Sale of cigarettes, gutkha products rampant near educational institutions
Special teams led by EAGLE head and Inspector General of Police (IGP) Ake Ravi Krishna and Deputy Commissioner of Police (DCP-NTR) K.G.V. Saritha and other police officers searched shops near education institutions on Pinnamaneni Polyclinic Road near Benz Circle a few days ago and seized different brands of cigarettes, gutkha packets and tobacco products. These shops were located near a pharma college, a hotel management institute, a degree college and a couple of schools.
'We have booked the shop owners and explained to them COPTA–2003 and the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, 1985,' Mr. Ravi Krishna said. EAGLE officials noticed a secret room attached to a paan shop and found students smoking in it.
Locals alleged that despite several complaints on the sale of banned gutkha products and cigarettes at paan shops near educational institutions, there was no response. 'Some shop owners sold cigarettes and tobacco products to schoolchildren and maintained secret rooms,' Sriram, a youth, told the EAGLE team.
Meanwhile, Director-General of Police (DGP) Harish Kumar Gupta directed the police to conduct searches and prevent the sale of tobacco products, gutkhas and cigarettes within 100 yards of educational institutions.
'The joint raids were aimed at implementing the guidelines of Tobacco Free Education Institutions (TOFEI) and prevent the sale of narcotic drugs. cigarettes, gutkha and tobacco products,' the DGP said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
30 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
HC asks state to see if Pradeep Gharat will return as SPP in Dr Payal Tadvi case
MUMBAI: The Bombay high court on Monday directed the Maharashtra government to approach senior advocate Pradeep Gharat to check if he would consider returning as special public prosecutor (SPP) in the 2019 Dr Payal Tadvi suicide abetment case, after his sudden removal earlier this year triggered objections from the victim's family. Mumbai, India - July 21, 2022: Lawyer Pradeep Gharat poses for the photos at his residence, in Mumbai, India, on Thursday, July 21, 2022. (Photo by Bhushan Koyande/HT Photo) (HT PHOTO) On March 7, 2025, the state government removed Pradeep Gharat from the case. In his place, the state had appointed advocate Mahesh Manohar Mule as special public prosecutor. Dr Payal Tadvi's husband, Dr Salman Tadvi and her mother Abeda Salim Tadvi opposed the new appointment. A division bench of justices Ravindra Ghuge and Gautam Ankhad was hearing a petition filed by Dr Tadvi's mother, Abeda Tadvi, challenging the state's decision to replace Gharat with advocate Mule. The petition alleged that the change was made without explanation, in violation of procedure, and without consulting the family. 'Such a senior advocate who has brought you so many convictions. The petitioner's faith in you has been shaken,' the bench remarked, questioning the state on the reasons for Gharat's removal. The judges also asked if any senior officer had personally taken the police into confidence to ensure cooperation in the sensitive case, noting that such matters needed to be handled 'judiciously.' In July, the court had asked the government to justify the decision. The state later filed an affidavit, but the bench said its contents 'did not inspire confidence.' Although the judges initially felt Gharat might be unwilling to return, they directed the state to check if he would reconsider. The matter will be heard again on August 12. Dr Payal Tadvi, 26, was a postgraduate medical student from the oppressed Tadvi-Bhil scheduled tribal community in Jalgaon district. She was enrolled in the obstetrics and gynaecology department at Topiwala National Medical College and BYL Nair Hospital. On May 22, 2019, she died by suicide, after months of caste-based harassment from three senior resident doctors – Dr Hema Ahuja, Dr Bhakti Mehare and Dr Ankita Khandelwal. The three accused were arrested under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and the Maharashtra Prohibition of Ragging Act, and are currently out on bail. Despite the passage of more than six years, the trial has yet to commence. In November 2024, while serving as SPP, Gharat sought to add Dr Yi Ching Ling Chung Chiang — then head of the department — as a co-accused for allegedly ignoring repeated complaints by Dr Tadvi and her family. The move was based on findings of the college's anti-ragging committee and an early complaint from the family. On February 28, 2025, a special court allowed the application. Just a week later, the state abruptly removed Gharat from the case — a decision that was not explained in the official notification nor conveyed to the Tadvi family, prompting Abeda Tadvi's legal challenge.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Pune police move sessions court against Juvenile Justice Board's rejection of plea to try teenage driver in Porsche crash case as adult
