logo
Why These Investment Firms Bet $400 Million On A Chinese Ozempic Rival

Why These Investment Firms Bet $400 Million On A Chinese Ozempic Rival

Forbes12-04-2025

Serial Salesman: Kailera CEO Ron Renaud has built and sold three biotechs, the last for $8.7 billion. 'Companies get bought, they don't get sold,' he says. But the obesity market's frenzy could make Kailera a prime acquisition target.
In the summer of 2023, Dr. Amir Zamani, a 42-year-old Johns Hopkins–trained physician who is a partner on Bain Capital's life sciences team in Boston, was obsessed with obesity drugs. Ozempic, the blockbuster injectable for type 2 diabetes from Novo Nordisk, was taking America by storm, on pace to generate some $14 billion in revenue that year for the Danish pharmaceutical giant. Eli Lilly was nearing FDA approval for its similar weight loss drug, Zepbound. Zamani eagerly wanted to find a competitor. He'd been reading the early research for two years and spent months digging through reams of data from dozens of companies. Then he struck gold in an unexpected place: the portfolio of Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals, one of China's biggest pharmaceutical companies.
Showcased in the early clinical data before him was a potential next-generation injectable weight loss therapy that, like Ozempic and Zepbound, targeted the blood sugar and appetite regulating hormone GLP-1. 'It was like, 'Wait a second, they're ahead of everybody else who's not Novo or Lilly,' ' he says.
Results from Phase II clinical trials in China ultimately showed 59% of participants lost 20% or more of their body weight on an eight-milligram dose of the drug in 36 weeks, and side effects were mild. If those results hold, the drug could be especially useful for severely obese patients who need to lose more weight than they can on currently available medications.
Better yet, it was available to license. 'We said, 'Gosh, this looks like it's really a best-in-class therapy,' ' Zamani recalls, noting that the port­folio also included three other drugs, two of them more easily administered pills. 'Then we got very serious.'
It used to be that Chinese drug development was largely about creating 'me too' drugs for the local market. But over the past 10 years, with Beijing focused on building a native biotech industry, U.S.-trained Chinese scientists returned home and started innovating instead of mimic­king. A January report by Stifel analyst Tim Opler noted that nearly one-third of molecules sourced by major pharmaceutical companies through licensing deals are coming from China. American outfits have spent $8.1 billion on upfront payments for Chinese drugs between 2020 and 2024, compared to $536 million in the preceding five years, according to biopharma deals database DealForma. While U.S. regulations have cracked down on investment in Chinese companies, there are minimal restrictions on U.S. companies buying or licensing pharmaceutical assets created there. 'When new biology hits or new sets of targets become proven, then suddenly everyone who wants one of those just goes shopping in China,' says Jory Bell, a general partner at VC firm Playground Global.
From HIV to GLP-1: John Milligan, Gilead's former CEO and Kailera's chairman, has been amazed by studies showing obesity drugs' benefits beyond weight loss. 'It shows how important metabolic health is to longevity,' he says.
Zamani wasted no time with the obesity drug, quickly partnering with Cambridge, Massachusetts–based VC shop Atlas Venture and New York's RTW Investments. The three firms inves­ted $400 million to spin up Kailera Therapeutics in October, launching with a license for the four Hengrui therapies and a plan to shepherd them to market. Having a ready-made portfolio of four drugs should allow Kailera to move fast in a space that has become extremely competitive since Ozempic became a household name. Global sales of the category ballooned 50% last year, to $36 billion, and could more than triple again, to $131 billion, by 2028, according to Durham, North Carolina–based research firm Iqvia Institute for Human Data Science.
To run Kailera, the investors hired an all-star: Ron Renaud, a 56-year-old former biotech stock analyst with a nearly unequaled track record of building biotech startups and then selling them for big profits. Over the past decade, Renaud has run and sold three companies—Idenix (focused on hepatitis C), Translate Bio (an mRNA therapeutics company) and Cerevel (centered on neurological diseases)—for a total of $16 billion.
