BJP urges officials to protect forest land
The delegation alleged that forest lands in Survey Nos. 133, 131 and 40, spread over more than 300 acres, were being illegally encroached upon by a Hyderabad-based real estate developer. According to the BJP, the builder, in collusion with local political leaders, had begun destroying hills and forest areas to facilitate illegal occupation.
'The developer started clearing forested hills with machinery, but retreated after BJP leaders and local farmers strongly protested the move,' said Ramalingeswara Rao, adding that this was not an isolated incident.
The BJP leaders expressed concern over what they described as a pattern of illegal encroachments on forest land in the region, allegedly due to inaction by revenue officials.
They stressed the need for an immediate and comprehensive government land survey to clearly demarcate and declare forest lands, and to initiate action against encroachers.
The delegation further said that with the support of BJP national leader Dr Ponguleti
Sudhakar Reddy, the matter will soon be brought to the notice of Union Ministers G Kishan Reddy (Coal and Mines), Bandi Sanjay Kumar (Minister of State for Home), and Bhupender Yadav (Environment, Forest and Climate Change).
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
7 minutes ago
- Hans India
Political Storm Erupts Over Chidambaram's Comments On Pahalgam Terror Attack Origins
Senior Congress politician P Chidambaram found himself at the center of a heated political controversy on Monday after defending his recent statements about the Pahalgam terror incident, which he claimed were being deliberately distorted through a coordinated misinformation effort. The veteran leader pushed back against accusations from the Bharatiya Janata Party, who alleged he was providing unwarranted support to Pakistan's position on terrorism. In a social media post on X, Chidambaram expressed frustration over what he described as selective editing and misrepresentation of his comments from a recent television interview. He criticized those spreading misinformation as the "worst kind" of trolls who deliberately suppress complete recorded interviews, extract isolated sentences, silence specific words, and present speakers in a negative light to serve their political agenda. The political firestorm began following Chidambaram's interview with The Quint, where he raised questions about the government's assertions linking Pakistan to the devastating April 22 attack in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam region. The assault resulted in 26 fatalities, with the majority being innocent civilians caught in the violence. During the interview, Chidambaram challenged the official narrative by questioning whether authorities had successfully identified the perpetrators or determined their origins. He suggested that the attackers could potentially be domestic terrorists rather than foreign infiltrators, emphasizing the absence of concrete evidence supporting claims of Pakistani involvement in the deadly incident. The BJP responded with fierce criticism, accusing the opposition Congress party of compromising national security interests and aligning with Pakistan's official stance on terrorism. Party officials characterized Chidambaram's remarks as providing undeserved legitimacy to Pakistan's denials of involvement in cross-border terrorism. Amit Malviya, who leads the BJP's information technology cell, used social media to condemn what he viewed as Congress's pattern of defending Pakistan following terrorist attacks. He questioned why Congress leaders consistently appeared to advocate for Pakistan's position rather than supporting India's security forces in their fight against state-sponsored terrorism. The criticism intensified when BJP Member of Parliament Nishikant Dubey escalated the rhetoric by labeling the entire Congress organization as traitorous. Speaking to the ANI news agency, Dubey referenced various allegations against Congress leadership, including claims about Rahul Gandhi's interactions with China's Communist Party and unsubstantiated corruption charges, while praising Prime Minister Modi's leadership as an obstacle to what he characterized as Congress's anti-national agenda. Another BJP parliamentarian, Deepak Prakash, echoed similar accusations, claiming that Congress was aligning itself with those who oppose India's interests and warning that the Indian population would never forgive political leaders who undermined national security. Several prominent Congress representatives rallied to defend Chidambaram against the mounting criticism, arguing that the BJP was attempting to deflect attention from its own shortcomings in addressing terrorism effectively. They characterized the attacks on Chidambaram as a deliberate diversionary strategy designed to avoid accountability for security failures. Congress MP Manickam Tagore specifically pointed to what he described as the BJP's failure to properly execute Operation Sindoor, suggesting that the governing party was using the controversy to distract from more substantive