
Viresh Borkar evicted from House after ruckus over Goan origin resolution
The state legislative assembly witnessed a ruckus on Friday when the Speaker prevented Revolutionary Goans MLA Viresh Borkar from speaking on a private members' resolution recommending that the terms 'Goans' and 'persons of Goan origin' be defined.
Borkar, who moved the private members' resolution, was eventually removed from the House by marshals after his private members' resolution was rejected. The St Andre MLA wanted the House to pass a resolution calling for a proper policy 'to benefit Goan people and prevent demographic change in the Goan landscape'.
The opposition also rushed into the well of the House after chief minister Pramod Sawant demanded that speaker Ramesh Tawadkar 'throw out' Borkar's resolution despite the resolution being listed for discussion in the business of the day.
To express his irritation with the speaker's refusal to listen to Borkar, opposition leader Yuri Alemao tore up some papers and threw them in the well of the assembly.
While Tawadkar finally allowed Borkar to speak, BJP legislators repeatedly disrupted the proceedings, interrupting the RG MLA.
'I demand that the chief minister form a high-level committee to protect Goa's identity and the interests of native Goans,' said Borkar.
The chief minister said that there were several laws and notifications where a person of Goan origin is already defined.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


United News of India
3 hours ago
- United News of India
Terrorism handled with iron fist under Modi Govt: Shah in RS
New Delhi, July 30 (UNI) Union Home Minister Amit Shah today launched a scathing attack on the Congress party during a fiery address in the Rajya Sabha, asserting that the terrorists behind several high-profile attacks during the UPA era had been eliminated under the Modi government's recent counter-terror operations—Operation Sindoor and Operation Mahadev. In a sharp political offensive during participation in debate on Operation Sindoor, Shah accused the Congress, particularly former Home Minister P. Chidambaram, of shielding Pakistan-backed narratives for the sake of "vote-bank politics". He alleged that the UPA government was reluctant to take strong action against terrorists and instead relied on diplomatic paperwork. 'Under Operation Sindoor, many key terrorists like Hafiz Muhammad, Mudassar, Mohamad Hamza, Mohammed Hazar, Abdul Malik and others have either been killed or incapacitated,' Shah told the Upper House, adding that several of them were so severely injured 'they won't be able to commit another terror attack in the future.' Hitting out at Chidambaram for questioning the nationality of the slain militants, Shah retorted: 'Why does Chidambaram need proof? Who is he trying to save—Pakistan or Lashkar?' He went on to accuse the Congress of "placing national security second to appeasement politics." Referring to the April 22 terrorist attack in Pahalgam, the Home Minister disclosed that the three Lashkar-e-Taiba commanders involved—identified as Suleimani, Afghan, and Jibran—were neutralised in Operation Mahadev conducted on Monday. He cited forensic evidence and eyewitness testimonies linking the trio to the attack, and attributed the plot to Lashkar's proxy outfit, The Resistance Front (TRF). 'Unlike the past, we did not wait. I reached Srinagar the same day,' Shah recalled. 'Congress kept sending dossiers, but under Prime Minister Modi's leadership, we gave a direct response. Only fear ensures peace with terrorists.' In an apparent swipe at Chidambaram, Shah questioned the Congress' credibility on national security. 'He says Operation Sindoor wasn't decisive. Was 1965 or 1971 decisive then? Why did terrorism rise so drastically under Congress?' he asked, pointing to what he termed a history of inaction and weak responses under previous governments. The Opposition, led by the Congress and other INDIA bloc constituents, staged a walkout during Shah's reply, demanding Prime Minister Narendra Modi's presence in the House to answer questions related to Operation Sindoor. The protest unfolded just as Shah began responding to their concerns. Shah said as per the rule, it is the Government's prerogative who will speak in the House. UNI AJ SS


Hindustan Times
3 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Amid Oppn walkout, Amit Shah hails PM Modi for giving Pak ‘befitting reply'
