
Confused about the economy? You're not alone
Economy
Federal agencies
Interest rates
FacebookTweetLink
If news about inflation, trade, the Federal Reserve and jobs has you confused and you're not sure what to make of the US economy, don't worry: You're in good company.
But this week offered a ton of information that provided a more focused — if not exactly crystal clear — picture of what's happening with America's economy.
We got reports on inflation, gross domestic product, jobs and consumer sentiment, a Fed rate decision and a flurry of trade announcements, all of which removed varying degrees of uncertainty about where the economy has been heading.
If you're just looking for the tl;dr, here are the big takeaways from this week:
America's economy is still robust but weakening.
Consumers are still willing to spend their money, but they're growing more cautious.
Tariffs came in lower than President Donald Trump's most aggressive threats, but they're slowly adding to inflation as some prices creep higher again.
Trump's trade agreements may open up some foreign markets to US goods, but Americans are now paying higher taxes on imported goods today than they were yesterday.
The reliable job market is become less of a sure bet, and employers may be more resistant to hiring than we previously believed.
And you might not have to linger too long for that long-awaited interest-rate cut.
If you crave context and don't mind a slightly unabridged rundown, here you go:
Trump's historic trade agenda was expected to turn the economy on its head. That hasn't happened — at least, not yet.
The lack of a sudden recession, as many feared, has given investors confidence that they can safely ignore trade — and stocks have risen to all-time highs in recent weeks. It has also given Trump confidence that he can raise tariffs dramatically, as he just did on Friday. Even with a flurry of 11th-hour trade agreements, America's effective tax rate on imported goods has shot above 18%. It stood at just 1.2% last year. That could add $2,400 in costs for the average American household, according to Yale's Budget Lab.
The economy has remained surprisingly strong this year, which perhaps shouldn't have come as such a shock: America is the world's largest and most complex economy, with a multitude of natural resources.
However, economists warn that tariff effects are just starting to become apparent, and they could escalate in the second half of 2025.
Tariffs left a bigger mark on goods prices in June, which in turn put upward pressure on overall inflation. The Personal Consumption Expenditures price index, a mouthful best known as the Fed's favored inflation gauge, showed that prices rose 0.3% in June from May, boosting the annual rate of inflation to 2.6% from 2.4%.
That 2.6% is the highest rate in four months and marks a step in the wrong direction from what the Fed wants to see, which is inflation at 2%. And that 0.3% monthly hike, if continued, would drive that annual rate well north of 3%.
The PCE price index painted a similar picture to the June Consumer Price Index and Producer Price Index: More businesses were seeing higher costs because of tariffs and passing some of those on to consumers.
And while the expansive and expensive tariffs aren't expected to trigger an inflationary surge like we saw in 2022, annual inflation is expected to bounce back above 3%. But as we learned and felt coming down from that recent inflation high, when price levels rise for a broad suite of commonly purchased items, it takes a big bite out of Americans' hard-earned pay.
Economists expected that job growth would slow in July. After all, uncertainty has stifled businesses' hiring plans for several months running now. Plus, job gains are becoming increasingly concentrated in a select few industries: health care, education and (especially during the summer) leisure and hospitality businesses.
But hiring was significantly slower in July than expected. And May and June were also revised down sharply, suggesting that the job market may be considerably worse than we had previously expected.
Through July, the US has added an average of just 85,000 jobs per month. That's pretty weak and slightly below the breakeven employment level, in which the jobs added are enough to keep up with labor force growth and hold the unemployment rate steady.
Outside of the pandemic recession in 2020, that current pace is the weakest January-to-July average since 2010, when the US economy was licking its wounds from the Great Recession.
Some tariff-sensitive goods — think: washers, dryers, furniture, clothes, shoes, toys, sporting goods and curtains (window and floor covering prices surged by a record 4.2% in June) — are on the rise, but consumers are generally holding up okay.
A slice of the population has benefited from stock market gains, as potential tariff rates come into better focus and boost investors' confidence. The broader populace is still seeing pay gains outpace inflation (although to a lesser extent than recent years).
