logo
On the Gulf Coast, homes are being elevated. When will the rest of Florida follow?

On the Gulf Coast, homes are being elevated. When will the rest of Florida follow?

Miami Herald21-05-2025
Once the hydraulic jacks were moved underneath the slab, Dr. Meghan Martin's home rose higher and higher – 12 inches at a time, level on a grid of wooden beams. Within a mere seven hours, her 1960s, ranch-style house was 12 feet up in the air.
'It was very surreal,' Martin, an emergency care pediatrician in St. Petersburg who has shared her experience of flooding three times in just four years with her more than 2 million followers on TikTok and Instagram, said. The videos she's now posted of her home elevation project, she told the Herald, don't do it justice, because 'it's just so high.'
With hurricane season around the corner, Martin is visibly relieved that her home and her family – her husband, four kids and three cats – are now out of the flood plain.
To stay safe from future storm surges and flooding, millions across Florida will need to follow suit. Florida already has more properties at risk of flooding than in any other state, and rising sea levels, increasingly more intense hurricanes and storm surges are making matters worse. Experts across real estate, construction, disaster preparedness, resilience and public and elected officials agree that Florida's future is in the air. This year, the state launched Elevate Florida, offering roughly $400 million in federal funding for residential mitigation, including raising an existing structure.
'If you don't adapt these buildings, they're not gonna make it,' says Roderick Scott, a flood hazard mitigation specialist who's been lifting homes since Hurricane Katrina kicked off the industry in New Orleans.
Experts argue that real estate prices in Florida have been propped up — at least in part— by what they call a 'climate denial bubble,' which has been valued in the billions. At some point, though, non-elevated buildings will start to devalue, while insurance costs will continue to rise across the state, whether a certain building has already flooded or not.
The task at hand, however, is nothing but formidable: While neither FEMA nor the state provide figures on how many homes will need to be elevated, Scott puts the estimate at as many as 2 million buildings. Roughly two-thirds of them – some 1.3 million – are private homes.
Statewide, little progress has been made. High costs, a lack of contractors, questions over permitting, and a market that incentivizes rebuilding without elevating, have led areas like Miami-Dade to instead focus on improving drainage systems or building sea walls. Such mitigation efforts, while part of the solution, will fail to protect properties from the several feet high storm surges that a hurricane can generate.
But on the other side of the state, in areas like Tampa Bay, Hurricanes Helene and Milton triggered a dramatic pivot. The two storms combined led to about 334,000 residential property insurance claims, according to February 2025 data by Florida's Office of Insurance Regulation, many of them in areas that were hit by particularly high storm surge. Since then, home elevations have surged.
'The increase is significant – it's actually unbelievable,' said Jeff Trosclair, CEO of JAS Builders, one of the few Florida contractors with experience in home elevation. Trosclair and his partners now raise 15 to 20 homes each month, more than ten times the pre-Helene and Milton average.
At one point, demand was so intense the traffic flood took out the company's website. 'That's just something that a construction company doesn't generally experience very often,' he said. Most of his clients are in Pinellas and Hillsborough county, among last year's hardest-hit areas.
The city of St. Petersburg, which used to issue an average of fewer than three home elevation permits annually, confirmed that Helene and Milton led to a sudden spike in applications, with 14 permits issue since last year, and another 12 pending from this year already.
'It's an expensive venture'
That sudden demand came from communities like low-lying Shore Acres, where the Martins bought a house just big enough to fit their four kids and three cats. They closed on the $260,000 steal nine years ago, having checked with neighbors that the area had never flooded. The only flood insurance record Dr. Martin's husband could find dated some 25 years back. They spent some $80,000 on renovations and assumed they could handle the risk of a little flooding every few decades.
But in recent years, repeated flooding from both named hurricanes and no-name storms fundamentally changed the community. When the Herald visited just after Helene, the streets were lined with waterlogged sofas and children's beds. Among Dr. Martin's personal losses: a Santa Claus cross-stitch from her late grandfather, who had inspired her to become a doctor.
'It's just so terrible to lose everything, to have everything in your house just completely water logged and dirty,' she told the Herald.
At least three houses on her block have already been elevated, she said, and about six more are in the process within the neighborhood. Another dozen are hoping to get started soon. Friends across the region, she says, are thinking about it.
Dr. Martin and her husband had already decided to raise their home after Hurricane Idalia flooded their home in 2023, just three years after they'd recovered from Eta. Each time documenting the devastation and emotional loss on social media.
