WTO warns Trump's tariffs risk reshaping global trade into two rival blocs
WASHINGTON – The Sino-American trade war could have drastic implications on the global economy and even split the world into two geopolitical trading blocs, according to the director general of the World Trade Organization, Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala.
The United States would lead one and China the other.
As the leader of the organization that regulates trade around the globe, Okonjo-Iweala outlined her concerns that President Donald Trump's tariff policies would disrupt the rules-based trading system. The future of international trade will depend on the ability of Beijing and Washington to come to an agreement.
The U.S. and China have been engaging in a 'tariff war.' The United States imposed 145% tariffs on Chinese imports while Beijing has imposed 125% on American imports.
Trump has been waiting for Beijing to come forward with a deal. However, China does not seem to budge on its position. Moreover, as both superpowers try to diversify their trading partners, the Chinese Communist Party vowed to retaliate against countries that try to increase trade with the United States to the detriment of China, risking broader global consequences.
If the world splits into two geopolitical trading blocs, global GDP could decrease by 7%, warned the World Trade Organization.
There was a glimmer of hope for tariff negotiations on Wednesday when Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun said,
'China's attitude towards the tariff war launched by the U.S. is quite clear: we don't want to fight, but we are not afraid of it. If we fight, we will fight to the end; if we talk, the door is wide open,' Jiakun said.
On April 14, the WTO released its Global Trade Outlook 2025 report and the main projections were negative. The WTO projected the amount of goods traded in 2025 would decline by 0.2 percent. This would be an almost 3% drop from what was projected before Trump enacted his sweeping tariffs.
North America's participation in global trade was forecast to decrease by 1.7% and GDP growth would decline by 1.6%, the largest downturn among all geographical regions. Moreover, North America's total exports were projected to drop by 12.6% and imports by 9.6%.
The WTO also projected that Asia would take a significant blow in GDP growth of 0.4%. The WTO expected the Sino-American trade war to inevitably affect the rest of the world. Chinese exports to regions other than North America were projected to grow between 4% and 9%.
Trump's unpredictability in global trade plays directly in these projections. The Chinese Ministry of Commerce said, 'China will unswervingly focus on handling its affairs well, using China's 'certainty' to counteract the 'uncertainty' of the external environment.'
Furthermore, the least developed countries were the most likely to be vulnerable to these external pressures and might face competition with China in exports such as textiles and electronics. The trade between the United States and China only accounts for 3% of global trade. Trade between the other WTO members accounts for 87% of trade.
However, China and the United States hold the most economic influence.
'China-US trade is 3% of world trade. So when you look at that, it's small, but the potential of these two big trading partners being able to persuade and create these blocks has such a negative impact on world trade, and therefore on world growth as well,' said Okonjo-Iweala.
Despite these dire projections, the director general also explained that there could be opportunities for regions like Africa to diversify their exports amid this potential restructuring of trade.
'Africa's world trade has stagnated at about 3%. That's not good enough, because they are still exporting the same things. So, I think it is time to attract more value addition on the continent, and the potential is there, and it's so critical now, because aid is drying out,' said Okonjo-Iweala, who is from Nigeria and is the first woman and African to lead the WHO.
Okonjo-Iweala also agreed with the Trump administration that there should be less over-dependence and more interdependence between countries.
'I've said very clearly that it does not build global resilience to have 95% of semiconductors made in one place. It does not build global resilience to have 10 countries export 80% of the vaccines used in the world when you have a pandemic, it just doesn't work. You need to decentralize,' she said.
She echoed Trump's claim that restoring local manufacturing could increase jobs in America.
'I think this administration would argue we want to see a wholesale re-industrialization of America. We want more manufacturing jobs,' Okonjo-Iweala said. 'But there's a broader agenda here of creating what are viewed as better jobs that support a community, that create more possibility for workers to succeed than just services jobs.'
Copyright 2025 UPI News Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


San Francisco Chronicle
11 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Iran's top diplomat says talks with US 'complicated' by American strike on nuclear sites
DUBAI, United Arab Emirates (AP) — Iran's top diplomat said the possibility of new negotiations with the United States on his country's nuclear program has been 'complicated' by the American attack on three of the sites, which he conceded caused 'serious damage." The U.S. was one of the parties to the 2015 nuclear deal in which Iran agreed to limits on its uranium enrichment program in exchange for sanctions relief and other benefits. That deal unraveled after U.S. President Donald Trump pulled the U.S. out unilaterally during his first term. Trump has suggested he is interested in new talks with Iran, and said that the two sides would meet next week. In an interview on Iranian state television broadcast late Thursday, Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi left open the possibility that his country would again enter talks on its nuclear program, but suggested it would not be anytime soon. 'No agreement has been made for resuming the negotiations,' he said. 'No time has been set, no promise has been made, and we haven't even talked about restarting the talks.' The American decision to intervene militarily 'made it more complicated and more difficult' for talks on Iran's nuclear program, Araghchi said. Israel attacked Iran on June 13, targeting its nuclear sites, defense systems, high-ranking military officials and atomic scientists in relentless attacks. In 12 days of strikes, Israel said it killed some 30 Iranian commanders and hit eight nuclear-related facilities and more than 720 military infrastructure sites. More than 1,000 people were killed, including at least 417 civilians, according to the Washington-based Human Rights Activists group. Iran fired more than 550 ballistic missiles at Israel, most of which were intercepted but those that got through caused damage in many areas and killed 28 people. The U.S. stepped in on Sunday to hit Iran's three most important strikes with a wave of cruise missiles and bunker-buster bombs dropped by B-2 bombers, designed to penetrate deep into the ground to damage the heavily-fortified targets. Iran, in retaliation, fired missiles at a U.S. base in Qatar on Monday but caused no known casualties. Trump said the American attacks 'completely and fully obliterated' Iran's nuclear program, though Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on Thursday accused the U.S. president of exaggerating the damage, saying the strikes did not 'achieve anything significant.' There has been speculation that Iran moved much of its highly-enriched uranium before the strikes, something that it told the U.N. nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, that it planned to do. Even if that turns out to be true, IAEA Director Rafael Grossi told Radio France International that the damage done to the Fordo site, which was built into a mountain, 'is very, very, very considerable.' Among other things, he said, centrifuges are 'quite precise machines' and it's 'not possible' that the concussion from multiple 30,000-pound bombs would not have caused 'important physical damage.' 'These centrifuges are no longer operational,' he said. Araghchi himself acknowledged that 'the level of damage is high, and it's serious damage.'
