India's wealthy investors turn to crypto assets as traditional markets stagnate
Remove Ads
Crypto TrackerPowered By
TOP COINS
TOP COIN SETS Ethereum
2,68,881 (
3.95 %) Buy Solana
14,075.09 (
1.01 %) Buy BNB
59,216 (
-0.03 %) Buy XRP
249.83 (
-1.2 %) Buy Bitcoin
1,01,04,647 (
-1.78 %) Buy
Mumbai: India's wealthy are increasingly taking a shine to crypto assets, a global favourite these days, as they see limited scope for appreciation in traditional favourites like stocks and gold at this point. Domestic affluent investors, who have been adding these virtual currencies to their portfolios since the election of the US president Donald Trump in November last year, have ramped up their holdings of late, a stark contrast to their position last year when they were reluctant to test out these new-age assets."Over the last 6 months, we're seeing clear momentum from HNIs and family offices who are now allocating a portion of their portfolios to digital assets," said Atul Ahluwalia, vice-president, HNI & institutional investments at CoinSwitch . "The conversation has moved from 'why crypto' to 'how much and where'." Bitcoin, the most popular cryptocurrency in the world, made a lifetime high after it crossed $120,000 earlier this week, jumping over 90% in the past year.While Trump's strong support for cryptocurrencies was the trigger for the renewed bull wave in this asset class, investors' search for alternatives to expensive stocks, record-breaking gold and volatile bonds has fuelled their demand."The limited availability of attractive investment opportunities and heightened volatility in India's secondary markets have further driven HNIs toward digital assets," said Pranjal Agarwal, India market head at Mudrex.A high-net-worth investor in cryptos is classified as having an average holding of ₹50 lakh-₹1 crore or above in these assets. There is no centralised data on how much money worth of cryptocurrencies are traded in India as they are unregulated. For CoinDCX , a domestic crypto exchange, almost 50% of its total trading volumes come from its 3,500-odd large investor base comprising HNIs, family offices, and institutions. The average contribution of these investors in our monthly trading volume on our spot markets is ₹50 lakh or more," said CoinDCX's co-founder Sumit Gupta. "Notably, our institutional and family office clientele has grown by 50%, underlining the rising conviction among serious investors." CoinDCX had a monthly spot trading volume of $275 million in the month of June.Cryptocurrencies emerged as an alternative to traditional money since 2009. Their rise reflects growing demand for digital assets amid distrust in conventional financial systems.'Crypto is increasingly viewed as a non-correlated asset, particularly valuable amid ongoing global macroeconomic volatility,' said Harish Vatnani, head of trade, ZebPay. The most popular cryptocurrencies globally today are Bitcoin and Ethereum, which remain key choices for investors seeking exposure to crypto. Even in India, HNIs have stuck to the most liquid. Mudrex's Agarwal said Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana consist of about 70% of the platform's HNI portfolios.Bitcoin has outperformed both US and Indian benchmarks by a wide margin. While bitcoin prices are on course to double, the Nifty is up 2.q5%, the S&P 500 has gained 11.3% and the Nasdaq Composite has advanced 12.5% in the past year.India topped global crypto adoption for the second year in 2024, according to Chainalysis, with 119 million investors, which is nearly one-fifth of all crypto holders worldwide.The US ranked second with 53 million investors, followed by Indonesia with 39 million, CoinLedger data showed. Himanshu Maradiya, chairman, CIFDAQ, a digital currency trading platform, said the growth in the participation of affluent investors in cryptos is a global trend.'Retail investors dominate crypto exchanges in user count, making up 90-95% of users, but contribute only 30-50% of trading volume,' said Maradiya. 'HNIs and institutions, though fewer in number (4-10%), drive 50-70% of turnover due to larger trades and frequent use of derivatives.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
24 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Coca-Cola refutes Trump's sugar claim, backs corn syrup as ‘safe'
The Coca-Cola Company has defended its continued use of high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS) in its US beverages, responding to Donald Trump's claim that he had persuaded the brand to switch to using real cane sugar instead. 'I have been speaking to Coca-Cola about using REAL Cane Sugar in Coke in the United States, and they have agreed to do so,' Trump said in a Truth Social post late Tuesday. 'I'd like to thank all of those in authority at Coca-Cola. This will be a very good move by them — You'll see. It's just better!' Coca-Cola initially issued a polite statement thanking 'President Trump's enthusiasm' for the brand, saying it looked forward to 'new innovative offerings within our Coca-Cola product range.' But by Thursday, the beverage giant issued a more detailed defence of HFCS, a sweetener that has long been controversial and blamed by some for contributing to rising obesity rates in the US. 'The name sounds complex, but high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) – which we use to sweeten some of our beverages – is actually just a sweetener made from corn,' the company said in a statement, The Guardian reported. 'It's safe; it has about the same number of calories per serving as table sugar and is metabolized in a similar way by your body.' The company cited the American Medical Association (AMA), saying it 'has confirmed that HFCS is no more likely to contribute to obesity than table sugar or other full-calorie sweeteners,' and added, 'Please be assured that Coca-Cola brand soft drinks do not contain any harmful substances.' In 2023, the AMA had stated that 'insufficient evidence exists to specifically restrict use of high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) or other fructose-containing sweeteners in the food supply or to require the use of warning labels on products containing HFCS.' As per report by The Guardian, Trump's fondness for Diet Coke is well known — including the installation of a red button in the Oval Office that summoned a butler with a can of the beverage. Diet Coke, however, does not use corn syrup or cane sugar; it's sweetened with aspartame, a low-calorie artificial sweetener.
