Microsoft Pushes for Bigger OpenAI Stake Amid Legal Friction
OpenAI and Microsoft are locked in critical negotiations over the former's plan to transform its for-profit entity into a public-benefit corporation, a move that hinges on Microsoft's approval and hinges on its desire for greater equity. With tensions mounting, OpenAI has even contemplated accusing Microsoft of anti-competitive conduct as leverage in talks, signalling a shift from collaboration to confrontation.
The dispute centres on Microsoft's demand for a larger ownership stake in OpenAI's restructured unit than the 33 per cent that OpenAI is reportedly willing to offer. Microsoft has invested roughly US$13 billion since 2019 but holds no direct equity, instead receiving a share of future profits. Under the new structure, Microsoft seeks equity in exchange for forgoing certain profit rights—an ask OpenAI deems excessive.
Executives at OpenAI have discussed using a 'nuclear option' against Microsoft, weighing antitrust claims and potential federal oversight of their partnership. The company is also mounting a public campaign warning of monopolistic behaviour. Such steps reflect a broader shift in openness to regulatory scrutiny amid high-stakes restructuring.
ADVERTISEMENT
Another dimension of the impasse involves OpenAI's US$3 billion acquisition of the coding start-up Windsurf. Although Microsoft's deal grants it access to all OpenAI intellectual property, OpenAI resists allowing Windsurf's IP to fall under those terms, citing competitive concerns over Microsoft's GitHub Copilot.
OpenAI must finalise its transition into a public-benefit corporation by year-end or risk losing around US$20–30 billion in planned funding, including an expected US$30 billion injection from SoftBank. That investment is contingent upon the restructuring process. Meanwhile, Microsoft is fortifying its own AI offerings—expanding its AI talent pool and integrating alternative AI models into its products.
OpenAI's roadmap envisages it as a public-benefit corporation: a for-profit subsidiary guided by a nonprofit board that balances shareholder outcomes with public interest. This model enables it to raise substantial capital through equity and prepare for a potential public listing. Its nonprofit parent will retain control over the subsidiary's board. Earlier plans to relinquish nonprofit oversight were dropped amid internal dissent and objections from California and Delaware attorneys general.
Microsoft faces its own trade-offs. The company possesses exclusive rights to commercialise OpenAI models through Azure and, under existing agreements, holds access to OpenAI technology until around 2030. But it has stepped back from high-level oversight—citing antitrust concerns—and removed its board observer seat in mid‑2024. Microsoft also supplies OpenAI with critical cloud computing resources via Azure, a pillar of their partnership.
Amid these frictions, OpenAI plans to lessen its reliance on Microsoft by endorsing alternative providers such as Google Cloud, Oracle and CoreWeave. Such diversification underscores its ambition to maintain independence in infrastructure and bargaining power. Microsoft, in response, has ramped up internal AI development efforts—such as augmenting Microsoft 365 Copilot—and hiring external talent including Sam Altman's former colleague Mustafa Suleyman.
Despite the sharp disagreements, officials from both companies have maintained public diplomacy. 'We have a long-term, productive partnership that has delivered amazing AI tools for everyone,' they said in a joint statement, expressing optimism that negotiations would yield a sustainable path forward.
Should talks falter, the broader implications for the AI landscape could be profound. Microsoft's leverage over OpenAI technology could diminish, and regulatory scrutiny may intensify around major AI alliances. OpenAI would also need to secure alternative funding and compute sources swiftly to support its PBC structure and broader mission.
