Honda's Racing Division Will Sell You Pieces of Senna's V-10 F1 Engine
Honda Racing Corporation has been busy lately. After spending a decades as the subsidiary behind Honda's global motorcycle racing, HRC has since integrated all of Honda's racing activity. That includes global programs like the upcoming 2026 Formula 1 engine program, SuperGT racing in Japan, and Honda's continuing IndyCar and IMSA activities under the HRC US brand. And it now also includes a memorabilia arm, a new venture designed to make Honda's racing heritage more accessible for collectors.
The program is launching with a major offering: parts from a Honda RA100E V-10 engine used in the 1990 F1 season. That, of course, is the motor that powered the McLaren MP4/5B, driven by Ayrton Senna and teammate Gerhard Berger to that season's constructor's championship. Senna also won the driver's championship in 1990, one of his three championship seasons in four years from 1988 to 1991.
HRC says that the engine was parted out at the company's factory in Sakura City, Japan by the same people who built it. Pieces available for sale include camshafts, cam covers, pistons, and connecting rods. The components will be auctioned off in California during this year's Monterey Car Week in August, and all will come with both a display case and a certificate of authenticity.
In addition to the engine components, HRC says that the brand plans to offer a "wide range of authentic, high-quality memorabilia, including signed merchandise, limited-edition collectibles and rare artifacts from the company's storied legacy in motorsport." The company adds that "heritage machines" from the IndyCar Series and "valuable race machines" from MotoGP are currently being chosen for similar offerings in the future. We're curious to see just what sort of memorabilia they might soon be offering up.
You Might Also Like
You Need a Torque Wrench in Your Toolbox
Tested: Best Car Interior Cleaners
The Man Who Signs Every Car
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Illinois lawmakers again fail to act on hemp, while a new study highlights growing health concerns
A new report on hemp-derived THC highlights growing concerns over its safety, legality and impact on health — even as Illinois lawmakers have failed again to keep the products away from children. The report by the University of Illinois System Institute of Government and Public Affairs notes that the lack of regulation of hemp means there is no state oversight of ingredients, potency or marketing to kids. The report cites studies showing many hemp products had different amounts of THC than labeled, while some were well above the package limits for licensed cannabis products, and contained toxic solvents left over from processing. Some products also mimicked popular candy or snack packaging that could appeal to kids. Several incidents have occurred in the Chicago area of school-age children going to hospitals after ingesting hemp products. But as in previous years, state lawmakers failed to take any significant action on hemp in its latest session, which ended Saturday. Hemp is caught in a Catch-22 repeating cycle of inaction. The 2018 federal Farm Bill legalized hemp, defined as cannabis plants that have less than 0.3% by weight of Delta-9 THC, the primary component of the plant that gets users high. Although the Farm Bill allowed production of non-intoxicating hemp derivatives such as CBD, it also inadvertantly set off an explosion of intoxicating products now available across the nation at smoke shops and gas stations. Hemp processors found ways to use chemical solvents or other methods to produce variants such as Delta-8, Delta-10, and THCO, which can get users high like marijuana. And with little enforcement, many hemp products contain Delta-9 THC anyway. The federal law also set no age restriction for hemp products. While cannabis, which is the same plant but with high levels of Delta-9, remains federally illegal, it's legal for recreational use in Illinois and 23 other states. But getting a business license is extremely difficult and expensive, and regulations make it much more expensive to open and run a cannabis business than a hemp shop. As a result, hemp shops have proliferated, while many who hold cannabis business licenses have failed to get up and running. Cannabis industry leaders want to shut down their competition, saying unlicensed hemp undercuts those who went through arduous cannabis