
Railways during Emergency: Trains on time, but veterans also recall long working hours
Amidst several bitter memories of 21 months of
Emergency in India
50 years ago, veteran railway employees recall mixed experiences during the period -- the praise received for trains running on time and the difficulty of long working hours with no avenues for grievance redressal.
Veteran trade union leader
Shiv Gopal Mishra
said that senior officers were held responsible for the delay in train services, and that's why there was a huge focus on punctuality.
"I remember an incident when some lower-level railway employees were suspended for lack of water in (the then Railway minister) Kamlapati Tripathi's saloon attached to the Kashi Vishwanath Express train. He used to perform puja in his private coach while travelling to Kashi, and during one of those days, water couldn't be pumped up, resulting in a lack of water in his coach," Mishra, who worked as a junior engineer at Lucknow station in 1977, said.
Play Video
Pause
Skip Backward
Skip Forward
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
30:13
Loaded
:
0.29%
00:00
Stream Type
LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
30:13
1x
Playback Rate
Chapters
Chapters
Descriptions
descriptions off
, selected
Captions
captions settings
, opens captions settings dialog
captions off
, selected
Audio Track
default
, selected
Picture-in-Picture
Fullscreen
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text
Color
White
Black
Red
Green
Blue
Yellow
Magenta
Cyan
Opacity
Opaque
Semi-Transparent
Text Background
Color
Black
White
Red
Green
Blue
Yellow
Magenta
Cyan
Opacity
Opaque
Semi-Transparent
Transparent
Caption Area Background
Color
Black
White
Red
Green
Blue
Yellow
Magenta
Cyan
Opacity
Transparent
Semi-Transparent
Opaque
Font Size
50%
75%
100%
125%
150%
175%
200%
300%
400%
Text Edge Style
None
Raised
Depressed
Uniform
Drop shadow
Font Family
Proportional Sans-Serif
Monospace Sans-Serif
Proportional Serif
Monospace Serif
Casual
Script
Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values
Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Ads By Google
Ad will close in 29
Skip ad in 4
Skip Ad
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Chuck Norris: If You're Over 60, Avoid These 3 Foods Like The Plague
Roundhouse Provisions
Watch Now
Undo
He added, "The rail administration suspended some lower-level workers for dereliction of duties. However, when the minister came to know about it, he immediately ordered the revocation of the suspension."
According to Mishra, in those days, instead of penalising lower-level officers, action was taken against senior officials for late running of trains, due to which it was ensured with more alacrity that all trains stick to their assigned time of arrival and departure.
Live Events
Mishra, presently the general secretary of
All India Railwaymen's Federation
, said, "Besides my official position in Railways, I was a branch assistant secretary of the workers' union too."
Cleanliness was also ensured, another retired railway employee, not willing to be quoted, said, adding that senior officers were asked to remain in the field for eight hours to keep a watch on the trains' working, stations and surrounding areas.
"They ensured cleanliness because they knew they would be the first in the firing line. There were nine railway zones at that time, which have now been increased to 17. Also, trains were not as crowded as they are today," he said.
"There was no corruption, so far as I remember, in the railways as officers were aware of severe action. Workers and senior officers were treated equally on the working hours front," he said.
Mishra also felt that corruption was at its lowest point in railways among senior officials during the Emergency days.
Retired loco pilot P Vijaykumar, who used to drive passenger trains in 1977, said that there were no fixed working hours for drivers and often they used to pilot trains for more than 14 to 16 hours and sometimes even 24 hours.
"We were not able to negotiate with the government, hold meetings or do anything to raise the workers' demand," Vijaykumar said, adding that before Emergency, there was an agreement with the government to give a 10-hour shift to loco pilots.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
27 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Midnight Hammer': What if US bombing on Iran's nuclear sites was effective - and that's the problem?