'It's an expensive venture,' she told the Herald of the $400,000 price tag. Yet even considering that they're still paying off their mortgage, flood and homeowner's insurance, as well as the cost of renting a place while their home is being renovated, it's the cheapest option. A new house in a safer area around St. Pete would have cost them well above $1 million, while building a new, elevated house would have cost around $700,000.
The Martins picked the most experienced of the five contractors and got to work on a plan. The ground floor would be raised by a foot – still uninsurable, but useful for storage. Electrical wiring and outlets will be installed only on the 10-foot-high ceilings, and the space will be used for their two minivans, kids' bikes, and general storage.
When they submitted their request in June 2024, they were hoping that their home would be elevated in time to survive the next storm surge.
The process, however, was 'arduous' and 'very frustrating,' Dr. Martin told the Herald. In August, Dr. Martin says, the permitting office responded with a laundry list of still missing documents and plans. Each time they submitted additional documents, more requests followed.
Home elevation applications are already prioritized, the city said, though they're working to improve the process, including by streamlining the zoning review process for flood mitigation. Some have taken less than two months, others, like the Martin's, closer to a year.
'It's very frustrating, all of the things they could have given us in the beginning,' Martin said.
A month later, Hurricane Helene flooded their home for a third time. This time, 89 percent of the property's value was destroyed. Whether they'd wanted to or not, they'd now need to elevate their home, as FEMA stipulates that houses with damage exceeding half their value be torn down and rebuilt to the newest standards.
Trosclair said that some of his customers are elevating to comply with this so-called '50 percent rule' while others are preemptively raising their homes because they understand that climate change is making storms more severe. Since Helene and Milton, homeowners have been asked to include estimates for budget items that used to fall under the table, like the cost of wall paint.
It's a different story in Miami-Dade and along most of Florida's east coast. Raising pre-existing homes is still rare, in part because the region has recently been spared the devastation the Gulf Coast endured.
The priority, Scott said, should be elevating homes out of harm's way. Anything short of that simply won't cut it, he said. 'People who think they can stop flooding are delusional - they are not living in the real world,' he said.
Challenges of elevating in Florida
Like the regions affected by super storms Katrina and Sandy, Florida will need to grow a safe and solid home elevation industry – the sooner, the better. Contractors who execute the job will need to be aware of Florida's unique challenges, Trosclair said. First, there's the sandy soil, which requires special piles to secure the house. Then, there's the low-quality construction.
Unlike in New Orleans, where most homes sit on a thick, solid footing of more than 30 inches, foundations in Florida are often just 4 inches thick. Rebars were 'thrown in the dirt' and, decades later, have 'all rusted out,' said Trosclair, who grew up in Louisiana, and first got exposed to home elevation after Hurricane Katrina. The slimmer foundation slab can't hold the weight of the house once it's in the air, making it necessary to reinforce it with steel. On average, raising a home in Florida costs 30 percent more than elsewhere, Trosclair said.
The incredibly high expense has many homeowners holding out for Elevate Florida funding. Though the $400 million in federal grants is a step in the right direction, even spending all of it on raising ranch-style, slab-on-grade homes like the Martins' would only elevate about 1,000 homes. That's only about .1 percent of the 1.3 million private homes Scott estimates might need to be raised statewide.
Martin and her family felt they couldn't wait that long. They secured a low-interest loan instead, and, with hurricane season just around the corner and still no permit in sight, they gave their contractor the go ahead. 'We decided to raise it up, without a permit,' she told her followers. They did get a code violation, but finally secured their permit in April.
'Congratulations…application has passed the plan review process,' her husband read in a social media video, while she's smiling next to him on the couch in their three-bedroom rental.
Her followers, who've mostly come for the medical advice she shared with a no-nonsense approach, have been cheering her on. 'Congratulations on minimizing future flood damage!!,' one follower, who raised their own Connecticut home after Hurricane Sandy, wrote.
By the time Dr. Martin and her family return home, it may be early 2026. They still need stairs and must complete interior renovations. But by next hurricane season, they'll be 11 feet above their flood-prone neighborhood – perhaps even high enough to glimpse Tampa Bay – posting medical advice, not storm loss updates.
As one follower commented: 'Peace out flooding.'
This climate report is funded by Florida International University, the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation and in partnership with Journalism Funding Partners. The Miami Herald retains editorial control of all content.
If you have questions for the climate team, please email climate@miamiherald.com.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gen Z Woman Leaves LA After 15 Years, Buys 17-Room Italian House for $31K
Gen Z Woman Leaves LA After 15 Years, Buys 17-Room Italian House for $31K