licensing. Hemp business owners say they want to be regulated instead. Proposed hemp legislation set guidelines that would have been similar to those on cannabis businesses: sales only to those 21 and over, and testing and labeling of products for potency and contaminants, but without the expensive licensing. The chief proponent of allowing hemp businesses to operate with further regulations in Springfield, Rep. La Shawn Ford, said lawmakers could not reach agreement over whether to ban or regulate hemp. But since the spring legislative session ended, Ford has had joint meetings with cannabis and hemp operators in an attempt to reach some compromise. With the lack of licensing and taxation for hemp, and continued problems for cannabis, the state is losing out on millions in potential tax revenue, Ford said. 'It's always been industry against industry, so now everyone has made a commitment to work together to regulate hemp and make some improvements to cannabis,' he said. At least 14 states have made intoxicating hemp products illegal, and numerous municipalities in Illinois have done so. Despite Gov. JB Pritzker calling last year for hemp restrictions, state lawmakers have been stuck between the two sides, unable to reach a consensus, and as a result have done nothing. Both cannabis and hemp businesses have made significant campaign contributions to legislators. Rachel Berry, president of the Illinois Hemp Growers Association, said the lack of legislation allows business to continue as usual, but again misses an opportunity for 'common-sense' regulation. 'It seems like there's been a lack of leadership amongst lawmakers to get this issue taken care of,' she said. 'This is something that the community has been asking for for years.' She also took issue with the hemp study's characterization of intoxicating hemp as a 'loophole' in the law. She noted that federal law explicitly allows for 'all derivatives, extracts, cannabinoids, isomers, acids, salts, and salts of isomers' from hemp, which opened the door to Delta-8 and other intoxicating products. From the other side of the issue, the Cannabis Business Association of Illinois argues that intoxicating hemp products are flooding the market, undercutting licensed operators, evading health and safety regulations, and generating minimal state revenue because they aren't taxed at the high rate applied to licensed cannabis. 'Hemp and cannabis come from the same plant,' association Executive Director Tiffany Chappell Ingram said. 'Both products can get users high. It's time Illinois regulate intoxicating hemp in a manner similar to cannabis.' The National Poison Center reported about 5,000 cases of Delta-8, Delta-10 or THC-O acetate accidental or abusive ingestion, representing an 89% increase from 2021 to 2022. A 2022 national survey found that 10% of Illinois youths age 12 to 17 had used a hemp product in the past year. The University of Illinois hemp study concluded that producers would likely find new ways to get around a ban on intoxicating hemp products, which could merely drive customers online. Instead, requiring limits on hemp packaging amounts, and testing hemp products for potency, accuracy in labeling, and contaminants 'could best serve the public interest.' Tomasz Gliszewski, founder of Chicago Cannabis Co., which sells hemp products, has grown to three stores on the city's North Side since 2018, said lawmakers should approve a 21 and older age limit for hemp, with a 3% sales tax. Responsible hemp store operators already restrict sales to adults, he said, and sell tested products. His stores are described as 'Your neighborhood weed shop.' The company offers joints, vapes and edibles with THC or CBD, available by online ordering and same-day home delivery via DoorDash — something state-licensed cannabis companies can't do. 'It's been rough not having clarity,' Gliszewski said. 'Instead of trying to ban this stuff, they should pass common-sense legislation.' More companies are moving into the hemp business. Even Edible Brands, the parent company that makes Edible Arrangements fruit bouquets, has entered the market, with hemp-derived THC-infused products at Meanwhile, lawmakers took no major action to help struggling state-licensed cannabis businesses and their customers. A bill that would have expanded medical marijuana to all dispensaries, lowered licensing fees and allowed curbside pickup and drive-thru windows died again in Springfield this session.