By striking three major nuclear facilities in Iran -- Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan -- US President Donald Trump may have delivered a "bold" military blow to Tehran's declared nuclear program. But analysts warn that this apparent tactical victory may come at a strategic cost- making it far more difficult to track what's left of Iran's nuclear activities and where they now lie. The US, in a midnight operation, targeted Iran's three key sites using B-2 bombers loaded with Massive Ordnance Penetrators (MOPs). Satellite images of Fordow show new craters and possible tunnel collapses, but no confirmed damage to the underground enrichment halls. Natanz suffered only partial damage to surface-level infrastructure during earlier Israeli raids, with the extent of US impact still unclear. The most visible destruction appears to be at Isfahan, though reports suggest Iran may have relocated uranium stockpiles ahead of the attacks. Trump hailed the operation as a 'spectacular military success,' saying the sites had been 'totally obliterated.' US defense secretary Pete Hegseth added that the strikes were focused and avoided civilian casualties. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Mannheim: GEERS sucht 700 Testhörer für Hörgeräte ohne Zuzahlung GEERS Undo However, the long-term consequences may be less about what was destroyed and more about what's now untraceable. Follow live updates on Iran-Israel crisis Fallout for nuclear monitoring The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), which previously conducted inspections at these sites, has now lost access to key materials and locations. The core mission of the IAEA is to meticulously track even gram-level quantities of uranium globally to prevent its diversion for nuclear weapons. However, according to Tariq Rauf, former head of the agency's nuclear verification policy, the recent airstrikes have significantly complicated efforts to monitor Iran's uranium stockpile. 'It will now be very difficult for the IAEA to establish a material balance for the nearly 9,000 kilograms of enriched uranium, especially the nearly 410 kilograms of 60% enriched uranium,' Bloomberg reported quoting Rauf. Moreover, inspectors, last week, admitted they had lost track of Iran's stockpile of highly enriched uranium, citing Israeli military operations as a key obstacle to their monitoring efforts. The uranium—previously verified by IAEA inspectors at the Isfahan facility—is sufficient to produce up to 10 nuclear warheads if processed at a covert location. Given its compact volume, small enough to fit into just 16 containers, experts believe the material may have already been relocated to an undisclosed site. What's left and what's next? Iran's nuclear capabilities are widely distributed across hardened facilities and backed by a workforce of thousands. Even if major sites are damaged, the infrastructure, expertise, and undeclared centrifuge stockpiles remain intact. "As for Iran's technical expertise, it cannot be destroyed, knowing that thousands of people have participated in Iran's nuclear programme," AFP quoted nuclear expert Heloise Fayet saying. While Iran is yet to respond militarily, experts suggest it may opt for a measured escalation — symbolic retaliation against Israel or Gulf targets, rather than directly drawing the US into a prolonged conflict.


Time of India
42 minutes ago
- Time of India
Iran-Israel war & US bombings: Should possible Strait of Hormuz closure worry India about its oil supply? Explained in 10 points
India's reliance on crude oil imports is at approximately 90%, with Middle Eastern nations supplying more than 40% of these imports. (AI image) Iran-Israel war & Strait of Hormuz: With escalating tensions between Iran and Israel, especially after the US bombed nuclear facilities in Iran earlier today, there are rising fears of the Strait of Hormuz being closed. The Strait of Hormuz is a crucial maritime passage handling 20% of global oil and gas transportation. According to state-run media, Iran's Parliament has approved the closure of Strait of Hormuz and the final decision will be taken by Iran's Supreme National Security Council. What will be the impact of the potential closure of the Strait of Hormuz? And importantly, how will India be hit? We take a look: Why is the Strait of Hormuz important? The Strait of Hormuz serves as a crucial maritime connection between the Persian Gulf and the Arabian Sea, extending into the Indian Ocean. This vital waterway, with its narrowest section at just 21 miles (33 kilometres), has Iran to the north and the Arabian Peninsula to the south. The navigable channels are considerably restricted, extending only two miles in either direction, which creates vulnerability to potential blockades and hostile actions. The Strait of Hormuz holds immense strategic and economic significance, particularly as a mandatory route for oil vessels departing from Persian Gulf ports. This maritime passage facilitates the transportation of one-fifth of global oil and gas supplies. Statistics from the US Energy Information Administration (EIA) indicate that in 2024, the daily transport volume reached 20.3 million barrels of oil and 290 million cubic metres of LNG. The major oil-producing nations of the region - Saudi Arabia, Iraq, UAE, Qatar, Iran, and Kuwait - rely on this passage for their exports. Whilst historical concerns about disruptions to Persian Gulf energy flows majorly affected Western nations, particularly the US and Europe, in today's situation the implications would most significantly impact China and Asian countries. Based on EIA data quoted by PTI, Asian nations received 8% of crude oil and condensate shipments through the Strait of Hormuz in 2022. India, China, Japan, and South Korea collectively made up 67% of total flows during 2022 and the firstl six months of 2023. