Opposition MPs write to Speaker Om Birla, seek special discussion on Bihar SIR
In their letter to Birla, the Opposition MPs expressed deep concern over the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise in Bihar, especially a few months before the state assembly elections.
The signatories to the letter included Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Gandhi, Congress's Deputy Leader in the House Gaurav Gogoi, DMK's TR Baalu, NCP (SP)'s Supriya Sule, RSP's N K Premachandran, SP's Lalji Verma, TMC's Kakoli Ghose Dastidar, Shiv Sena (UBT)'s Arvind Savant and RJD's Abhay Kumar.
"We, the undersigned Members of Parliament representing various Opposition parties, wish to express our deep concern over the ongoing voter list revision in Bihar, especially a few months before the state assembly elections," the opposition MPs said in their letter.
"This is unprecedented. The Election Commission of India has indicated that similar exercises will soon be undertaken across the country. Given the widespread apprehension about the transparency, timing, and intent of this process, the matter requires the urgent attention of the House," they said.
The Opposition has consistently raised this issue since the start of the current session, the MPs said.
"It was reiterated in several interactions with the Government, including the All-Party Meeting held on Sunday, July 20. While the Government has stated its willingness to discuss all issues, including this one, no date has yet been fixed for such a discussion," the letter said.
The revision of electoral rolls has direct implications on the right to vote and the conduct of free and fair elections, the opposition MPs said .
"A special discussion in the Lok Sabha will allow Members to seek clarity and ensure transparency and accountability. We, therefore, urge you to schedule a special discussion on the ongoing voter roll revision without any further delay," they said in their letter to Birla.
The opposition has been protesting in both Houses of Parliament against the SIR, alleging the EC's exercise was aimed at "disenfranchising voters" in Bihar ahead of the Assembly elections. They have been demanding a discussion on the issue in both Houses.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
39 minutes ago
- Time of India
SC remarks on Rahul Gandhi 'extraordinary, unwarranted': Opposition
NEW DELHI: The opposition INDIA bloc on Tuesday termed as "unwarranted" Supreme Court 's remarks on Rahul Gandhi , asserting that they encroach on the democratic rights of political parties, which have a responsibility to speak on issues of national interest. Congress MP Priyanka Gandhi Vadra said the Supreme Court cannot decide who is a "true Indian", stressing that Rahul holds the Army in the highest regard. A joint statement issued by the bloc said, "All the leaders of the INDIA parties agreed that the sitting judge has made an extraordinary observation, which is unwarranted given the democratic rights of political parties. It is the responsibility of political parties, especially the leader of opposition, to comment on issues of national interest". It added, "When a govt fails so spectacularly to defend our borders, it is every citizen's moral duty to hold it accountable". INDIA bloc discussed the apex court's remarks at the morning meeting of floor leaders in Parliament, which was attended by Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge and Rahul Gandhi. After RSP MP NK Premachandran raised the issue, questioning SC's remarks, the same was endorsed by John Brittas (CPM), Kanimozhi (DMK), Kakoli Ghosh Dastidar (TMC), Ramgopal Yadav (SP), Arvind Sawant (SS-UBT), Supriya Sule (NCP-SP), Rajkumar Roat (BAP). by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Best Software Categories Undo Best Software Categories Undo Best Software Categories Undo Best Software Categories Undo Best Software Categories Undo Best Software Categories Undo Best Software Categories Undo A decision was then made to issue a joint statement . Later, speaking to reporters, Priyanka Gandhi Vadra said, "With due respect to the honourable judges of the Supreme Court, they do not decide who is a true Indian. It is the job of the opposition leader; it is his duty to ask questions and to challenge the govt". She added, "My brother would never say anything against the Army."
