Infant highchairs recalled over ‘risk of serious injury or death'
(NEXSTAR) – A high-end highchair was recalled Thursday over a potentially deadly flaw and several reports of serious injuries, according to the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC).
CPSC officials said the decision was made after multiple parents blamed the Bugaboo Giraffe highchair for serious falls that resulted in injuries including a hematoma, facial bruising, abrasions and a temporary loss of consciousness.
The screws that attach the legs to the chair are apparently prone to loosening over time – and even detaching by themselves, the CPSC said, citing incident reports on SaferProducts.gov as well as posts by parents on Reddit and Amazon.
Restaurant chain has highest job satisfaction for 10th year straight
Under one Reddit post titled 'An Unsafe Scam Disguised as a Premium Product,' one parent described what happened after two years of using the highchair, which retails for over $400 on the Bugaboo site:
I went to pick up the highchair to move it—and it crumbled. Just completely fell apart in my hands. I was furious. This was supposed to be a safe, durable, premium product, and instead, it was falling to pieces right in front of me.
The post contains a number of complaints about the customer service process, ranging from hangups to weekslong waits for email replies.
Parents who bought the chair are advised to stop using it immediately and contact Bugaboo for a repair kit. No refunds are currently being offered.
'Safety is paramount to ensure the well-being of our customers and their children,' Bugaboo states on its website. 'To decrease the potential for incorrect installation of the screws, we have developed a free Repair Kit.'
The kit apparently includes:
A redesigned set of screws;
An improved Allen key for easier installation;
A step-by-step instruction manual.
'If you have ordered a Bugaboo Giraffe after May 1st, 2025, you will already have the Repair Kit included in your Bugaboo Giraffe box and no further action is needed,' according to Bugaboo. The recall page contains a link for parents who want to check their highchair's serial number.
Geomagnetic storming could spark northern lights this weekend: What to know
The recall comes after Consumer Reports sent a letter to the CPSC earlier in the week urging an investigation into the injury reports.
'While we are glad to see the product being recalled, it is unacceptable that Bugaboo is not offering a refund to consumers who want one,' said Gabe Knight, Senior Policy Analyst at Consumer Reports. 'Babies have been injured falling from this high chair, and parents may not feel comfortable using it anymore. We applaud the CPSC for recalling this product and alerting consumers to the potential safety risks, but Bugaboo should let caretakers decide whether they want the free repair kit, or their money back.'
As of Friday, 18,280 highchairs had been recalled in the U.S., with another 2,325 in Canada.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What's the Best Way to Invest $100,000 Right Now?
There's no perfect way to put a sum of cash to work. The right strategy depends on how involved you want to be with your portfolio, and your risk tolerance level. There are some good rules you can use to help get you started. These 10 stocks could mint the next wave of millionaires › As always, The Motley Fool cannot and does not provide personalized investing or financial advice. This information is for informational and educational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional financial advice. Always seek the guidance of a qualified financial advisor for any questions regarding your personal financial situation. If you'd like to submit your question for feedback, you can do so here. ** If you have a lump sum of cash to invest, and your debts are all under control, what should you do? This is a question that a Reddit (NYSE: RDDT) user recently posted, and it's a very good one to look at more closely. If you had $100k, zero debt, how would you invest your money?by u/cinnamonbon12 in DaveRamsey What I'm about to share isn't personal financial advice. I would need to be familiar with all aspects of your financial situation to make any customized suggestions. But I'm happy to offer some general steps you can take that will point you in the right direction. The first suggestion I'd make is to answer two "test" questions that can give you a solid outline for your investment strategy. The first is asking just how active an investor you want to be. There are three basic levels: "I want to put money in an investment(s) and not have to check on it or worry about it." "I don't mind doing a bit of investment maintenance, but don't have the time, knowledge, or desire to own individual stocks." "I'm well-versed in the stock market (or plan to get there before investing real money) and would love to construct a portfolio of individual stocks." If you are in the first group, it's probably best to look into a robo-advisor. This is a type of investing service where you deposit money, and the platform will construct an age-appropriate portfolio of investment funds. It's the best way to truly put your investments on autopilot. If you're in the second group, definitely read on, but you'll be focusing on index fund investments, not