logo
Karoline Leavitt's Short Response To A Pride Month Question Is Really Something

Karoline Leavitt's Short Response To A Pride Month Question Is Really Something

Yahoo05-06-2025
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt recently responded to a question about the current administration's plans to issue proclamations during Pride Month, which is observed in June, and her response was rather unsurprising.
During a press briefing on Tuesday, right-wing podcaster Alec Lace asked Leavitt whether President Donald Trump plans to issue a proclamation this month. Lace mentioned Pride month, and inquired about potential proclamations for other ideas, such as a 'Veterans Month' or a 'Family Month.'
'Congresswoman Mary Miller suggested that changing Pride Month to Family Month — I'd personally like to see maybe a Nuclear Family Month. Some people are saying, 'Let's get a Veterans Month,'' Lace asked. 'Does the president have any plans on making a proclamation? Or is it just going to be June this year?'
'There are no plans for a proclamation for the month of June, but I can tell you this president is very proud to be a president for all Americans, regardless of race, religion or creed,' Leavitt said.
The president did not recognize June as Pride Month — which celebrates the LGBTQ+ community and recognizes the ongoing efforts toward equality and justice — with a proclamation during his first term as president. He publicly acknowledged the month for the first time in a post on X, formerly Twitter, in 2019, according to NBC News.
Former President Bill Clinton was the first U.S. president to officially recognize the month when he proclaimed June as Gay and Lesbian Pride Month in 1999. Former Presidents Barack Obama and Joe Biden also commemorated the month.
Obama issued his first Pride Month proclamation in 2009 recognizing June as Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Pride Month, and Biden issued his first Pride Month proclamation as president in 2021, recognizing June as Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer (LGBTQ+) Pride Month. Former President George W. Bush, who succeeded Clinton, did not issue a Pride Month proclamation during his two terms as president.
Leavitt didn't bother to mention the word 'Pride' in her response at the briefing on Tuesday — and her comment that Trump is proud to serve 'all Americans' rings hollow, as LGBTQ+ rights have been under attack under Trump's administration.
In the first days of his current term, Trump signed an executive order declaring it official U.S. policy that there are only two sexes, male and female, rejecting that sex is viewed on a spectrum — and that gender is different than sex. He's also directed a transgender military ban, among other attacks on the LGBTQ+ community.
T Smith, a postdoctoral fellow in racial politics at Johns Hopkins University's Krieger School of Arts & Sciences, said that it's 'entirely unsurprising' that Trump has not issued Pride proclamations — or that Leavitt didn't say the word 'Pride' at the briefing.
'The Trump administration has a long and well-documented history of signaling exactly whose lives it values, and whose it does not,' they told HuffPost. 'The ongoing marginalization of queer and trans people — particularly Black, Brown, and Indigenous queer and trans communities — is not an unfortunate oversight. It is a deliberate feature of this administration.'
Kari J. Winter, a professor of American studies at the University at Buffalo, said that the way the discussion about Pride Month at Tuesday's briefing came about was concerning in itself.
Winter, whose expertise includes gender, feminism, race and class, said, 'the exchange between Alec Lace and Karoline Leavitt encapsulates the Orwellian dystopia of this American presidency.'
'A sycophant asks a leading question that invites the presidential spokesperson to deliver her bit of propaganda,' she said, before adding, 'Alec Lace is not a journalist; he's a podcaster hand-picked by the Trump administration to ask disingenuous rather than tough-minded questions.' (The White House announced a new policy in January encouraging podcasters, bloggers and social media influencers to apply for credentials to attend briefings.)
