This 'quiet luxury' Italian brand is shaking off tariff woes as sales jump
The elite retailer posted an estimate-beating 10.7% rise in first-half sales at constant exchange rates after the market close Thursday, as demand for its $2,000 cashmere sweaters and "quiet luxury" aesthetic continues apace.
Preliminary second quarter revenues came in 342.6 million euros ($400.5 million), ahead of the 341.4 million estimated, according to Jefferies, which dubbed the gains "industry-topping."
Brunello Cucinelli's "ability to drive [double-digit] growth across all regions will come as of little surprise," the analyst wrote in a note Thursday.
"These results highlight resilience and on-going, sector leading momentum," RBC Capital Markets analysts added.
The company also pointed to a solid start to July and confirmed its outlook for around 10% sales growth in 2025 and 2026.
The results give an early read on the outlook for the luxury sector as second-quarter earnings kick off in earnest next week with Cartier-owner Richemont.
However, analysts expressed doubt over broad-based growth for the beleaguered sector, as President Donald Trump's on-again, off-again tariffs threaten to dampen consumer spending even at the top end.
European luxury names LVMH, Kering, Moncler, Richemont and Hermes all traded lower Friday. Brunello Cucinelli also swung lower after starting the session in the green.
The luxury sector is expected to face a considerable hit from U.S. import duties, given its reliance on localized, niche production. In the meantime, firms have flagged any associated macroeconomic downturn and dampening of consumer sentiment as a key concern.
Brunello Cucinelli, executive chairman and creative director of the eponymous brand, on Thursday described the tariff threat as "extraordinary" and demanding "utmost attention." Nevertheless, he said that the company was focused on what it can control.
"Each of us should commit even more deeply to changing what can be changed, and to accepting that which lies beyond our control," he said in a statement accompanying the results.
For the top-end brand, that looks set to include price rises.
The company said it plans to raise U.S. prices by around 3% to 4% in the second half of the year as a result of higher import duties. That follows worldwide price hikes of 3% to 3.5% in the first half, according to Jefferies.
The Italian fashion house has so far shown its ability to pass on costs to consumers even in tough times, reporting several consecutive quarters of solid growth. Questions remain over whether other brands will be able to follow suit.
"[Brunello Cucinelli] screens very well relative to peers amid the sector's downside risk to margins," UBS added in a note Friday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump officials scramble to justify firing of economic statistician – as critics say ‘scary' move is a sign of ‘authoritiarianism'
Members of Donald Trump's team scrambled to provide coherent explanations for the sudden firing of a top official at the Bureau of Labor Statistics on Sunday as Friday's firing resonated throughout Washington and left the White House open to criticism of Trump's 'authoritarian' leanings. The US president directed the firing of Erika McEntarfer on Friday after a jobs report showed private companies adding just 73,000 positions in July, a drop from projections and a further sign that the Trump economy is stalling in the face of growing uncertainty around the president's tariff agenda. McEntarfer's firing was immediately denounced by her Trump-appointed predecessor and numerous others in Washington. Republicans on the Hill struggled to defend it, while members of Donald Trump's team insisted in interviews that the president and the nation needed what he called 'reliable' numbers. Trump accused McEntarfer of cooking the numbers on Kamala Harris's behalf during the 2024 election, and now working to make him look bad, a notion even the president's own advisers wouldn't echo directly. Kevin Hassett, director of the White House economic council, led the efforts to defend the president's decision-making on Sunday. He was joined by Jamieson Greer, the US trade representative. Hassett directly contradicted the president during his interview on Fox News Sunday with Shannon Bream; he argued that it was the formula by which the BLS determined job market gains — not malicious activity by McEntarfer — which needed to be addressed. Pointing to a letter from McEntarfer's predecessors, Bream asked Hassett: 'They're saying it's not good to cast aspersions on what's being done because it's a formula. It's used the same way every single time. So are you saying maybe the formulas, the calculations need to change?' 'That's right. They really need to get back to ground zero and find out why these numbers are so unreliable,' said Hassett.' "The data can't be propaganda. The data has to be something you can trust, because decision-makers throughout the economy trust that these are the data that they can build a factory because they believe, or cut interest rates because they believe. And if the data aren't that good, then it's a real problem for the US,' Hassett continued. He and others pointed to the agency revising totals for May and June as evidence that the BLS required changes: 'We expect more big revisions for the jobs data in September, for example ... we want to know why, we want people to explain it to us.' Greer, during a pre-taped interview with CBS's Face the Nation, backed up Hassett's claims that sharp revisions dating back to 2024 were evidence of the numbers produced by the agency being unreliable. "You want to be able to have somewhat reliable numbers,' he said. 'There are always revisions, but sometimes you see these revisions go in really extreme ways.' But there's still nothing linking McEntarfer to the kind of nefarious activity which Trump alleged she was up to in a Truth Social post. 'I have directed my Team to fire this Biden Political Appointee, IMMEDIATELY. She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified. Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate, they can't be manipulated for political purposes,' Trump wrote on Friday. He added: 'In my opinion, today's Jobs Numbers were RIGGED in order to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad — Just like when they had three great days around the 2024 Presidential Election, and then, those numbers were 'taken away' on November 15, 2024, right after the Election.' No one on the president's team has attempted to present any evidence backing up Trump's claims. A number of McEntarfer's predecessors and other top officialst at the BLS fired back in a statement from a group called the 'Friends of the BLS': 'The President seeks to blame someone for unwelcome economic news.' The president's critics said that the firing and unsupported explanation meant that future figures released by the agency would be thrown into question and was an example of Trump desiring ability to dictate the creation of phony statistics. 'This is the stuff of democracies giving way to authoritarianism,' warned Larry Summers, former director of the White House economic council under Biden (and Hassett's predecessor), on ABC's This Week. 'This is really scary stuff, and it can hardly be surprising that when the rule of law is in a bit question that there's a big uncertainty premium in the markets.' He went on to argue that Trump's battering of Fed Chair Jerome Powell followed in a similar vein, and was behind much of the uncertainty curbing U.S. investments on Wall Street. Friday marked the resumption of Trump's reciprocal tariffs; enforcement of rates as high as 50% on some U.S. trading partners will resume this week. Economists largely agree that those tariffs are driving up consumer prices and stifling U.S. investment rather than encouraging the return of manufacturing plants to America as companies continue to evaluate new costs stemming from Trump's import duties. The job numbers put out by the BLS on a monthly basis are some of the most important statistics gathered by the U.S. government in terms of their ability to move financial markets around the world. Experts say the sharp revisions are a result of more accurate data collection efforts.
Newsweek
5 minutes ago
- Newsweek
OPEC+ Countries Agree to Boost Oil Production: What to Know
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC+) on Sunday announced plans to increase oil production by over half a million barrels per day for September as concerns over supply disruptions persist. The eight members of OPEC+ held a virtual meeting in response to U.S. pressure on some nations—such as India—to halt all Russian oil purchases in an additional move aimed at pressuring Moscow to end its ongoing conflict in Ukraine. However, OPEC+ said it would increase output due to a healthy economy and low oil inventory, with oil prices remaining at a higher level even as output has increased from members. Newsweek reached out to the White House and Department of Energy (DOE) by email on Sunday outside of normal business hours for comment. Why It Matters President Donald Trump in last year's presidential campaign promised to tackle a number of major targets, including an end to the Russia-Ukraine war and lowering prices for Americans amid high inflation. Russian President Vladimir Putin's resistance to diplomatic efforts has frustrated Trump and forced the U.S. to seek more creative means to try and achieve an end to the war that began in February 2022. What To Know The U.S. has looked at imposing tariffs on Russia and convincing countries that still purchase Russian oil to switch to other sources. Some feared that these actions could drive up gas prices for Americans, as well. However, those fears appear to have been averted as OPEC+ agreed to increase production, providing a healthy alternative to Russian oil. OPEC+ includes Saudi Arabia, Russia, Iraq, United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Kazakhstan, Algeria and Oman. It remains unclear how this could impact Russia's other sales and negotiations. OPEC+ has made voluntary production cuts since November 2023, with plans to phase those cuts out by September 2026, but the announcement means that the countries will increase output for the second time this year—following July's announcement of a similar increase in August—and effectively ending the program early. Prices have remained at the higher rate of around $70 a barrel for Brent crude despite the increased output, however, raising some doubts as to what impact the increased output might have on gas prices. An Austrian soldier stands outside of the building headquarters of OPEC (Organization of The Petroleum Exporting Countries) in Vienna, Austria on May 28. An Austrian soldier stands outside of the building headquarters of OPEC (Organization of The Petroleum Exporting Countries) in Vienna, Austria on May 28. Joe Klamar/AFP via Getty Images What People Are Saying President Donald Trump last week wrote on Truth Social, in part: "We have just concluded a Deal with the Country of Pakistan, whereby Pakistan and the United States will work together on developing their massive Oil Reserves. We are in the process of choosing the Oil Company that will lead this Partnership. Who knows, maybe they'll be selling Oil to India some day!" Mark Temnycky, a nonresident fellow at the Atlantic Council think tank's Eurasia Center, previously told Newsweek: "If the U.S. follows with new restrictions or tariffs, Americans could see higher energy prices, especially at the gas pump and in sectors tied closely to fuel, like transportation and manufacturing." He added: "These cost increases may filter down to everyday goods as companies adjust for rising input expenses. In addition, inflation will be a concern for many American consumers and policymakers." What Happens Next? The members will meet again in September for further discussions and adjustments to production. This article includes reporting by the Associated Press.