The Print
36 minutes ago
- The Print
Gold falls Rs 200 to Rs 98,670/10 g; silver declines Rs 500
Meanwhile, gold of 99.5 per cent purity declined by Rs 200 to Rs 98,200 per 10 grams (inclusive of all taxes) on Thursday. It had finished at Rs 98,400 per 10 grams in the previous market close. The precious metal of 99.9 per cent purity went lower by Rs 500 to close at Rs 98,870 per 10 grams on Wednesday. New Delhi, Jul 17 (PTI) Gold prices fell by Rs 200 to Rs 98,670 per 10 grams in the national capital on Thursday due to unabated selling by stockists amid subdued demand trend in the overseas markets, according to the All India Sarafa Association. As per the association, silver prices diminished by Rs 500 to Rs 1,10,500 per kilogram (inclusive of all taxes) on Thursday. The white metal had ended at Rs 1,11,000 per kg on Wednesday. 'Gold prices slipped as safe-haven demand eased after US-China tensions cooled with the lifting of the AI chip ban, and President Donald Trump signalled that a trade deal with India is close. 'Meanwhile, steep 30 per cent tariffs were imposed on Mexico and the European Union, the possibility of further negotiations kept market fears in check. This has reduced the urgency for safety trades like gold, weighing on prices,' Abans Financial Services' Chief Executive Officer Chintan Mehta said. However, the broader uncertainty from aggressive tariff actions continues to offer some underlying support, limiting the downside for the yellow metal, Mehta added. Globally, spot gold fell by USD 21.55 or 0.64 per cent to USD 3,326.05 per ounce. 'Gold edged lower as traders turned cautious ahead of US macroeconomic data, including retail sales data, employment numbers, and speeches by several Fed Reserve officials,' Kaynat Chainwala, AVP-Commodity Research at Kotak Securities, said. According to Jateen Trivedi, VP Research Analyst – Commodity and Currency at LKP Securities, gold traded weak below USD 3,330 per ounce as the dollar index strengthened above 98.75, following higher-than-expected US CPI inflation data, which dampened hopes of an immediate interest rate cut by the Fed. Spot silver went lower by 0.11 per cent to trade at USD 37.86 per ounce in the international markets. PTI HG HG SHW This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.
News18
an hour ago
- News18
Who Really Gains from the Big Beautiful Bill?
The bill may well be remembered not for its symbolism, but for the long-term structural imbalances it entrenched, in debt, in distribution, and in institutional accountability 'The burden of government is not measured by how much it taxes, but by how much it spends." As Milton Friedman wrote in Free to Choose (1980), this principle illustrates the foundational economic concept that public expenditure, whether financed by taxes or debt, diverts scarce resources from the private sector. Four decades later, President Donald Trump's newly enacted 'One Big Beautiful Bill" stands as a direct challenge to that maxim. The legislation is expansive in rhetoric and even more so in fiscal consequence. It combines permanent tax cuts with historic spending increases and deep cuts to welfare, all at an estimated cost of $3.3 trillion over the next decade. At nearly 900 pages, the legislation is not only one of the most extensive tax-and-spend packages in recent American history, but it also represents a significant structural shift in federal fiscal architecture. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates that the bill will increase the federal budget deficit by 1.3 percentage points of GDP annually over the next ten years. If temporary provisions are extended, as political economy suggests they often are, the Penn Wharton Budget Model projects the total deficit impact could rise to $5.5 trillion by 2034, raising the debt-to-GDP ratio to 127 percent. This would exceed the peak debt level recorded in the aftermath of World War II. The core of the bill centres on the permanent extension of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. While proponents argue this will preserve current tax rates for middle-income households, the distributional benefits remain highly skewed. According to estimates from the Tax Policy Centre, the top 0.1 percent of earners will experience an average annual after-tax gain of $290,000. By contrast, households earning below $18,000 per annum will see their after-tax income decline by approximately $165, once changes to Medicaid and food assistance are included. The tax provisions are supplemented by a range of new deductions, including a $25,000 deduction for tip income, a $12,500 deduction for overtime pay, and a $10,000 deduction for interest on car loans for domestically manufactured vehicles. These provisions are, however, temporary and will expire after the 2028 tax year. More importantly, these deductions are income-capped and structured in such a way that the majority of benefits accrue to middle- and upper-middle-income earners. Households earning more than $150,000 annually will see these benefits phased out entirely. On the expenditure side, the legislation makes structural changes to the American welfare state. Medicaid will see the introduction of stringent work requirements, increased eligibility checks, and mandatory cost-sharing for