T Smith said Leavitt's claim that Trump is proud to serve 'all Americans' was 'hollow' and 'purely symbolic.'
'It does not align with Trump or his administration's attitudes or policies in practice,' they said. 'The current deportation crisis, the violent targeting of immigrants, and the withholding of Palestinian, Congolese and Sudanese freedom all illustrate the same underlying truth: Only some people are viewed as 'American' and, therefore, categorically 'deserving' while others are treated as disposable.'
Trump's refusal to issue a Pride proclamation is 'unacceptable, yes, but it is not novel,' T Smith said.
'It falls squarely in line with a broader history of apathy and hostility toward LGBTQ+ communities, particularly Black trans people,' they added.
'Everyone who is paying attention to the actions of the Trump administration knows that it is on an anti-LGBTQ crusade,' Winter said. 'We also know that Donald Trump and Karoline Leavitt are habitual liars who are allergic to evidence-based speech.'
She continued: 'Looking at the evidence, we might say that Trump supports all Americans except LGBTQ people, women, African Americans, American Indians, Harvard faculty, Medicaid recipients, scientists, judges, lawyers, Muslims, Jews, Venezuelans, legal immigrants... the list of exclusions is ever-growing.'
Several LGBTQ+ Pride festivals across the country, and in Canada, have lost corporate sponsorships this year amid Trump's hostility toward the trans community, and his crusade against diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives.
Alison Gash, professor and head of the department of political science at the University of Oregon, told HuffPost that she doesn't think it's 'surprising' that businesses have scaled back since 'we have seen backlash among louder factions of anti-LGBTQ communities for a few years.'
'They are following the demands of their louder more aggressive customers as well as answering the call of and responding to threats from conservative politicians,' she told HuffPost. 'At the same time other notable businesses are doubling down on their commitments to queer and trans communities. Those are the businesses who deserve our attention. '
Winter said corporations that have pulled back from their Pride sponsorships are either 'cowards' or 'showing their true colors.'
'People who desert their principles when the political wind changes either lack the courage of their convictions or were never truly principled,' she said.
T Smith emphasized that a lot corporations are guilty of 'pinkwashing' and 'rainbow capitalism' — meaning that they are disingenuous and use tactics to capitalize off the LGBTQ+ community under the guise of actually advocating for the community.
'Changing a company logo to rainbow colors for 30 days and temporarily funneling money into a few LGBTQ+ organizations does not constitute meaningful support,' they said, adding, 'They are business tactics. They are performative. And they are exploitative.'
Even still, corporations pulling back support is a 'troubling signal,' T Smith said.
'It suggests that in the current political climate, it is more advantageous to align with rising anti-LGBTQ+ sentiment than to stand for equity and justice,' they said, before adding, 'if corporations were serious about supporting our communities, their commitments would last longer than June — and center those most at risk, not abandon them when it's no longer convenient.'
Companies Go Silent On A Cause They Once Supported Just To Appease Donald Trump
'Cowardcore:' Everyone Is Noticing The Same Thing About Target's Pride Merch
'Sesame Street' Pride Post Triggers Conservatives Into Meltdown Mode
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Boeing in Talks to Sell as Many as 500 Planes to China
Boeing in Talks to Sell as Many as 500 Planes to China

