The latest WNBA controversy makes it clear that officiating has to be better
The latest WNBA controversy makes it clear that officiating has to be better
Stephanie White should have been solely talking about the surging Indiana Fever claiming a spot in the prestigious Commissioner's Cup finals. The Fever coach's postgame comments should have been fawning over Caitlin Clark's performance in her two games back from an injury, sparking the Fever to back-to-back wins with a combined 52 points and 11 3-pointers.
Instead, the aftermath of the Fever's victory over the Connecticut Sun on Tuesday was a focused frustration about WNBA officiating. Rightly so. The crew's blunders in Indianapolis were a blatant mismanagement of the game after scuffles broke out, including when Caitlin Clark was blindsided by a shove to the court by Marina Mabrey.
Advertisement
'When the officials don't get control of the ballgame, when they allow stuff to happen, and it's been happening all season long … this is what happens,' White said. 'You've got competitive women, who are the best in the world at what they do, right? And when you allow them to play physical, and you allow these things to happen, they're going to compete, and they're going to have their teammates' backs.'
White made her point clear: WNBA officials, catch up.
'They've got to get control of it,' she said. 'They've got to be better.'
Tensions were rising throughout the game, obvious to most that the Gainbridge Fieldhouse lid was in danger of blowing off. White said she noticed the tension in the first quarter as players chirped at each other and pointed it out to officials. In the second quarter, Clark and Fever teammate Sophie Cunningham had to be separated from Sun guards Jacy Sheldon and Marina Mabrey, after Clark gave Sheldon a slight shove as they jawed at each other.
Advertisement
In the third quarter, Clark was poked in the eye by Sheldon, who then bumped her. Clark shoved Sheldon, which prompted Tina Charles to approach Clark during a dead ball. Then Mabrey body-checked Clark from the side, sending Clark crashing to the court. The Fever crowd let Mabrey have it, of course, but ire later was directed at officials.
'Marina Mabrey's going to get ejected,' broadcast commentator Pat Boylan immediately and matter-of-factly predicted.
But she wasn't. After a review, Sheldon's foul was upgraded to a flagrant penalty 1. Mabrey was merely assessed with a technical foul, as were Charles and Clark. Officials missed an opportunity to draw a line.
Late in the game, Cunningham grabbed Sheldon as she drove through the lane, and pulled her to the floor, sparking another scuffle to break out. The kerfuffle spilled nearly into courtside seating and required arena security to break it up.
Advertisement
The broadcast crew rightly brought it back to the melee after Clark was fouled. 'I'm blaming this all on the officials tonight. This is their responsibility. … If they had taken care of their business earlier, we wouldn't be in this situation right now,' Debbie Antonelli said.
She also pointed out the obvious inconsistency: 'You can't eject her because you didn't eject Mabrey.' The officials did just that: Cunningham, Sheldon and the Sun's Linsday Allen were all tossed from the game.
From pee-wee basketball to the pros, hearing coaches, players and fans complain about officiating is nothing new.
Last season, Clark was similarly blindsided with a knock to the court by the Sky's Chennedy Carter, which prompted questions about what players can get away with during games. That Clark was involved in both instances has not gone unnoticed — some WNBA fans will argue this is really about protecting the superstar. But it's not just the physical aggression on Clark that has some in the WNBA questioning the caliber of officiating.
Advertisement
Last month, Atlanta Dream center Brittney Griner was on camera during an on-court interview when she walked away to tell officials to 'be better' with an expletive mixed in. Sparks guard Kelsey Plum also sounded off in an impassioned post-game rant about foul discrepancies. 'I drive more than anyone in the league,' Plum said. 'So to shoot six free throws is (expletive) absurd. I got scratches on my face. I got scratches on my body. And these guards on the other team get these ticky-tack fouls. I'm sick of it.'
What stands out about the WNBA is that in many of the instances that have drawn rebuke, coaches are advocating on behalf of the league as a whole, not just their own players.
Las Vegas Aces coach Becky Hammon recently referenced the rash of concussions in the league, including to her own star A'ja Wilson but also Wings rookie Paige Buckers and the Mystics' Shakira Austin. 'There's been too many shots to the face,' Hammon said.
White said Tuesday she wants to see more consistency across the league and indicated coaches raise concerns about officiating in league meetings every year.
Advertisement
'I've seen quite a few dustups in the league so far, so I think it's a league-wide issue,' White said. 'Bad officiating is bad officiating.'
