US designates Pakistani group LeT's proxy The Resistance Front as global terrorists over Pahalgam attack
Announcing the designation, Secretary of State Marco Rubio described TRF as a 'front and proxy' of the Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), which is already listed as a terrorist group by both the United Nations and the United States.
'These actions demonstrate the Trump administration's commitment to protecting our national security interests, countering terrorism, and enforcing President Trump's call for justice for the Pahalgam attack,' Rubio said in a statement.
The Pahalgam terror attack shocked the region. Survivors told media that armed militants targeted Hindu civilians, reportedly separating women and children before ordering male victims to recite the Muslim declaration of faith. Most of the 26 victims were Hindus.
TRF claimed responsibility for the massacre shortly after, though little was previously known about the group, a 'smokescreen' created by LeT to operate under a different name and mask its Pakistan-based support.
In response to the Pahalgam killings, India launched Operation Sindoor, targeted strikes on terror networks across the Line of Control and into Pakistani territory. While Islamabad condemned the violence, it denied any connection to the attack or to TRF's operations.
The US designation puts additional pressure on Pakistan to crack down on terror proxies operating from its soil. It also enables US authorities to block TRF's assets and prohibit material support to the group.
The announcement marks a significant diplomatic step by the Trump administration, which has repeatedly signaled closer security ties with India amid shared concerns about regional terrorism and cross-border militancy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
10 minutes ago
- NDTV
Fake Call Centre Scammed Foreigners, Busted. Assets Attached By Enforcement Directorate
New Delhi: The Patna zonal office of the Enforcement Directorate (ED) has provisionally attached movable and immovable properties worth approximately Rs 2.83 crore under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002. The attachment is linked to a transnational cyber fraud racket involving fake call centres operated by Sagar Yadav and his Kolkata-based companies - Scrapix Consultancy Services Pvt Ltd and Casanovus Reality Pvt Ltd. The attached assets include land parcels, flats, and fixed deposits, acquired using proceeds of crime generated through cyber fraud targeting foreign nationals. The investigation was initiated following a tip-off received by the ED from the National Central Bureau (NCB)-India (CBI), which had been alerted by NCB-Ireland. The case involved fraud committed on an Irish national, Carmel Fox, and was registered under the "cross-border Implication" category as per Section 2(1)(ra) of the PMLA. The ED's probe revealed that the accused had been running fake call centres to defraud international victims. The illicit funds were funneled into India through channels like Western Union, Moneygram, Rewire, Remitly, and even cryptocurrencies. These funds were then laundered through peer-to-peer lending platforms including Lenden Club, Lendbox, and Liquiloans. Two immovable properties bought in the names of Scrapix Consultancy and Casanovus Reality worth Rs 2.67 crore, along with fixed deposits of Rs 15.75 lakh have been placed under provisional attachment. So far, the ED has arrested seven individuals including mastermind Sagar Yadav and has filed one prosecution complaint and two supplementary complaints against him, his companies, and associates. Further investigation is ongoing.
NDTV
10 minutes ago
- NDTV
Union Ministers Hold Strategy Meet Ahead Of Parliament Monsoon Session
New Delhi: Several Union ministers, including Rajnath Singh, Amit Shah, J P Nadda and Kiren Rijiju, held a strategy session at the defence minister's residence here on Thursday ahead of Parliament's Monsoon Session beginning from July 21. With the customary all-party meeting being held on Sunday, the Group of Ministers are believed to have strategised over the government's stand over a host of matters amid the opposition raising heat on issues, including the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of the electoral rolls in Bihar, the Pahalgam attack and Operation Sindoor. There was no official comment on the agenda of the meeting, but sources said it was related to the session. Besides Defence Minister Singh, Home Minister Shah, Health Minister Nadda and Parliamentary Affairs Minister Rijiju, their ministerial colleagues Piyush Goyal and G Kishan Reddy were among those who were part of the strategy session. The opposition has been pushing for debate in Parliament on issues like SIR and Operation Sindoor. Leading opposition parties such as the Congress, Samajwadi Party and Trinamool Congress have alleged that SIR, which is likely to be rolled out in other states, is aimed at benefiting the BJP. They have also seized on US President Donald Trump's claim of mediating the "ceasefire" between India and Pakistan to attack the Modi government. The government has rejected Trump's claim, but the opposition has been insisting on a debate and has even demanded a special session of Parliament over the issue. The government has termed Operation Sindoor a big success, which inflicted massive damage on terror sites and military facilities in Pakistan. The BJP and its Bihar allies have backed the SIR in the poll-bound state, asserting that it is aimed at ensuring that only eligible people are allowed to vote in the assembly polls. Mr Singh usually chairs the all-party meeting. The Parliament session is scheduled to end on August 21. Mr Singh later held a separate meeting with top defence brass amid indications that he may make a statement on Operation Sindoor in Parliament.