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Big INDIA bloc parties reject smaller allies' plea to find a way to let Parliament run
NEW DELHI: As the opposition's protest seeking a discussion on the special intensive revision (SIR) of Bihar electoral rolls has brought Parliament to a halt, some members in the INDIA bloc ranks Tuesday urged the alliance brass to find a way to run Parliament, but their plea was shot down. Sources said at the meeting of the INDIA bloc on Tuesday morning, CPM's John Brittas, RSP's NK Premachandran and IUML's ET Mohammed Basheer felt that the Parliament session should not be washed out. While Brittas is a Rajya Sabha MP, Basheer and Premachandran are in Lok Sabha. However, their plea was countered strongly by the bigger parties of the bloc like Congress , DMK, TMC, SP, Shiv Sena, RJD, who felt the govt cannot get away by evading a discussion on a politically critical issue like the electoral rolls review. With the opposition programmes targeting the Election Commission lined up in coming days - dinner meeting at Rahul Gandhi's residence on Thursday, Bangalore protest led by Rahul on Friday, and the joint march to EC on Aug 11 - the opposition is unlikely to relent till then. A wider consensus to raise a protest over the electoral roll revision was evolved last week after a discussion on Pahalgam-Operation Sindoor in the two Houses over three days. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 25 Brilliant Plant Hacks That Will Change the Way You Grow Things Learn More Undo As they gathered to chart out the future strategy, SIR came to dominate the discussion. Opposition leaders were told by Rahul that issues being raised in Parliament were important but BJP was winning elections by manipulating the electoral rolls. He told INDIA bloc members that a "deep dive" on voters' list done by Congress in a sample Bangalore seat has unearthed serious irregularities, and the govt should be forced to discuss the subject in Parliament. Since then, the opposition has mounted vigorous protests in the parliament every morning.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Ask EC to publish names, details of 65 lakh deleted voters: ADR plea in Supreme Court
The Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR) on Tuesday sought directions from the Supreme Court to the Election Commission to publish the name and details of around 65 lakh electors left out of the draft electoral rolls in Bihar. The SC is hearing a batch of petitions challenging the EC's June 24 order to conduct a Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls across the country, starting with Bihar. The court is scheduled to hear the matters on August 12. In an application filed on Tuesday, the ADR, one of the petitioners, asked the court to direct the EC to publish the Assembly constituency and part or booth-wise list of names and details, including reasons (deceased, permanently shifted, duplicate or untraceable), of the around 65 lakh electors removed from the draft roll published on August 1. As part of the SIR exercise, the EC had ordered that only those voters who submit enumeration forms by July 25 would be included in the draft roll. Out of the total 7.89 crore registered electors in the state, the EC said forms had been received from 7.24 crore, meaning the remaining 65 lakh were removed. The EC said in a press note on July 25 that 22 lakh of these electors were found to have died, 35 lakh had either permanently migrated or could not be found and 7 lakh were registered in more than one place. According to EC sources, the lists provided to the booth level agents (BLAs) of political parties on July 20 included the names, EPIC numbers and reasons for removal of electors from each booth. The ADR, represented by Senior Advocate Prashant Bhushan, also asked that the EC publish an Assembly constituency and part or booth-wise list of the electors who were included in the draft roll but were in the category of 'not recommended' by the Booth Level Officers (BLOs), which means they could be removed from the final roll to be published on September 30. The petitioner said while the EC had provided a list of electors whose names had been deleted to the BLAs of a few political parties, the reasons for their removal were not mentioned in that list. It said that as per the lists provided to parties on July 20, when five days for submission of forms still remained, the reasons for uncollected forms was mentioned. But, in the lists provided on August 1, the column recording reason was not there. 'It is submitted that the list with names of 65 lakh deleted electors curiously fails to disclose the reason of non-submission of their enumeration forms, an information that the Election Commission evidently possesses. In other words, it fails to provide any explanation as to why these names were not included in the draft electoral rolls whether for reasons of having been deceased, permanently migrated out of Bihar, being untraceable or on the ground of duplicate entry,' ADR said. In a departure from the annual special summary revision and pre-poll revisions, this time, the EC decided to prepare the rolls afresh. All those added to the rolls after January 1, 2003, when the last intensive revision was done, are required to submit documents establishing their eligibility, including citizenship. Those born after July 1, 1987 are required to submit date and/or place of birth proof for one or both parents. Damini Nath is an Assistant Editor with the national bureau of The Indian Express. She covers the housing and urban affairs and Election Commission beats. She has 11 years of experience as a reporter and sub-editor. Before joining The Indian Express in 2022, she was a reporter with The Hindu's national bureau covering culture, social justice, housing and urban affairs and the Election Commission. ... Read More