Newsweek

time10 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Gen Z Woman Leaves LA After 15 Years, Buys 17-Room Italian House for $31K

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A Generation Z Canadian expat has swapped Los Angeles for a medieval Sicilian village after snapping up a €27,000 ($31,000) house with 17 rooms and a castle view. Kiki Leigh, 28, had lived in Los Angeles for nearly 15 years before stumbling across a TikTok video that changed her life. From TikTok Scroll to Italian Castle Views The clip featured Sicily, and its reputation for affordable real estate, and, within a week, Leigh was on a plane to the Italian island. "I bought the property in June 2024 after seeing a TikTok video of cheap homes for sale in Sicily," Leigh told Newsweek. "I booked a trip about a week later and, soon after, I was in Mussomeli looking at homes." Nestled in the heart of Sicily, Mussomeli is a historic village known for its medieval castle and breathtaking countryside views—a far cry from the bustling streets of Los Angeles. From left: A view from Kiki Leigh's Sicilian home; and the poster poses for the camera. From left: A view from Kiki Leigh's Sicilian home; and the poster poses for the camera. @ Renovating a 17-Room Sicilian House The house, which cost Leigh just €27,000, spans 17 rooms. While the structure is sound, the property requires a significant face-lift. Renovations began in March 2025 and are expected to take eight months. "The home needs roughly €140,000 of work," Leigh said. "The house I'm creating is my dream home, so I will be keeping it and living there full time when it's complete this fall." A Tale of Two Housing Markets While the 17-room house needs a lot of work, the price tag is a far cry from real estate prices in North America. Property company Redfin says the median sale price in July 2025 was about $652 per square foot, or roughly €6,200 per square meter. By contrast, data from shows the average asking price across the Sicily in June 2025 was just €1,167 ($1,362) per square meter. Prices range from €682/m² ($796/m²) in Caltanissetta, where Mussomeli is located, to €1,294/m² ($1,510/m²) in Palermo. That means homes in Los Angeles cost about five times more than the Sicilian regional average—and nearly 11 times more than in Mussomeli. From left: The front door is seen from inside the home; and a view from a balcony. From left: The front door is seen from inside the home; and a view from a balcony. @ Foreign Buyers Are Flocking to Sicily Sicily has become a hotspot for international buyers drawn to its cheap homes, warm climate, and rich cultural history. Many towns, including Mussomeli, have run "€1 home" schemes in recent years to combat depopulation, but even traditionally priced properties offer remarkable value compared to North American or Northern European markets. For Leigh, the move is not just about cost savings but also about lifestyle. "This is the house I've always dreamed of," she said. "It's not an investment to flip; it's where I want to live." A New Life in the Mediterranean Once renovations are finished this fall, Leigh will leave behind the high rents and traffic of Los Angeles for a slower-paced life in Sicily, surrounded by history, food, and sunshine. She shared her story on TikTok, showing off the home just four months into renovations with its hundreds of years of history and incredible number of rooms. "It's still not finished, but it's finally starting to feel like a home, not just a wild idea," Leigh said on TikTok. With thousands of followers, she has been sharing her journey on TikTok where she hopes to inspire others, just like she was inspired on TikTok.

Social media is dead. Meta has admitted as much. What now?
Social media is dead. Meta has admitted as much. What now?

Fast Company

time2 hours ago

  • Fast Company

Social media is dead. Meta has admitted as much. What now?

