sheikh Hasina, who is currently in India, of "crimes against humanity" during last year's uprising against her rule. The trial against Bangladesh's former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina began in Dhaka on Sunday, with the fugitive former leader being accused of crimes against humanity. Hasina was ousted in a student-led uprising last year, with the nationwide unrest ending with her fleeing Bangladesh and finding refuge in neighboring India. She has since refused an extradition order to return to Dhaka. The trial against Hasina is being held in absentia by the International Crimes Tribunal (ICT). The officials are focusing on her government's crackdown against the protest movement, which marked the end of her 15-year rule. What did prosecutors say about Sheikh Hasina? "Upon scrutinising the evidence, we reached the conclusion that it was a coordinated, widespread and systematic attack," ICT chief prosecutor Mohammad Tajul Islam told the court in his opening speech. "The accused unleashed all law enforcement agencies and her armed party members to crush the uprising." Prosecutors have accused Hasina of directing the violent crackdown, including ordering the killing of student protester Abu Sayeed, the first to be killed during the uprising. The prosecution has listed five charges against Hasina and several other top officials from her government, including "abetment, incitement, complicity, facilitation, conspiracy, and failure to prevent mass murder during the July uprising." Islam said the charges amounted to "crimes against humanity." How has Sheikh Hasina responded to the charges? Hasina claims the charges against her are politically motivated. Her party, the Awami League, was banned pending the result of the trial. Bangladesh seeks India's extradition of ousted PM To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Islam vowed the trial would be impartial, saying: "This is not an act of vendetta but a commitment to the principle that, in a democratic country, there is no room for crimes against humanity." Sunday's trial also included ex-police chief Chowdhury Abdullah Al Mamun, who is in custody but was not in court on the opening day, and former Interior Minister Asaduzzaman Khan Kamal who is on the run, presumed to also be in India. The ICT was first set up by Hasina in 2009 to investigate crimes carried out by the Pakistani military during Bangladesh's war for independence in 1971. During her rule, Hasina allegedly used the ICT to eliminate politicial opponents, having sentenced several prominent rivals to death. Edited by: Darko Janjevic


Int'l Business Times
17 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Donald Trump Not Happy With Apple CEO Tim Cook's India iPhone Production Plan
Expressing his dismay at Apple CEO Tim Cook's plan to shift some of the iPhone production operations to India, US President Donald Trump categorically emphasised that he 'doesn't want this to happen'. The main Apple iPhone production is in China and there's a good reason for this as the tech giant mass produces its popular iOS models in the Asian country because of workers' manufacturing expertise, the supply chain infrastructure's efficiency, and cheaper labour costs. However, Tim Cook is now considering other countries because of the massive tariffs imposed by the Trump administration in China. According to Mashable SE Asia, Apple is planning to shift some of its iPhone manufacturing operations to India. People familiar with the matter even claimed that the initiative is already underway. Trump disappointed after learning about Tim Cook's plan. 'I had a little problem with Tim Cook,' said the American leader via CNBC. "I said to him, 'My friend, I treated you very good. You're coming here with $500 billion, but now I hear you're building all over India,'" added Trump. With US. tariffs remaining high, it seems like Trump doesn't give Tim Cook any other choice but to rely on India as an alternative. So what does POTUS want? Donald Trump said that he wants Apple to focus its iPhone production in the U.S. During the conference, he said that they treated Tim Cook and his giant firm really well. Trump added that they didn't interfere with Apple building manufacturing plants in China. The US president argued that the administration is not interested in India since it can take care of itself. Donald Trump also argued that India is one of the nations with the highest tariffs. He further stated that India is even willing to remove all tariffs on American products. In April, the White House's trade protectionist policies revealed that the Trump administration has imposed a 26% reciprocal tariff on Indian goods. But, this was temporarily lowered until July. Instead, POTUS wants Tim Cook to start manufacturing in the U.S. Apple has been designing its iPhones and other products in the U.S. However, the actual assemblies of its devices are outsourced to various manufacturers in China and other countries. Although the tech giant also produces in the U.S., it only manufactures very few products. Originally published on IBTimes UK Donald trump Tim cook Apple