Chicago Tribune
2 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
Illinois lawmakers again fail to act on hemp, while a new study highlights growing health concerns
A new report on hemp-derived THC highlights growing concerns over its safety, legality and impact on health — even as Illinois lawmakers have failed again to keep the products away from children. The report by the University of Illinois System Institute of Government and Public Affairs notes that the lack of regulation of hemp means there is no state oversight of ingredients, potency or marketing to kids. The report cites studies showing many hemp products had different amounts of THC than labeled, while some were well above the package limits for licensed cannabis products, and contained toxic solvents left over from processing. Some products also mimicked popular candy or snack packaging that could appeal to kids. Several incidents have occurred in the Chicago area of school-age children going to hospitals after ingesting hemp products. But as in previous years, state lawmakers failed to take any significant action on hemp in its latest session, which ended Saturday. Hemp is caught in a Catch-22 repeating cycle of inaction. The 2018 federal Farm Bill legalized hemp, defined as cannabis plants that have less than 0.3% by weight of Delta-9 THC, the primary component of the plant that gets users high. Although the Farm Bill allowed production of non-intoxicating hemp derivatives such as CBD, it also inadvertantly set off an explosion of intoxicating products now available across the nation at smoke shops and gas stations. Hemp processors found ways to use chemical solvents or other methods to produce variants such as Delta-8, Delta-10, and THCO, which can get users high like marijuana. And with little enforcement, many hemp products contain Delta-9 THC anyway. The federal law also set no age restriction for hemp products. While cannabis, which is the same plant but with high levels of Delta-9, remains federally illegal, it's legal for recreational use in Illinois and 23 other states. But getting a business license is extremely difficult and expensive, and regulations make it much more expensive to open and run a cannabis business than a hemp shop. As a result, hemp shops have proliferated, while many who hold cannabis business licenses have failed to get up and running. Cannabis industry leaders want to shut down their competition, saying unlicensed hemp undercuts those who went through arduous cannabis licensing. Hemp business owners say they want to be regulated instead. Proposed hemp legislation set guidelines that would have been similar to those on cannabis businesses: sales only to those 21 and over, and testing and labeling of products for potency and contaminants, but without the expensive licensing. The chief proponent of allowing hemp businesses to operate with further regulations in Springfield, Rep. La Shawn Ford, said lawmakers could not reach agreement over whether to ban or regulate hemp. But since the spring legislative session ended, Ford has had joint meetings with cannabis and hemp operators in an attempt to reach some compromise. With the lack of licensing and taxation for hemp, and continued problems for cannabis, the state is losing out on millions in potential tax revenue, Ford said. 'It's always been industry against industry, so now everyone has made a commitment to work together to regulate hemp and make some improvements to cannabis,' he said. At least 14 states have made intoxicating hemp products illegal, and numerous municipalities in Illinois have done so. Despite Gov. JB Pritzker calling last year for hemp restrictions, state lawmakers have been stuck between the two sides, unable to reach a consensus, and as a result have done nothing. Both cannabis and hemp businesses have made significant campaign contributions to legislators. Rachel Berry, president of the Illinois Hemp Growers Association, said the lack of legislation allows business to continue as usual, but again misses an opportunity for 'common-sense' regulation. 'It seems like there's been a lack of leadership amongst lawmakers to get this issue taken care of,' she said. 'This is something that the community has been asking for for years.' She also took issue with the hemp study's characterization of intoxicating hemp as a 'loophole' in the law. She noted that federal law explicitly allows for 'all derivatives, extracts, cannabinoids, isomers, acids, salts, and salts of isomers' from hemp, which opened the door to Delta-8 and other intoxicating products. From the other side of the issue, the Cannabis Business Association of Illinois argues that intoxicating hemp products are flooding the market, undercutting licensed operators, evading health and safety regulations, and generating minimal state revenue because they aren't taxed at the high rate applied to licensed cannabis. 'Hemp and cannabis come from the same plant,' association Executive Director Tiffany Chappell Ingram said. 'Both products can get users high. It's time Illinois regulate intoxicating hemp in a manner similar to cannabis.' The National Poison Center reported about 5,000 cases of Delta-8, Delta-10 or THC-O acetate accidental or abusive ingestion, representing an 89% increase from 2021 to 2022. A 2022 national survey found that 10% of Illinois youths age 12 to 17 had used a hemp product in the past year. The University of Illinois hemp study concluded that producers would likely find new ways to get around a ban on intoxicating hemp products, which could merely drive customers online. Instead, requiring limits on hemp packaging amounts, and testing hemp products for potency, accuracy in labeling, and contaminants 'could best serve the public interest.' Tomasz Gliszewski, founder of Chicago Cannabis Co., which sells hemp products, has grown to three stores on the city's North Side since 2018, said lawmakers should approve a 21 and older age limit for hemp, with a 3% sales tax. Responsible hemp store operators already restrict sales to adults, he said, and sell tested products. His stores are described as 'Your neighborhood weed shop.' The company offers joints, vapes and edibles with THC or CBD, available by online ordering and same-day home delivery via DoorDash — something state-licensed cannabis companies can't do. 'It's been rough not having clarity,' Gliszewski said. 'Instead of trying to ban this stuff, they should pass common-sense legislation.' More companies are moving into the hemp business. Even Edible Brands, the parent company that makes Edible Arrangements fruit bouquets, has entered the market, with hemp-derived THC-infused products at Meanwhile, lawmakers took no major action to help struggling state-licensed cannabis businesses and their customers. A bill that would have expanded medical marijuana to all dispensaries, lowered licensing fees and allowed curbside pickup and drive-thru windows died again in Springfield this session.