As summer advances, the two technology giants are faced with a defining choice: reshape their relationship to align ownership, governance and strategic interests—or head toward a rupture with enduring consequences for both.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arabian Post
4 hours ago
- Arabian Post
Microsoft Pushes for Bigger OpenAI Stake Amid Legal Friction
OpenAI and Microsoft are locked in critical negotiations over the former's plan to transform its for-profit entity into a public-benefit corporation, a move that hinges on Microsoft's approval and hinges on its desire for greater equity. With tensions mounting, OpenAI has even contemplated accusing Microsoft of anti-competitive conduct as leverage in talks, signalling a shift from collaboration to confrontation. The dispute centres on Microsoft's demand for a larger ownership stake in OpenAI's restructured unit than the 33 per cent that OpenAI is reportedly willing to offer. Microsoft has invested roughly US$13 billion since 2019 but holds no direct equity, instead receiving a share of future profits. Under the new structure, Microsoft seeks equity in exchange for forgoing certain profit rights—an ask OpenAI deems excessive. Executives at OpenAI have discussed using a 'nuclear option' against Microsoft, weighing antitrust claims and potential federal oversight of their partnership. The company is also mounting a public campaign warning of monopolistic behaviour. Such steps reflect a broader shift in openness to regulatory scrutiny amid high-stakes restructuring. ADVERTISEMENT Another dimension of the impasse involves OpenAI's US$3 billion acquisition of the coding start-up Windsurf. Although Microsoft's deal grants it access to all OpenAI intellectual property, OpenAI resists allowing Windsurf's IP to fall under those terms, citing competitive concerns over Microsoft's GitHub Copilot. OpenAI must finalise its transition into a public-benefit corporation by year-end or risk losing around US$20–30 billion in planned funding, including an expected US$30 billion injection from SoftBank. That investment is contingent upon the restructuring process. Meanwhile, Microsoft is fortifying its own AI offerings—expanding its AI talent pool and integrating alternative AI models into its products. OpenAI's roadmap envisages it as a public-benefit corporation: a for-profit subsidiary guided by a nonprofit board that balances shareholder outcomes with public interest. This model enables it to raise substantial capital through equity and prepare for a potential public listing. Its nonprofit parent will retain control over the subsidiary's board. Earlier plans to relinquish nonprofit oversight were dropped amid internal dissent and objections from California and Delaware attorneys general. Microsoft faces its own trade-offs. The company possesses exclusive rights to commercialise OpenAI models through Azure and, under existing agreements, holds access to OpenAI technology until around 2030. But it has stepped back from high-level oversight—citing antitrust concerns—and removed its board observer seat in mid‑2024. Microsoft also supplies OpenAI with critical cloud computing resources via Azure, a pillar of their partnership. Amid these frictions, OpenAI plans to lessen its reliance on Microsoft by endorsing alternative providers such as Google Cloud, Oracle and CoreWeave. Such diversification underscores its ambition to maintain independence in infrastructure and bargaining power. Microsoft, in response, has ramped up internal AI development efforts—such as augmenting Microsoft 365 Copilot—and hiring external talent including Sam Altman's former colleague Mustafa Suleyman. Despite the sharp disagreements, officials from both companies have maintained public diplomacy. 'We have a long-term, productive partnership that has delivered amazing AI tools for everyone,' they said in a joint statement, expressing optimism that negotiations would yield a sustainable path forward. Should talks falter, the broader implications for the AI landscape could be profound. Microsoft's leverage over OpenAI technology could diminish, and regulatory scrutiny may intensify around major AI alliances. OpenAI would also need to secure alternative funding and compute sources swiftly to support its PBC structure and broader mission. As summer advances, the two technology giants are faced with a defining choice: reshape their relationship to align ownership, governance and strategic interests—or head toward a rupture with enduring consequences for both.
Tahawul Tech
5 hours ago
- Tahawul Tech
Adobe releases dedicated AI-image generation app
Adobe Inc. recently released its first dedicated AI smartphone app that includes AI models from the company and will feature partner firms in the future. This is understood to be part of a strategy to tap into a growing trend of sharing AI images and videos over social media. The new Firefly mobile app packages Adobe's own AI model together with models from OpenAI and Google and is available on iOS and Android phones. In addition, Adobe is planning to integrate models from new partner firms Ideogram, Luma AI, Pika and Runway, which will be accessed in Firefly Boards, a product that is part of the Firefly web app. Adobe's mobile service will offer subscribers unlimited basic image generation from Adobe models, while it will charge extra for access to the company's premium models and those from its partners. The subscription cost will be the same as for the web versions of Firefly, which start at $10 per month. The San Jose, California-based company had earlier released AI tools along with the mobile app version of its popular image-editing program Photoshop. The company had promised users that its AI model is trained only on material that it has a legal right to use, with Adobe offering protection against copyright claims. Ely Greenfield, Adobe's Chief Technology Officer for Digital Media, said Adobe's approach has also gained some resonance among consumers. 'Even for many of our individual customers, that promise of the commercial safety and the story about how Firefly is trained continues to be a really important differentiator,' Greenfield said. Source: Reuters Image Credit: Stock Image
Channel Post MEA
6 hours ago
- Channel Post MEA
Global Cloud Infrastructure Spending Rose 21% In Q1 2025
