
Commentary: At 100, Dr Mahathir shows that legacy is never static
The former Malaysian prime minister's milestone comes at a time when the archetype of the "strongman" leader is resurgent globally – from Hungary to, undeniably, the United States where President Donald Trump is barely six months into a second tumultuous term.
This context offers Dr Mahathir, the ultimate political strategist and survivor, a unique lens through which to refract his own legacy – not merely to reflect on his doings, but to actively reshape its perception.
DR MAHATHIR'S COMPLEX LEGACY
On their own, Dr Mahathir's two stints as prime minister make for a complex legacy.
His first, defining 22-year premiership – from 1981 to 2003, when he was president of the ruling United Malays National Organisation (UMNO) – stands as a cornerstone of modern Malaysia.
It was an era of profound transformation: Towering skyscrapers, sprawling highways, and ambitious industrialisation projects testified to his relentless drive for development. Per capita gross domestic product more than doubled.
Yet, this progress was inextricably intertwined with a consolidation of authority, a governance style often justified by the imperative of stability for advancement, articulated through the framework of distinctive "Asian values".
His tenure showcased a masterful ability to navigate, and often orchestrate, political sentiment, positioning himself as a leader whose firm hand was the necessary price of Malaysia's progress.
Then in 2018, an audacious political recalibration.
At 92, he transcended his own creation. The architect of the UMNO-Barisan Nasional hegemony, which ruled for six decades post-independence, became the figurehead of the opposition Pakatan Harapan coalition.
Overnight, the narrative shifted: Mahathir the autocratic leader was reborn as Mahathir the democratic saviour, toppling the corruption-ridden regime of Najib Razak.
This remarkable feat relied on a national focus fixated on the immediate triumph over graft, allowing the more contentious chapters of his own past to fade into the background.
A WISE ELDER CRITIQUING DONALD TRUMP
Now, with Donald Trump presiding with his distinct brand of authority, there is a profound, almost paradoxical, power in a centenarian former strongman issuing warnings about the trajectory of Western democracy.
Dr Mahathir's pointed critiques of Mr Trump – focusing on the flouting of international conventions, the overt politicisation of institutions, and the destabilising nature of such leadership – land with amplified resonance precisely because of his own history.
This is far more than geopolitical commentary; it is a sophisticated exercise in legacy refinement.
Dr Mahathir's critique of Mr Trump's perceived "blatant abuse of power" seems to implicitly delineate his own brand of assertive rule. The distinction: His leadership, however firm, was culturally contextualised, developmentally focused – and ultimately less crassly self-serving or globally disruptive than the spectacle unfolding in Washington.
This would position his past actions as difficult necessities of their time and place, contrasting them with what he portrays as the more gratuitous exercises of power witnessed today.
Furthermore, his critiques, often delivered with characteristic dry detachment, actively cultivate the persona of the rational elder statesman, one who speaks from a century of observation and seasoned wisdom.
It overwrites older narratives of impulsive control, leveraging age and experience to amplify a message that might have rung hollow decades ago.
VALIDATING ARGUMENT AGAINST WESTERN DOUBLE STANDARDS
The perceived double standards of Western powers have long been a cornerstone of Dr Mahathir's worldview. Mr Trump's current presidency provides potent ammunition.
Dr Mahathir has long faced criticism for alleged harassment of political opponents – including the imprisonment of his former deputy and current Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, which added strain to US-Malaysia ties then. He has also rejected claims that he had targeted journalists, discredited critics, and interfered with the judiciary or other institutions.
Yet while Western leaders lectured Dr Mahathir and leaders of other developing countries on human rights and democratic norms, few have rebuked Mr Trump. What would have likely been termed 'democratic backsliding' elsewhere has been met with muted diplomacy.
Highlighting this perceived hypocrisy has a dual purpose: Dr Mahathir effectively critiques a contemporary Western leader while validating his own longstanding arguments against Western hegemony and interventionism.
Ultimately, the global resurgence of forceful leadership styles provides Dr Mahathir with a crucial contextual frame. It allows him to subtly reposition his first tenure not as an isolated anomaly of concentrated power, but as part of a broader historical pattern of strong leadership for emerging nations.
As he turns 100, Dr Mahathir Mohamad demonstrates that a legacy, like power itself, is never static. Shaping how he will be remembered is the final, masterful strategy of this political survivor.