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Boeing in Talks to Sell as Many as 500 Planes to China

(Bloomberg) -- Boeing Co. is heading closer toward finalizing a deal with China to sell as many as 500 aircraft, according to people familiar with the matter, a transaction that would end a sales drought that stretches back to US President Donald Trump's last visit in 2017. The two sides are still hammering out terms of the complex aircraft sale, including the types and volume of jet models and delivery timetables, according to one of the people, who asked not to be identified discussing confidential matters. Why New York City Has a Fleet of New EVs From a Dead Carmaker Trump Takes Second Swing at Cutting Housing Assistance for Immigrants Chicago Schools Seeks $1 Billion of Short-Term Debt as Cash Gone Neom's Desert Ski Resort Strains Saudi Prince's $1.5 Trillion Plan The mega sale to China, years in the making, is contingent on the two nations defusing the trade hostilities that hark back to Trump's first term in office — and could still fall apart, they said. Chinese officials have already started consulting domestic airlines about how many Boeing aircraft they'll need, the people said. The transaction taking shape is similar in scope to the order for as many as 500 jets that China's central planners have struck with Airbus SE, but haven't yet announced, they added. The Boeing order is expected to be the centerpiece of a trade agreement that would benefit both Trump and China's President Xi Jinping, the culmination of long-running and sometimes contentious negotiations. The nation's leaders were close to a similar announcement in 2023, but then-President Joe Biden and Xi left a San Francisco summit without consummating an aircraft sale. Complicating matters for Boeing is a leadership void in China. Alvin Liu, its top executive in China and a fluent Mandarin-speaker with extensive government contacts, left the company in recent weeks. Carol Shen has been named interim president of Boeing China, said people familiar with the matter. Boeing declined to comment on any potential deal or management changes. Shares of the US planemaker advanced less than 1% in New York on Thursday following Bloomberg's report, as most members of the Dow Jones Industrial Average declined. The stock had risen 27% this year amid a turnaround under Chief Executive Officer Kelly Ortberg. Aircraft orders for Boeing have figured large in US diplomacy since Trump returned to the White House in January, with nations touting new, tentative and existing deals for airplanes, which are as expensive as skyscrapers, to narrow trade imbalances with the US. The US and China have engaged in several rounds of talks since de-escalating tit-for-tat tariffs that soared to as high as 145%, but have yet to reach a final trade deal. Earlier in the summer, Xi, in a phone call, invited Trump to China at an unspecified date. One opportunity for the pair to meet is in late October, ahead of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in South Korea. For China, the deal would secure aircraft delivery slots that are hard to come by at both Boeing and Airbus, which are largely sold out into the 2030s. The world's second largest aviation market is expected to more than double its commercial fleet to 9,755 airplanes over the next 20 years, by Boeing's estimation, far more than China's homegrown planemaker Comac could manufacture. While Boeing slots are scarce, the company likely has some flexibility in its delivery schedule to accommodate strategic customers, Jefferies analyst Sheila Kahyaoglu said in a research note. The country's top economic planning agency, the National Development and Reform Commission, recently sought input from Chinese carriers about how many jets they want, one of the people said. Talks centered on the 737 Max series of aircraft, Boeing's popular single-aisle jet, in a sign Beijing is laying the groundwork for a major order. Boeing's last Chinese deal was unveiled in November 2017 during Trump's first state visit to China. The deal amounted to orders and commitments for 300 single-aisle and twin-aisle planes valued at $37 billion at the time. The next year, Boeing's China deliveries peaked, when a quarter of its jets ended up in the mainland. Airbus has dominated sales and deliveries to China since 2019, when the nation's regulators were the first to ground the 737 Max after two fatal accidents. Boeing has notched only 30 orders with Chinese carriers and leasing companies since the start of 2019, according to the company's website. In an interview with Bloomberg in January, CEO Ortberg was optimistic that years of talks with Beijing would finally pay off. 'We certainly hope that there's an opportunity for some additional orders in the next year with China,' he said. --With assistance from Jenni Marsh. (Updates with Jefferies comment in 12th paragraph) Foreigners Are Buying US Homes Again While Americans Get Sidelined Volkswagen EVs Outsell Tesla in Europe a Decade After Dieselgate What Declining Cardboard Box Sales Tell Us About the US Economy Survived Bankruptcy. Next Up: Cultural Relevance? Women's Earnings Never Really Recover After They Have Children ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Sign in to access your portfolio

Who is Tina Peters? Trump calls for her to be released from prison ‘RIGHT NOW'
Who is Tina Peters? Trump calls for her to be released from prison ‘RIGHT NOW'

Miami Herald

time23 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

Who is Tina Peters? Trump calls for her to be released from prison ‘RIGHT NOW'

President Donald Trump demanded the immediate release of Tina Peters, a former Colorado election official who is currently in prison. 'FREE TINA PETERS, a brave and innocent Patriot who has been tortured by Crooked Colorado politicians,' Trump wrote in an Aug. 21 Truth Social post. 'Let Tina Peters out of jail, RIGHT NOW,' he added. 'She did nothing wrong, except catching the Democrats cheat in the Election. She is an old woman, and very sick. If she is not released, I am going to take harsh measures!!!' The president previously called for Peters' release in May. Peters, 69, served as the county clerk of Mesa County, Colorado, from 2018 to 2023, where she oversaw elections. In 2021, state officials began investigating Peters after sensitive voting information from Mesa County surfaced online, according to Colorado Public Radio. It was alleged that she provided unauthorized access to voting equipment undergoing a software update to an individual connected to Mike Lindell, the MyPillow CEO, who has argued that the 2020 election was stolen. Peters, herself, was a prominent election denier. In Aug. 2024, a jury found Peters guilty of several criminal charges, including first degree official misconduct and failure to comply with secretary of state requirements. 'Today's verdict is a warning to others that they will face serious consequences if they attempt to illegally tamper with our voting processes or election systems,' Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser said at the time. Two months later, Peters was handed a 9-year prison sentence. During her sentencing hearing, Peters asked the judge for leniency, saying she 'never did anything with malice' and that she believed she was doing right by the people in her county, according to ABC News. 'I really am remorseful,' she added. Attorneys for Peters are currently appealing her conviction at the Colorado State Court of Appeals. In May, Trump also directed the Department of Justice to take action in order to secure the release of Peters, whom he said exposed fraud in the 2020 election. For years, Trump has claimed without evidence that the 2020 presidential election was stolen or 'rigged' due to voter fraud. Neither an attorney for Peters nor Colorado officials immediately responded to requests for comment from McClatchy News.