Global spending on cloud infrastructure services, according to Canalys (now part of Omdia) estimates, reached US$90.9 billion in Q1 2025, marking a 21% year-on-year increase. Enterprises have recognized that deploying AI applications requires renewed emphasis on cloud migration. Large-scale investment in both cloud and AI infrastructure remains a defining theme of the market in 2025. Meanwhile, to accelerate the enterprise adoption of AI at scale, leading cloud providers are intensifying efforts to optimize infrastructure—most notably through the development of proprietary chips—aimed at lowering the cost of AI usage and improving inference efficiency. In Q1 2025, the ranking of the top three cloud providers (AWS, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud) remained unchanged from the previous quarter, with their combined market share accounting for 65% of global cloud spending. Collectively, the three hyperscalers recorded a 24% year-on-year increase in cloud-related spending. Growth momentum diverged among the top players. Microsoft Azure and Google Cloud both maintained growth rates of over 30% (although Google Cloud's growth slowed slightly from the previous quarter), while AWS grew by 17%, a deceleration from 19% growth in Q4 2024. This deceleration was largely driven by supply-side constraints, which limited the ability to meet rapidly rising AI-related demand. In response, cloud hyperscalers have continued to invest aggressively in AI infrastructure to expand capacity and position themselves for long-term growth. Overall, the global cloud services market sustained steady growth in Q1 2025, as enterprises sharpened their focus on two strategic priorities: accelerating cloud migration—either by shifting additional workloads or reviving stalled on-premises transitions—and exploring the adoption of generative AI. The rise of generative AI, which relies heavily on cloud infrastructure, has in turn reinforced enterprise cloud strategies and hastened migration timelines. 'As AI transitions from research to large-scale deployment, enterprises are increasingly focused on the cost-efficiency of inference, comparing models, cloud platforms, and hardware architectures such as GPUs versus custom accelerators,' said Rachel Brindley, Senior Director at Canalys (now part of Omdia ). 'Unlike training, which is a one-time investment, inference represents a recurring operational cost, making it a critical constraint on the path to AI commercialization.' 'Many AI services today follow usage-based pricing models—typically charging by token or API call—which makes cost forecasting increasingly difficult as usage scales,' added Yi Zhang, Analyst at Canalys (now part of Omdia ). 'When inference costs are volatile or excessively high, enterprises are forced to restrict usage, reduce model complexity, or limit deployment to high-value scenarios. As a result, the broader potential of AI remains underutilized.' To address these challenges, leading cloud providers are deepening their investments in AI-optimized infrastructure. Hyperscalers including AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud have introduced proprietary chips such as Trainium and TPU, and purpose-built instance families, all aimed at improving inference efficiency and reducing total cost of AI. Amazon Web Services (AWS) maintained its position as the market leader in Q1 2025, capturing 32% of global market share and recording a 17% year-over-year increase in revenue. Its AI business continues to grow at a triple-digit annual rate, though it remains in the early stages of development. In March, AWS introduced a price-cutting strategy to promote adoption of its Trainium AI chips over more costly NVIDIA-based solutions, highlighting Trainium 2's 30–40% price-performance advantage. The company also accelerated the expansion of its Bedrock service, adding Anthropic's Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Meta's Llama 4 models, and became the first cloud provider to fully manage DeepSeek R1 and Mistral's Mixtral Large. Further underscoring its long-term commitment to global infrastructure, AWS announced a capital investment of over US$4 billion in May 2025 to establish a new cloud region in Chile by the end of 2026. Microsoft Azure remained the second-largest cloud provider in Q1 2025, holding a 23% market share and delivering strong year-over-year growth of 33%. Microsoft reported a 16 point growth rate lift to Azure from AI, marking the largest single-quarter uplift since Q2 2024. In April, Azure announced the availability of the GPT-4.1 model series on both Azure AI Foundry and GitHub, further broadening developer access to advanced AI capabilities across its ecosystem. Azure AI Foundry, Microsoft's platform for building and managing AI applications and agents, is now used by developers at more than 70,000 enterprises. The platform processed over 100 trillion tokens this quarter, a fivefold increase year-over-year. Microsoft has also focused on lowering the cost of AI adoption, reporting a nearly 30% improvement in its AI performance at constant power consumption and a reduction of over 50% in cost per token. As part of its ongoing global infrastructure expansion, it opened new data centers in 10 countries across four continents during Q1. Google Cloud, the world's third-largest cloud provider, maintained a 10% market share in Q1 2025 and delivered strong year-over-year growth of 31%. As of 31 March, its revenue backlog reached US$92.4 billion, marking a slight decline from the previous quarter. This decrease was primarily attributed to supply constraints, particularly in compute capacity, that limited Google Cloud's ability to fully meet customer demand. In March, Google introduced the Gemini 2.5 model series, with Gemini 2.5 Pro receiving widespread acclaim for its leading benchmark performance and top ranking on Chatbot Arena. With enhanced reasoning and coding capabilities, the model opens new possibilities for both developers and enterprise users. Since the beginning of the year, active usage of Google AI Studio and the Gemini API has surged by over 200%, reflecting strong developer adoption and growing demand for generative AI solutions. Google also launched a new cloud region in Sweden (its 42nd globally) and committed US$7 billion to expand its Iowa data center, further supporting its growing AI and cloud workloads.
