The Atlantic Hires Alexandra Petri as Staff Writer
Alexandra Petri, one of America's great columnists and funniest writers, is joining The Atlantic as a staff writer. Alexandra will begin writing for The Atlantic next month; she has been a long-time columnist for The Washington Post, where she started as an intern in 2010.
Below is the staff announcement about Alexandra from editor in chief Jeffrey Goldberg:
Dear everyone,
I'm writing today to share the outstanding news that Alexandra Petri, one of America's greatest columnists – and funniest writers – is joining The Atlantic as a staff writer. You are undoubtedly familiar with her work as a columnist for The Washington Post (although you may have seen her writing in McSweeneys, The New Yorker, or other publications), and I'm beyond thrilled that she is coming aboard.
Alexandra is brilliant and hilarious, wildly creative and adventurous. Her columns for The Post have been the favorites of readers for years. No one cuts to the heart of the matter faster or more incisively than Alexandra. And even those among us who don't laugh out loud as they read columns laugh out loud while reading hers.
Alexandra appears to believe that no experience should be left unexperienced, which is why she entered and performed in an international whistling competition without actually knowing how to whistle. Then there was the time she made what was later described as the 'worst final Jeopardy! wager of all time.' She somewhat recently achieved her lifelong dream of being a talking head in a documentary about our 23rd president, Benjamin Harrison. Alexandra is the winner of the 2025 Thurber Prize for American Humor—for her book, AP's US History: Important American Documents I Made Up. She also received an award for her parody Twitter account (Emo Kylo Ren). And she is an O. Henry International pun-off champion (You can watch her winning performance here).
Alexandra begins with us next month. I can't wait for all of you to meet her, and I can't wait to read her. Please join me in welcoming Alexandra to The Atlantic.
Best wishes,
Jeff
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time Magazine
7 hours ago
- Time Magazine
The Most Challenging Questions in Jeopardy's History (According to AI)
This article is published by a partner of TIME. 'Jeopardy!' has captivated audiences for decades with its unique format of providing answers and having contestants respond with questions. With its fast-paced nature and broad range of categories, the show challenges not only the general knowledge of its contestants but also their ability to think quickly under pressure. Throughout its history, the show has used some incredibly difficult questions that have left even the most experienced contestants stumped. These questions often require precise knowledge in specialized fields, and despite their seemingly straightforward nature, the pressure of the game can cause even the brightest minds to falter. Over the years, 'Jeopardy!' has tested the knowledge of countless contestants, with some clues proving so challenging that they remain infamous in the show's history. Whether it's science, history, or pop culture, the difficulty of the clues often lies in their phrasing, the obscure details they demand, or the limited time in which contestants must respond. This article highlights 10 of the most challenging questions in 'Jeopardy!' history, focusing on why these clues stumped even the most seasoned players and the lessons we can learn from their difficulty. Thanks to AI, we can now analyze why these clues were so difficult and break down the specific aspects that caused them to perplex contestants. Let's dive into 10 of the hardest 'Jeopardy!' questions ever asked and see how even the most knowledgeable players struggled under the pressure. 1. Category: Science (2012) Clue:"Discovered in 1947, the Dead Sea Scrolls were written in Hebrew and this language." Answer: ' What is Aramaic?' Background: The Dead Sea Scrolls are a collection of ancient texts that have provided significant insight into early religious history, and while Hebrew is a commonly known language in this context, Aramaic was the other language featured in many of the scrolls. This $800 clue stumped all the contestants, demonstrating how even seemingly simple facts can become complicated under pressure. Aramaic is an ancient language spoken during the time of Jesus, but its obscure nature in the context of the scrolls made it difficult for contestants to recall quickly. Despite the relatively low point value, this question showed how unfamiliar or less commonly known languages can cause difficulty in fast-paced quiz environments. Aramaic's historical significance was key but not as easily recognized. The timing pressure caused contestants to second-guess their immediate response. Hebrew's prominence overshadowed Aramaic, causing confusion. The discovery date (1947) added a layer of complexity, tying it to the 20th century. Ancient languages like Aramaic are often overlooked in general knowledge trivia. 