
Commentary: At 100, Dr Mahathir shows that legacy is never static
The former Malaysian prime minister's milestone comes at a time when the archetype of the "strongman" leader is resurgent globally – from Hungary to, undeniably, the United States where President Donald Trump is barely six months into a second tumultuous term.
This context offers Dr Mahathir, the ultimate political strategist and survivor, a unique lens through which to refract his own legacy – not merely to reflect on his doings, but to actively reshape its perception.
DR MAHATHIR'S COMPLEX LEGACY
On their own, Dr Mahathir's two stints as prime minister make for a complex legacy.
His first, defining 22-year premiership – from 1981 to 2003, when he was president of the ruling United Malays National Organisation (UMNO) – stands as a cornerstone of modern Malaysia.
It was an era of profound transformation: Towering skyscrapers, sprawling highways, and ambitious industrialisation projects testified to his relentless drive for development. Per capita gross domestic product more than doubled.
Yet, this progress was inextricably intertwined with a consolidation of authority, a governance style often justified by the imperative of stability for advancement, articulated through the framework of distinctive "Asian values".
His tenure showcased a masterful ability to navigate, and often orchestrate, political sentiment, positioning himself as a leader whose firm hand was the necessary price of Malaysia's progress.
Then in 2018, an audacious political recalibration.
At 92, he transcended his own creation. The architect of the UMNO-Barisan Nasional hegemony, which ruled for six decades post-independence, became the figurehead of the opposition Pakatan Harapan coalition.
Overnight, the narrative shifted: Mahathir the autocratic leader was reborn as Mahathir the democratic saviour, toppling the corruption-ridden regime of Najib Razak.
This remarkable feat relied on a national focus fixated on the immediate triumph over graft, allowing the more contentious chapters of his own past to fade into the background.
A WISE ELDER CRITIQUING DONALD TRUMP
Now, with Donald Trump presiding with his distinct brand of authority, there is a profound, almost paradoxical, power in a centenarian former strongman issuing warnings about the trajectory of Western democracy.
Dr Mahathir's pointed critiques of Mr Trump – focusing on the flouting of international conventions, the overt politicisation of institutions, and the destabilising nature of such leadership – land with amplified resonance precisely because of his own history.
This is far more than geopolitical commentary; it is a sophisticated exercise in legacy refinement.
Dr Mahathir's critique of Mr Trump's perceived "blatant abuse of power" seems to implicitly delineate his own brand of assertive rule. The distinction: His leadership, however firm, was culturally contextualised, developmentally focused – and ultimately less crassly self-serving or globally disruptive than the spectacle unfolding in Washington.
This would position his past actions as difficult necessities of their time and place, contrasting them with what he portrays as the more gratuitous exercises of power witnessed today.
Furthermore, his critiques, often delivered with characteristic dry detachment, actively cultivate the persona of the rational elder statesman, one who speaks from a century of observation and seasoned wisdom.
It overwrites older narratives of impulsive control, leveraging age and experience to amplify a message that might have rung hollow decades ago.
VALIDATING ARGUMENT AGAINST WESTERN DOUBLE STANDARDS
The perceived double standards of Western powers have long been a cornerstone of Dr Mahathir's worldview. Mr Trump's current presidency provides potent ammunition.
Dr Mahathir has long faced criticism for alleged harassment of political opponents – including the imprisonment of his former deputy and current Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, which added strain to US-Malaysia ties then. He has also rejected claims that he had targeted journalists, discredited critics, and interfered with the judiciary or other institutions.
Yet while Western leaders lectured Dr Mahathir and leaders of other developing countries on human rights and democratic norms, few have rebuked Mr Trump. What would have likely been termed 'democratic backsliding' elsewhere has been met with muted diplomacy.
Highlighting this perceived hypocrisy has a dual purpose: Dr Mahathir effectively critiques a contemporary Western leader while validating his own longstanding arguments against Western hegemony and interventionism.
Ultimately, the global resurgence of forceful leadership styles provides Dr Mahathir with a crucial contextual frame. It allows him to subtly reposition his first tenure not as an isolated anomaly of concentrated power, but as part of a broader historical pattern of strong leadership for emerging nations.
As he turns 100, Dr Mahathir Mohamad demonstrates that a legacy, like power itself, is never static. Shaping how he will be remembered is the final, masterful strategy of this political survivor.
Dr Sophie Lemiere is a political anthropologist who specialises in Malaysian and Southeast Asian politics, and has held research and teaching positions in major universities across Europe, the United States and Southeast Asia. She is currently Research Fellow at College de France in Paris.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNA
43 minutes ago
- CNA
CNA938 Rewind - A Letter to Myself: Threading purpose with vision, Meiko Tailor's Adele Chung takes family business forward
CNA938 Rewind - A Letter to Myself: Threading purpose with vision, Meiko Tailor's Adele Chung takes family business forward Adele Chung stepped away from a successful corporate career to join her father's business — Meiko Tailor, which he founded in 1977. Mr Chung Chi Kwong's uncompromising eye for detail and quality led it to become a respected name for bespoke clothing, with local and foreign dignitaries among its clientele. Although the prospect of continuing her father's legacy was initially daunting, Adele shares how her sense of purpose overcame the early doubts and continues to fuel her vision for the family business — which includes the opening of a second shop at Boat Quay and launch of a new sustainability-focussed sub-brand, Uncommon Hem.

Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Takeaways of US-Japan deal include potential gains for Trump, Ishiba and EU
An emerging U.S.-Japanese trade deal could unlock major investment, avert a potential shock to the global economy and may deliver political wins for both U.S. President Donald Trump and Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, though many specifics of the agreement remain unclear. Here's a closer look at the early takeaways: * The deal stabilizes the global trade outlook by imposing a 15% tariff on Japanese goods — down from a threatened 25% — while Japan commits to investing $550 billion in the U.S. economy, a boost to U.S. jobs. It almost certainly averts a worst-case scenario for the Japanese economy. Moreover, if it signals that the balance of U.S. tariff rates are likely to settle in that range, Jefferies Chief Economist and Strategist for Europe Mohit Kumar said: "the world can live with 15% or so tariffs." * Trump gains some political capital ahead of November 2026 midterm elections by reinforcing his 'America First' trade stance and potentially bolstering his influence with industrial and agricultural constituencies while avoiding the market instability that loomed under earlier tariff threats. Still, not every U.S. constituency was happy with the announcement. The decision has angered the Detroit Three automakers, who still face a 25% levy on significant segments of their non-U.S. produced vehicles. * For Ishiba, the deal is a diplomatic and economic win amid domestic political turbulence. Just days earlier, Japan's ruling coalition lost its majority in upper house elections. * Analysts say the deal could serve as a benchmark for other economies negotiating with Washington, including the EU and China, both facing August tariff deadlines. * American exporters could gain broader access to Japan's markets, especially in autos and agriculture — sectors vital to U.S. economic growth. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Judge asks prosecution for more information on Kpods in first case involving etomidate-laced vapes World In landmark opinion, World Court says countries must address climate change threat Singapore 5 teens arrested for threatening boy with knife, 2 charged with causing hurt Singapore Male victim of fatal Toa Payoh fire was known to keep many things, say residents Sport Bukayo Saka the difference as Arsenal beat AC Milan at National Stadium Singapore HDB launches 10,209 BTO and balance flats, as priority scheme for singles kicks in Singapore Over 1.15 million Singaporeans aged 21 to 59 have claimed SG60 vouchers Singapore Cyclist charged after allegedly hitting elderly pedestrian, killing him * Global financial markets are rallying led by automakers. Stocks of major Japanese firms surged following the announcement, and capital inflows are expected to continue as investors seek exposure to Japan's innovation-led growth. * Despite the investment commitments, the deal may not significantly reduce the U.S. trade deficit with Japan in the short term. Critics argue that without stronger enforcement mechanisms or structural reforms, the imbalance could persist. * A 15% tariff, though lower than the threatened 25%, still represents a significantly higher import tax for consumer goods, especially for cars and electronics, which are heavily imported to the U.S. from Japan. Yale Budget Lab last week estimated the overall average U.S. tariff rate under Trump's policy shifts has climbed to around 20% from between 2% and 3% prior to his return to the White House in January. REUTERS

Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
US State Department probes Harvard over visiting scholar programme
Find out what's new on ST website and app. The State Department's probe is part of a continuing crackdown on the elite institution. WASHINGTON - US President Donald Trump's administration on July 23 launched an investigation into Harvard University's ability to sponsor visiting students and academics, part of a continuing crackdown on the elite institution. Since taking office in January, Mr Trump has repeatedly accused Harvard and other top US universities of having a 'liberal' bias, accusing some of 'anti-Semitism' to cut federal funding and demand greater oversight. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the latest investigation would examine whether the university was complying with regulations in the Exchange Visitor Programme. That included probing whether the university was 'conducting their programmes in a manner that does not undermine the foreign policy objectives or compromise the national security interests of the United States.' 'The American people have the right to expect their universities to uphold national security, comply with the law, and provide safe environments for all students,' he said in a statement. Harvard has so far defied Mr Trump's calls to submit to oversight of its curriculum, staffing, student recruitment and 'viewpoint diversity.' Mr Trump has cut federal grants for Harvard and tried a host of different tactics to block the institution from hosting international students. The administration has sought to remove Harvard from an electronic student immigration registry and instructed embassies to deny visas to international students hoping to attend the Massachusetts-based university. The administration insists its moves are legally justified over Harvard's failure to protect Jewish students, particularly amid campus protests against Israel's war in Gaza. Harvard has sued the Department of Homeland Security and other agencies to block the efforts, arguing they are illegal and unconstitutional. The Ivy League institution has also sued to restore more than US$2 billion (S$2.5 billion) in frozen funds. A Harvard spokesman did not immediately respond to a request from AFP for its response to the State Department investigation. AFP