Rahul Gandhi: Wasn't there… but ready to take responsibility for 1984 riots
From taking 'responsibility' for the anti-Sikh riots to saying that US president Donald Trump 'being within his rights' in negotiating on trade tariffs to China and Pakistan being 'fused', Lok Sabha Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi touched upon a variety of topics in his discussion at Brown University (US) last month.
Gandhi's interaction at Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs with Ashutosh Varshney, a professor at the university, on April 21 was uploaded on Sunday.
On a question about 1984 anti-Sikh riots, the Congress's relationship with the community, he said: 'As far as the mistakes the Congress party have made are concerned, a lot of them happened when I was not there. But I am more than happy to take responsibility for everything bad that the Congress has done in its history.'
On reconciliation with the community, he said: 'I have publicly stated that what happened in the 1980s was wrong. I have been to Golden Temple multiple times. I have an extremely good relationship with the Sikh community in India and a loving relationship with them,' said Gandhi who started the interaction by saying that the idea of India as a Union of states 'is under systematic attack by a narrow ideology'.
On the caste census, Gandhi said, 'It is the first step. I was shocked with what we found (in Telangana caste census)… It will transform the way we think about development and politics'.
He went on to say, '… All our mythological figures – Lord Ram was of that type where he was forgiving and compassionate. I don't consider what the BJP says to be the Hindu idea at all… It is much more pluralistic, embracing, affectionate, tolerant and open.' The remarks referring to Lord Ram as a 'mythological figure' saw the BJP reacting with a 'Ram drohi' (anti-Ram) jibe and saying that the Opposition party opposed the construction of the Ram Temple in Ayodhya.
BJP national spokesperson Pradeep Bhandari asked him to change his party's name to 'anti-Hindu Congress'. 'The party that used words like Hindu terrorism, did not believe in the existence of Lord Ram and made every possible effort to not build the Ram temple in Ayodhya, its anti-Hindu face stands exposed today,' Bhandari told PTI.
The BJP urged Gandhi to ensure the expulsion of Jagdish Tytler, Kamal Nath and Sam Pitroda from the party if he actually felt the 1984 riots were wrong.
Asked about how India should respond to US President Donald Trump 's tariff policy, Rahul said: 'We don't know how it (India) is responding. Because they don't tell us these things. Donald Trump is negotiating. We should negotiate right back.'
On the threat from Pakistan and China, Rahul said that 'now China and Pakistan are fused'. 'So, any conflict we have will probably involves both of them together,' he said, adding that China has monopolised manufacturing and Trump has 'diagnosed this problem accurately'.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
33 minutes ago
- Time of India
NEET-PG 2025: Shashi Tharoor urges JP Nadda to allot extra exam centres in Kerala; says available seats 'exhausted within minutes'
Shashi Tharoor & JP Nadda (File photos) NEW DELHI: Congress leader Shashi Tharoor , who is also the Lok Sabha MP from Kerala's Thiruvananthapuram, wrote to Union heath minister JP Nadda on Saturday, urging his immediate intervention in authorising additional centres for NEET-PG aspirants in the coastal state. Tharoor said the medical exam students were unable to choose any city within Kerala as the available seats were "exhausted within minutes of the website reopening". Highlighting that National Board of Examinations in Medical Sciences (NBEMS) already has data on number of applicants in Kerala, Tharoor said it would be "unfair to restrict the number of centres in the state and put the candidates through distress, inconvenience, and financial burden by forcing them to travel to other states for the exam". "Dear @JPNadda Candidates from Kerala appearing for the NEET-PG 2025 exam are unable to choose any city within the state as their test city, as the available seats were exhausted within minutes of the website reopening. As NBEMS already has data on the number of applicants from Kerala, it is unfair to restrict the number of centres in the state and put the candidates through distress, inconvenience, and financial burden by forcing them to travel to other states for the exam. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn IC Markets Tìm hiểu thêm Undo I hope you will intervene immediately to help these candidates by authorising additional centres without delay. Thank you!" posted MP Shashi Tharoor on X. The NBEMS on Friday published the revised list of exam cities for the NEET PG 2025 examination on its official website. The updated list confirms that the number of test cities has been expanded to 233, ahead of the entrance test scheduled for August 3, 2025. Candidates will now be required to resubmit their preferred exam cities from June 13, 2025 (3 PM) to June 17, 2025 (11:55 PM) via the official portal. NBEMS has clarified that the city allotment process will operate on a first-come-first-serve basis, depending on candidate priority and availability.