2. Category: Music (2018) Clue:"This dance seen here, performed in 3/4 time, became popular in Vienna and spread across Europe in the 1800s." Answer: ' What is the waltz?' Background: The waltz is one of the most iconic dances in European history, known for its graceful movements performed to music in 3/4 time. Despite its historical importance, this $2000 clue stumped all three contestants. The difficulty here wasn't necessarily in knowing the waltz, but rather in recognizing it within the context of the clue and responding quickly under pressure. The contestants struggled to come up with the term "waltz," as they likely overthought the answer, possibly considering other dances or wondering if it was too obvious. The 3/4 time signature gave a big hint, but contestants were hesitant to connect it to the waltz. The cultural significance of the waltz was immense, but it required rapid recall under pressure. The history of the dance in Vienna and Europe may have distracted contestants from recognizing the correct answer. Other dances like the minuet or the mazurka could have caused confusion in the contestants' minds. The $2000 value made the question particularly high stakes, adding more pressure. 3. Category: World Geography (2015) Clue:"This European capital's Vasa Museum houses a warship that sank on its maiden voyage in 1628." Answer: ' What is Stockholm?' Background: The Vasa Museum in Stockholm is home to the Vasa ship, which tragically sank on its maiden voyage in 1628. Despite the fame of the Vasa ship, this clue left contestants stumped, especially given that it was a relatively straightforward geography question. The problem arose from the contestants' confusion about the European cities with notable maritime history. With multiple cities across Europe known for their naval connections, contestants had difficulty recalling Stockholm under time pressure, which led to a triple stumper. The historical importance of the Vasa ship made the clue valuable but not immediately recalled. The location of the museum in Stockholm was key but not universally known by all contestants. European geography involving maritime history may have caused contestants to overthink. The year (1628) was significant, but the city's historical ties to the event were not immediately apparent. The triple stumper highlighted how specific knowledge about European history and geography can cause confusion. 4. Category: Literature (2022) Clue:"The title of this 1961 Roald Dahl story is now used as military slang for someone who flies through dangerous situations." Answer: ' What is 'James and the Giant Peach'?' Background: In this Final Jeopardy! question, the answer "James and the Giant Peach" was famously elusive for all three contestants, despite the book's popularity. The clue's challenge was that the title had been adapted into a term used in military slang, which was not widely known outside of specific circles. The obscure link between the book's title and the slang caused confusion, as most contestants were more familiar with the story's plot than its extended use in military contexts. This clue demonstrates how even well-known works can be tough to recall when the reference point is an uncommon one. The military slang connection made the question more challenging than simply recalling the title. Roald Dahl's literary fame wasn't enough for some contestants to instantly recognize the slang use of the title. The uncommon reference to military slang created confusion. The children's book's popularity didn't translate into recognizing the slang term. Final Jeopardy's stakes added extra pressure, leading to hesitations in responding. The literary knowledge required combined with a non-literal interpretation of the title made it tricky. 5. Category: Television (2016) Clue:"The last name of this TV dad played by John Goodman was actually Harris; the show's creator changed it to honor his own dad." Answer: ' What is Conner?' (from Roseanne) Background: In this $2000 clue, contestants were asked about John Goodman's character on 'Roseanne.' While the show 'Roseanne' is a major part of television history, the clue referred to the character's original last name—Harris—and its change to Conner as a tribute to the show's creator. Contestants were stumped, possibly because the details were considered trivial and not essential to the show's plot or popular discussions. Many viewers at home might have guessed correctly, but under the pressure of the game, the connection to the character's last name was easily overlooked. The creator's personal connection to the character's name change made it a niche piece of trivia. The character of Dan Conner was iconic, but the name change was less well-known. Television history can involve subtle behind-the-scenes facts that aren't always widely publicized. The $2000 value added pressure, as contestants wanted to secure a significant score with this clue. Contestants may have focused on more prominent aspects of the show instead of character details. 