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
SC senator announces run for Ralph Norman's 5th District seat in Congress
Republican state Sen. Wes Climer is running for Congress, seeking to succeed U.S. Rep. Ralph Norman, who is running for South Carolina governor. Climer announced his run at Southern Charm Events in Rock Hill Thursday evening, promising to be an ally to President Donald Trump in Congress and push an 'America First' agenda. 'I've had enough and I think you have too,' Climer said Thursday. 'Enough of the career politicians. Enough of unelected bureaucrats running our lives. Enough of special interests calling the shots.' South Carolina's 5th Congressional district includes all of York, Lee, Lancaster, Union, Cherokee, Chester, Fairfield and Kershaw counties, as well as portions of Sumter and Spartanburg counties. The district heavily favors Republicans, and Climer is the biggest name in the race so far. Climer joins two Democrats already in the 2026 race, Alex Harper and Andrew Clough. Climer endorsed Norman's run for governor at the Thursday event, encouraging York County Republicans in attendance to vote for him. Who is Wes Climer? Climer is in his third term in the state Senate, representing District 15 in York County since 2016. He is the chairman of the S.C. Senate's agriculture and natural resources committee. He formerly served as the chairman of the York County Republican Party. In July, Climer filed a lawsuit over the General Assembly-approved pay increase for lawmakers, The State reported. He called the increase of $1,500 a month 'unconstitutional.' Climer also advocated this year for candy and soda to be excluded from SNAP benefits, and voted against the confirmation of Myra Reece as director of the Department of Environmental Services. Climer said at the time he did not want the state to make rules based on 'thoroughly unproven theories,' citing climate change as an example. Climer described himself Thursday as a Christian, a small business owner and 'a lifelong conservative who is sick and tired of watching this county get hollowed out by people who either don't know what they're doing or don't care.' What are Climer's campaign priorities? Climer said his campaign priorities include cutting the federal budget, sealing the Southern border, fighting against Critical Race Theory in schools and overhauling the Department of Justice. He said in South Carolina he will push for better coordination between federal, local and state governments to manage the state's growth. Climer emphasized his record in the state senate fighting for constitutional carry, tax cuts, school choice and anti-Critical Race Theory measures. 'We don't need more noise in Washington,' Climer said. 'We need results,' What is Climer's experience? Climer has served in the state Senate for nearly nine years and ranks 23rd out of 46 senators in seniority. When asked why he would give up the seniority he has gained in the smaller chamber to be one of 435 U.S. representatives, Climer said he believes Congress is where he can make the biggest impact. 'The real fight for the future of this country is happening in Washington,' he said. 'The stakes are incredibly high. I have learned a lot serving in the State House about how to accomplish conservative objectives, not just talking about it, not just doing a press release or a tweet, but moving it from an idea into a law. I think we need more of that in Washington, people who not only can make the argument, but people who can close the deal.' His experience makes him a good candidate for Congress, said Alex Stroman, a former SC GOP executive director. Climer has worked on Capitol Hill and is a popular senator throughout the state, Stroman said. 'He will be able to go in with an understanding that I think a lot of freshmen members of Congress don't have,' Stroman said. 'He knows how it works, and he knows how to get things done. He knows what to avoid, and I think that the legislative experience that he's had and the leadership experience he's had in the South Carolina Senate really will make him an even better congressman. It's kind of a no-brainer.' Is Climer aligned with President Donald Trump? Climer is aligned with the president's agenda, Stroman said. Though he deals more with state-specific issues as a senator, he has maintained a strong Republican stance, he said. 'Those Republican values that he's had for years being a county party chairman, working in the Senate, focusing on constituent service issues, really taking some really tough stances at times in the South Carolina Senate that I think are more aligned with… the president's agenda.' Climer said he would be an ally to the president in Congress. Climer told The Charlotte Observer on Thursday he doesn't disagree with any Trump policy. What advantages does Climer have? Stroman said some of Climer's biggest strengths include his personality, strong stances in the senate and his ability to raise money. 'Climer is someone who can disagree without being disagreeable. He's somebody who has really taken tough stances at times in the South Carolina legislature and led on issues,' he said. 'I think that he has so many built-in advantages that will prove him well in a Republican primary and a general election.' Climer told the Observer his record in the state senate is his biggest advantage. 'Most people, when they run for office, they have to run from their record in a conservative primary,' he said. 'I'm running on my record as a principled conservative who delivers results.'