This article originally appeared in The Athletic.
Indiana Fever, WNBA, Opinion
2025 The Athletic Media Company
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
21 minutes ago
- Forbes
How Much Do Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders Make? How They Fought For A 400% Raise
Forbes values the Dallas Cowboys at more than $10 billion. Yet when viewers were given a closer look at the women competing for a spot on the team's iconic cheerleading squad, many were surprised by how little the dancers were paid. Season two of America's Sweethearts: Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders delves into the squad's ongoing push for fair compensation after years of being historically underpaid. In 2024, Dallas Cowboys Chief Brand Officer Charlotte Jones faced backlash after stating in season one that the cheerleaders 'don't come here for the money,' but rather for their passion for dance. "There are not a lot of opportunities in the field of dance to get to perform at an elite level," Jones said at the time. 'It is about being a part of something bigger than themselves.' While the Cowboys did not directly respond to criticism over compensation, a team spokesperson told Sports Illustrated that the organization 'pays cheerleaders for games, practices and appearances and covers the cost of uniforms, some meals, health club memberships and salon services.' However, across both seasons, several dancers have been vocal about the financial challenges. While Dallas Cowboys cheerleaders earn significantly more than their counterparts across the league, the pay is still not enough to make ends meet. One dancer revealed in the series that she juggled three jobs in addition to her cheerleading duties to sustain her career on the squad. In 2022, Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders were earning approximately $15 to $20 per hour, which added up to about $500 per game. That brought their annual salary to roughly $75,000, which is significantly higher than the NFL average of around $150 per game, or $22,500 per year, according to NBC Sports Boston. Jada McLean, a five-year veteran, told The Times that in 2024, her fifth year with the squad, she was earning $15 an hour and $500 per appearance. In Season 2, Episode 7, it was announced that the team had secured a massive 400% raise for the upcoming 2025–26 season. Following the pay increase, McLean confirmed to The New York Times that veteran cheerleaders could now be earning more than $75 an hour. (In an emailed statement, the franchise would not confirm the new wages to the newspaper.) "We pushed and we got back good results," fifth-year veteran Armani Latimer said in the series. 'I get emotional knowing that I was a part of that. I love the fact that I made change for the girls that are coming up behind me, even if I'm not getting a chance to benefit.' In Season 2 of America's Sweethearts, several veteran cheerleaders joined forces to advocate for a pay increase, a topic that gained national attention following the docuseries' premiere on Netflix in 2024. In one episode, McLean and fellow veterans Armani Latimer, Chandi Dayle and Megan McElaney discuss raising the issue of pay before signing their contracts for the next season. However, when McLean and Latimer brought their concerns to management, they 'were met with 'OK, we hear you and we understand where you're coming from, unfortunately, this is just not the time for that,'' Latimer told The New York Times. 'That was a little disheartening to hear.' McLean later explained to that, at the beginning of the summer of 2024, the cheerleaders began consulting family members and alumni in the legal field to explore their options. They also held meetings with the Cowboys' HR and legal teams, though those conversations were not shown in the Netflix series. Amanda, a member of the squad, described an emotional moment in a meeting with management. 'It was just breaking my heart the way they were speaking about us,' she said in a Zoom call featured in the series. Later in the show, the team discussed skipping practice or staging a walkout to put pressure on Cowboys management, but ultimately decided against it, McLean told 'We didn't want to let people down who were so excited to see the cheerleaders after supporting us through the first season of our television show," the veteran said. Head choreographer Judy Trammell said in the series that a walkout would make her 'nervous,' but added, "I know people have to fight for certain things to make changes, and I understand that.' At the 2024–25 end-of-year banquet, Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders Director Kelli Finglass praised the dancers who had led the fight for better pay. "You guys have moved some mountains this year that will forever change our organization, and hopefully, dancers' organizations across the world," she said. "It's just amazing, because that has been 60-plus years long overdue." Season 2 of America's Sweethearts: Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders is streaming on Netflix. Watch the official trailer below.