issues surrounding the Pahalgam attack and the government's counter-terrorism efforts. He emphasized Congress's unwavering support for India's armed forces in their ongoing battle against terrorist threats. Veteran Congress leader Pramod Tiwari raised pointed questions about the investigation's progress, highlighting that three months after the attack, the perpetrators remained unidentified. He questioned the government's effectiveness in tracking down those responsible for killing what he described as the husbands of 26 women, criticizing the administration's handling of the security situation in Kashmir as potentially harmful to national interests. The controversy also drew commentary from outside the Congress-BJP divide, with Shiv Sena (UBT) Member of Parliament Priyanka Chaturvedi offering criticism of Chidambaram's position. Drawing on his extensive experience as a former Home Minister and cabinet member in multiple portfolios, she argued that his comments were inappropriate given the well-established pattern of Pakistani involvement in similar attacks over several decades. Chaturvedi referenced the initial claim of responsibility by The Resistance Front (TRF), which was subsequently withdrawn, and noted Pakistan's advocacy for such groups in international forums like the United Nations as clear evidence of the source of terrorist threats facing India. She maintained that the origins of such attacks should be obvious given historical patterns and Pakistan's documented support for militant organizations operating in the region. The debate reflects broader tensions over how political parties approach discussions of national security and terrorism, with opposition parties seeking to hold the government accountable for security failures while governing parties demand unity in facing external threats. The controversy also highlights the challenges of maintaining productive political discourse on sensitive security matters without compromising either democratic debate or national solidarity in confronting terrorism. As the political storm continues, both sides appear entrenched in their positions, with Congress defending its right to question government claims and demand accountability, while the BJP maintains that such questioning undermines national security and provides comfort to hostile foreign actors. The resolution of this controversy may depend on whether new evidence emerges regarding the Pahalgam attack or whether political attention shifts to other pressing national issues.
The Wire
7 minutes ago
- The Wire
NGO Alleges ‘Statistical Purge' in Challenge to EC's 65 Lakh Deletions from Bihar Draft Rolls
Visakhapatnam: The Election Commission (EC) is facing a legal and procedural challenge over its decision to remove approximately 65 lakh voters from Bihar's electoral rolls following a month-long 'special intensive revision' (SIR). A Maharashtra-based civil society group, Vote for Democracy (VFD), has presented a report to the Supreme Court alleging the exercise was a "statistical purge" riddled with anomalies. The EC maintains that the process was a transparent and successful clean-up of the rolls, conducted with "overwhelming participation" from electors. The revision, the first of its kind in Bihar since 2003, concluded with 7.24 crore voters re-affirming their eligibility and 65 lakh (8.31% of the electorate) marked for deletion. A one-month period for claims and objections to the draft rolls, published on August 1, is currently underway. The VFD's report, titled " Dysfunctional ECI and Weaponisation of India's Election System" alleges that the EC's own daily data reveals patterns that are logistically and statistically improbable. The analysis points to several anomalies, including: Sudden data surges: The number of "untraceable" voters reportedly surged by 771% in 24 hours between July 22 and July 23. The number of "permanently shifted" voters increased by over 15 lakh in three days (July 21-24), while the number of identified "deceased" electors jumped by 2,11,462 in a single day, an outcome the report deems logistically impossible. Data discrepancies: On July 22-23, the VFD analysis notes that for every one new enumeration form received from the field, more than four voters were identified for removal, suggesting the deletion process operated independently of form collection. Opaque reporting: The report claims that as deletion numbers increased, the ECI's reporting became less granular, with precise figures being rounded off or grouped under a single "Merged Data" heading after July 22. Static figures: Between July 14 and July 17, figures for "probably deceased" and "probably permanently shifted" remained completely static, which the report argues is improbable for a dynamic, real-time field exercise. The VFD report also raises concerns about the potential disproportionate impact on vulnerable populations, identifying "hotspot districts" with deletion rates far exceeding the state average. These include Gopalganj (15.10%), Purnia (12.08%), Kishanganj (11.82%) and Madhubani (10.44%), areas with large migrant labourer and