'We have probably the most advanced, diverse, late-stage pipeline that is focused exclusively on weight management, outside of Big Pharma,' he says.
By going to China, Kailera skipped years of research and lab work. Renaud now plans to move aggressively with Phase III clinical trials in the U.S. for that first drug in hopes of bringing it to market by 2030 if not sooner. That might sound a long way off, but in the scheme of drug development and approval, it's lightning-fast, thanks to Hengrui's early work. If all goes well, Kailera's first drug should launch ahead of competitors that are now doing early- and mid-stage clinical trials. And the fact that Kailera's licensing deal with Hengrui includes two drugs that can be taken orally is a potentially huge advantage in a market currently dominated by injectable drugs. Pills are such a big deal that Lilly had stockpiled some $550 million worth of its oral GLP-1 weight loss drug orforglipron at year end despite not having FDA approval. Pills, after all, are not only less intimidating for patients but also cost far less to produce and distribute.
Some 40% of American adults are obese. That means there is currently a pool of more than 100 million people who could qualify medically for one of Kailera's therapeutics. And that, Renaud says, is before you account for a rising obesity rate, the global market beyond the States or the potential for these drugs to treat related conditions, including cardiovascular disease and even some cancers. 'That is an incredible market opportunity,' he says. 'That's not going to be addressed by a single drug, or two, or three.'
Patrick welsh for forbes
By John Buckingham
Zimmer Biomet, which specializes in orthopedic implants for hips, knees, feet, ankles, shoulders and other surgical implants, has been facing investor concerns about the potential impact of GLP-1 drugs (such as Ozempic), which have the potential to make a dent in global obesity rates. The thought is that lower body mass indexes could result in fewer joint-related surgeries. ZBH CEO Ivan Tornos claims the opposite is true. Lower rates of obesity will actually be a boost for Zimmer considering that damaged cartilage, osteoarthritis and other joint issues are typically irreversible, and thinner people will want to be more mobile. ZBH should be trading for more than its current forward P/E ratio of 14, given healthy bottom-line growth expected for the foreseeable future and a historic average P/E in the mid-20s.
John Buckingham is a portfolio manager and editor of The PrudentSpeculator
'I don't know how you make decisions about medicines unless you understand things at the low level, and Ron was that person—he always understood his business down to the low level,' says John Milligan, the former CEO of Gilead Sciences, who is now Kailera's chairman. (The two first met in the early 2000s when Milligan was Gilead's CFO and Renaud was a biotech analyst who refused to put a 'buy' on the then-high-flying stock.)
For Kailera, the next step is getting its first drug ready to go through FDA approval while building out research and manufacturing in the U.S. Large-scale clinical trials like those required for weight loss drugs cost a fortune, and Kailera will need to raise funds, almost certainly hundreds of millions, to cover the expense. While Renaud won't talk about what the company might be worth, PitchBook says it was valued at $595 million at its initial funding. Early-stage publicly traded obesity biotechs Metsera and Viking Therapeutics sport market caps in the $3 billion range.
In October, Renaud hired Scott Wasserman, who served as Amgen's first cardiologist and built its cardiovascular and metabolic portfolios, as its chief medical officer. Then, in January, he brought on one of the country's top obesity drug marketers as his chief commercial officer: Jamie Coleman. Her prior gig? Repping Zepbound for Lilly.
Chairman Milligan figures the obesity field is far larger than those of HIV and hepatitis C when he was leading Gilead, which had a recent market cap of $133 billion. 'We can build a substantial company if we can raise enough capital and fend off acquisitions, which is hard to do in this industry,' he says. If it can't, Kailera may go the way of Renaud's previous efforts and wind up being sold to one of the major pharmaceutical firms, adding a fourth notch to his belt and potentially billions of dollars more in upside.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sanofi (SNY) Stock Down 5% Despite AERIFY-1 Success
Sanofi (SNY) Stock Down 5% Despite AERIFY-1 Success

