Microsoft Pushes for Bigger OpenAI Stake Amid Legal Friction
The dispute centres on Microsoft's demand for a larger ownership stake in OpenAI's restructured unit than the 33 per cent that OpenAI is reportedly willing to offer. Microsoft has invested roughly US$13 billion since 2019 but holds no direct equity, instead receiving a share of future profits. Under the new structure, Microsoft seeks equity in exchange for forgoing certain profit rights—an ask OpenAI deems excessive.
Executives at OpenAI have discussed using a 'nuclear option' against Microsoft, weighing antitrust claims and potential federal oversight of their partnership. The company is also mounting a public campaign warning of monopolistic behaviour. Such steps reflect a broader shift in openness to regulatory scrutiny amid high-stakes restructuring.
ADVERTISEMENT
Another dimension of the impasse involves OpenAI's US$3 billion acquisition of the coding start-up Windsurf. Although Microsoft's deal grants it access to all OpenAI intellectual property, OpenAI resists allowing Windsurf's IP to fall under those terms, citing competitive concerns over Microsoft's GitHub Copilot.
OpenAI must finalise its transition into a public-benefit corporation by year-end or risk losing around US$20–30 billion in planned funding, including an expected US$30 billion injection from SoftBank. That investment is contingent upon the restructuring process. Meanwhile, Microsoft is fortifying its own AI offerings—expanding its AI talent pool and integrating alternative AI models into its products.
OpenAI's roadmap envisages it as a public-benefit corporation: a for-profit subsidiary guided by a nonprofit board that balances shareholder outcomes with public interest. This model enables it to raise substantial capital through equity and prepare for a potential public listing. Its nonprofit parent will retain control over the subsidiary's board. Earlier plans to relinquish nonprofit oversight were dropped amid internal dissent and objections from California and Delaware attorneys general.
Microsoft faces its own trade-offs. The company possesses exclusive rights to commercialise OpenAI models through Azure and, under existing agreements, holds access to OpenAI technology until around 2030. But it has stepped back from high-level oversight—citing antitrust concerns—and removed its board observer seat in mid‑2024. Microsoft also supplies OpenAI with critical cloud computing resources via Azure, a pillar of their partnership.
Amid these frictions, OpenAI plans to lessen its reliance on Microsoft by endorsing alternative providers such as Google Cloud, Oracle and CoreWeave. Such diversification underscores its ambition to maintain independence in infrastructure and bargaining power. Microsoft, in response, has ramped up internal AI development efforts—such as augmenting Microsoft 365 Copilot—and hiring external talent including Sam Altman's former colleague Mustafa Suleyman.
Despite the sharp disagreements, officials from both companies have maintained public diplomacy. 'We have a long-term, productive partnership that has delivered amazing AI tools for everyone,' they said in a joint statement, expressing optimism that negotiations would yield a sustainable path forward.
Should talks falter, the broader implications for the AI landscape could be profound. Microsoft's leverage over OpenAI technology could diminish, and regulatory scrutiny may intensify around major AI alliances. OpenAI would also need to secure alternative funding and compute sources swiftly to support its PBC structure and broader mission.