Indianapolis Star
3 hours ago
- Indianapolis Star
Will Fox, IndyCar find 'rapid growth' it sought after Indy 500? Detroit Grand Prix was a start
It's an age-old, annual trend a couple days after the race immediately following the Indianapolis 500: Why did IndyCar lose 80% of its audience from a week ago? And this year, for better or worse, was no different — although if you want to be specific, this year's post-500 audience drop-off was the worst the race has seen since at least 2016, if you're looking at Indy 500s with a race the next Sunday on the calendar that ran on network TV with no weather or scheduling alternations. Sunday's Detroit Grand Prix won by Andretti Global's Kyle Kirkwood averaged an audience of 1.061 million viewers, meaning the race was watched by 14.97% of the fans who tuned in for Alex Palou's Indy 500 victory the week prior. Those other figures dating back to 2016 look like this: 2023 Indy 500: 4.716 million (on NBC) Detroit Grand Prix: 1.047 million (on NBC) Percentage of audience retained: 22.2% 2019 Indy 500: 5.435 million (on NBC) Detroit Grand Prix Race 2: 1.091 million (on NBC) Percentage of audience retained: 20.07% 2018 Indy 500: 4.910 million (on ABC) Detroit Grand Prix Race 2: 951,000 (on ABC) Percentage of audience retained: 19.37% 2017 Indy 500: 5.457 million (on ABC) Detroit Grand Prix Race 2: 918,000 (on ABC) Percentage of audience retained: 16.82% 2016 Indy 500: 6.010 million (on ABC) Detroit Grand Prix Race 2: 1.397 million (on ABC) Percentage of audience retained: 23.24% In other words, as frustrating as it may be, a highly watched 500 like this year's (7.087 million) isn't going to guarantee an outlier of a next race audience. For millions upon millions of people, the Indy 500 will forever be on their radar the Sunday of Memorial Day weekend, and the next time they'll think of IndyCar enough to channel surf for a race will be 365 days later. Now, does that mean Fox shouldn't have been hitting people over the head with reminders that the Detroit Grand Prix was the following Sunday, same channel and same time? No. In my opinion, that's a missed opportunity for sure, when you know you have the attention of so many casual race fans who at that moment either have no idea when you race next or don't care enough to look into it, but that's a conversation for another column entirely. What's clear is that the seven-day audience falloff is nothing new, and unless there's a notable move in future years to push tune-in to the next race (I watched this year's 500 back and do not remember a single mention of Detroit), then there's no reason to think it will change. It doesn't mean that topping the 7 million mark for this year's 500 for the first time since 2008 isn't a major accomplishment, because it is — an achievement borne out of more than six months of intentional, varied promotion from Fox and a product of the network pulling out all the stops. But at the moment, IndyCar's in need of a meaningful uptick in fans who care about it more than one day a year. That 500 audience bump will no doubt help teams ask for more sponsorship dollars for Indy 500-only deals moving forward, but it's not a data figure that should be seen as an indication of where the size of the sport's active fan base is the other 364 days. And that's a number that will ultimately shape the sport's future. The Detroit Grand Prix TV audience shouldn't be overlooked, because it's the type of figure (i.e. seven figures) IndyCar and Fox need to see a lot more of over the next three months to make Year 1 of this deal a true success. PR reps and executives from both sides will tout the year-over-year audience boost from 2024 as proof of a monumental win already. Seven races in, the average audience size for IndyCar races this year (2.173 million) is up 31% on last year's mark with NBC (1.662 million) — a percentage boost that's only going to continue to rise. At this point a year ago, two of the seven races had aired on cable. In total, seven of the 17 races on the 2024 calendar were scheduled for