Back in March, Facebook introduced a new feature that wasn't exactly new. The Friends tab—described by Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg as 'a throwback to OG Facebook'—is a way for the app's users to see only the latest posts from friends, and none of the algorithm-recommended content otherwise dominating their feeds. Personal social networking, once Facebook's core product, had finally been relegated to a nostalgic lark its users could whimsically opt into. Less than a month later, with its years-in-the-making antitrust trial, the Federal Trade Commission sought to prove Meta's early-2010s acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp gave it a monopoly on personal social networking sites. Over the course of the trial's six weeks, Meta's defense emerged: a precise accounting of why Facebook's new Friends feature feels so quaint and retro. As detailed in a just-released post-trial brief, Meta's argument is that it can't possibly have a monopoly on personal social networking—because personal social networking no longer meaningfully exists. That's entirely due to the way people now use Facebook and Instagram, with most of them drawn to what Meta calls 'unconnected' content, from accounts users don't even follow. The protracted legal battle began in December 2020, when the FTC filed its lawsuit against Meta in conjunction with 46 states. The agency claimed Meta had scooped up smaller social startups like Instagram to extinguish their threat to its supremacy, and used the reach of its platforms to slow down user growth among competitors. (Less compelling for the FTC, apparently, were the instances in which Meta allegedly just copied features from the companies it didn't acquire.) Unfortunately for the FTC, the lawsuit began taking shape right as TikTok was enjoying the kind of explosive growth that Meta's monopoly is meant to have made impossible, and right as that growth's seismic impact on the entire social media landscape settled in. In its earliest days, Facebook was all about connection, rather than content. People used it to build digital rapport with new friends, get back in touch with old ones, and keep tabs on crushes. Gradually, though, the site's News Feed began absorbing more and more of the greater internet around it, to discourage users from ever leaving. Even before TikTok's For You page hit social media like a nonchronological atom bomb, Meta seemed to realize that content relevance was driving engagement more than friendship strength, and began peppering in 'unconnected' posts that algorithmically matched user interest. TikTok's ascendance merely accelerated the shift toward unconnected-ness. Log into Facebook in 2025, perhaps to search for a used couch on Marketplace, and what awaits between updates from friends is a heady brew of sponsored posts, straight-up ads, dispatches from various celebrities and politicians, and, yes, a bottomless well of short-form video content. The significance of Meta's evolution, though, seems lost on the FTC. The agency has worked itself into contortions to argue that Meta's primary offering is still 'personal social networking,' and that Meta isn't competing against TikTok or YouTube. In its opening statement, the FTC narrowly defined the market for its antitrust case, citing Meta competitors as insignificant as BeReal and MeWe, while excluding obvious peers such as X and TikTok, along with YouTube. With this puzzlingly limited definition of the services Facebook and Instagram provide, the FTC claims Meta's market share of personal social networking sites amounts to 78% of all monthly active users and 85% of time spent in-app. That assertion holds water, however, only if the mid-aughts version of social media were still a market any of these apps is currently competing to dominate. During the trial, the FTC thoroughly emphasized TikTok and YouTube's disinterest in 'friend sharing' as a means of differentiating them from Meta's apps. Adam Presser, who leads operations at TikTok, testified that only around 1% of users' time on TikTok is spent on the app's Friends tab. (The company only keeps that feature around, he claimed, in hopes that it might eventually enhance users' experience in some way.) The FTC further revealed during the trial the failure of YouTube's mid-2010s experiments with adding social features like private messaging, and that YouTube has since abandoned friend-sharing as a goal. If anything, the FTC may have been too convincing in its portrayal of the short-form video giants' indifference toward friend sharing. By doing so, the agency left an opening for Meta to argue why its own apps are now similarly inclined. People's habits have shifted away from friend sharing In its posttrial brief, Meta reveals the full extent to which it was rattled by TikTok's late-2010s success with both short-form video and AI recommendations, which the company claims slowed user growth for both Facebook and Instagram. 'Meta consequently made a major strategic shift to respond to competition,' the brief states. 'It invested billions of dollars to develop its own AI-recommendation algorithms to rival TikTok and introduced a new feature (called Reels) to serve the demonstrated consumer demand that was shifting away from friend sharing.' The document goes on to mention that a Meta executive, whose name and title are redacted, has been 'paying creators hundreds of millions of dollars' to secure exclusive content for Instagram. For better or worse, to suggest that Meta has not been competing in the arms race for unconnected video content is to deny reality. At the same time, Meta's users have demonstrably gravitated to content over connection. The posttrial brief cites a 2023 experiment to determine what most engages Facebook users. Upon increasing 'friend-original' content in users' feeds by 20%, the company reported that users began spending less time on the app. When Meta took the opposite tact, however, serving more short-form video content instead, users stayed locked in longer. Skip ahead to 2025 and Meta now claims users spend only 7% of their time on Instagram and 17% of their time on Facebook consuming content from online friends. advertisement Social media as an industry is now more than 20 years old. At the time Facebook first hit critical mass, adults may have been thrilled with the novelty of being digitally linked to so many friends and acquaintances. Zoomers, on the other hand, have grown up with social media and have been able to choose whether and how to connect online with friends their entire lives. Many now seem to prefer doing so in group chats and messaging apps. If they come to Facebook at all these days, many apparently do so as yet another means of consuming content. According to Meta's posttrial brief, 'The number of new young adult monthly active users with zero friends after 90 days on Facebook has increased from only 8% to 10% in 2012 to nearly 50% today.' In retrospect, Meta may have rolled out its 'OG Facebook'-style Friends tab less than a month before the antitrust trial began just to prove how uninterested today's users are in friend sharing. The posttrial brief cites, in its as-yet-unsealed evidence, 'de minimis usage of the new dedicated Friends Tab' as confirmation that 'the puck is moving elsewhere.' Where social media goes from here is yet to be determined So, where is social media heading? There are plenty of hints in where it already is—much of them having to do with AI. Social apps are currently inundated with all manner of AI slop. A Cornell University study found that during the 2024 election about 12% of images and 1.4% of text posts on X were AI-generated. More recently, TikTok has seen a surge in AI-generated video content—with a clip of bunnies on trampolines, created by Google Veo 3, garnering more than 230 million views on the app this summer. And beyond the AI that users are posting to these apps, the platforms have been experimenting with AI chatbots as a new form of 'friend' to connect with. So far, the results have been decidedly mixed. Back in March, for instance, a Facebook Messenger chatbot named 'Big sis Billie' reportedly lured a cognitively impaired man to a physical address across state lines. The man tripped and fell along the way, ultimately dying from his injuries. Early on in the antitrust trial, Zuckerberg described his vision of social media's future. Despite the relative failures of the Metaverse and Apple Vision Pro recently, the Meta CEO predicted the rise of 'increasingly immersive content' beyond video, claiming, 'we're just about due for this next major transition' to smart glasses that blend 'the physical and digital world together.' It remains to be seen, though, how much consumer demand exists for social media to become more like an augmented reality game. Perhaps the future of social media is group chat apps like Geneva, Internet 1.0-aping 'social magazines' like Perfectly Imperfect, or subscription-based micro-communities on Patreon built around shared interests in a podcast or creator. On a long enough timeline, though, every done-to-death trend becomes ripe for renewal. (See: our reboot-filled box office, or Uber's obsession with reinventing the bus.) It may just be a matter of time before user fatigue from connecting with people across disparate sites and apps leads a Silicon Valley wunderkind to bring everyone together in a massive digital community. Sort of like a social network.