Dr Sophie Lemiere is a political anthropologist who specialises in Malaysian and Southeast Asian politics, and has held research and teaching positions in major universities across Europe, the United States and Southeast Asia. She is currently Research Fellow at College de France in Paris.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNA
a few seconds ago
- CNA
Thai-Cambodia ceasefire: ‘Rare diplomatic success' due to Anwar, ASEAN and US pressure
KUALA LUMPUR: The carrot of trade negotiations from United States President Donald Trump, Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim's leadership and the provision of a 'face-saving' platform for Thailand and Cambodia to conduct peace talks helped achieve a fragile ceasefire that began at the stroke of midnight on Tuesday (Jul 29), analysts told CNA. It is too early to tell if the ceasefire will hold, but with Thailand accusing Cambodia of armed attacks on Tuesday morning – which Cambodia has denied – there is now an urgent need to deploy observation teams on the ground, the experts added. They also said reports of some skirmishes hours after the truce came into effect are not surprising, and that the deal is a 'coup' for the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and Anwar. Border tensions between the two Southeast Asian neighbours escalated last Thursday into a deadly conflict that has killed at least 38 people and displaced hundreds of thousands in both countries. On Monday, Thai Acting Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai and Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet agreed to an unconditional ceasefire after talks in Putrajaya chaired by Anwar, who is this year's ASEAN chair. The special meeting was co-organised by the US with the 'active participation' of China, according to a joint press release issued after the event. Both sides' regional commanders were also due to meet on Tuesday morning, and this could be followed by a meeting with both countries' defence attaches led by the ASEAN chair, according to the press release. A spokesperson from the Thai army said on Tuesday its Army Region 1 (Trat and Chanthaburi) has met with Cambodian counterparts. Its Army Region 2, which covers the Isaan region including the four provinces affected by clashes, is still setting up a date with Cambodian counterparts. The border situation was calm on Tuesday, with Phumtham saying "there is no escalation," and Cambodia's defence ministry spokeswoman Maly Socheata adding earlier that there had been "no armed clashes against each other in any regions". WHAT CEASEFIRE MEANS FOR ASEAN – AND ANWAR? Some analysts have dubbed the ceasefire agreement a 'rare diplomatic success' for ASEAN. It reinforces the bloc's relevance in managing intra-regional crises, said Jamil Ghani, a doctoral candidate at Singapore's S Rajaratnam School of International Studies. 'It revives confidence in ASEAN centrality and showcases the bloc's potential to uphold its founding commitments to regional peace, neutrality, and non-interference … The swift resolution also strengthens ASEAN's credibility as a framework for conflict mediation without great-power involvement,' he said. 'Amid mounting criticism over ASEAN's inertia on issues like Myanmar, the Cambodia-Thailand ceasefire illustrates that the bloc can still deliver meaningful outcomes — when its chair acts decisively,' said Jamil. Anwar had acted quickly and displayed his diplomatic skills in brokering the ceasefire, analysts agreed. He offered a neutral venue and framed the talks under ASEAN's diplomatic umbrella, giving both parties 'political space to de-escalate', noted Jamil. 'To save face, neither Thailand nor Cambodia would have acted to stop first, so Malaysia stepped in as mediator. Malaysia understands the predicament of Thailand and Cambodia and that is a starting point to end the conflict,' said Nusantara Academy for Strategic Research senior fellow Azmi Hassan. While a 'coup' for Malaysia and ASEAN, Azmi and other experts noted US President Trump's role in nudging both sides towards peace. Both Cambodia and Thailand currently face a 36 per cent tariff on goods exported to the US, which is set to take effect from Aug 1, unless a reduction can be negotiated. 'Trump had linked tariff talks to a ceasefire. For all the talk about China, it seems that these states still can't do without the US market. ASEAN on its own was unable to broker a meeting earlier or to prevent the conflict from breaking out,' said Chong Ja Ian, an assistant professor of political science at the National University of Singapore (NUS). US Ambassador Edgard Kagan and Chinese Ambassador Ouyang Yujing were present during the meeting in Putrajaya. Trump on Monday claimed that both countries reached a ceasefire and peace because of his involvement, and said trade negotiations would resume. 'By ending this war, we have saved thousands of lives. I have instructed my trade team to restart negotiations on trade. I have now ended many wars in just six months — I am proud to be the President of peace!' he said on the Truth Social platform. Anwar himself called the agreement 'concrete evidence of ASEAN's diplomatic strength' and said the 10-member bloc 'remains united and principled'. It was the alignment of multiple factors that led to the announcement of the ceasefire, said retired Malaysian ambassador Ilango Karuppannan. For Anwar, the ceasefire success is both symbolic and strategic, coming days after thousands of Malaysians took to the streets to protest rising living costs and a perceived lack of reform by his unity government, marking the first major protest since he came to power in 2022. 