Bersatu proposes united opposition front
According to party secretary-general Datuk Seri Mohamed Azmin Ali, the proposal was put forward during the party's supreme leadership council (MPT) meeting and will be discussed at the Perikatan Nasional presidential council meeting later this weekend.
He said that the party leaders have also agreed to have party president Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin lead the efforts to initiate this collaboration.
Azmin added that Muhyiddin had also instructed Bersatu leaders to intensify groundwork in key constituencies ahead of the Sabah state election.
"The MPT is confident that the people of Sabah are receptive to and support the struggle of Bersatu and Perikatan Nasional," he said in a statement on Tuesday (July 15).
The council also confirmed the party's annual general assembly will take place on Sept 6–7 in Shah Alam, Selangor, with a ninth-anniversary dinner to be held on the final night, expected to host over 2,000 guests.
Azmin said the council had also approved the launch of the Infaq Bersatu fundraising programme, inviting contributions from the public to support its pro-rakyat agenda.
Additionally, he said that Bersatu would mobilise its leaders and supporters for the "Himpunan Turun Anwar" rally at Dataran Merdeka on July 26, scheduled to begin at 2pm.
"This peaceful gathering aims to defend the Constitution and the rule of law, and to stand against oppression," said Azmin.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
2 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Mechanisms to probe judges exist under constitution, says Azalina
Law and institutional reform minister Azalina Othman Said said judicial independence is vital to maintaining public confidence in the justice system. (Facebook pic) PETALING JAYA : The government today reminded all parties that the Federal Constitution outlines clear mechanisms for dealing with judicial misconduct amid concerns over judicial interference and integrity. Law and institutional reform minister Azalina Othman Said said Articles 125(3) and (4) empower the Yang di-Pertuan Agong to establish a special tribunal to investigate allegations of misconduct against judges, on the advice of the prime minister after consultation with the chief justice. She said additional safeguards are provided under Article 125(3A), which allows the chief justice to refer breaches of ethics to the Judicial Ethics Committee, and Article 125(3B), which supports a written code of conduct, currently the Judges' Code of Ethics 2009. 'This framework ensures that the judiciary remains free from political or external influence, thereby upholding the supremacy of the constitution and the rule of law,' Azalina said in a statement today. 'The executive and legislature have no power to interfere in issues of judicial ethics. This is essential to maintain public trust in the justice system.' Azalina said the government acknowledged the concerns raised by the Malaysian Bar during yesterday's judicial independence march and pledged to address them transparently and in accordance with the law. She said the Bar would be invited to contribute to an ongoing comparative study on judicial appointments, led by the Legal Affairs Division of the Prime Minister's Department, together with select committees from the Dewan Rakyat and Dewan Negara. 'Furthermore, the concerns raised by the Malaysian Bar must be examined in accordance with the Federal Constitution, the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) Act 2009, and all other applicable laws,' she said. A document allegedly containing excerpts from a JAC meeting held in May went viral on social media last weekend, raising concerns from various parties. The extract of the purported minutes said that the former chief justice had raised concerns about the integrity of a candidate for an administrative post in the judiciary. Claims were made that the judge in question had once attempted to influence the outcome of a case in favour of a specific party, and had sought the transfer of a fellow judge for holding a differing view. Police are investigating the alleged leak of the JAC meeting minutes under the Official Secrets Act and two other laws.
The Star
6 hours ago
- The Star
Bersatu proposes united opposition front
PETALING JAYA: Bersatu is proposing the formation of a united opposition front involving parties outside the government bloc to coordinate a joint stand on matters affecting the people. According to party secretary-general Datuk Seri Mohamed Azmin Ali, the proposal was put forward during the party's supreme leadership council (MPT) meeting and will be discussed at the Perikatan Nasional presidential council meeting later this weekend. He said that the party leaders have also agreed to have party president Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin lead the efforts to initiate this collaboration. Azmin added that Muhyiddin had also instructed Bersatu leaders to intensify groundwork in key constituencies ahead of the Sabah state election. "The MPT is confident that the people of Sabah are receptive to and support the struggle of Bersatu and Perikatan Nasional," he said in a statement on Tuesday (July 15). The council also confirmed the party's annual general assembly will take place on Sept 6–7 in Shah Alam, Selangor, with a ninth-anniversary dinner to be held on the final night, expected to host over 2,000 guests. Azmin said the council had also approved the launch of the Infaq Bersatu fundraising programme, inviting contributions from the public to support its pro-rakyat agenda. Additionally, he said that Bersatu would mobilise its leaders and supporters for the "Himpunan Turun Anwar" rally at Dataran Merdeka on July 26, scheduled to begin at 2pm. "This peaceful gathering aims to defend the Constitution and the rule of law, and to stand against oppression," said Azmin.
New Straits Times
12 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Former Bar president calls to amend JAC Act to give 'meaningful interpretation'
KUALA LUMPUR: The government should amend the Constitution to give the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) Act 2009 greater legal weight in the appointment of judges, says former Malaysian Bar Council president Salim Bashir. He said while the JAC Act 2009 had set out the procedural framework for judicial selections and recommendations, it should be given a "meaningful interpretation". "JAC Act 2009 is a federal law enacted under legislative power by virtue of Article 132(1)(a) of the Federal Constitution. "Though it sets out a procedural framework for selections of judges and recommendations, it should be given a meaningful interpretation that its existence is to complement the constitutional discretion bestowed under Article 122B(1) to the prime minister for recommendations and His Majesty for the appointment of judges. "Otherwise, it will certainly render the law redundant, repugnant to its objective and stamp absurdity to the working of rule of law and independence of judiciary," he said. Yesterday, Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reform) Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said said that the JAC Act was not a binding provision in the appointment of judges. She said that such appointments were ultimately governed by Article 122B of the Federal Constitution, which empowered the prime minister to advise the Yang di-Pertuan Agong and the Conference of Rulers. She added that the JAC's role was to screen, assess and recommend names of judicial candidates, but its recommendations were not final or binding. Salim said if the government believes that the JAC Act did not provide any binding effect on the appointment of judges, then it should move to amend the Constitution. "Her (Azalina) statement has given impetus for legislative changes, and the government should consider amending the Constitution to give effect to the JAC Act on the appointment of judges. I am sure legislative members will render their support." Meanwhile, criminal lawyer Datuk Geethan Ram Vincent agreed with Azalina's constitutional interpretation, but cautioned against overlooking the JAC's intended role. "Yes, this is correct. Under Article 122B of the Federal Constitution, the prime minister retains full authority to advise the Yang di-Pertuan Agong on judicial appointments. The JAC can recommend, but not decide. "Despite lacking binding authority, the JAC serves important functions. It provides professional vetting of candidates, ensures some degree of transparency in appointments and maintains records of the selection process. "Even though its recommendations are not binding, the JAC acts as an important institutional check against arbitrary or political appointments." Geethan said the JAC's primary task was to review potential judges based on their experience, skills and professional conduct. "They interview candidates and then suggest names to the prime minister. Although the JAC thoroughly documents the selection process, it has no authority to compel the prime minister to accept its recommendations or to require any explanation if they are disregarded. "In essence, the JAC handles the groundwork but holds no real influence over whether its suggestions are acted upon." He added that while Azalina's remarks were technically accurate, they failed to address the broader issue of judicial independence. "While Azalina's remarks are technically accurate regarding the constitutional framework, they overlook the original intent behind creating the JAC to reduce political influence in judicial appointments. "Her statement reflects the current legal reality but fails to address whether this system adequately protects."