As summer advances, the two technology giants are faced with a defining choice: reshape their relationship to align ownership, governance and strategic interests—or head toward a rupture with enduring consequences for both.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
a minute ago
- The National
The Middle East must get ready for a US-China digital arms race
A starting gun fired this summer, but many of us didn't hear it. On July 18, when the US unveiled its National AI Action Plan, it wasn't just another policy document. It was a declaration, signalling the start of what could be humanity's ultimate race: a global contest to build the digital foundations of the 21st century and, in the process, redefine the very meaning of national power. For centuries, nations have vied for territory, resources and influence. This new competition is of a different order entirely. It is a sprint to embed artificial intelligence into every sector, every institution and every decision-making layer of society. AI is no longer a far-off concept from science fiction; it has become the invisible infrastructure of our present, the operating system of modern life. With its plan, the US has made its intentions clear: it is mobilising to win. The American strategy is breath-taking in its scale and speed. This is not a cautious roadmap but a full-scale mobilisation of capital, talent and government will. The plan accelerates the National AI Research Resource, a flagship initiative backed by an initial $110 million to arm the nation's researchers with the raw computing power needed to innovate. Yet this public push is dwarfed by the staggering ambitions of the private sector. Elon Musk's xAI is building a $10 billion 'Gigafactory of Compute', a cathedral of processing power designed to run on 100,000 of Nvidia 's most advanced chips. Not to be outdone, Microsoft and OpenAI are reportedly planning a $100 billion data centre project codenamed 'Stargate'. These are the moonshots of our time. And their impact is already filtering down into the machinery of government, where AI is being used to slash medical backlogs for veterans and help reduce the nearly 43,000 annual roadway deaths. This isn't just automation; it's a fundamental rewiring of the state into an entity that can learn and adapt in real-time. But America is not running this race alone. For every move the US makes, China has a powerful and increasingly sophisticated countermove, often executed with a different philosophy. While the US champions a public-private partnership model, China's state-led industrial policy delivers breakthroughs with stunning speed. Consider the shockwave sent through the robotics world this year by Unitree, a Chinese firm that launched a sophisticated humanoid robot for just $16,000. It was a watershed moment, transforming advanced robotics from a high-cost industrial tool into something approaching a mass-market product. This focus on tangible, real-world applications is complemented by a brilliant software strategy. While American giants often keep their most powerful models proprietary, Beijing-based DeepSeek AI recently released its powerhouse DeepSeek-V2 model completely open-source. In doing so, it invited the world's developers to build on its technology, a clever play to win the hearts and minds of the global tech community. In this global digital race, there may be no prize for second place However, this digital arms race is running headfirst into a very physical wall: energy. AI is insatiably power-hungry. By 2030, Nvidia's AI servers alone are projected to consume more electricity annually than the entire country of Finland. Mr Musk predicts that within a year, the primary constraint on AI development will shift from a shortage of chips to a shortage of electricity. Here, the competition becomes one of concrete and power grids. The US AI sector is projected to require 50 gigawatts of new power capacity by 2028. In 2023 alone, China added more than 400 gigawatts of new capacity, more than the rest of the world combined. The lesson is stark: winning the AI race isn't just about designing algorithms in the cloud; it's about having the industrial might to power them on the ground. For those of us in the Middle East, the sound of this starting gun should echo with a particular urgency. Regional ambitions are high. The UAE has pioneered world-class Arabic language models and the use of AI in government applications, while Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund is reportedly planning a $40 billion fund to invest in AI. But the actions of the US and China reveal a new truth: ambition is no longer enough. Success now demands execution at a national scale, requiring the sovereign capabilities – computation, talent and especially energy – to sustain it. The global race has begun. It is a contest not just for technological dominance, but for the right to shape the future of trade, security and society itself. And in this race, there may be no prize for second place.