The Thursday report that contained the Fed's favorite inflation gauge also provided the most comprehensive look at how US households' income, savings and spending are faring.
Consumers spent more in June than they did in May, with expenditures rising 0.3% from the month before (0.1% when adjusting for inflation). Those are modest gains, but they are still gains.
'Consumers are in a position to handle this, though consumer psychology is a fickle thing,' Gus Faucher, chief economist for the PNC Financial Services Company, told CNN Thursday. 'The (spending and inflation data) does not suggest that a recession is imminent. But I think what it does suggest is that we're starting to see some cracks; and, if there is something else that goes wrong, then the economy is vulnerable to a downturn.'
Presidential excoriations (and back slaps) aside, Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell and the rest of the Fed have their work cut out for them. At the conclusion of a two-day policy meeting Wednesday, Powell — a target of Trump's ire because the Fed has kept interest rates high — kept interest rates high again.
Powell's rationale: The economy is strong enough to support higher interest rates. And it's not yet clear whether tariffs will raise prices a bit or a lot. Keeping interest rates steady could help to keep inflation in check.
Trump and his economic advisers have claimed that the Fed's high rates are hurting Americans' ability to get a mortgage. The Fed's rates may influence consumer loan rates — but it doesn't set them. That's the bond market, and Trump's massively expensive domestic policy agenda, his tariffs and even his constant blasting of Powell have made bonds relatively unattractive to investors.
Because yields and prices trade in opposite direction, Trump has his own share of blame for high mortgage rates. But Trump may get what he wants in September: Expectations for a Fed rate cut shot higher Friday after a weaker-than-expected jobs report.
This week, we got our first glimpse at America's second-quarter gross domestic product, the broadest measure of the US economy. And economists are still trying to figure out what it means.
The headline number looked strong: A 3% annualized growth rate is good by anyone's measure. Consumer spending, the backbone of America's economy, picked up. And, most importantly, America's economy is growing again, after shrinking in the first quarter.
But when you peer more closely into the data, it becomes apparent that tariffs are masking a hidden weakness in the US economy.
Importers scrambled to stockpile a ton of goods before tariffs went into effect in the first quarter, widening America's trade imbalance to historic levels and making the economy appear much worse off than it actually was.
In the second quarter, as tariffs took effect, imports plunged and companies sold off their inventories. That narrowed the trade gap, making the economy look better off than it actually was.
So what's actually happening? Something in between: America's economy remained strong but slowing in the first half of this year. Consumer spending may have bounced back, but it remained weak — and businesses are growing cautious.
The blizzard of economic data and activity this week largely came in line with expectations, with the major exception of jobs. The overall picture may give some reassurance that the economy is doing mostly okay (accompanied by some caveats or asterisks).
But the jobs and trade data is worrying.
'The events and data of this week paint a picture of an economy that is slowing and will continue to slow through the back half of the year,' Gregory Daco, chief economist at EY-Parthenon, told CNN in an interview Friday.
And while Daco believes that a recession is not necessarily imminent, Thursday night's trade blitz and Friday's jobs report raise those odds.