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Sanofi (SNY) Stock Down 5% Despite AERIFY-1 Success

Sanofi (NASDAQ:SNY)'s shares fell 5% this week, even as the company announced positive results from its AERIFY-1 trial with Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, marking a significant advance in COPD treatment. This decline comes in contrast to a 2% rise in the broader market, suggesting that investors may be focusing on other company initiatives, such as SNY's recent partnership with Stagecoach Performing Arts to raise awareness about Type 1 diabetes. Despite the short-term drop, Sanofi (NASDAQ:SNY)'s long-term performance remains strong. Over the past five years, the company has delivered a total return of 19.59%, outpacing both the French Pharmaceuticals sector and the broader market, which saw declines of 4% and 4.5% respectively in the past year. Analysts remain optimistic about Sanofi (NASDAQ:SNY)'s future, with the current share price at €95.9 and a consensus target of €117.17, an 18.5% potential upside. The company's Projections for 2028 include revenues of €51.2 billion and earnings of €10.2 billion, supported by innovative drug development and efficient operations. While we acknowledge the potential of SNY as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: and Disclosure: None.

Here's How CBDC Fears Are Fueling Bitcoin's Surge
Here's How CBDC Fears Are Fueling Bitcoin's Surge

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Here's How CBDC Fears Are Fueling Bitcoin's Surge

Chatter about state-run digital money is nudging capital toward Bitcoin. China is extensively testing digital currencies, whereas the U.S. is not. Investors betting on perpetual fear driving prices up should temper their expectations. 10 stocks we like better than Bitcoin › The Y2K bug never melted the global grid, yet the panic-buying of flashlights and canned beans in the last months of 1999 was very real. Today, central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) could be playing a similar role in a different fear cycle. CBDCs are digital currencies issued and controlled by a central bank, combining the convenience of digital money with the potential for state oversight of transactions. Talk of state-issued, fully traceable (and controllable) digital money has some investors looking for a lifeboat, and the main beneficiary this time could be Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC). If you think a large and fearful capital flight to Bitcoin driven by CBDCs is improbable in the near term, you aren't wrong. Nonetheless, it's undeniable that a centralized and government-controlled digital currency could threaten financial privacy in a way that encourages certain investors to hold their funds in another form. There's already some evidence that at least a few people are buying Bitcoin for this reason. Let's dig in and understand this trend a bit more so that you'll be prepared if it continues to take off. China's recent push to expand its digital yuan pilot projects is both a technical experiment and a catalyst for Chinese investors seeking to safeguard their financial privacy by seeking alternative currencies like Bitcoin. It's also a good example of how capital can behave in a way that's beneficial to Bitcoin when central bankers start to posture regarding implementing CBDCs. On April 23, the People's Bank of China urged state-owned enterprises to prioritize using the yuan for cross-border payments; the digital yuan is likely going to be promoted next. That move sent a clear message: The Chinese government is accelerating control over money and its flows, thereby spurring underground over-the-counter (OTC) purchasing of Bitcoin in cities like Shenzhen and Shanghai as investors scrambled to move capital offshore. The dynamic echoes early 2023, when the start of one of China's digital yuan pilot programs coincided with a 72% surge in Bitcoin's price from January to April, reflecting a classic flight to a perceived safe asset. With around 94% of central banks now exploring CBDCs, according to data from the Bank of International Settlements, the same impulse that's driving Chinese investors to Bitcoin could very easily spread internationally. In the U.S., CBDC conversations are a mix of cautious exploration and staunch political resistance. The Federal Reserve's research into a digital dollar is ongoing. Yet on Capitol Hill, resistance is mounting. A bill reintroduced in late February seeks to bar the Fed from issuing a CBDC. Furthermore, President Donald Trump's executive order on Jan. 28 bans a "digital dollar" outright, but that could actually spur CBDCs in other countries, as they'll be free to establish any norms they prefer for the currency category. So, U.S. investors aren't exactly afraid of a new CBDC threatening their privacy or control over their funds. However, they could still capture the upside from investors in other countries buying Bitcoin to evade their nations' CBDCs. At the moment, capital flight into Bitcoin as a result of CBDCs is a trend that's just starting to pick up. Still, it's important to keep expectations in check here. Bitcoin probably can't ever replace fiat currencies completely, whether they're digitized or not. Bitcoin's supply is famously capped at 21 million coins. That scarcity can support price strength until the cows come home. But there are many technical hurdles to using Bitcoin as an actual currency rather than merely as a store of value. Everyday transactions are far too slow or too costly to be competitive with cash, even on throughput-specialized side chains like the Lightning network. So while the CBDC debate may push Bitcoin higher to the extent it persists and intensifies, don't expect a one-way rocket ride. Investors can count on a tailwind here as long as privacy fears persist. Still, there's no wholly new reason to invest in Bitcoin any more than you're already doing, unless you want to avoid using a CBDC in the future. Before you buy stock in Bitcoin, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Bitcoin wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $668,538!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $869,841!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 789% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 Alex Carchidi has positions in Bitcoin. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Bitcoin. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Here's How CBDC Fears Are Fueling Bitcoin's Surge was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