individual stocks. There are hundreds of great index funds to choose from, and a well-constructed portfolio of passive index funds can be a great way to build wealth over time. Finally, if you're in the third group, you've definitely come to the right website. While I can't possibly thoroughly discuss constructing a stock portfolio in a 600-word article, I'd encourage you to check out our list of some of the best stocks to buy, and to browse some of the other great content around Second, you need to determine your ideal asset allocation, unless you plan to use the robo-advisor route. Of course, there's no perfect rule for everyone. One popular guideline is known as the Rule of 110, and it's rather straightforward. Simply subtract your age from 110 to determine the percentage of your portfolio that should be in stocks, with the remainder in fixed income assets like bonds and CDs. For example, I'm 43 years old, so this rule says that I should have about 67% of my money in stocks (or stock-based funds), with the rest in fixed income. The idea here is that when you're young and have time to ride out the ups and downs of the stock market, more of your money should be there. But as you get older and preserving your capital becomes more of a priority, you should gradually shift money into "safer" assets like bonds. Of course, you can customize this based on your own risk tolerance and investment goals. For example, if you are planning to retire early, it might be a good idea to err on the side of a higher fixed income allocation. If I were starting from scratch (at age 43) with $100,000 to invest, I'd put about two-thirds of the money in a portfolio of top-quality stocks and exchange-traded funds (ETFs). A basic S&P 500 index fund like the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (NYSEMKT: VOO) makes a great portfolio "backbone," and I'd add some top stocks to the mix. For fixed income, I generally use bond ETFs and CDs for my own portfolio. Buying individual bonds is a clunky process, and there's really no reason to do that instead of using an ETF like the Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (NASDAQ: BND). Of course, it shouldn't really matter to you exactly what I'd invest $100,000 in -- that is, unless you're a 43-year-old father of two with 15 years of experience analyzing stocks. Having said that, the point is that by applying the results of the two questions presented earlier, you can help set yourself on the right path to build wealth while simultaneously preserving capital over a long-term investment strategy. Ever feel like you missed the boat in buying the most successful stocks? Then you'll want to hear this. On rare occasions, our expert team of analysts issues a 'Double Down' stock recommendation for companies that they think are about to pop. If you're worried you've already missed your chance to invest, now is the best time to buy before it's too late. And the numbers speak for themselves: Nvidia: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, you'd have $368,190!* Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you'd have $37,294!* Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you'd have $653,702!* Right now, we're issuing 'Double Down' alerts for three incredible companies, available when you join , and there may not be another chance like this anytime soon.*Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Matt Frankel has positions in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Vanguard S&P 500 ETF and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. What's the Best Way to Invest $100,000 Right Now? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
An Investor Who Took Out $150,000 In Loans To Buy Bitcoin Gives A Three-Year Update. But Everyone Just Wants To Know—How'd He Get 0% Loans?
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. Three years ago, one Reddit user made a high-risk decision: they borrowed $150,000 using a mix of personal loans and 0% APR credit card balance transfers to buy Bitcoin. As of June 4, they say that investment is paying off in a big way. The investor says they now own 4.75 Bitcoin, purchased at an average price of $35,000. With Bitcoin trading at around $105,000 at the time of the update, their holdings are worth roughly $498,750. After accounting for the $15,000 in interest paid and the original $150,000 in loans, they're sitting on an unrealized gain of over $330,000. Don't Miss: — no wallets, just price speculation and free paper trading to practice different strategies. Grow your IRA or 401(k) with Crypto – . 'I have no plans to sell any of it. Just buy and hold. Retire early,' they wrote. The remaining debt, now at about $40,000, comes from credit card balance transfers that carry 0% interest for the next six to 12 months. They admitted to recently taking out another $25,000 balance transfer to buy an additional 0.25 BTC when the price crossed $100,000, despite previously promising not to borrow more. 