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US Department of Defense expands militarised zone along Texas border
The US Department of Defense is significantly expanding a militarised zone along the southern border in Texas, granting troops the authority to detain individuals for potential federal prosecution on charges of trespassing within a national defence area. The Air Force announced on Monday the annexation of a winding 250-mile (400-kilometre) stretch of the border. This expansion comes amid a broader buildup of military forces initiated under President Trump's declaration of a national emergency at the border. This newly designated national defence area, running along the Rio Grande, spans two Texas counties and borders cities including Brownsville and McAllen. It will be treated as an extension of Joint Base San Antonio. The Air Force has stated its readiness to immediately install warning signs prohibiting entry into the zone. The military strategy was pioneered in April along a 170-mile (275-kilometer) stretch of the border in New Mexico and expanded to a swath of western Texas in May. Hunters, hikers and humanitarian aid groups fear that they will no longer have access. In the newest national defense area, military responsibilities include 'enhanced detection and monitoring' and "temporarily detaining trespassers until they are transferred to the appropriate law enforcement authorities,' the Air Force said in a news release. At least three people have been directly detained by troops in New Mexico for processing by Border Patrol. More than 1,400 immigrants have been charged with incursions into the national defense areas, a criminal misdemeanor punishable by up to 18 months in prison. Court challenges to the charges have met with mixed results. The militarized border zone is a counterpoint to the deployment of roughly 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines to Los Angeles following protests over Trump's stepped-up enforcement of immigration laws. The troop deployments are testing the limits of the Posse Comitatus Act, which prohibits the military from conducting civilian law enforcement on U.S. soil. Arrests at the border for illegal entry have decreased dramatically this year.


Axios
17 minutes ago
- Axios
Exclusive poll: Most voters back Iran strikes, but worry about attacks on U.S.
The U.S. attacks on Iran's nuclear facilities Saturday have left American voters with contradictory feelings, a new poll finds: A majority favored limited strikes, but nearly as many said they were worried about a widening war and Iran retaliating on U.S. soil. Meanwhile, most viewed the U.S. attacks as a success — and are likely to back similar military action as a result. Why it matters: The survey sheds light on Americans' nuanced views of war and rapidly evolving foreign policy. Republicans overwhelmingly approved of bombing Iran; sizable majorities of Democrats and independents did not. But once they were told the bombings only targeted Iran's uranium enrichment for its nuclear program, support increased in each group. The big picture:"When voters understand the strategic rationale behind the strikes, support increases," said pollster Ryan Tyson, head of the Tyson Group, which conducted the survey. It recently worked for Elon Musk's political committee when it supported President Trump's re-election. The broad support for military action that the survey found among Republicans and self-identified MAGA voters suggested that the divisions within Trump's base over Iran were more talk than reality. The poll also measured Trump's job performance, finding that 46% of Americans approve and 51% disapprove. Voters are deadlocked on his handling of foreign policy, but he's underwater by double digits when it comes to handling inflation. More concerns for Trump: There's persistent worry in the U.S. electorate about blowback from the bombings and the contagion of war. 75% of voters think that despite the Israel-Iran ceasefire, the conflict could escalate into a wider war. 46% think some sort of Iranian attack on U.S. soil is now likely. And 45% believe the strikes didn't make the U.S. safer, while just 36% said they did. The good news for Trump: By 50-33, voters would support airstrikes similar to those launched Saturday, a sign they see it as a success and a manageable risk. Two-thirds believe more U.S. attacks like last Saturday's are likely. 56% agree with the sentiment that military force is justified to stop a nuclear Iran. 55% believe that Iran's nuclear program was either "obliterated," to use Trump's words, or dealt a major setback. Just 25% thought it was barely affected or was unscathed. 62% said the strikes will have been worth it if Iran stops enriching uranium. The intrigue: The poll also reflected how Israel's war against Hamas in Gaza has been a drag on how U.S. voters view America's ally. By 2 percentage points, U.S. voters oppose the war in Gaza, the poll found. By 54-27%, they believe Israel has too much influence on American foreign policy. Voters are more inclined to arm Ukraine than Israel, the survey found. Ukraine's president, Volodymyr Zelensky, has solid favorability numbers as well, but Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's ratings are negative. Methodology: The Tyson Group's national survey of 1,027 U.S. voters was conducted online June 25-26. The survey has a margin of error of ±3.1 percentage points at the 95% confidence level. To analyze only the responses of those identifying as Republicans, an oversample was used to ensure the margin of error remained consistent. That did not affect the top-line results of the survey.