'This type of very weak job growth momentum is essentially eroding the economy's bugger against headwinds,' he said. 'And and in an environment where the US economy is subject to historic supply shocks, that will essentially expose it to the risk of a of a recession.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a minute ago
- Yahoo
Trump says he will 'substantially' raise tariffs on India over Russian oil purchases
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Trump said on Monday he willsubstantially raise tariffs on India over its purchases of Russian oil. "India is not only buying massive amounts of Russian Oil, they are then, for much of the Oil purchased, selling it on the Open Market for big profits. They don't care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian War Machine," Trump said in a post on Truth Social. "Because of this, I will be substantially raising the Tariff paid by India to the USA." 擷取數據時發生錯誤 登入存取你的投資組合 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤


Newsweek
a minute ago
- Newsweek
Student Loan Update: Millions of Borrowers to See Debt Change This Month
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Millions of student loan holders may see their paychecks garnished to recover their defaulted debts this month. According to a report by credit bureau TransUnion, some 1 million borrowers will enter default this month—meaning they will become subject to federal collections, as well as dented credit scores and other unwanted elements. Why It Matters Student loan collections were largely paused beginning in March 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic, under the Joe Biden administration. But this has changed under President Donald Trump. The process of resuming collections began in May, as the Department of Education warned that borrowers who fell behind and failed to take action could face wage garnishment and significant damage to their credit scores. What To Know Approximately 270 days after a borrower first becomes 90 or more days past due on a loan, they are classified as in default and become subject to collection efforts by the Department of Education. At that point, loan holders are at risk of having 15 percent of their pay docked to help pay off the debt. Of the 5.8 million borrowers who recently became delinquent (usually having missed one quarterly payment), an estimated one-third—about 1.8 million—were expected to enter default in July 2025, according to TransUnion. Another 1 million are projected to default in August, followed by an additional 2 million in September. The impact on borrowers goes beyond just collections. The report indicates that those falling behind on payments have experienced an average drop of 60 points in their credit scores. Stock image of a mortarboard laid over U.S. Dollars. Stock image of a mortarboard laid over U.S. Dollars. GETTY Over 20 percent of borrowers who are now at least 90 days delinquent were previously classified in "prime" or "super prime" credit categories. However, after missing payments, fewer than 2 percent remain in these top credit tiers, with many slipping down by at least one entire risk level. "Late payments can hurt your credit score, and if you are actually in default, it can stay on your credit report for up to seven years," Bobbi Rebell, financial planner and personal finance expert at told Newsweek—something that can have far-reaching consequences. "Keep in mind that employers sometimes check your credit, not to mention mortgage lenders if you hope to purchase a home," she said. "Perhaps the biggest incentive to stay on track is that if you aren't paying on time, you could lose access to things that are helping you to get rid of the debt like income-driven payment plans, as well as deferment and forbearance options. Finally, without a track record of paying on time, if you want to continue your education, it will likely be challenging to get another student loan in the future." What People Are Saying Michele Raneri, vice president and head of U.S. research and consulting at TransUnion: "We continue to see more and more federal student loan borrowers being reported as the 90+ days delinquent, making a larger number of consumers vulnerable to entering default and the start of collections activities." Secretary of Education Linda McMahon said in a statement on May 5: "As we begin to help defaulted borrowers back into repayment, we must also fix a broken higher education finance system that has put upward pressure on tuition rates without ensuring that colleges and universities are delivering a high-value degree to students. "For too long, insufficient transparency and accountability structures have allowed U.S. universities to saddle students with enormous debt loads without paying enough attention to whether their own graduates are truly prepared to succeed in the labor market." What Happens Next The Department of Education is sending notices to borrowers who have fallen behind on their loans payments. Meanwhile, more than 7 million federal student loan borrowers are seeing their balances increase as of August as interest charges resumed for participants in the Saving on a Valuable Education plan.


Fast Company
2 minutes ago
- Fast Company
How Tesla's brand loyalty suffered during Musk's alliance with Trump