minority populations. Meanwhile, in its official communications, the EC has described the SIR as a necessary and structured process to update rolls that have seen significant changes over 20 years. The commission states the goal was to ensure "no eligible citizen is left out while no ineligible person is included". According to the EC, the 65 lakh voters who did not submit enumeration forms and were excluded from the draft rolls fall into three categories: 36 lakh permanently shifted or not found (4.59%), 22 lakh deceased (2.83%) and seven lakh enrolled in multiple places (0.89%). The EC's stated procedure involved door-to-door visits from nearly one lakh booth-level officers between June 25 and July 26. The commission also emphasised the involvement of political parties, stating that lists of unverified electors were shared with 12 major parties on July 20 for their booth-level agents to review. The EC asserts that the current claims and objections period, which runs until September 1, constitutes due process and that "no deletion will be made without due inquiry and providing the concerned person a fair hearing". As of August 15, two weeks into the period, the EC reported that 28,370 claims and objections had been received directly from electors. The final electoral roll for the 2025 state assembly elections is scheduled to be published on September 30. The resolution of the conflicting accounts presented by the EC and VFD now rests with the commission's internal appellate process and the Supreme Court.
Hans India
7 minutes ago
- Hans India
BJP Veterans Resist Calls For Renewed Alliance with Shiromani Akali Dal In Punjab
The recent suggestion by Sunil Jakhar for the Bharatiya Janata Party to reestablish its partnership with the Shiromani Akali Dal has triggered significant resistance from within the party's Punjab unit, with veteran leaders and the national leadership expressing strong reservations about revisiting what they consider a politically limiting arrangement from the past. Jakhar's public declaration advocating for renewed cooperation between the two parties, which he positioned as necessary for maintaining communal harmony in Punjab, has been met with skepticism from long-serving BJP members who spent years operating under what they describe as the restrictive framework of Akali dominance. These seasoned politicians, along with Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh activists and ideological workers, view the proposal as a regression to a period they believed had been definitively left behind. The party's recent organizational changes signal a clear direction away from Jakhar's approach. On July 7, BJP national president J.P. Nadda appointed Pathankot MLA Ashwani Sharma as the state unit's working president, marking a return to trusted cadre leadership. Punjab, along with Manipur, had been unable to complete organizational elections for mandals and districts, necessitating Sharma's appointment initially as working president rather than full president. However, the party high command subsequently instructed Sharma to complete the electoral process, representing what many interpret as the party's return to its established organizational structure. The appointment of Sharma, who had previously served as state chief twice during the earlier BJP-SAD alliance, represents a significant shift from the experimental leadership approach that brought Jakhar to prominence two years ago. Party insiders suggest that Jakhar's tenure revealed his inability to understand the concerns of long-term party members and his misalignment with core BJP and Sangh ideological principles. Veterans within the Punjab BJP argue that the previous alliance arrangement primarily benefited the Badal-led Akali Dal rather than creating genuine partnership. During those years, the BJP found itself confined to urban constituencies while the Akalis dominated rural areas and dictated the terms of political engagement. This arrangement forced BJP leaders to moderate their positions on various issues, from religious matters to rural politics, effectively limiting their ability to articulate an independent political identity. The dissolution of the BJP-SAD alliance in 2020, triggered by disagreements over central farm legislation, provided what many party members describe as liberation from these constraints. For the first time in decades, the BJP could assess its authentic strength in Punjab without being filtered through Akali priorities or limited by coalition compromises. Recent electoral performance has provided encouragement for those favoring independent growth. While the BJP did not secure any Lok Sabha seats in the 2024 general elections, the party demonstrated significant improvement by leading in 23 assembly segments and finishing as a close second in approximately 10 additional constituencies. The party captured around 19 percent of the total vote share, substantially outperforming the SAD, which saw its support decline below 12 percent. In 65 assembly segments, BJP candidates received more votes than their SAD counterparts, achievements that