Is ‘Panchayat' Real Story? Explained Amid Bihar Vidhayak's ‘Marunga' Threat To ‘Sachiv' Goes Viral
An audio clip allegedly features the RJD MLA from Maner scolding a government official for failing to recognise him after hearing his name.
In a real-life drama that felt like a scene straight out of the popular web series Panchayat, Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) MLA Bhai Virendra was reportedly caught in a heated argument with the local panchayat secretary over a call. An audio clip, allegedly featuring their conversation, has now gone viral on the Internet, where the MLA is heard scolding the government official for not recognising him upon knowing his name.
The RJD MLA of Maner had called the panchayat secretary to enquire about the death certificate of the husband of a woman named Rinki Devi. But when he failed to recognise Bhai Virendra, things turned tense quickly. 'You don't know Bhai Virendra? You want me to introduce myself? The whole country knows me," he said.
Still, the official, now identified as Panchayat Secretary Sandeep Kumar, maintained his composure during the entire conversation. After the incident unfolded, he reportedly filed an FIR against the RJD MLA.
This wasn't a one-of-a-kind incident. Heated conversations and tussles have become a routine thing between elected representatives and bureaucrats.
Viral Audio Clip Sparks Comparisons To Panchayat's Power Tussle
This viral audio has reminded many of the feud between MLA Chandrakishore Singh (Pankaj Jha) and Secretary Abhishek Tripathi (Jitendra Kumar) in Prime Video's web show, Panchayat. Ever since the MLA was introduced into the storyline of the series, he was often seen colliding with Sachiv Ji over various issues in Phulera.
Other Instances When Netas Locked Horns With Government Officials
The Delhi government, under the Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, had often found itself at odds with the Lieutenant Governor's office. They repeatedly found themselves either in the Supreme Court or the High Court over various issues. Over the years, the former Delhi CM has had repeated showdowns with LG VK Saxena over administrative disputes, fund allocations and other government schemes.
Meanwhile, back in August 2024, the then Kolkata Police Commissioner Vineet Goyal came under fire for the way the police handled the rape and murder of a 31-year-old trainee doctor at RG Kar Medical College. The Calcutta High Court transferred the case to the CBI when the police failed to make any progress on it. Top BJP leaders accused the police commissioner of covering up the case and even highlighted a similar case that happened in 2013 under his watch.
Such conflicts between elected representatives, or netas, and government officials have become a repetitive issue in India's political scenario. While both sides are meant to work together to run the country properly, their differing views and affiliations often put them at loggerheads. Here are some of the reasons why both parties clash from time to time.
Political interference: Politicians often attempt to influence administrative decisions, such as transfers or specific rulings in favour of their supporters, to achieve their political goals.
Differing objectives: Politicians and government officials have different objectives in a political scenario. While the former have to maintain a good public image to win in elections, the latter have the responsibility to uphold rules and act within the law.
Corruption: Some politicians often request and sometimes demand that government officials overlook irregularities or ask for favours, which, when denied, causes friction.
Lack of clear role definitions: The lines between the powers and responsibilities of elected representatives and appointed officials are not well-defined, leading to a tussle between the two parties.
Power dynamics: The dynamics between elected officials and appointed bureaucrats can be complex, with instances where either side may assert dominance or resist perceived encroachments on their authority.
News18's viral page features trending stories, videos, and memes, covering quirky incidents, social media buzz from india and around the world, Also Download the News18 App to stay updated!
tags :
panchayat viral news
view comments
Location :
Delhi, India, India
First Published:
July 29, 2025, 09:01 IST
News viral Is 'Panchayat' Real Story? Explained Amid Bihar Vidhayak's 'Marunga' Threat To 'Sachiv' Goes Viral
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
No Game Zone: Chhattisgarh village decides to slap penalty on parents of young gamers
RAIPUR: Forget fines for spitting or smoking in public, the latest crackdown in this Chhattisgarh village targets thumbs, not tobacco. In a first-of-its-kind move, a village has warned parents they'll be slapped with a Rs 5,000 penalty if their children are caught playing 'dangerous' mobile games like 'PUBG' or 'Free Fire' and the village head has even put a Rs 1,000 bounty on tipping off about young gamers flouting the ban. Gram Panchayat of Gahirabhedi in Chhuriya block of Rajnandgaon district has taken this initiative aiming to prevent children wasting time on mobile games and engage in physical activities in stead of being glued to phones and spend the day sitting at one place. Besides, steering children towards studies and other activities is also the motive. Sarpanch Bedbai Porte said the decision was taken collectively by the Panchayat and villagers. 'To ensure real implementation of the rule in letter and spirit, we decided to reward the informers to give a tip-off about youths playing mobile games. They will get Rs 1000 from village funds. The diktat is being hammered into the minds of people and making them aware about the seriousness of the initiative, the village kotwar goes out on bi-cycle making public announcements (munaadi) about the new rule. It's repeated thrice a month,' sarpanch said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like NRIs Living In Ukraine Are Eligible For INR 2 Lakh Monthly Pension. Invest 18K/Month Get Offer Undo Yashoda Bai Thakur, a mom of 7-year-old in the village said that her son was told about the rule and he picks up phone only after seeking permission from her for his studies or calling up his father. She believes it will soon show results across the village. So far, no fines have been collected, but villagers hope the warning would make a noticeable effect on children's behaviour. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