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Cuối cùng, chơi miễn phí game chiến thuật hay nhất 2025! Sea of Conquest Phát ngay Undo Also Read | 'Highest in two years': India increases oil imports from Russia, US amidst Iran-Israel war; why it's about strategic positioning, not panic India's reliance on crude oil imports is at approximately 90%, with Middle Eastern nations, whose exports pass through the Strait of Hormuz, supplying more than 40% of these imports. EIA reports indicate that during the first quarter of 2025, China's crude imports via the Strait of Hormuz reached 5.4 million bpd. India received 2.1 million bpd, whilst South Korea and Japan imported 1.7 million bpd and 1.6 million bpd respectively. The IEA has emphasised that any interference with the flow through the Strait would significantly impact global oil markets. How will the closure of Strait of Hormuz impact India? India imports 5.5 million barrels per day (bpd) of crude oil, with 2 million bpd passing through this strategic waterway. However, experts suggest that India's position remains secure due to its diversified import strategy, with alternative suppliers including Russia, the United States and Brazil available to maintain supply continuity. The Russian oil supply remains unaffected by Hormuz-related disruptions, as it uses alternative routes including the Suez Canal, Cape of Good Hope, or Pacific Ocean pathways. Similarly, supplies from the US, West Africa, and Latin America, though more expensive, serve as viable alternatives. Regarding gas supplies, India's primary supplier Qatar delivers without using the Strait of Hormuz for Indian shipments. Additional LNG sources from Australia, Russia and the US remain accessible regardless of any Strait of Hormuz closure . However, analysts predict that increasing tensions in this significant energy supply region could cause short-term price fluctuations, potentially pushing oil prices towards $80 per barrel. India relies on imports for 90% of its crude oil requirements and sources approximately half of its natural gas from international markets. The imported crude oil undergoes refining to produce petrol and diesel, while natural gas serves multiple purposes including power generation, fertiliser production, CNG for vehicles, and domestic cooking gas supply. India obtains approximately 40% of its oil requirements from Middle Eastern countries including Iraq, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Kuwait, with shipments travelling through the Strait of Hormuz. Russia has become a significant oil supplier to India, with current imports exceeding the total imports from Middle Eastern nations. According to preliminary trade data from Kpler, Indian refineries imported 2-2.2 million bpd of Russian crude oil in June, surpassing the combined imports of about 2 million bpd from Iraq, Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Kuwait, marking the highest level in two years. Additionally, imports from the United States increased to 439,000 bpd in June, showing substantial growth from 280,000 bpd in the previous month. Although current supplies remain stable, vessel movements indicate a reduction in crude loadings from the Middle East in the forthcoming period. Vessel operators are showing reluctance to dispatch empty tankers (ballasters) to the Gulf, with numbers decreasing from 69 to 40, whilst MEG-bound signals from the Gulf of Oman have reduced by half. Kpler reports quoted by PTI indicate potential tightening of MEG supplies in the immediate future, possibly necessitating adjustments to India's procurement strategy, noting significant changes in India's import patterns over the past two years. In the event of escalating tensions or temporary Hormuz disruptions, Russian oil supplies could increase, providing both availability and cost advantages. India has options to diversify its oil imports from the United States, Nigeria, Angola, and Brazil, despite higher transportation expenses. On June 13, Oil Minister Hardeep Singh Puri confirmed India's sufficient energy reserves for upcoming months, with capability to access alternative sources if needed. India can utilise its strategic petroleum reserves, which cover 9-10 days of imports, to manage any supply gaps. To control inflation during price surges, particularly for diesel and LPG, the government maintains the option of implementing price subsidies. Will oil prices rise? Global oil prices saw a sharp increase after Israel launched attacks targeting Iranian military commanders, homes, military installations and nuclear facilities on June 13. Iran retaliated by firing numerous ballistic missiles. This heightened tension caused oil prices to rise substantially, as concerns grew about geopolitical instability and potential supply chain disruptions. The benchmark Brent crude oil has reached $77 per barrel, marking a 10 per cent increase since the onset of hostilities. According to oil market specialists at Goldman Sachs, prices could potentially rise beyond $90 should the situation deteriorate further. Citigroup analysts project that Brent crude values might approach $90 per barrel in the event of a closure of the Strait of