6. Category: American History (2020) Clue:"Before the American Revolution, Crispus Attucks, a man of African and Native American descent, was killed in this 1770 event." Answer: ' What is the Boston Massacre?' Background: This clue, featured in Final Jeopardy!, stumped all contestants despite being one of the most significant events leading to the American Revolution. The challenge stemmed from the specific historical context, where Crispus Attucks' death in the Boston Massacre was a pivotal moment in pre-revolutionary America. The contestants had difficulty connecting the year 1770 to the event, and many were unsure of the exact details. Although the Boston Massacre is a key part of American history, its significance in this particular context wasn't immediately obvious to the players. The Boston Massacre was a well-known event, but the association with Attucks added complexity. The year 1770 didn't immediately resonate with all contestants under the time crunch. The specifics of Attucks' death required contestants to recall obscure historical details. The question's phrasing caused confusion about the event's historical importance. The Final Jeopardy pressure made it harder for contestants to connect the dots quickly. Understanding pre-revolutionary events was crucial, yet not everyone could recall it under the time limit. 7. Category: Word Origins (2019) Clue:"From the Latin for 'to roll', it's the type of chair seen here." Answer: ' What is a rotary chair?' Background: This $1600 clue stumped all three contestants, despite the fact that the answer seemed straightforward. The clue's challenge stemmed from the unfamiliarity of the term "rotary chair," which was a specific type of office furniture. Contestants were confused by the term's Latin roots and were unfamiliar with this more obscure category in furniture design. The connection between the Latin word for "to roll" and the type of chair seen in the visual was lost on them due to the obscure nature of the terminology. The specific term "rotary chair" was not part of everyday knowledge for most contestants. The visual aid created confusion rather than clarity, as contestants were unsure of the reference. Latin etymology required contestants to recall specialized language knowledge. Rotary chairs are often associated with office settings but are not universally recognized. The word's origin added complexity, as contestants were distracted by the unfamiliar term. Office furniture terminology is less likely to be top-of-mind in general trivia. 8. Category: Ancient History (2017) Clue:"Built circa 1350 B.C.E., the Temple of Luxor honored this Egyptian god and was a site of an annual festival." Answer: ' Who is Amun?' Background: The Temple of Luxor is one of the most impressive structures from ancient Egypt, but the reference to Amun, the god it honored, was challenging for contestants. The clue required contestants to recall Egyptian mythology and the deities associated with monumental temples, which not all players could do under pressure. The specificity of the festival and the god's role was difficult for many to recall, resulting in another stumper. Egyptian gods like Ra and Osiris are more famous, making Amun harder to remember quickly. Amun's lesser fame compared to other Egyptian gods made it tough to recall. The festival at Luxor added to the complexity, as it wasn't a widely recognized historical event. Ancient Egyptian history requires knowledge of a vast pantheon of deities, complicating quick recall. Egyptian mythology is rich but often difficult to connect with specific monuments. Luxor's prominence didn't necessarily extend to widespread knowledge of its religious significance. 9. Category: Food & Drink (2021) Clue:"Worcestershire sauce is made with molasses, anchovies and this vinegar whose name is French for 'sour wine.'" Answer: ' What is vin aigre?' Background: This etymology question proved too difficult for all three contestants, despite the clues being relatively straightforward. The vinegar in question, vin aigre (French for 'sour wine'), is a key component of Worcestershire sauce but was a tricky detail for contestants to recall under pressure. The need for knowledge of both the French language and obscure details of food production, combined with the complexity of the question, stumped the players. Contestants likely recognized Worcestershire sauce's key ingredients but struggled to connect them to this specific type of vinegar. The French terminology was difficult to recall quickly under the time pressure. The obscure nature of vin aigre made it hard to connect with everyday food knowledge. Worcestershire sauce itself is widely known, but not the specific details of its ingredients. Food etymology is a niche area of knowledge that doesn't come up often in general trivia. The challenge of language knowledge combined with food trivia made this question particularly tough. Vinegar types are many, and remembering the French term under pressure was difficult. 