
How digital wallets are powering financial inclusion and credit access
It was called M-Pesa, and it became a lifeline for many, especially women working in far-off towns and cities. At the time, there were no formal or affordable systems for sending money home. People had to rely on others traveling back to their villages with cash, a method that was risky and unreliable.
Vodafone, through its Kenyan subsidiary Safaricom, introduced a solution: a mobile wallet system. Every worker had a phone. Every family back home had one too. Using mobile SMS or a simple app, money could be transferred instantly. Family members could walk into a local shop (acting as an agent), show an ID, and withdraw cash. It was secure, fast, and didn't require a bank account.
Years later, this same model made its way to India, especially to cities with large migrant worker populations from rural areas. While Vodafone didn't pioneer mobile money in India, Airtel did with Airtel Money, and Vodafone followed with M-Paisa. Soon after, players like MobiKwik, Paytm, Freecharge, and later PhonePe entered the space.
For many Indians, especially in rural areas, these digital wallets became their first step into the formal financial system. Before that, sending money home often meant giving it to a co-worker or friend and hoping it arrived safely. Banks had little presence in remote geographies, and expanding there wasn't financially viable due to low transaction volumes.
As a result, a new kind of financial ecosystem began to emerge. What started as peer-to-peer money transfers evolved into wallets enabling merchant payments, utility bill payments, and even micro-credit, by linking debit or credit cards to digital platforms.
Today, nearly every adult owns a mobile phone. Teenagers, too, often have phones, given to them for education, safety, or communication. This widespread access has meant that even those who are illiterate or digitally inexperienced can make digital payments using simple apps or QR codes. Events like demonetisation in 2016 triggered a massive surge in digital wallet usage, as people scrambled to cope with the cash crunch. Later, during the COVID-19 pandemic, digital wallets and UPI became essential for contactless transactions, whether buying groceries or receiving wages.
What began as a workaround for limited banking access has now become a core pillar of India's digital economy, enabling financial inclusion on a scale the country had never seen before.
India is now one of the youngest nations in the world, with a massive population from Generation Z and Generation Alpha, many of whom will soon become credit-eligible. These digital natives have grown up using smartphones. For them, digital wallets and UPI have often been the first introduction to formal financial tools, laying the foundation for broader financial inclusion. Importantly, this digital adoption hasn't been limited to urban areas. Reports show that youth in deep rural geographies have also embraced digital payments, thanks to the accessibility and simplicity of platforms like UPI. Today, UPI is not just India's largest digital payment system, it also offers credit on UPI, expanding access even further.
Driving this transformation is India's 'Digital Trinity', Aadhaar, mobile phones, and Jan Dhan accounts, which has brought even small merchants into the digital economy. This ecosystem has rapidly accelerated the adoption of digital transactions across the country.
While India still faces challenges in infrastructure and access, it has leapfrogged in financial technology. From mobile wallets to real-time payments to credit on UPI, India has redefined what financial inclusion can look like, bringing millions into the formal economy in just a few short years.
Disclaimer: The information provided in this article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or professional advice. While every effort has been made to ensure accuracy, readers should verify details independently and consult relevant professionals before making financial decisions. The views expressed are based on current industry trends and regulatory frameworks, which may change over time. Neither the author nor the publisher is responsible for any decisions based on this content.