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Kristaps Porzingis trade rumors: Suns doing ‘background' work on Celtics center (report)
The Celtics are weighing a number of different moves this offseason as they explore ways to reduce a historic luxury tax bill following Jayson Tatum's torn Achilles. One notable name that could be on the trade block is Kristaps Porzingis. The 29-year-old has been a key part of the Celtics roster for the past two years but struggled through the 2025 postseason while dealing with the lingering effects of a mysterious illness that sidelined him for nine games in March. Porzingis has one year remaining on his contract after signing a two-year extension with Boston back in July 2023. He is earning $30.3 million next year, making him a movable trade chip, but his value around the league is uncertain after his postseason performance and a history of durability issues (99 games played in the last two years). Advertisement Boston could look to move other potential roster players (Jrue Holiday, Sam Hauser) while keeping Porzingis in hopes he can rebuild his value next season. However, given his age and contract situation, Brad Stevens could pull the trigger on a move this summer if he finds the right return. One team that desperately needs some big man help are the Phoenix Suns. NBA insider Jake Fischer writes on Marc Stein's Substack today that the Suns may be a team taking a closer look at Porzingis. 'I've also heard that Phoenix has done some background work on Kristaps Porziņģis with Boston known to be exploring its trade options up and down the roster,' Fischer reports. The Suns were not on the list of potential Porzingis trade destinations laid out by MassLive earlier this month and that comes for good reasons. Both the Celtics and Suns are currently set to be above the second apron next season, making any trade between the two teams illegal as things currently stand. However, both teams are expected to be very busy this offseason in their attempts to reduce some payroll. The Suns are deep in Kevin Durant trade talks at the moment with a host of players and draft picks expected to coming back their way once that deal goes through. Advertisement If the Suns are able to dip under the second apron (or waive contracts so they can dip under second apron beginning in July) they will be able to aggregate salaries in any trade. The Suns wouldn't be able to take back more than 100 percent of any salary they send out if they remain above the first apron, but if they can find a landing spot for some salary with a third team, that would open the door for a hypothetical Porzingis swap. There's obviously not a lot that would entice the Celtics right now on the Suns current roster. Grayson Allen and Royce O'Neale are on mid-level deals that could reduce some salary and be easier to move, but those are long-term pacts. Beyond that, it's just a lot of big salaries (Beal, Booker) and smaller ones that won't be particularly helpful in a deal. Ultimately, a lot of things would need to happen for a deal like this to become feasible (perhaps the Celtics could work their way into the Durant deal as a facilitator) but even that would be tricky with their second apron limitations. The Suns do need a center though and if they want to compete next year despite losing Durant, Porzingis may be one of their best options at center available on the trade market. More Celtics content Read the original article on MassLive.
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Former Boston Celtics forward criticizes Kristaps Porzingis
With the Celtics in the thick of trade rumors, just about everyone seemingly has an opinion on what Boston's front office should do this summer. The C's are looking to shed salary off their payroll, so the roster will look different. It's just a question of who exactly could be moved and what return the Celtics will get in any trades. Marcus Morris Sr. was blunt when asked about the Celtics' future on an appearance on Yahoo! Sports' "Good Word With Goodwill." The former C's forward made it clear what he thinks about current big man Kristaps Porzingis, specifically. Morris played for the Celtics from 2017-19, playing in a total of 832 career NBA games. Advertisement 'I don't think they need any major changes,' Morris said. 'I'm going to be candid because I'm on the media's side. Porzingis is not a Celtic. Porzingis doesn't embody what they need from him. That's not no knock to him; I know he has injuries. I think you definitely dangle him to see what you can get. But I don't think you can get that much, to be honest, the way this league is going on.' Porzingis has played the past two seasons in Boston, and while he's shown his otherworldly talent, he just hasn't been consistently healthy. That was again the case publicly during the East semifinals against the Knicks. Porzingis was bogged down significantly by his illness during the series as the Celtics were upset in six games. Porzingis is one guy who could be moved this summer, though it also depends on what the Celtics could get back for him. While the C's know about his injury history, so does the rest of the league. With one year and $30.7 million left on his contract, it remains to be seen what teams are willing to give up for the talented big man. The Celtics are also shopping other names like Jrue Holiday and Sam Hauser, while potentially listening to offers for some of their core guys. That's part of the uncertainty when it comes to this summer as, depending on the haul, a key piece could be unexpectedly traded. But, for now, the Celtics front office is doing their due diligence ahead of the 2025 NBA Draft. Advertisement 'Jrue Holiday, I feel like Jrue still has a ton of years left in him,' Morris said. 'Wherever Jrue goes, he's still going to be able to help a team. The things he brings to the team is unmatched. Defensively, scoring, being able to guard multiple positions. I'm a little skeptical about trading the Jrue thing, but I know they just kind of want to open their books. They got a lot of money on the books.' More Celtics content Read the original article on MassLive.