10. Category: Sports History (2019) Clue:"The first official international cricket match was played between the USA and this country in 1844." Answer: ' What is Canada?' Background: This surprising fact about sports history stumped all contestants during Final Jeopardy. While cricket is known as a global sport, the clue's connection between the USA and Canada as participants in the first official international match was a difficult one to recall. Cricket's early history in North America is often overshadowed by more popular sports like baseball and football. The specificity of the year 1844, combined with a lack of familiarity with cricket, made this clue a true challenge for contestants. Cricket's early history in North America isn't widely discussed in modern sports trivia. The year 1844 was an obscure reference, adding an additional layer of difficulty. The USA and Canada's cricket rivalry was surprising to many contestants who were unfamiliar with this sports history. The obscure nature of early international sports matches often causes confusion in trivia settings. Cricket's global dominance outside North America made it harder for contestants to connect to the U.S. The sports history of cricket in North America is less prominent in contemporary discussions. Conclusion on Challenging Jeopardy Questions These 10 challenging questions highlight the intricate balance between knowledge, timing, and the specific context of 'Jeopardy!' trivia. What may seem like a straightforward question can quickly become an insurmountable challenge due to the speed and pressure of the game. These clues demonstrate that while knowledge is essential, 'Jeopardy!' contestants also need to be quick thinkers and adept at recalling even the most obscure details. Ultimately, these difficult questions remind us that trivia is not just about having facts in our head—it's about the ability to connect those facts under pressure. Whether it's obscure historical knowledge, scientific details, or literary references, these 'Jeopardy!' clues show that even the brightest minds can be stumped by the complexity and timing of the game. Related Articles: About the Authors: Richard D. Harroch is a Senior Advisor to CEOs, management teams, and Boards of Directors. He is an expert on M&A, venture capital, startups, and business contracts. He was the Managing Director and Global Head of M&A at VantagePoint Capital Partners, a venture capital fund in the San Francisco area. His focus is on internet, digital media, AI and technology companies. He was the founder of several Internet companies. His articles have appeared online in Forbes, Fortune, MSN, Yahoo, Fox Business and Richard is the author of several books on startups and entrepreneurship as well as the co-author of Poker for Dummies and a Wall Street Journal-bestselling book on small business. He is the co-author of a 1,500-page book published by Bloomberg on mergers and acquisitions of privately held companies. He was also a corporate and M&A partner at the international law firm of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe. He has been involved in over 200 M&A transactions and 250 startup financings. He can be reached through LinkedIn. Dominique Harroch is the Chief of Staff at She has acted as a Chief of Staff or Operations Leader for multiple companies where she leveraged her extensive experience in operations management, strategic planning, and team leadership to drive organizational success. With a background that spans over two decades in operations leadership, event planning at her own start-up and marketing at various financial and retail companies. Dominique is known for her ability to optimize processes, manage complex projects and lead high-performing teams. She holds a BA in English and Psychology from U.C. Berkeley and an MBA from the University of San Francisco. She can be reached via LinkedIn.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Michelle Obama releasing style book after looks 'constantly dissected' in White House