Sachin Seth,Chairman CRIF High Mark and Regional MD CRIF India & South Asia

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Perplexity wants Chrome. Here's why that could be great news for Google
Perplexity AI has reportedly made a $34.5 billion offer to buy Google Chrome. On paper, that sounds wild: a fast‑growing AI startup pitching for the world's most used web browser. In practice, it reflects a larger regulatory moment where Big Tech platforms are being challenged on how they tie browsers, search, ads, and data together. Chrome is not just a desktop icon. It is the default gateway to the internet for hundreds of millions here, the primary route to UPI payments, government services, education portals, OTT, and vernacular news. Any ownership change, even as a hypothetical, touches everyday digital life in India. Why Chrome is even part of this conversation In the United States, a landmark antitrust case found Google maintained an illegal monopoly in search. The court is now weighing remedies, and one option pushed by the Department of Justice is unusually tough: separating Chrome and its open‑source base, Chromium, from Alphabet. Europe has already forced structural changes under the DMA, including unbundling defaults and offering choice screens. India, too, via the CCI's 2022 Android ruling, pressed Google to loosen how search, browser, and Play services are tied, which led to some changes on Android phones sold here. Put simply, regulators across regions are probing the same pattern: when a company controls the browser, the search defaults, the ad stack, and the app store, the flywheel becomes hard for rivals to crack and harder for consumers to exit. Perplexity's reported bid slots into that global context. The company says it would keep the Chromium project healthy, which is essential because Chromium powers not just Chrome but also Microsoft Edge, Brave, Arc, and a long tail of Indian OEM browsers and in‑app web views. A credible steward must protect developer stability, security updates, and web standards. That is where the technical challenge lives. Chrome today is interlaced with Google layers like Safe Browsing, account sync, payments integration, autofill, WebView on Android, and privacy protections that ship on a tightly coordinated cadence. Unwinding or relicensing those parts without degrading safety or breaking websites is a non‑trivial job. Google argues this is precisely why a forced sale would harm users. Critics counter that concentration of control is the risk, and stewardship can be re‑architected. Also read Looking for a smartphone? To check mobile finder click here. If divestiture were ever ordered, it would move slowly, with appeals and interim arrangements. For Indian users and developers, three practical questions would dominate. First, security cadence. Chrome's rapid patch cycle protects billions from fresh exploits. Any owner must match that tempo, or CERT‑In and enterprise CISOs will not be amused. Second, defaults and data. Choice screens for search and services could expand further, giving Indian brands, language‑first startups, and public platforms a fairer shot at the default slot without hacks. Third, Android's WebView and OEM builds. Indian smartphone makers rely on Chromium for in‑app browsing and updates. Continuity here is non‑negotiable, especially for BFSI, government apps, and education platforms that lean on web tech to scale across price tiers. For now, this is a long shot. Google has shown no willingness to sell, and any remedy that drastic would be fought hard. The more immediate takeaway is strategic. AI‑native companies want a browser foothold because the browser is the front door to intent, context, and high‑frequency user sessions. That is where AI assistants live best. Whether Chrome changes hands or not, expect the browser to become the next battleground for AI overlays, summarisation, trusted shopping, and verified sources.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
IITian impressed by Gen Z candidate's sassy reply after not being selected: ‘One day I'll be sitting on top while you …'
The Recruiter's Post That Sparked a Debate The Candidate's Uncompromising Message Generational Reactions to the Boldness The Internet Weighs In Generation Z is rapidly proving that they are not a generation willing to remain silent in professional settings. With a reputation for speaking their minds openly, they challenge long-standing workplace norms and question traditional ideas about work-life balance, leadership, and career progression. Recently, one such unapologetically bold job seeker grabbed the internet's attention with a rejection response that was as fiery as it was Bid, the founder and CEO of the technology firm Coditas, shared an intriguing incident on LinkedIn. He posted a screenshot of an email he had received from a Gen Z applicant who was not selected for a role in his company. The message stood out not because it was bitter or defensive, but because of its sheer audacity and unwavering self-belief. Bid's post, tinged with amusement and admiration, highlighted the learning he felt he gained from younger the email, the candidate acknowledged the rejection but swiftly turned the conversation toward their belief that the company had overlooked their true potential. They asserted that the decision-makers had barely grasped their skills, determination, or the value they could bring to the