CPI(M) demands cancellation of bids for privatisation of 44 departments in Visakhapatnam Steel Plant
Addressing the protesters, CPI(M) district secretary M. Jaggunaidu recalled that Prime Minister Narendra Modi had assured that VSP would remain in the public sector while announcing the revival package. He pointed out that the Chief Minister and Deputy Chief Minister too had promised there would be no privatisation, displaced persons would be given justice, and the revival package was showcased as an achievement of the alliance government within its first year in power.
However, Mr. Jaggunaidu alleged that the package was intended to mislead workers and the public, while accelerating the privatisation process. At present, he said, VSP engages nearly 600 local private agencies and contractors, who are set to be replaced by around 50 large firms working under the influence of the Centre and the State government. This, he warned, would deprive officials and permanent employees of any say in operations.
He further cautioned that the move would result in downsizing of permanent staff and mass termination of contract workers. Outsourced workers from other States would be appointed instead, without rights or job security. The EOI, he alleged, was designed to benefit big contractors and politically influential groups. VSP, which provides employment to nearly one lakh people directly and indirectly and has contributed about ₹54,000 crore to the Centre and State in taxes and dividends, was being handed over to vested interests, he alleged.
CPI(M) district secretariat member B. Ganga Rao came down heavily on TDP State president and Gajuwaka MLA Palla Srinivasa Rao, and Visakhapatnam MP M. Sribharat for not opposing the termination of 5,000 contract workers and 2,000 permanent workers in VSP. He termed it a betrayal of the people who had voted them to power.
District leaders R.K.S.V. Kumar, P. Mani, B. Jagan, V. Krishna Rao, B. Eswaramma, Subba Rao, P. Pydiraju and U.S.N. Raju also took part in the protest.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
14 minutes ago
- The Hindu
A urea crisis in Telangana
Urea, a soil nutrient essential for plant growth, has become a political flashpoint between the Central government and the Telangana government. Given short supply, farmers are standing in queues outside fertilizer shops for hours, hoping to secure urea for their crops. While the ruling Congress and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) are blaming each other for the situation, the Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS) is blaming both. In February, the Ministry of Agriculture had allotted five types of fertilizers (urea, di-ammonium phosphate, muriate of potash, complex fertilizers, and single super phosphate) to Telangana. This included 9.8 lakh tonnes of urea for the Kharif season. While there has been little difference between demand and supply of other fertilizers, the gap regarding urea has become an issue. In an official communication, the Central government informed Telangana that it would receive 8.3 lakh tonnes of urea in the April-August period. However, the State received only 5.32 lakh tonnes till August 17. The Minister for Agriculture, Tummala Nageswara Rao, has blamed the Centre for the crisis, stating that it has failed to ensure supply. 'I have written separately to the Union Ministers for Agriculture and Chemicals and Fertilizers to supply the allotted quantity of urea. Officials of the Agriculture Department have also addressed letters to the Union Secretaries of Agriculture and Chemicals and Fertilizers, but in vain,' he said. Mr. Nageswara Rao accused the Centre of misleading Parliament by stating that an ample quantity of urea had been allotted to the State, claiming that it did not provide the supply numbers. Meanwhile the State unit president of the BJP, N. Ramchander Rao, alleged that the State government mismanaged supply. He claimed that the Centre had supplied Telangana more than the required amount. He accused the State administration of diversion, inefficiency, and black marketing. Mr. Ramchander Rao also demanded to know why the problem had cropped up only in Telangana. Mr. Nageswara Rao countered him saying Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Bihar, Haryana, and Punjab were also facing urea scarcity due to the short supply of both indigenous and imported urea. The Congress also raised the issue in Parliament. While the Congress and the BJP are engaged in a war of words, the BRS has been meeting farmers at fertilizer shops and reminding them that they did not face such hassles during its regime. With the crisis escalating, Mr. Nageswara Rao wrote to the Union Minister for Chemicals and Fertilizers, requesting him to supply at least 3 lakh tonnes of urea in August in addition to the 0.68 lakh tonnes supplied so far this month. Telangana, like many other States, has not received the required supplies of either the indigenous variety of urea or of the imported variety. Issues in domestic production are due to hurdles in imports of key raw materials and the rise in consumption of the soil