Former First Lady Michelle Obama is releasing a book looking back at her favorite fashion and style moments over the years. Obama said she wanted to write the beauty book, titled "The Look," to "reclaim" her story after her looks were scrutinized during her time in the White House. "During our family's time in the White House, the way I looked was constantly being dissected — what I wore, how my hair was styled," she wrote in an Instagram announcement. "For a while now, I've been wanting to reclaim more of that story, to share it in my own way. I'm thankful to be at a stage in life where I feel comfortable expressing myself freely — wearing what I love and doing what feels true to me. And I'm excited to share some of what I've learned along the way," she added. Michelle Obama Reveals Additional Reason She Skipped Trump's Inauguration The $50 book, to be released on November 4, features more than 200 photographs of the former first lady, including never-before-published images, according to publisher Crown Publishing Group. Read On The Fox News App Obama said the book will give readers a behind-the-scenes look at her most memorable looks and the meaningful moments that accompanied them. It will also introduce readers to her style team from over the years. "The Look is about more than fashion. It's about confidence. It's about identity. It's about the power of authenticity," Obama said in her social media announcement. "My hope is that this book sparks conversation and reflection about the ways we see ourselves — and the way our society defines beauty." Obama has spoken out before about her style being scrutinized during her time in the White House. Click Here For More Coverage Of Media And Culture During the book tour for her 2022 book, "The Light We Carry," Obama revealed that she straightened her hair while her husband Barack Obama was in office because she didn't feel Americans were ready to accept her natural hair. The American people were "just getting adjusted" to having a Black president and weren't "ready" to see the first lady's hair in braids, she believed, according to a report in The Washington Post. "Let me keep my hair straight," Obama said of her thoughts at the time. "Let's get healthcare passed." Michelle Obama Slams Divorce Rumors During Podcast Interview In April, Obama revealed that fashion was one reason she skipped President Donald Trump's second inauguration. "It started with not having anything to wear," Obama said on her podcast, "IMO with Michelle Obama & Craig Robinson." "I mean, I had affirmatively, cause I'm always prepared for any funeral, anything," Obama added. "I walk around with the right dress, I travel with clothes just in case something pops off. So I was like, if I'm not going to do this thing, I got to tell my team, I don't even want to have a dress ready, right? Because it's so easy to just say, let me do the right thing." Fox News' Rachel del Guidice contributed to this article source: Michelle Obama releasing style book after looks 'constantly dissected' in White House
New York Times
2 days ago
- New York Times
Ken Jennings: Trivia and ‘Jeopardy!' Could Save Our Republic
When I first stepped behind the host lectern on the quiz show 'Jeopardy!,' I was intimidated for two reasons. Most obviously, I had the hopeless task of filling the very large shoes of Alex Trebek, the legendary broadcaster and pitch-perfect host who'd been synonymous with the show since 1984. But I was also keenly aware that the show was one of TV's great institutions, almost a public trust. Since I was 10 years old, I'd watched Alex Trebek carve out a safe space for people to know things, where viewers get a steady diet of 61 accurate (and hopefully even interesting) facts every game. And I wondered: Even if 'Jeopardy!' could survive the loss in 2020 of its peerless host, could it survive the conspiracy theories and fake news of our post-fact era? Facts may seem faintly old-timey in the 21st century, remnants of the rote learning style that went out of fashion in classrooms (and that the internet search made obsolete) decades ago. But societies are built on facts, as we can see more clearly when institutions built on knowledge teeter. Inaccurate facts make for less informed decisions. Less informed decisions make for bad policy. Garbage in, garbage out. I've always hated the fact that 'trivia,' really our only word in English for general-knowledge facts and games, is the same word we use to mean 'things of no importance.' So unfair! Etymologically, the word is linked to the trivium of medieval universities, the three fundamental courses of grammar, rhetoric and logic. And much of today's so-called trivia still deals with subjects that are fundamentally academic. Watch a game of 'Jeopardy!' tonight, or head down to your local pub quiz, and you're sure to be asked about scientific breakthroughs, milestones of history and masterpieces of art. Trivia, maybe — but far from trivial. There might also be questions about pop lyrics and sports statistics, but even those are markers of cultural literacy, the kind of shared knowledge that used to tie society together: the proposition that factual questions could be answered correctly or not, that those answers matter, and that we largely agreed on the authorities and experts who could confirm them. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