New image reveals Kia could soon launch transforming EV: 'Something I want to see more of'
New image reveals Kia could soon launch transforming EV: 'Something I want to see more of'

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

New image reveals Kia could soon launch transforming EV: 'Something I want to see more of'

Kia's futuristic electric van may soon hit American roads, according to The Korean Car Blog. The Kia PV5 prototype was recently spotted by Instagram user Chris Higa (@chrisediting) undergoing testing in Arizona, a sign that the automaker could be preparing the multipurpose electric vehicle for a U.S. release. The PV5 isn't your average electric van. It's the first major launch in Kia's Platform Beyond Vehicle initiative, which is centered on flexibility. Thanks to its modular upper body design, the PV5 can morph from a passenger shuttle to a cargo van, delivery vehicle, or even robotaxi. It's essentially one vehicle with many uses, making it a cost-effective and eco-friendly option for fleet operators, small businesses, and rideshare companies. Kia's desert test run is a big deal. Arizona's extreme heat pushes EV battery systems to their limits, and testing there is usually a sign that a vehicle is being prepared for the North American market. If the PV5 makes it stateside, it'll join a growing list of EV options available to U.S. drivers. EVs come with benefits such as lower fuel costs, minimal maintenance, and zero tailpipe pollution — plus, they're quieter and offer smoother drives than their gas-powered cousins. While some critics worry about the pollution tied to EV battery production, data shows the bigger picture favors EVs over internal combustion engine vehicles. ICE vehicles release about 350 grams of carbon per mile over their lifetimes, compared to just 200 for EVs running on the average U.S. grid. Plus, EV battery materials can be recycled, unlike fossil fuels, which are burned and lost forever. EV ownership can be even cheaper for drivers who install solar panels at home. Charging with solar power can lower monthly costs when compared to using public stations or relying on the grid. For anyone interested in exploring this option, EnergySage offers vetted quotes from local solar providers and can help homeowners save up to $10,000 on installations. Social media users have already taken notice of the PV5's flexible design and sleek test images. "That van is something I want to see more of. Hope it becomes available in U.S.," one Instagrammer commented. Another added: "It would be interesting to see! If sold in the U.S. to compete with the VW ID Buzz, it could make vans/minivans popular again." A third chimed in, saying, "I'd drive it." Would you be more likely to drive an EV if you could charge it in 5 minutes? Yes Depends on the cost No way I already have an EV Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store