recipients. Enrollees with incomes between 100 and 138 percent of the federal poverty line (approximately $33,000 for a family of four) could face out-of-pocket healthcare costs of up to $1,650 per year. These changes, according to the CBO, will result in 11.8 million individuals losing Medicaid coverage by 2034. An additional 4.2 million are projected to lose coverage due to the rollback of Affordable Care Act subsidies. The bill also restructures the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). States will now be required to contribute between 5 percent and 15 percent of benefit costs if their administrative error rates exceed 6 percent. Simultaneously, new federal work requirements will apply to able-bodied adults without dependents and to parents of children aged 14 and above. These measures are expected to remove 270,000 vulnerable individuals from SNAP rolls over the next three years, according to the Centre on Budget and Policy Priorities. In the domain of energy policy, the legislation repeals key tax credits introduced under the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) for wind, solar, and battery storage projects. While these credits had catalyzed a surge in renewable investment, their removal is expected to reverse that trajectory. Princeton University's ZERO Lab estimates that clean energy projects initiated after 2026 will face capital cost increases of up to 50 percent. A 2024 Energy Innovation analysis projects that the average electricity bill in Texas will rise by $777 annually by 2035, with similar increases expected in other high-demand states such as California and Michigan. The repeal occurs at a time when national electricity demand is projected to increase by 15 to 20 percent over the next decade, driven by the expansion of artificial intelligence infrastructure and electrified transport. On education, the bill eliminates all existing income-driven student loan repayment plans, replacing them with a fixed 'Repayment Assistance Plan" (RAP). Under the new scheme, a typical borrower with a college degree will pay approximately $2,900 more annually compared to the Biden-era SAVE plan. Graduate and professional students will face borrowing caps of $100,000 and $200,000 respectively, along with exclusion from previously available forgiveness programmes. Moreover, the bill expands school voucher programmes by providing a 100 percent federal tax credit for donations to private school scholarship funds. The Joint Committee on Taxation estimates that this provision could cost up to $51 billion annually. In contrast, federal allocations for the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act stand at only $14 billion, and Title I funding for low-income schools at $18 billion. The disproportionate allocation of resources is expected to exacerbate funding challenges for rural and public schools, which serve more than 80 percent of all US students. The bill also includes a significant expansion of federal enforcement capacity. The budget for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is increased from $8 billion to $30 billion annually. This is the largest single increase in federal law enforcement funding in modern US history. In parallel, the Office of Management and Budget receives a $100 million fund to 'identify efficiency gains" across the executive branch. Critics have described this as a discretionary slush fund that allows executive overreach without Congressional appropriation oversight. Collectively, the One Big Beautiful Bill constitutes a comprehensive recalibration of American fiscal priorities. It reduces the redistributive role of the state while increasing the fiscal burden on future generations. It amplifies tax expenditures for the wealthy while shrinking welfare entitlements for the poor. And it does so at a moment of already-elevated debt levels, persistently high interest rates, and increased macroeconomic uncertainty. President Trump has claimed that this bill will launch the American economy 'like a rocket ship." Yet historical experience and mainstream macroeconomic modelling suggest otherwise. According to Goldman Sachs, continued fiscal expansion at this scale may require an eventual fiscal adjustment equivalent to 5.5 per cent of GDP, exceeding the austerity levels implemented in the eurozone post-2010. If such an adjustment proves politically infeasible, the US may resort to financial repression, inflationary finance, or other distortions to stabilise its debt trajectory. Milton Friedman warned that fiscal illusions have a way of catching up with economic reality. The Big Beautiful Bill may well be remembered not for its symbolism, but for the long-term structural imbalances it entrenched, in debt, in distribution, and in institutional accountability. The burden of government, as Friedman cautioned, lies not in what it collects, but in what it commits. By that measure, the burden just got heavier. Aditya Sinha (X: @adityasinha004) writes on macroeconomic and geopolitical issues. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect News18's views. tags : donald trump United states us economy Location : United States of America (USA) First Published: July 05, 2025, 15:54 IST News opinion Opinion | Who Really Gains from the Big Beautiful Bill?