occurred despite ongoing farmer protests and anti-BJP sentiment in rural areas. These results have convinced many party leaders that the BJP can build sustainable political influence without relying on Akali partnerships. Senior leaders from the Doaba region, who have been associated with the party since the Atal Bihari Vajpayee era, argue that direct engagement with Sikh voters without SAD intermediaries represents a more promising long-term strategy than returning to restrictive alliance arrangements. The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh has also developed comprehensive outreach programs targeting Sikh communities, scholars, and institutions both within Punjab and internationally. These efforts focus on ideological dialogue rather than transactional political relationships, creating spaces for Sikh voices that embrace both religious devotion and nationalist perspectives without requiring SAD endorsement. Recent RSS initiatives include consultations led by sarkaryavah Dattatreya Hosabale and other senior leaders with Punjab-based Sangh activists, ideologues, and academics to deepen understanding of border state dynamics and Sikh community concerns. These efforts represent systematic attempts to build authentic relationships rather than depend on traditional political intermediaries. Party leaders highlight various achievements of the Modi government that directly benefited Sikh communities, including the removal of blacklisted Sikhs from entry restrictions, the opening of the Kartarpur Sahib corridor through negotiations with Pakistan, and policies accommodating Sikh religious practices such as allowing Amritdhari Sikhs to carry kirpans on domestic flights. During the alliance years, SAD often claimed credit for such initiatives, but the party's credibility crisis has limited its ability to effectively communicate these achievements to Sikh constituents. Current SAD leader Sukhbir Badal has responded to alliance discussions by stating that his party would only align with those genuinely supporting Punjab's interests, while listing demands including the release of convicted Sikh militants. However, BJP leaders note that the Modi government had already released some Sikh militants during its first term without receiving political credit from SAD. The broader political landscape in Punjab appears to support the BJP's independent approach. The decline of radical elements, exemplified by figures like Amritpal Singh, the poor performance of Khalistan-aligned candidates in Canada's 2024 elections, and reduced interest in separatist narratives among Punjab's youth suggest that de-radicalization processes are gradually taking effect. This changing environment creates opportunities for parties that can communicate respectfully and directly with Sikh communities without relying on traditional alliance structures. BJP's evolving approach is evident in specific situations such as the party's support for actor-singer Diljit Dosanjh during controversies surrounding his movie Sardaar Ji 3, which featured a Pakistani actress. Rather than allowing radical groups to exploit the issue for anti-government sentiment, the BJP effectively defused tensions by backing Dosanjh, demonstrating a more nuanced understanding of contemporary Sikh concerns. Many party leaders view Jakhar's alliance proposal as applying outdated solutions to current challenges. They argue that Punjab's political dynamics have fundamentally changed since the 1990s, requiring fresh approaches rather than revival of previous arrangements. Some leaders suggest that Jakhar's perspective may be influenced by his Congress background, where broad coalitions were standard practice, rather than reflecting the BJP's emphasis on ideological consistency and long-term vision. The party is instead focusing on developing independent political strategies tailored to Punjab's diverse constituencies. This includes engaging with backward classes, ex-servicemen, traders, and communities in regions where neither Congress nor the Aam Aadmi Party maintains strong presence. In the Majha region, the BJP sees potential among border villages and mixed Hindu-Sikh constituencies, while in Doaba, non-resident Indians and Dalit voters appear increasingly receptive to nationalist messaging independent of Akali influence. Senior BJP leadership has chosen not to publicly confront Jakhar over his alliance suggestions, but their strategic direction clearly emphasizes building direct relationships with Sikh communities rather than outsourcing such engagement to SAD. The party's future in Punjab appears to depend on patient, systematic outreach efforts conducted village by village, institution by institution, rather than broad political deals with declining coalition partners. This approach reflects the BJP's broader organizational philosophy of sustainable growth through ideological engagement rather than electoral convenience, suggesting that calls for renewed SAD alliance are unlikely to gain traction among decision-makers who have invested years in building independent political infrastructure in Punjab.