streaming-only or cable, versus zero this year with Fox. An overall average audience boost was already baked into IndyCar's deal with its newest broadcast partner. Ultimately, that means this year will be a win achieved at the negotiating table and one stemming from the sport's pure increased exposure. That simple fact, along with all practice and qualifying sessions airing on cable instead of streaming-only means that without a doubt, this sport will be seen by more eyeballs than any season in recent memory. That means more value for teams to sell, and ultimately more revenue coming in the door, but it's not a fact indicative of a sport whose discernable fanbase has grown according to the TV numbers (more on that in a minute). Sunday's audience size (again, 1.061 million) would fall into the middle or the upper half of recent IndyCar seasons on NBC, in terms of those years' network race metrics. Through six non-Indy 500s, it ranks second best, and notably best since the season opener on March 2 averaged 1.42 million. Since then, only one race had even topped 715,000, and none had hit 920,000. So in that sense, eclipsing that seven-figure glass ceiling for a race that didn't have close to the buzz or intrigue of a season opener on a new network (even though it immediately followed the 500) was a win coming out of this weekend. And if IndyCar can see more of those audience sizes that start with a 1 and hit seven figures, as the season cranks into high gear with 10 races over the next 13 weekends, this could appear in hindsight a bit of an inflection point — one that would show just how important it is to race with high frequency and avoid multiple consecutive weekends off. Still, as we stand six non-Indy 500s into the year, Fox's all-network, non-Indy 500 audience size for the year sits at 893,500. Is it higher than NBC's last year (which included seven races)? Yes (868,571). But it lags behind the four previous seasons of NBC's non-COVID-19 year IndyCar coverage. Those seasons sat pretty level throughout the entirety of the deal, ranging from 948,429 (2021) to 967,250 (2023). It's a figure I've chosen to track for years for a couple important reasons: In essence, I feel this number most accurately tells the story of how many people are tuning into IndyCar races in recent years when the series is available to the largest audience possible, and in that, I think you can best track your race watching (i.e. passionate dedicated fans not attending the actual race) fan base and see how it ebbs and flows. As illustrated above, that figure stayed relatively flat during IndyCar's tenure with NBC through 2023, before falling off significantly in the sides' final year together. What Fox has done so far is already gain back a not insignificant chunk of those who for whatever reason fell off from 2023 to 2024, but it's not yet at 2019 and 2021-23 standards. To get back to that level, the final 10 IndyCar races on Fox will need to average just over 1 million viewers — 1,011,500 to be exact — for this year's non-500 network average to match that of 2023. Think the series should aspire to more? For that figure to hit 1 million for 2025, the final 10 races would need to deliver average audience sizes of 1,063,900 — almost identical to Sunday's Detroit Grand Prix. In short: Sunday's race audience was a step in the right direction, but it can't be IndyCar's ceiling the rest of this year, if we're expected to be able to look back at Year 1 of IndyCar with Fox and see it as anything more than a win achieved in a boardroom back in June 2024. A win here means notable evidence that Fox has, by its weekly tune-in campaigns, its placement of IndyCar drivers on its various sports and news properties and its production of entertaining race broadcasts, created new TV-watching IndyCar fans. Fox and IndyCar executives talked of 'rapid growth' and a series set 'on another trajectory' heading in this year. In a couple months, that non-Indy 500 network audience average will tell us whether or not that goal was achieved in Year 1.