Union home minister Amit Shah on Wednesday attacked the Congress for 'giving away' parts of Kashmir to Pakistan when it was in power and said that the Union government under Prime Minister Narendra Modi was committed to ending terrorism and ensuring the return of Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir. Opposition MPs protest in Rajya Sabha during the Monsoon Session of Parliament, in New Delhi on Wednesday. (ANI PHOTO) Shah was speaking in the Rajya Sabha even as the Opposition walked out in protest over the PM's absence from the Upper House during a special discussion on Operation Sindoor. 'I want to tell the Congress that POK was given by you, and only the BJP government will bring it back,' he said. 'Look at the coincidence that they died of bullet wounds in their heads. After the Pahalgam attacks I was requested by the family members of the killed to shoot the culprits in their heads, and coincidentally their demands have been fulfilled,' Shah said on the killing of the three terrorists. He also accused the Congress of creating the bogey of hindu terror in response to the 26/11 Mumbai attack. 'I proudly declare to the world... Hindus can never be terrorists' Shah said. The Opposition criticised the PM for not being present and speaking in the Rajya Sabha, as he had done a day before in the Lok Sabha. The government said its prerogative was to decide who will reply, but the Opposition dubbed the PM's absence as an 'insult to the House'. As soon as Shah rose to speak, Leader of the Opposition in the Rajya Sabha, Mallikarjun Kharge, said, 'Members had demanded that after 16 hours of discussion, the Prime Minister should be present and address the House…Most of our questions are directed at him. It's not that you (Shah) are not capable of if the PM is present and still chooses not to come, it is an insult to the House.' As the opposition closed ranks and walked out, Shah slammed Kharge. 'He (Kharge) is not allowed to speak on important issues. The BAC decided that the discussion will be for 16 hours, and who will reply will be decided by the government. I know why they are walking out…for all these years, to protect their vote bank, they did not do anything to prevent terrorism,' he said. Congratulating the armed forces for the precision strikes on terror camps in Pakistan during Operation Sindoor and more recently for Operation Mahadev, which led to the killing of three terrorists involved in the April 22 Pahalgam attack that left 26 people dead, Shah slammed the Congress for failing to take a tough stance against terrorism. 'If the Congress had been in power, they would have declared Pakistan innocent. Congress has no moral right to question the BJP on terrorism. Today, we have a Prime Minister who responds with BrahMos missiles, not dossiers,' he said, criticising the Congress for not taking decisive steps against terror operatives. He said the party was opposed to the Prevention of Terrorism Act or POTA, a law passed in Parliament during the BJP rule in 2002 and scrapped it right away when it came to power in 2004. Responding to the Congress's charge about the timing of Operation Mahadev, the minister said he had wanted the terrorist responsible for the 'barbaric killing' of tourists in Pahalgam dead within days of the attack. Taking potshots at the Congress, he said, '...It is the mentality of the Congress party… in front of the whole world (P) Chidambaram proved that they will not be scared to support Pakistan for their vote bank; they will not be scared to save LeT for the sake of the vote bank. I also ask why they were killed today. They should've been killed much before.' Shah said the terror attack was used to deliver a message that Pakistan will not allow Kashmir to become free from terrorism. 'I want to give a message too… Kashmir will be free of terrorism,' he said, pointing out that the PM on April 24 has assured that those responsible for the attack would be punished 'beyond their imagination'. He credited the PM for giving the armed forces the 'operational freedom' to choose the time and the action in response to the Pahalgam attack. Shah also responded to Opposition criticism over US President Donald Trump's repeated assertion that he mediated a ceasefire between India and Pakistan, and said the pause was in response to the Pakistani DGMO's request. 'During Operation Sindoor, terrorists who were responsible for attacks during the UPA regime were killed,' he said. Shah cited the names of terrorists associated with the Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Mohammed who were killed during the May 7 operation across nine locations in Pakistan and PoK. Terrorists such as Dawood Ibrahim had fled the country during the Congress regime, he said. Criticising former Union minister P Chidambaram, Shah said, 'Why does Chidambaram need proof? Who is he trying to save—Pakistan or the LeT?' He said the forensic evidence and eyewitness accounts confirmed the involvement, and accused Lashkar's front, The Resistance Front (TRF), for executing the attack. 'Chidambaram questions if Operation Sindoor was decisive. Was (war in) 1965 or 1971 decisive? Then why did terrorism grow under the Congress?' he said. Shah lashed out at the party and said it was under Jawaharlal Nehru's premiership that Indian territory was lost to China. 'After the Indo-China war, Prime Minister Nehru gave away 38,000 square kilometers of Indian territory to China. At that time, the US had suggested that India should be made a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council instead of China. But the Congress government declined, pushing a case for China,' he said.


Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
US election voting maps, number of seats to be changed in New York, California, Texas?