'I was down to just $20,000 remaining balance, but I simply couldn't resist.' When asked why they didn't just use earned income to slowly invest, the investor explained, 'If I only did that, then I would not have been able to buy nearly as much Bitcoin as I did at the lowest prices.' They describe their approach as a 'reverse dollar-cost averaging.' Instead of buying a little over time, they borrowed a lump sum when BTC was trading between $16,000 and $35,000, then repaid it in monthly installments. To critics who say borrowing to invest is reckless, they responded, 'Taking out loans to buy assets is fine, so long as you can afford to responsibly service the debt. Just don't take out loans to buy liabilities.' They argue that inflationary U.S. fiscal policy will continue to devalue the dollar. Their thesis: borrow in USD and buy an appreciating asset like Bitcoin. 'The strategy is basically a speculative attack on the U.S. dollar,' they said. Trending: New to crypto? on Coinbase. That was the number one question in the comment section. 'Credit Card Balance Transfer Offers. I get them all the time in the mail or with my current credit cards. You have to have a good credit score though,' they wrote. Balance transfer credit cards let users move existing debt from one card to another, often with an introductory 0% interest rate for a limited time, typically 12 to 18 months. Some issuers even allow the transferred funds to be deposited directly into a bank account, turning it interest-free loan for a set period. The original poster also clarified that it wasn't about transferring balances from one card to another in the traditional sense. 'You don't have to transfer a balance. They deposit it directly into your bank account.' As for fees, they acknowledged a 3% upfront transaction fee on those balance transfers. Their income isn't unusually high either. They claim to take home around $65,000 a year, but maintain an 800+ credit score, which is how they secured access to so much credit. Reactions were split. Some called the move genius, gutsy, or inspiring. Others labeled it reckless or 'degenerate gambling.' One commenter wrote, 'I did this with shitcoins and lost $175K. Good luck!' while another added, 'It's not gambling if you have a plan and discipline.' The original poster seems unfazed by either side. 'Bitcoin is the exit strategy,' they said. Read Next: A must-have for all crypto enthusiasts: . Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing — This article An Investor Who Took Out $150,000 In Loans To Buy Bitcoin Gives A Three-Year Update. But Everyone Just Wants To Know—How'd He Get 0% Loans? originally appeared on
Newsweek
5 hours ago
- Newsweek
Man Gets Work Message Not Meant for Him—Then Everything Changes
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A man has shared the shocking way he learned he was losing his job, via a mistakenly sent message. The 30-year-old systems engineer, who asked to remain anonymous, had been hired to help automate database and CRM software functions at a local hospital network in the Midwest. But days before Christmas, a notification on his phone revealed an unsettling truth. A message, sent via Microsoft Teams, stated: "Sorry for the late note—I plan to terminate [employee's name redacted] on Monday. Unfortunate timing since tomorrow will be awkward if he shows up." The employee has since shared the incident, which happened last December, on Reddit's popular r/antiwork subreddit, explaining that "it still makes my blood boil thinking about it." "When I first saw it, I was p***** off," the man told Newsweek. "But I cooled down a bit. HR told me they had no idea what my director was talking about because no complaints had been made. And to terminate me, he needed to talk to them first—which he did not do." A picture of the message the employee accidentally received. A picture of the message the employee accidentally received. Substanzz/Reddit A week later, after HR had formally reviewed the situation, the employee was officially let go, but the fury of the handling of the situation remains. Reflecting on the ordeal, he now wishes he had handled it with a bit more humor—perhaps attending the company Christmas party and pretending he was planning to retire at the firm before casually confronting his director about the deleted message. "Hindsight is 20/20 and that would of been a more satisfying end to the job," he joked. This is far from the first time an accidental message in the workplace has caused havoc. Earlier this year a man was stunned when a recruiter misspelled his name, Cian, as "Ciabatta" in an email. Earlier this month another employee shared how their boss asked to be copied into every email they sent, only for it to spectacularly backfire. In comments on Reddit, people reacted to the mistaken message. "Text back, 'so what are you thinking for a severance package?'" said one commenter. While another wrote: "You shouldn't trust the people you work with unless and until they actively demonstrate they're trustworthy." "Never trust anyone you work with. They are not your friends and gain nothing by being so unless you can help them make more money. Realize when they are trying to eliminate parts of your job as well. Sad fact that we all have to learn one day in our lives," agreed another Redditor. Signing off the post on r/antiwork, the employee said: "In the end, I only had about a week of downtime before a contracting agency helped me land another job. Still, the whole experience made it really hard to trust the people I work with. Stay safe and stay sane out there. Wishing you all the best in this messed up world."