Tesla for years had more repeat U.S. customers than any other major automotive brand but its loyalty has plunged since CEO Elon Musk endorsed President Donald Trump last summer, according to data from research firm S&P Global Mobility shared exclusively with Reuters. The data, which has not been previously reported, shows Tesla's customer loyalty peaked in June 2024, when 73% of Tesla-owning households in the market for a new car bought another Tesla, according to an S&P analysis of vehicle-registration data in all 50 states. That industry-leading brand loyalty rate started to nosedive in July, that data showed, when Musk endorsed Trump following an assassination attempt in Pennsylvania on the Republican nominee. The rate bottomed out at 49.9% last March, just below the industry average, after Musk launched Trump's budget-slashing Department of Government Efficiency in January and started firing thousands of government workers. Tesla's U.S. loyalty rate has since ticked back up to 57.4% in May, the most recent month the S&P data is available, putting it back above the industry average and about the same as Toyota but behind Chevrolet and Ford. S&P analyst Tom Libby called it 'unprecedented' to see the runaway leader in customer loyalty fall so quickly to industry-average levels. 'I've never seen this rapid of a decline in such a short period of time,' he said. Tesla and Musk did not respond to requests for comment. On Monday, Tesla granted Musk 96 million shares worth about $29 billion, a move aimed at keeping the billionaire entrepreneur at the helm as he fights a court ruling that voided his original pay deal for being unfair to shareholders. The timing of Tesla's plunging brand loyalty suggests the CEO's involvement in politics turned off customers in the EV pioneer's eco-conscious customer base, some analysts said. 'If they have Democratic leanings, then perhaps they consider other brands in addition to Tesla,' said Seth Goldstein, an analyst at Morningstar. Tesla's aging model lineup also faces stiffer competition from an array of EVs from legacy automakers including General Motors, Hyundai and BMW. The only new model Tesla has released since 2020, its triangular Cybertruck, has proved a flop despite Musk's prediction of hundreds of thousands of annual sales. On an April earnings call, Tesla CFO Vaibhav Taneja singled out 'the negative impact of vandalism and unwarranted hostility towards our brand and people,' but also said there were 'several weeks of lost production' when the company retooled factories to produce a refreshed version of its top-selling Model Y. Musk on the April call said that 'absent macro issues, we don't see any reduction in demand.' Tesla vehicle sales overall are falling globally and have declined 8% in the United States the first five months of 2025, according to S&P. Sales fell 33% over the first six months of the year in Europe, where public backlash to Musk's politicking has been particularly fierce. Musk's increased political activism was 'very bad timing' for Tesla, said Garrett Nelson, an analyst who tracks the EV maker at CFRA Research, because it came exactly as the company faced heightened competition from Chinese EV makers and other traditional automakers. He said his top concerns for Tesla are its loss of market share and 'what can be done to repair the brand damage.' LOYALTY NOSEDIVE Tesla remains the U.S. electric-vehicle sales leader but has seen its dominance erode as Musk last year delved into politics and focused Tesla more on developing self-driving technology than on new affordable models for human drivers. Customer loyalty is a closely watched auto-industry metric because it is 'much more expensive' to take new customers from competitors than to retain existing ones, said S&P's Libby. S&P offers some of the most detailed industry data on automotive purchases because it analyzes vehicle registration data from all 50 states on a household-by-household basis. Unlike survey data, it follows actual vehicle transactions to track how consumers migrate among brands and models. From the fourth quarter of 2021 through the third quarter of last year, more than 60% of Tesla-owning households bought another one for their next car purchase, the data show. Only one other brand – Ford – posted a quarterly loyalty rate exceeding 60% during the period, and only once. CUSTOMER DEFECTIONS S&P's data also examines another aspect of the automotive market: Which brands and models are taking customers away from others, and which ones are losing them? Until recently, Tesla was in a different stratosphere than other automotive brands on this metric. For the four years prior to July 2024, Tesla, on average, acquired nearly five new households for every one it lost to another brand. No other brand from a major automaker was even close: Hyundai's luxury Genesis brand was the next best, acquiring on average 2.8 households for every one it lost, followed by Kia and Hyundai, which acquired on average 1.5 and 1.4 households, respectively, for every one they lost. Ford, Toyota and Honda lost more households on average than they gained during that period. Tesla's average inflow of customers started to decline in July 2024 along with its loyalty rate. Since February, Tesla has been gaining fewer than two households for every one it loses to the rest of the industry, its lowest level ever, according to the data. 'The data shows clearly that the net migration to Tesla is slowing,' Libby said. Brands that now attract more Tesla customers than they lose to Tesla include Rivian, Polestar, Porsche and Cadillac, the data show. Brian Mulberry, client portfolio manager at Tesla investor Zacks Investment Management, said he isn't concerned about Tesla's long-term earnings because he expects enormous profits from its plans to operate robotaxis and license self-driving technology to other automakers. Tesla launched a small test of robotaxis in Austin in June, giving rides to hand-picked fans and Internet personalities but the service isn't available to the general public. If Tesla succeeds in expanding the technology, Mulberry said, 'there's a case to be made that Tesla doesn't need to sell cars and trucks anymore.'