'Trust deficit': SC on Bihar SIR showdown; what happened during the hearing
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Tuesday reiterated that it can set aside the results of the entire special intensive revision (SIR) of electoral bonds in poll-bound Bihar - in as late as September - if its illegality is established. While hearing a bunch of petitions against poll body's exercise, a bench of justices Surya Kant and Joymala Bagchi said that logjam over the exercise is largely due the "trust deficit" between the poll body and the opposition. Here is what happened during the hearing Senior advocate Kapil Sibal , appearing for RJD MP Manoj Jha, said that the exclusion of about 65 lakh voters from the draft electoral roll published on August 1 is illegal. However, the top court said that as per the rules, the persons excluded have to submit applications for inclusion, and it is only at this stage that anyone's objection will be considered. Sibal argued that most of the population of Bihar does not posses the documents specified by the ECI as acceptable. 'Bihar people don't have these documents, that's the point.' Justice Kant said it was a 'very sweeping argument' to suggest no one in Bihar possessed valid documents, noting Aadhaar and ration cards existed but could not be treated as definitive proof. 'Bihar is part of India. If they don't have them, other states won't either,' the top court said. 'There must be something to prove you are a citizen of India… everybody possesses some certificate - you need it even to buy a SIM. OBC, SC, ST certificates." Advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for Association for Democratic Reforms, said that the poll body not published a list of names of the 65 lakh persons who have been deleted from the draft roll. He also accused the EC of not specifying who are dead or migrated persons. "Today, what they have done is something mischievous. Till the 4th of August, the draft of the roll was searchable. After the 4th of August, the document is not searchable. They say, go and ask the Booth Level Agent of the political party. Why should I, as a citizen, not know from their document and should ask an agent of the political party?" Bhushan said. Meanwhile, appearing for the EC, senior advocate Rakesh Dwivedi said an exercise of this nature was 'bound to have some defects', but errors could be corrected before the final roll is published on 30 September. Opposition leaders and civil society groups have petitioned against the EC's June 24 decision. Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi said "You cannot start by presumptively doubting the citizenship of 5 crore of voters (who are in the post-2003 roll). The presumption is that they are citizens unless established otherwise through a procedure in accordance with the you declare 5 crore people to be not valid and give them 2.5 months." Political activist Yogendra Yadav, who addressed the court in person, questioned the data given by the poll panel and said instead of 7.9 crore voters there was total adult population of 8.18 crore and the design of SIR exercise was to delete the voters. "They (EC) were not able to find any individual whose name was added and the booth level officers visited house to house for deletion of names," Yadav said, calling it a case of "total disenfranchisement". The hearing will resume again on Wednesday. On July 29, the top court warned it would step in immediately if there was 'mass exclusion' of voters. The draft roll was published on August 1, with the final version due on September 30. Opposition parties claim the process could disenfranchise crores of eligible voters. The pleas have been jointly filed by leaders from RJD, Trinamool Congress, Congress, NCP (Sharad Pawar), CPI, SP, Shiv Sena (Uddhav Thackeray), JMM, CPI (ML), along with PUCL, ADR and activist Yogendra Yadav, challenging the EC's June 24 decis ion.
Economic Times
6 hours ago
- Economic Times
SC backs EC, says Aadhar, Ration Card cannot be accepted as conclusive proof of residence
The Supreme Court on Tuesday backed the Election Commission's view that Aadhar cannot be accepted as conclusive proof of residence in the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar. A bench of of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi heard senior advocate Kapil Sibal, representing RJD leader Manoj Jha, who alleged discrepancies, including people listed as dead being found alive, and vice versa. Sibal, appearing for the petitioners argued that despite residents holding Aadhaar, ration and EPIC cards, officials were 'not accepting it' as proof of anything. However, Justice Kant said such documents could 'bonafide show you're resident of that area', TOI rpeorted. The top court observed that the situation over revision of electoral rolls is largely due the "trust deficit" between the Election Commission and the opposition. Justice Kant said it was a 'very sweeping argument' to suggest no one in Bihar possessed valid documents and noted Aadhaar and ration cards existed but could not be treated as definitive advocate Rakesh Dwivedi, appearing for the EC, argued that an exercise of such a nature was 'bound to have some defects'. However, he said that the errors could be corrected within September 30. Opposition leaders and civil society groups have petitioned against the EC's June 24 July 29, the apex court had warned to step in immediately if there was 'mass exclusion' of voters. The draft roll was published on August 1, with the final version due on September 30. Opposition parties claim the process could disenfranchise lakhs of eligible voters. Multiple pleas have been jointly filed by leaders from RJD, Trinamool Congress, Congress, NCP (Sharad Pawar), CPI, SP, Shiv Sena (Uddhav Thackeray), JMM, CPI (ML), along with PUCL, ADR and activist Yogendra Yadav, challenging the EC's June 24 decision.