nutrient. Issues in imports are due to export restrictions imposed by China. India also imports urea from Oman, Russia, the UAE, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Indonesia, Algeria, Egypt and Nigeria, besides China. Imports vary from 15% to 30% of the total based on the local production in a year. India had aimed to end imports of urea by 2025 by enhancing local production. In 2022, the Union Minister for Chemicals and Fertilizers said that new plants would be established. However, the goal remains a mirage. The estimated consumption of urea in 2025-26 is about 410 lakh tonnes, with an increase expected due to a rise in Kharif cultivation. Telangana's woes are compounded with problems in the operation of the Ramagundam Fertilizers and Chemicals, where there was no production for 78 days from April due to technical glitches. Of the urea produced in India, Telangana gets most of its supply from the plant, which has a production capacity of 12.7 lakh tonnes per annum. Production of nano urea (liquid) is also yet to be scaled up in the country. Farmers have also not embraced nano urea yet, as it involves additional costs. With reports of China easing restrictions on exports to India, officials are hopeful that there will be no scarcity in the Rabi season. During the Kharif season, however, there is little hope of getting additional supply from overseas or increasing domestic capacity immediately.
Time of India
24 minutes ago
- Time of India
Contractors protest outside govt offices for payment
Kolhapur: Hundreds of contractors sat in protest outside govt offices across all districts on Tuesday, protesting against the state govt's failure to pay their dues of over Rs89,000 crore. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Contractors who have signed up for public works said they have not received payment from various govt departments. The public works department has the highest dues of Rs36,000 crore, followed by Jal Jeevan Mission, with dues of over Rs12,500 crore. The contractors sat in rain the whole day. They claimed that they have been facing heavy financial troubles due to the delay in payment. Recently, a sub-contractor from Sangli district committed suicide, allegedly due to financial distress caused by delay in payment from govt for works worth Rs1.5 crore. "Not a single representative of the govt, nor any official, paid a visit to the grieving family of the contractor. This is not the way the govt should treat the contractors without whom no govt can carry out development works," said a protesting contractor from Kolhapur. The contractors claimed that they had carried out various works on assurance from officials and leaders. "Now the Centre has written to the state govt expressing its inability to pay for the work done by us. We are facing the brunt at the end. We will wait for some days and decide to take further course of action for fulfilment of our demands," said Milind Bhosale, state president of Federation of Contractors and Engineers. Bhosale said that none from the govt paid a visit to the protesting contractors on Tuesday. He, however, claimed that some local leaders reached out to them through phone calls, assuring a meeting with the CM soon. "We are hopeful," said Bhosale.
Time of India
43 minutes ago
- Time of India
25 killed, 108 injured in predator attacks in Chandrapur in 7 months: MoEFCC
Chandrapur: Over the past seven months, predator attacks have claimed 25 lives and left 108 others injured in Chandrapur district, revealed information provided by the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change in response to a query raised in the Lok Sabha by MP Pratibha Dhanorkar. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The ministry informed that the Maharashtra govt has adopted several steps to mitigate the crisis, including the installation of AI-powered cameras to monitor animal movement, deployment of Quick Response Teams (QRTs) in villages bordering the Tadoba-Andhari Tiger Reserve, and timely disbursal of financial relief to victims of wild animal attacks. The center's reply further stated that funds are being utilised for solar fencing and construction of physical barriers to limit wild animal incursions. Dhanorkar, however, questioned the effectiveness of these measures, alleging that despite rising casualties, the response from both the Centre and the state remains "confined to paperwork". She argued that under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, the chief wildlife warden has the authority to order the capture or shoot animals posing a threat to human life, "yet decisive action to protect citizens is missing". "The deaths and injuries clearly show that existing deterrents like solar fencing and fencing barriers have failed on the ground," Dhanorkar said, pressing for stronger intervention to safeguard villagers living in forest-fringe areas. The Chandrapur MP alleged that while the Centre has underlined its continued support and funding for conflict-mitigation projects, the mounting human toll highlights the widening gap between policy measures and their impact on the ground.