Democratic Backlash Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel Texas Republicans on Wednesday unveiled plans for a new U.S. House map that would deliver on President Donald Trump's goal of creating more winnable GOP seats before the 2026 elections, pushing ahead with a fast and unusual summer redrawing that Democrats have few options to blunt. The new map would create five new Republican-leaning seats that Trump is seeking as his party looks to bolster its chances of maintaining its slim House majority. Republicans hope to pass it during a special 30-day session of the GOP-dominated Legislature called by GOP Governor Greg of the changes target Texas' big cities, which are the few strongholds for Democrats in the booming state of more than 30 million residents. Trump had urged Texas to help the GOP, and his team has signaled that efforts could expand to other states, with a similar push underway in Missouri.'My understanding is that there is a path forward for a Republican to win five more of those seats,' said Republican state Rep. Cody Vasut, chair of the Texas House's redistricting committee, on the new the effort has spurred a push by Democrats in California and New York to consider redrawing their districts as well to counter the GOP efforts. Democrats in Texas also are considering walking out to prevent the GOP from passing new maps before the special session ends Augu 19, though Abbott could simply call another hold 25 of the state's 38 seats, and the new map ups the total they could win to 30. Had the same lines been in place in 2024, Trump would have carried each of the 30 districts by at least 10 percentage points, leading to conservative optimism despite what's likely to be a tough midterm environment for the California Governor Gavin Newsom said on social media that 'The 2026 election is being rigged.' 'California won't sit back and watch that happen,' he posted on in Texas and other states have walked out of legislative sessions before, hoping to thwart the other party, with mixed 1979, a dozen liberal Democratic state senators in Texas who became known as the 'Killer Bees' bunked down in a staffer's garage and evaded Texas Rangers for four days, killing a plan to change the date of the state's GOP presidential primary to favor former Governor John 2003, when Texas Republicans also sought to redraw district lines in place for only one congressional election, Democrats fled to Oklahoma and New Mexico but failed to overturn the GOP plan. Republicans had taken full control of the Legislature in the 2002 elections for the first time since the 1870s, and their new congressional map allowed the GOP to pick up six seats in 2004, meaning they held 21 to the Democrats' 11.U.S. Representative Greg Casar, whose seat would be drawn into a liberal district for Austin and San Antonio with fellow Democratic incumbent Lloyd Doggett, called the proposed changes 'illegal voter suppression,' because his district would be merged with another Democratic-held seat.'Everyone who cares about our democracy must mobilize against this illegal map,' Casar said in a new seats come from making two Rio Grande Valley seats that have been narrowly won by Democrats recently slightly more Republican, collapsing the seats held by Casar and Doggett and turning two Democratic-held seats in the Dallas-Ft. Worth area into GOP-majority Kincaid, executive director of the National Republican Redistricting Trust overseeing GOP mapmaking, defended the proposal as beneficial for minority communities in Texas' two largest cities. He said the new map would create two new Black-majority seats, one in Dallas and the other in the Houston area, and one new majority Hispanic one.'If you go through it, you're going to see that a lot of the communities that were broken up in the previous map were put together in this one,' he has been pushing for redistricting in Texas with the explicit goal of making it easier for Republicans to defend their U.S. House majority. And Democrats are limited in their options for countering the GOP's California, Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom has talked about redistricting, but an independent commission draws political New York, Democrats introduced a proposal this week that would allow a new map ahead of schedule, but it would require amending the state constitution, a change that must pass the Legislature twice and be approved by voters. The soonest new lines could be in place would be York also has a nonpartisan commission that is supposed to come up with the state's congressional lines, though Democrats have in the past overridden the commission's map to draw districts that would be more favorable for their state Senator Michael Gianaris, who is sponsoring the proposal, acknowledged the 2026 shortcomings of his legislation but said 'we can't just sit there and watch' as Texas redraw its maps.'There may be opportunities elsewhere but this is not a battle that's going to be over in a year,' he said in a phone interview after Texas proposed its new map. 'Unfortunately this is just a new front in the manipulation in our democracy to gain political advantage.'During the first few days of Texas' special session, Republicans faced scathing criticism from Democrats, who questioned the timing of redistricting efforts when lawmakers are supposed to be focused on providing relief following deadly Hill Country GOP-led hearings, hundreds of residents testified and expressed their concerns about not yet being able to see the maps and what new districts could mean for Democratic voters. Vasut repeatedly denied the maps would harm voters.A1. California Governor is Gavin Newsom.A2. During the first few days of Texas' special session, Republicans faced scathing criticism from Democrats, who questioned the timing of redistricting efforts when lawmakers are supposed to be focused on providing relief following deadly Hill Country floods.