Hormuz. The credit rating organisation Icra indicated that any intensification of regional tensions could have considerable effects on oil prices. Higher oil prices would reduce the profits that state-owned retailers IOC, BPCL and HPCL have built up by maintaining stable retail prices despite previous decreases in international rates. Also Read | Iran-Israel conflict: India keeping tab on Chabahar Port, International North-South Transport Corridor; why it's important According to Jain of Yes Securities, oil markets remain adequately supplied, supported by OPEC's 4 million barrels per day spare capacity and a pre-conflict global surplus of 0.9 million bpd. Additional stability comes from US shale production. Global security analysts deem an extended blockage of the Strait of Hormuz unlikely, given the US naval forces in the region. Any such action by Iran would not only impact the oil exports of Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Kuwait and Qatar but would also hamper its own export capabilities. Despite aggressive rhetoric from Iranian conservatives and state media predictions of oil prices reaching $400 per barrel, the international trade analysis organisation Kpler suggests the probability of a complete blockade remains minimal, citing significant deterrents for Iran. Such an action would severely affect China, Iran's primary oil buyer, which sources 47 per cent of its maritime crude imports from the Middle East Gulf region. As the world's second-largest economy, China stands as the principal purchaser of Iranian oil, reportedly consuming more than three-quarters of Iran's oil exports. The fact that Iran relies heavily on the Strait of Hormuz for its oil shipments through Kharg Island, which manages 96% of its exports, makes any self-imposed blockade counterproductive to its interests. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Gulf states on high alert after US strikes Iran's nuclear sites
Gulf states, home to multiple U.S. military bases, were on high alert on Sunday with their leaders calling on all parties to exercise maximum restraint following U.S. strikes on Iran that raised the possibility of a wider conflict in the region. President Donald Trump said U.S. forces "obliterated" Iran's main nuclear sites with massive bunker-busting bombs in the early hours of Sunday, joining an Israeli assault in a significant new escalation. Gulf leaders including the United Arab Emirates president, the Emir of Qatar and the Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia, who had all hosted Trump last month for a tour of the region, discussed the serious implications of the escalation for international and regional security, the UAE state news agency reported. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like If You Eat Ginger Everyday for 1 Month This is What Happens Tips and Tricks Undo Saudi Arabia, the world's largest oil exporter, was on a high-security alert after the U.S. strikes, two sources with knowledge of the matter told Reuters on Sunday, while Bahrain urged motorists to avoid main roads. Kuwait, another key oil exporter, said its defence council would remain in permanent session, according to the state news agency on Sunday, and set up shelters in a ministries complex. Live Events Tehran has previously warned that if it were attacked by the United States, it could target American assets in the region, including U.S. military bases. The country's parliament approved the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, through which around 20% of global oil and gas demand flows, according to Iran's Press TV, but a final decision rests with the Iranian Supreme National Security Council. Bahrain is home to the headquarters of the U.S. Navy's 5th Fleet and there are U.S. bases in Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, as well as in neighbouring Qatar and the UAE. Nuclear authorities in Saudi Arabia and the UAE said they had not detected signs of nuclear contamination following the strikes in Iran. "While the war has so far been contained in direct hostilities between Israel and Iran, direct U.S. involvement is a critical threshold that risks dragging the Gulf states, notably Bahrain, Kuwait and Qatar, which host large U.S. military facilities, into the conflict," said Hasan Al Hasan, a senior fellow for Middle East Policy at the International Institute for Strategic Studies. He said the risk of an open conflict between the U.S. and Iran could plunge the region into a devastating and potentially protracted conflict. The U.S. strikes added to airline woes with Singapore Airlines cancelling flights from Singapore to Dubai on Sunday and British Airways cancelling flights to and from Dubai and Doha. Airlines have been avoiding flying over large parts of the Middle East, including Iran, Iraq, Syria and Israel, due to ongoing missile exchanges. "In light of recent developments in the regional security situation, we urge citizens and residents to use main roads only when necessary to maintain public safety and to allow the relevant authorities to use the roads efficiently," Bahrain's interior ministry said on X. Bahrain also told 70% of its government employees to work from home on Sunday until further notice, citing escalating tensions, according to the Civil Service Bureau. The country's authorities earlier this week said they had activated a national plan to prepare for emergencies, set up an emergency centre and tested warning sirens. Local media also reported that Bahrain had set up 33 shelters.