Appeals court throws out massive civil fraud penalty against President Donald Trump
Appeals court throws out massive civil fraud penalty against President Donald Trump

San Francisco Chronicle​

time23 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Appeals court throws out massive civil fraud penalty against President Donald Trump

NEW YORK (AP) — An appeals court has thrown out the massive civil fraud penalty against President Donald Trump, ruling Thursday in New York state's lawsuit accusing him of exaggerating his wealth. The decision came seven months after the Republican returned to the White House. A panel of five judges in New York's mid-level Appellate Division said the verdict, which stood to cost Trump more than $515 million and rock his real estate empire, was 'excessive.' After finding that Trump engaged in fraud by flagrantly padding financial statements that went to lenders and insurers, Judge Arthur Engoron ordered him last year to pay $355 million in penalties. With interest, the sum has topped $515 million. The total — combined with penalties levied on some other Trump Organization executives, including Trump's sons Eric and Donald Jr. — now exceeds $527 million, with interest. 'While the injunctive relief ordered by the court is well crafted to curb defendants' business culture, the court's disgorgement order, which directs that defendants pay nearly half a billion dollars to the State of New York, is an excessive fine that violates the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution,' Judges Dianne T. Renwick and Peter H. Moulton wrote in one of several opinions shaping the appeals court's ruling. Engoron also imposed other punishments, such as banning Trump and his two eldest sons from serving in corporate leadership for a few years. Those provisions have been on pause during Trump's appeal, and he was able to hold off collection of the money by posting a $175 million bond. The court, which was split on the merits of the lawsuit and the lower court's fraud finding, dismissed the penalty Engoron imposed in its entirety while also leaving a pathway for further appeals to the state's highest court, the Court of Appeals. The appeals court, the Appellate Division of the state's trial court, took an unusually long time to rule, weighing Trump's appeal for nearly 11 months after oral arguments last fall. Normally, appeals are decided in a matter of weeks or a few months. New York Attorney General Letitia James, who brought the suit on the state's behalf, has said the businessman-turned-politician engaged in 'lying, cheating, and staggering fraud.' Trump and his co-defendants denied wrongdoing. In a six-minute summation of sorts after a monthslong trial, Trump proclaimed in January 2024 that he was 'an innocent man' and the case was a 'fraud on me.' He has repeatedly maintained that the case and verdict were political moves by James and Engoron, who are both Democrats. Trump's Justice Department has subpoenaed James for records related to the lawsuit, among other documents, as part of an investigation into whether she violated the president's civil rights. James' personal attorney, Abbe D. Lowell, has said that investigating the fraud case is 'the most blatant and desperate example of this administration carrying out the president's political retribution campaign.' Trump and his lawyers said his financial statements weren't deceptive, since they came with disclaimers noting they weren't audited. The defense also noted that bankers and insurers independently evaluated the numbers, and the loans were repaid. Despite such discrepancies as tripling the size of his Trump Tower penthouse, he said the financial statements were, if anything, lowball estimates of his fortune. During an appellate court hearing in September, Trump's lawyers argued that many of the case's allegations were too old, an assertion they made unsuccessfully before trial. The defense also contends that James misused a consumer-protection law to sue Trump and improperly policed private business transactions that were satisfactory to those involved. State attorneys said the law in question applies to fraudulent or illegal business conduct, whether it targets everyday consumers or big corporations. Though Trump insists no one was harmed by the financial statements, the state contends that the numbers led lenders to make riskier loans than they knew, and that honest borrowers lose out when others game their net-worth numbers. The state has argued that the verdict rests on ample evidence and that the scale of the penalty comports with Trump's gains, including his profits on properties financed with the loans and the interest he saved by getting favorable terms offered to wealthy borrowers. The civil fraud case was just one of several legal obstacles for Trump as he campaigned, won and segued to a second term as president. On Jan. 10, he was sentenced in his criminal hush money case to what's known as an unconditional discharge, leaving his conviction on the books but sparing him jail, probation, a fine or other punishment. He is appealing the conviction. And in December, a federal appeals court upheld a jury's finding that Trump sexually abused writer E. Jean Carroll in the mid-1990s and later defamed her, affirming a $5 million judgment against him. The appeals court declined in June to reconsider; he still can try to get the Supreme Court to hear his appeal. ___

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store