Pune: The city police have filed an appeal before the sessions court against the Juvenile Justice Board's (JJB) order of July 15 this year, which rejected their plea to try the 17-year-old driver in the Porsche Taycan car crash case as an adult. The crash on May 19, 2024, had claimed the lives of two young IT professionals in the Kalyaninagar area. Deputy commissioner of police (crime) Nikhil Pingale told TOI on Monday, "The Pune district collector, on behalf of state govt, gave us permission on July 31, 2025, to file the appeal. It was filed before the sessions court on Aug 4." You Can Also Check: Pune AQI | Weather in Pune | Bank Holidays in Pune | Public Holidays in Pune The JJB, while rejecting the police's plea, had relied on a Supreme Court ruling of Jan 9, 2020. It held that the offence attributed to the minor in the case could not be considered as 'heinous' under the ambit of the Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection) Act to merit his trial as an adult. The teenager's lawyer had argued, among other things, that the offences attributed to the minor could not be termed as 'heinous' in nature considering the said SC ruling. The apex court had held that offences prescribing a maximum sentence of more than seven years but not providing any minimum sentence or providing a minimum sentence of less than seven years, cannot be considered a 'heinous offence' within the meaning of section 2 (33) of the JJ Act. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like This Japanese AI invention allows you to speak 68 languages instantly. The idea? Genius. Enence 2.0 Undo The JJB upheld this point. On Monday, lawyer Sarthi Pansare, who is assisting special public prosecutor Shishir Hiray, told TOI that the Pune police's appeal, filed under Section 101 of the JJ Act, states that the accident involving the teenager should be treated as an "exceptional case" and his psychological assessment was imperative to know if he acted as a minor or a major at the time of the accident. Pansare said, "Section 467 (forgery) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) applied in this case for tampering with valuable security (blood samples) provides for a life imprisonment as the maximum punishment but does not provide for a minimum sentence. Our case is that if a minor tried under this section is convicted, s/he can be sentenced to a minimum period of seven years under section 233 (2) of the JJ Act. Our case is that at the time of the incident, the teenage driver was 17 years and eight months old. So, his psychological evaluation was needed. For that purpose, the JJB should have treated the minor as an adult." Pansare said the appeal will be listed for hearing before a special court in due course of time. Two young software engineers were killed when the 17-year-old son of a prominent Pune-based builder rammed their bike from behind at Kalyaninagar junction around 2.30am on May 19, 2024. This occurred while the teen was driving the high-end car back to his bungalow in Wadgaon Sheri after late-night partying with friends at a couple of pubs in Mundhwa. The teenager was released from an observation home after Bombay high court on June 25, 2024, held that his continuation there was illegal. In between, the Pune police had filed an appeal seeking his trial as an adult. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Education department official fined Rs25k for delay in RTI reply by a year
Gurgaon: Haryana State Information Commission (SIC) has imposed the maximum permissible penalty of Rs 25,000 on block education official Anita Chauhan for failing to provide information under Right to Information (RTI) Act within the stipulated 30-day period and instead delivering it nearly a year late. Chauhan, who is also a deemed state public information officer (SPIO), was fined on June 12 after Saroj Yadav, a teacher, filed a complaint against her. Yadav's RTI application, filed on Aug 26, 2023, sought information on investigative reports, related to the block education office, prepared by block education officer. The delay in dispatch of the information to the complainant came to light during hearings in 2024, when Yadav informed SIC that she only received the data after the commission issued a show-cause notice. "What's the benefit of the information being in my favour if I don't get it on time?" Yadav said. You Can Also Check: Gurgaon AQI | Weather in Gurgaon | Bank Holidays in Gurgaon | Public Holidays in Gurgaon The fine imposed by SIC in this case is notable as the amount is unprecedented. Gurgaon education department has not been imposed penalties exceeding Rs 5,000 before this. Meanwhile, in her written submission to SIC, Chauhan admitted to the lapse, attributing the delay to a heavy workload and her unfamiliarity with RTI provisions. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Your New Zealand escape starts with Singapore Airlines Fly with Singapore Airlines Book Now Undo She also offered an unconditional apology. However, state information commissioner Kulbir Chhikara found her explanation "insufficient". His order referred to a 2014 Punjab and Haryana High Court judgment that mandates fines for delays without reasonable cause. Proceedings were also initiated against SPIO-cum-block education officer Sudesh Kumar, but he was later exonerated by the commission after he said that Chauhan was responsible for diary and dispatch work alongside her RTI duties and had "overlooked" sending the reply. The penalty amount of Rs 25,000 will be recovered by director of secondary education, Haryana, and the district education officer, Gurgaon. This amount must be deposited into the commission's designated account by Oct 31, 2025, with the registrar of SIC tasked with monitoring compliance. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.