3 Terrible Companies To Lose $5 Billion in Federal Green Energy Loans
3 Terrible Companies To Lose $5 Billion in Federal Green Energy Loans

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

3 Terrible Companies To Lose $5 Billion in Federal Green Energy Loans

In the last days of the Biden administration, the Energy Department dolled out billions of dollars for politically favored green energy projects. The Trump administration is looking to claw this funding back. The Energy Department is getting ready to "cancel seven major loans and loan guarantees that had been conditionally approved under the Biden administration," reports Semafor. This action will cancel approximately $5 billion worth of funding for a transmission project by a New Jersey utility company, a loan program for low-income homeowners to install rooftop solar panels by Sunnova, and a Monolith Nebraska factory to produce low-carbon ammonia. The remaining four projects, which collectively received over $3 billion, include three battery factories and a plastics and recycling facility, which "were already previously cancelled by their companies because of other various headwinds," according to Semafor. The three active projects that will have their federal loans axed have faced their own share of problems. In September 2023, Sunnova received a $3 billion partial loan guarantee from the Energy Department's Loan Programs Office (LPO) for Project Hestia—a program that would make residential rooftop solar, battery storage, and virtual power plants "available to more American homeowners." Hestia was expected to provide loans to as many as 115,000 homeowners in the United States and Puerto Rico for these technologies, while creating "3,400 good-paying, high-quality American jobs." After receiving the federal loan, Sunnova came under fire for its alleged history of predatory practices and scamming elderly clients, which led to subsequent congressional scrutiny. In April, Sunnova began filing for bankruptcy. The company recently said it was no longer planning to use the programming funding and was working with the Energy Department to return the remaining guarantees. Monolith received a $953 million conditional loan guarantee from the LPO to accelerate its clean hydrogen and carbon utilization project in Nebraska. The company, which has received backing from BlackRock and NextEra Energy and was valued at over $1 billion in 2022, creates hydrogen fuel with renewable energy (which can be used to make ammonia in fertilizers) and carbon black. Despite the federal funding and private sector support, The Wall Street Journal reported in September 2024 that the company was "running short on cash and facing project delays." The third project facing the ax is New Jersey's Clean Energy Corridor, "a project to upgrade and expand transmission infrastructure to accommodate planned generation in New Jersey to meet growing electricity demand." Run by Jersey Central Power & Light Company, the project received a conditional loan guarantee of up to $716 million in January to support the state's goal of "introducing 11,000 MW of offshore wind-generated electricity by 2035." When First Energy, which owns Jersey Central, first announced the project in 2022, Danish energy company Orsted was planning two large wind projects off New Jersey's coast. The projects were canceled in 2023. Another New Jersey offshore wind project was recently halted after the Environmental Protection Agency rescinded the project's environmental permits. Despite these project cancellations and the LPO's history of questionable and risky investments, it does not appear that the office is going away soon; Energy Secretary Chris Wright recently told lawmakers that his agency would use the LPO to advance nuclear energy projects. Assuming Wright fully cuts billions of dollars worth of wasteful projects and narrows the agency's scope to only fund nuclear power projects, it's possible that the LPO's budget—which ballooned to over $400 billion under the Biden administration—could meaningfully shrink. Still, a meaningfully reduced budget is not enough. With the national deficit climbing to over $28 trillion in debt held by the public, taxpayers can no longer afford to support the federal government's fantasy that it should be a green bank. The post 3 Terrible Companies To Lose $5 Billion in Federal Green Energy Loans appeared first on Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store