'Domestically, it provides a high-profile foreign policy achievement during Malaysia's ASEAN chairmanship — one that can strengthen his government's standing and enhance Malaysia's diplomatic profile,' Jamil said. While it boosts his international image, 'whether that helps his domestic situation is yet to be seen', said Ilango. GROUND MONITORING NOW NEEDED However, with the spectre of one or both sides reneging on the ceasefire, experts said there is an immediate need for a monitoring and observation team. It is common to see remnants of fighting as local commanders may not have all received the orders, said Ilango. 'Sometimes, it's simple things like (the) lack of walkie talkies. Sometimes, a soldier wants revenge for his friends' death,' he said. 'So what can the three governments do? The first is to deploy the ceasefire monitoring or observation mission immediately. It must go to the ground and not just go to the capitals for briefings,' he added. Even with an agreement in place, one or both sides could always renege on it, noted Chong. 'There is presently no mechanism in place to restrain their behaviour. Tensions, suspicions, tempers and animosity continue to run high. Ultimately, the two sides need to move troops away from each other to avoid rapid escalation and allow negotiations to prevail,' he said. The latest reports of clashes, he said, suggests the 'real limits to what ASEAN and other actors can do' if they are not utilising political capital to get the two sides to stop the hostilities. 'If ASEAN wishes to be more active, it could offer observers on the ground to monitor phased withdrawals by both sides and provide transparency to avoid misunderstanding or miscalculation by the Thai and Cambodian sides on the ground,' Chong said. Chong said ASEAN could theoretically work with the United Nations (UN) or offer its own peacekeepers to keep the two sides apart. But this would be challenging, he said, as it could involve putting personnel from other ASEAN states in the middle of tensions, or suggest that ASEAN is unable to act on its own if other actors are called in. 'This option does not appear to be on the table right now,' Chong noted. Malaysia could also try to convene further talks between Cambodia and Thailand in the hopes that this could bring more stability to the relationship, he added. The joint statement after the Putrajaya talks had stated that direct communications between the prime ministers, foreign and defence ministers of Cambodia and Thailand will resume.
Business Times
a few seconds ago
- Business Times
Nomura profit exceeds estimates on stock trading boom
[TOKYO] Nomura Holdings' profit beat expectations last quarter, as the Japanese firm joined the equity trading boom that fuelled earnings for Wall Street banks. Net income rose 52 per cent from a year earlier to 104.6 billion yen (S$907.05 million) in the fiscal first quarter ended June 30, Japan's biggest brokerage said in a statement on Tuesday (Jul 29). That marked the sixth straight quarter of growth and exceeded the 76.4 billion yen average of three analyst estimates compiled by Bloomberg. The results were helped by one-time gains from the sale of a Tokyo property. Investors are watching whether chief executive officer Kentaro Okuda can sustain the earnings growth that led to record profit last year as Japan's markets roared back to life. Global banks from Goldman Sachs Group to Deutsche Bank reaped income from trading stocks and bonds last quarter, taking advantage of volatility fuelled by US President Donald Trump's trade policies. Revenue from stock trading jumped 20 per cent from a year earlier, the ninth consecutive quarter of growth. Fixed-income revenue fell 1 per cent, even as the biggest US banks posted gains. Volatility in Japanese government bond trading hit a historic high in recent months, leaving banks and investors grappling with how to navigate a market that was moribund until the Bank of Japan ended its ultra-loose monetary policy last year. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Nomura is off to a 'solid start' to the new fiscal year, chief financial officer Hiroyuki Moriuchi said at a news briefing in Tokyo. Volatility in April had a significant impact on the company's fixed-income trading business, but the team recovered in the ensuing months, he said. Revenue from investment banking rose 2 per cent, led by fees from bond underwriting. Fees on mergers and acquisitions slipped from a year earlier, even as Nomura grabbed the top spot among financial advisers, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Shares of Nomura closed 0.3 per cent higher before the results were released. The stock has risen almost 10 per cent since March 31, in line with an increase in the benchmark Topix, which reached a record high last week after Japan secured a trade deal with the US. Revenue from the wealth management business fell 4 per cent, signalling the stock market's rebound wasn't enough to spur trading by individual clients in Japan. The brokerage earned 56 billion yen from the sale of a training centre in central Tokyo, a plan announced in February. That accounted for about a third of pretax profit. BLOOMBERG


CNA
30 minutes ago
- CNA
Advantest raises full-year operating profit forecast by 24% on strong AI demand
TOKYO :Japanese chip testing equipment maker Advantest raised on Tuesday its full-year operating profit forecast by 24 per cent due to robust demand for semiconductors used in artificial intelligence. The company forecast an operating profit of 300 billion yen ($2.02 billion) for the current business year to the end of March 2026, compared with an earlier forecast of 242 billion yen and an average estimate of 302.05 billon yen in a survey of 23 analysts by LSEG. ($1 = 148.7100 yen)