Indian Express
10 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Decode Politics: Why a court order has upset Congress govt's applecart in Himachal
In an unusual expression of helplessness Thursday, Himachal Pradesh Chief Minister Sukhvinder Singh Sukhu said the state High Court 'does not listen to my government' and said he may approach the Supreme Court. Sukhu's complaint was regarding the felling of fruit-laden trees across approximately 3,000 bighas — about 243 hectares — of 'encroached' forest land. On July 2, the High Court had directed state-wide removal of all apple trees and orchards that had come up on forest land. The Himachal government tried arguing that the court order put at risk livelihoods, especially in a state that relies heavily on fruit production. Himachal Pradesh's forest cover spans from the Shivalik foothills to the Pir Panjal ranges, totalling 37,033 sq km. As per an affidavit submitted to the National Green Tribunal (NGT) in February 2025 Himachal's Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, the IFS officer Sameer Rastogi, there were 18,374 cases of encroachment on 5,689 hectares of forest land across the state. The affidavit, which did not talk about the nature of the encroachments, said 9,903 – or nearly half – of the encroachments had been removed, reclaiming 3,097 hectares. However, action against removal of encroachments has been sporadic at best, and runs into resistance by local communities which have been profiting by using the land to cultivate fruit. The ongoing clearing of encroached land stems from two complaints, filed back in 2014 and 2015 and later converted into Public Interest Litigations (PILs). On July 2, a Division Bench of Justices Vivek Singh Thakur and Bipin C Negi ruled that 'fruit-bearing trees are not forest species' and directed the Forest Department to plant native forest species like deodar, chir, and kail after clearing the encroached areas. The Division Bench further said, 'The needful be done at a war footing. The ongoing monsoon is a conducive period to plant forest species. The cost of removal — cutting, removal of stumps and plantation of forest species — can be recovered from the encroachers.' Many of the felled trees were three to four decades old, farmers have pointed out, with the yields now destroyed just before harvesting. 'These trees were at their peak bearing stage. It takes 7 to 10 years for a new orchard to reach this maturity,' says a Chaithla-based orchardist, who saw trees over two bighas flattened. Noted horticulturist Deepak Singha, who has hailed the High Court decision to evict the encroached forest land, cautioned that small farmers could bear the brunt of the drive. 'Big farmers who have encroached hundreds of bighas of forest land have become rich, but the small apple growers live hand to mouth. The government should come up with a policy for these growers,' Singha said. Environment activist Guman Singh said he was 'not in favour of cutting down any kind of tree, be it forest species or fruit species'. Himachal's economy rests on apple farming to a large extent, with the fruit accounting for 49% of the total area under fruit crops. Apples make up 85% of the state's fruit economy, which is valued at around Rs 4,000 crore. With harvest season only weeks away, the tree-felling and the damage to their yields have left apple farmers distressed. According to state government data, available in an affidavit submitted to the High Court, '3,659 apple and other fruit-bearing trees had been felled on encroached forest land till July 15'. This included land in Chaithla (2,456 trees felled), Rohru (713) and Kotgarh (490) – the three towns which constitute the main region for apple cultivation in Himachal. As the Sukhu government tries to assess the overall impact of the drive on production this season, the CPI(M) is mobilising the smaller farmers, who own less than five bighas and whose land is among that cleared, in protest. Rakesh Singha, a senior CPI (M) leader and former MLA from Theog, has led multiple meetings under various farmer fronts. While refraining from commenting directly on the High Court order, the CPI (M) has accused the state government of not having a policy to protect the interests of small fruit growers. BJP MLA from Chopal (Shimla) and party spokesperson Balbir Singh Verma has said Sukhu's claim of going to the Supreme Court is 'merely political'. He pointed out that in January 2025, the High Court had offered the state the option to take possession of the fruit trees growing on encroached land. At the time, the government, through the Advocate General, expressed its inability to do so, claiming that its Forest and Revenue Departments were not in a position to manage or harvest fruit from such land. This, Verma argued, effectively paved the way for court-ordered felling. The BJP leader said the Congress government will have to pay a heavy price. The state is due to see panchayat elections next year.