Khaleej Times
2 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
Trump announces $100 billion new investment pledge from Apple
President Donald Trump announced on Wednesday that Apple will invest an additional $100 billion in the United States, a move that could help it sidestep potential tariffs on iPhones. The new pledge raises Apple's total domestic investment commitment in the US to $600 billion over the next four years. Earlier this year, the company announced it would invest $500 billion and hire 20,000 workers across the country in that period. The announcement centres on expanding Apple's supply chain and advanced manufacturing footprint in the US, but still falls short of Trump's demand that Apple begin making iPhones domestically. "Companies like Apple, they're coming home. They're all coming home," Trump told reporters in the Oval Office, moments after Apple CEO Tim Cook gave him a US-made souvenir with a 24-karat gold base. "This is a significant step toward the ultimate goal of ensuring that iPhones sold in America also are made in America," Trump added. Asked if Apple could eventually build entire iPhones in the US, Cook noted that many components such as semiconductors, glass and Face ID modules are already made domestically, but said that final assembly will remain overseas "for a while." While the investment pledge is significant, analysts say the numbers align with Apple's typical spending patterns and echo commitments made during both the Biden administration and Trump's previous term. In May, Trump had threatened Apple with a 25% tariff on products manufactured overseas, a sharp reversal from earlier policy when his administration had exempted smartphones, computers and other electronics from rounds of tariffs on Chinese imports. Trump's effort to reshape global trade through tariffs cost Apple $800 million in the June quarter. "Today is a good step in the right direction for Apple, and it helps get on Trump's good side after what appears to be a tension-filled few months in the eyes of the Street between the White House and Apple," said Daniel Ives, an analyst with Wedbush Securities. "A savvy solution" Apple has a mixed track record when it comes to following through on investment promises. In 2019, for instance, Cook toured a Texas factory with Trump that was promoted as a new manufacturing site. But the facility had been producing Apple computers since 2013 and Apple has since moved that production to Thailand. Apple continues to manufacture most of its products, including iPhones and iPads, in Asia, primarily in China, although it has shifted some production to Vietnam, Thailand and India in recent years. Despite political pressure, analysts widely agree that building iPhones in the U.S. remains unrealistic due to labor costs and the complexity of the global supply chain. "The announcement is a savvy solution to the president's demand that Apple manufacture all iPhones in the U.S.," said Nancy Tengler, CEO and CIO of Laffer Tengler Investments, which holds Apple shares. Partners on Apple's latest U.S. investment effort include specialty glass maker Corning, semiconductor manufacturing equipment supplier Applied Materials, and chipmakers Texas InstrumentsO, GlobalFoundries, Broadcom and Samsung. Apple said Samsung will supply chips from its production plant in Texas for its products including iPhones, while GlobalWafers said it would be supplying 300mm silicon wafers from its Texas plant. Apple shares closed up 5% on Wednesday. Shares of Corning rose nearly 4% in extended trading, while Applied Materials gained almost 2%.
Zawya
2 hours ago
- Zawya
Oil prices rise on US demand strength, though sanctions uncertainty remains
TOKYO: Oil prices rose on Thursday, pausing a five-day losing streak, on signs of steady demand in the U.S., the world's biggest oil user, though the prospect of U.S.-Russian talks on the Ukraine war eased concerns of supply disruptions from further sanctions. Brent crude futures rose 20 cents, or 0.3%, to $67.09 a barrel by 0039 GMT while U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude was at $64.57 a barrel, up 22 cents, or 0.3%. Both benchmarks slid about 1% to their lowest in eight weeks on Wednesday after U.S. President Donald Trump's remarks about progress in talks with Moscow. Trump could meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin as soon as next week, a White House official said on Wednesday, though the U.S. continued preparations to impose secondary sanctions, including potentially on China, to pressure Moscow to end the war in Ukraine. Russia is the world's second-biggest producer of crude after the U.S. Still, oil markets were supported from a bigger-than-expected draw in U.S. crude inventories last week. The Energy Information Administration said on Wednesday that U.S. crude oil stockpiles fell by 3 million barrels to 423.7 million barrels in the week ended August 1, exceeding analysts' expectations in a Reuters poll for a 591,000-barrel draw. Inventories fell as U.S. crude exports climbed and refinery runs climbed, with utilization on the Gulf Coast, the country's biggest refining region, and the West Coast climbing to their highest since 2023. But the unsettled nature of the talks and the overall supply and demand situation with major producers increasing their output has made investors cautious, said Hiroyuki Kikukawa, chief strategist of Nissan Securities Investment, a unit of Nissan Securities. "Uncertainty over the outcome of the US-Russia summit, possible additional tariffs on India and China - key buyers of Russian crude - and the broader impact of U.S. tariffs on the global economy are prompting investors to stay on the sidelines," said Kikukawa. "With planned OPEC+'s output increases weighing on prices, WTI will likely remain in the $60-$70 range for the rest of the month," he said, referring to the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and its allies including Russia. Adding to the pressure on Russian oil buyers, Trump on Wednesday imposed an additional 25% tariff on Indian goods, citing their continued imports of Russian oil. The new import tax will go into effect 21 days after August 7. Trump also said he could announce further tariffs on China similar to the 25% duties announced earlier on India over its purchases of Russian oil.