Mint
37 minutes ago
- Mint
GDP's dirty little secret: Why we should be tracking GVA instead
Gross domestic product (GDP) growth rate is the headline number everyone tracks to figure out how the economy is doing. It's time we shifted focus to gross value added, or GVA, which is a more direct measure of the incomes generated in the economy. That's because GDP numbers are affected by random decisions by the GST Council to raise tax rates or by the government to slash subsidies. Cut subsidies, boost growth. Such a prescription might seem like snake oil for the consumption of the simpleminded. But cutting subsidies has, indeed, been the simple route to boost GDP growth in India. India's GDP growth in the final quarter of 2024-25 was a dramatic 7.4%. The growth in GVA, which is what counts for creating jobs and putting income in the hands of people, was a more modest 6.8%. The divergence between the growth rates of GDP (6.5%) and GVA (6.4%) has been modest for 2024-25 as a whole. It was starker in 2023-24, when the GDP growth rate was 9.2%, while GVA grew by only 8.6%. The more subsidies are cut, the greater the boost GDP growth gets over GVA growth. Also read | Growth in charts: GDP-GVA divide, export silver lining, capex push India is not accustomed to the chainsaw breed of fiscal conservatism that Elon Musk vocally championed before his high-profile breakup with US President Donald Trump. In the US, the notion that cutting welfare expenditure and other subsidies will make for a healthier fisc and a more robust economy is part of the mainstream narrative, at least on one side of the political divide. The conventional wisdom in Republican circles is that ridding government expenditure of waste and excess would make room for lower government borrowing and lower taxes, and these two would, combined with a dose of deregulation, boost growth. In India, too, many economists have used this approach – not to genuinely foster growth, but rather to dismiss the government's significant role in the economy by labelling it 'socialism' that curtails capitalist dynamism. The NDA government came to power as a slayer of big government and socialism. It once portrayed the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme as a monument of national failure. But, in the face of revealed distress in the economy, it has also assiduously funded the scheme, regardless of how this made the 'monument of failure' shine brighter. There is a big difference between the role the state and subsidies play in an economy like the US and in India, whose per-capita GDP is 3% of the US's $89,000. The way India's GDP is computed allows for a lower subsidy bill to boost GDP, whatever the role of subsidies in supporting subsistence and sustaining growth. GVA is what really matters While GDP is the headline number on everyone's radar, what matters for creating jobs and incomes is GVA. GVA and GDP are highly correlated but not quite the same. The total value that is generated in an economy breaks down into gross profits and the sum total of wages and salaries. GDP is the value of all final goods and services produced and sold in the economy, whether for consumption, investment or export, net of the imports that go into the production of those goods and services. By taking into account only the final goods, we avoid double counting. Steel goes into machinery, construction, washing machines and safety pins. We look at only the value of these final goods, and not the value of the steel produced. Also read | Kaushik Basu: Redefine prosperity; GDP tunnel-vision could prove costly National income can be estimated either from the income side or the expenditure side. Data on income is hard to capture directly on a comprehensive basis, and it is easier to estimate the expenditure on things. When you buy pills, an X-Ray machine, or lab test, what you pay for includes the tax on the good or service. Some of the goods you buy are subsidised by the government, so the price is lower than the actual value – grain from the fair price shop, or electricity in many states for certain classes of consumers are just two examples of this. So, to arrive at the GVA of the economy, you must add up the total expenditure on final goods and services, which will give you GDP, subtract the taxes borne by these goods and services, and add back the subsidies that artificially lowered your expenditure. In other words, GVA = GDP - tax + subsidy. In other words, GDP = GVA + tax - subsidy. Taxes net of subsidies are called net taxes. So GDP = GVA + net taxes. For the same level of value added in the economy, you can have a higher or lower level of GDP by raising or lowering net taxes. You can raise net taxes by raising taxes, lowering the subsidy outgo, or both. You can lower net taxes by lowering tax collections or increasing the subsidy bill. As you can see from the table, when the GVA growth rate increased from 6.7% in 2022-23 to 8.6% the following year, that is, by 1.9 percentage points, the GDP growth rate rose 2.2 percentage points, from 7% to 9.2%. This was effected by reducing the outlays on major subsidies from 2% of GDP to 1.37% of GDP – a decline of 31.5%. Another 15.5% drop in the subsidy/GDP ratio helped boost the GDP number in 2024-25. To get a grip on economic activity and the incomes it generates, it is more useful to look at GVA, rather than GDP, since GDP is affected by changes to subsidy allocations. Also read: Mint Quick Edit | India's GDP: A key test lies ahead
India.com
38 minutes ago
- India.com
Parade Or Power Play And For Whom? Tanks, Troops And Flyovers – Trump Stages Unprecedented Military Show In DC On His Birthday
Washingto, DC: An extraordinary military display is set to unfold in the U.S. capital this weekend. Tousands of troops, columns of tanks and roaring fighter jets prepare to roll out in one of the largest ceremonial deployments ever seen in peacetime Washington. Set to be held on Saturday (June 14), the event will coincide with the 250th anniversary of the United States Army. This year's commemoration comes with an added layer of attention. It falls on President Donald Trump's 79th birthday, in his second term in office. More than 6,000 active-duty personnel, including artillery units, cavalry detachments and aviation wings, have been rehearsing for days near the National Mall. Satellite images show dozens of M1 Abrams tanks, Stryker units and Bradley fighting vehicles positioned at staging grounds in Virginia and southern Maryland. The Pentagon confirmed the inclusion of 34 ceremonial horses, two trained mules and a military working dog unit as part of the procession. While military parades have periodically occurred in U.S. history, today's spectacle is notable for its scale and timing. It follows major conflicts. Unlike traditional Independence Day reviews or post-war celebrations, this event appears carefully curated for maximum visibility and symbolic resonance. Though federal officials maintain that the day is intended to 'honor the heritage and achievements' of the Army, the narrative unfolding around it has shifted. White House press aides have shared promotional materials referring to the event as 'The American Power March', accompanied by the phrase – 'A capital city, a proud legacy and a moment the world will watch'. In the weeks leading up to the parade, deployments of the National Guard and Marine units to border protest sites in southern California reignited public discourse about the military's role in domestic law enforcement. Critics in the Congress have questioned the cost, timing and intent of Saturday's display, especially as it closely follows highly publicised civil unrest over recent immigration crackdowns. Several roads in central Washington have been closed since early Friday, with security fences and checkpoints set up along Constitution Avenue and the surrounding perimeter. Air traffic alerts have been issued for low-flying military jets expected to conduct formation flyovers during the program. Speaking on background, a senior defense official confirmed that planning for the display began months ago – with directives passed through the Department of the Army. The same official described the parade as 'an opportunity to present the readiness and evolution of America's ground forces'. While no official statements have linked the timing to the president's birthday, invitations for VIP seating include both the Army insignia and the presidential seal, along with a gold-lettered inscription – 'June 14 – A Date of Strength'. City residents have expressed mixed reactions. Some have welcomed the rare display of military pageantry, while others remain uneasy over its proximity to political symbolism. Many are expected to line the streets early Saturday morning, hoping to glimpse the long columns of machinery and formations that will pass through the heart of the capital. Whether framed as tradition, tribute or something else entirely, Washington is bracing for a spectacle that will leave an imprint – both on its streets and its political landscape.