organization. Instead of expressing disappointment, the candidate confidently declared that larger opportunities awaited them and that they would eventually secure a significant win—perhaps even within the same company, should it learn how to recognize exceptional response then escalated into a bold prediction: one day, they would rise to a position of power and might even be responsible for the exit of those who had dismissed them."I'm not here to beg for chances—I create them. And mark my words, one day I'll be sitting at the top while folks like you get shown the door," he candidate portrayed themselves as someone who doesn't plead for opportunities but actively creates them, positioning themselves as a lost asset for the organization—a 'gem' they believed the company had failed to his LinkedIn post, Bid also described how reactions to the candidate's message varied sharply depending on the age group. Among Baby Boomers and Generation X professionals, the dominant responses were surprise and, in some cases, irritation. Many seemed unsettled by the forthright tone and saw it as a breach of expected professional presented a mix of reactions. Some were as startled as the older generations, others showed empathy, and a few attributed the candidate's assertiveness to the influence of social media culture. Terms like 'entitlement' and 'disillusioned' surfaced, but so did acknowledgments of ambition and Z, unsurprisingly, largely rallied behind the candidate. Supporters praised the message as an expression of self-worth, motivation, and manifestation. Many felt it reflected the courage to challenge outdated recruitment attitudes and the refusal to shrink in the face of post quickly became a hotspot for debate, with the comments section turning into a forum for generational perspectives. Some users admired the candidate's conviction, even if it came across as abrasive. Others criticized the tone, arguing that confidence should be paired with commenter commended the self-belief but warned that a rejection handled with grace leaves a more lasting positive impression. Another suggested the response might stem from hurt pride rather than pure ambition, noting that some individuals hold themselves to such high standards that rejection feels personal. A few commenters pointed out that while the candidate's words brimmed with energy and ambition, they also carried hints of arrogance and dismissal toward the Bid holds a degree in computer science and Engineering from the prestigious IIT Bombay


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
82.5% rise in Bengal firms since 2011: Union govt data
1 2 Kolkata: The number of companies registered in Bengal has gone up 82.5% between 2011 and 2025, according to data from the Union ministry of corporate affairs. In 2011, there were 1,37,156 companies registered in the state. On March 31 this year, number of companies registered in the state stood at 2,50,343. The numbers were part of a reply by Harsh Malhotra, minister of state in the corporate affairs ministry, in response to a question by Trinamool's Mathurapur MP Bapi Haldar. According to the reply, companies with registered offices in Bengal in 2010 stood at 1,21,496. This rose to 1,37,156 the next year. Between 2019, when this number was 2,00,626, and 2020 (the Covid year), the number rose to 2,06,305. As of 31 March 2021, despite Covid constraints, it stood at 2,13,504. By 2022, this number climbed to 2,21,873, and then to 2,50,343 in 2025. The minister shared in an annexure that in 2020-21, 7,197 companies were incorporated in Bengal while 306 left. In 2021-22, 8,365 companies were incorporated and 273 left. In 2022-23, the numbers stood at 7,978 and 270, respectively, and the comparative figures in 2023-24 stood at 8,683 and 371. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Learn More - How Donating Sperm May Boost Your Income SpellRock Undo In 2024-2025, this stood at 8,353 and 366, and this year, till 31 July, 3,464 companies were incorporated and 156 left Bengal. You Can Also Check: Kolkata AQI | Weather in Kolkata | Bank Holidays in Kolkata | Public Holidays in Kolkata | Gold Rates Today in Kolkata | Silver Rates Today in Kolkata These numbers go against the narrative of industrial flight from Bengal. State industry minister Shashi Panja, in a statement on X, said, "A bitter pill for BJP to swallow! For years, they've run a one-sided smear campaign painting Bengal as 'industry-averse.' But now, data from their own ministry blows their lies to pieces." "In the last six years (up to 31 July 2025), 44,040 companies were incorporated in Bengal, while only 1,742 companies shifted their registered offices out of the state. Under CM Mamata Banerjee, Bengal has witnessed a wave of development the BJP can't match. So, they resort to peddling lies, half-truths, and propaganda to hide their own miserable record," it added. BJP's Amit Malviya, citing the numbers, on X wrote: "Registering an office is not the same as running a thriving industry. The real story is written in boarded-up factories, fleeing companies, collapsing investor confidence, and Bengal's plunge from industrial pride to economic cautionary tale under Mamata Banerjee." 'In last six years (up to 31 July 2025), 44,040 companies were incorporated in Bengal, while only 1,742 companies shifted their registered offices out of the state,' said Shashi Panja Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.