All to know on BBC drama The Bombing of Pan Am 103 starring Connor Swindells
A new BBC factual drama series in The Bombing of Pan Am 103, will be airing soon on the channel.
It will explore the tragic bombing of an American passenger flight above the small Scottish town of Lockerbie, which occurred back in 1988.
The attack killed 270 people, which included all 243 passengers and 16 crew aboard the flight and 11 residents of Lockerbie.
The programme follows the joint investigation from US and Scottish authorities into who exactly could have planned and carried out the bombing.
As reported by the Radio Times, the synopsis reads: "The series follows the untold story of the Scots-US investigation into the attack and the devastating effect it had on the small town and the families who lost loved ones.
"From the initial exhaustive search for evidence on the ground in Scotland, via the US and Malta to the trial at Camp Zeist in 2000, the series leads up to the forthcoming new trial in the US."
For accuracy and sensitivity, families and friends of the victims were consulted by the production team during development of The Bombing of Pan Am 103.
The Bombing of Pan Am 103 becomes the second TV show released in 2025 to cover the incident, following Lockerbie: A Search for Truth, which starred Colin Firth.
THE BOMBING OF PAN AM 103 comes to @BBCOne this Sunday evening from 9pm. Episode 2 will air on Monday at 9pm. Episodes available on @BBCiPlayer shortly afterwards #TBOPA103 pic.twitter.com/nDLLYlakXT
— World Productions (@worldprods) May 13, 2025
Connor Swindells as DS Ed McCusker
Patrick J. Adams as Dick Marquise
Tony Curran as DCI Harry Bell
Eddie Marsan as Tom Thurman
Peter Mullan as DCS John Orr
Phyllis Logan as Moira Shearer
Lauren Lyle as June McCusker
James Harkness as DS Sandy Gay
Merritt Wever as Kathryn Turman
Douglas Hodge as DS Stuart Henderson
Alastair Mackenzie as Alastair P Campbell
Kevin McKidd as DCS Tom McCulloch
Armina Karima as Khaled Jaafar
Avin Shah as Jaswant Basuta
Alex Magliaro as Fran Cuilla
Rosie Yates as Rose Grant
Cameron Mullane as Tim Burman
Lyra Jackson as Lynne McCusker
Etta Jackson as Fiona McCusker
Gareth Morrison as Thomas Flannigan
Archie McCormick as Steven Flannigan
Ryan J Mackay as PC Gibson
Beth Marshall as Margaret Connell
Philip Cairns as David Jardine
Amanda Drew as Linda Burman
Adrian Lukis as Roy Burman
Adam Rothenberg as Neil Gallagher
Finlay Robertson as Mick Charles
Estrid Barton as Ella Ramsden
John Hollingworth as Seymour
Cora Bissett as Elma Pringle
Andrew Marley as David Flannigan
Andrew Byatt as Rev Alan Neal
Marianne McIvor as Mrs Harley
Recommended reading:
Everything to know on new Channel 5 drama The Game starring Jason Watkins
Everything you need to know ahead of Malpractice series 2 - cast list and more
All to know ahead of The Handmaid's Tale's final series including cast list
The first episode of The Bombing of Pan Am 103 will air at 9pm on BBC One on Sunday, May 18.
After that, the second episode will be shown in the same timeslot on the following day (Monday, May 19).
No other scheduled times have been confirmed at the time of writing, but it is possible the other four episodes will air in the same pattern.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Esko resident awarded Bush Fellowship to 'indigenize' tribal law
Jun. 6—ESKO — Tribal courts on reservations nationwide often rely on practices derived from the American legal system. For Esko's Megan Treuer, chief judge for the Bois Forte Band of Chippewa, these practices can overlook the nuances of tribal culture and, consequently, fail to deliver effective justice. The Bush Foundation announced Tuesday, June 6, that Treuer is the recipient of a $150,000 two-year fellowship. The funds will allow her to further incorporate traditional Ojibwe practice into her tribal court by immersing herself in the Ojibwe language and culture, and travel across the world to mentor under global Indigenous leaders. "We don't have a separation of our way of life, our ceremonial practices, or language and justice," she said. The Bush Foundation aims to identify and support leaders in Minnesota, North Dakota and South Dakota by providing monetary assistance to grow their capacity and knowledge to be even more effective community leaders, according to Adora Land, grant-making director with the Bush Fellowship. "Megan was someone who we identified for the work that she's doing," Land said. "(It) would be really impactful (for Treuer to) have a fellowship in this moment." A member of the Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe, Treuer has worked in tribal justice for about 20 years and served as a judge for the past 12. Through her fellowship, Treuer will focus on how to "fully indigenize" the tribal justice system by reexamining how justice is delivered in Indian country and revitalizing cultural justice practices that reflect how the communities have traditionally taken care of each other. Bois Forte is one of two tribal nations in Minnesota with criminal jurisdiction, the other being the Red Lake Nation. Most of Treuer's casework is criminal and child protection. Treuer believes that implementing Indigenous practices that reconnect legal jurisdiction to culture will result in lower recidivism rates and better outcomes. For example, she said that if a young offender partakes in a ceremony instead of being sent to jail, it could yield better long-term outcomes. But to do that, Treuer believes she first needs to reacquaint herself with and immerse herself in her own culture and language. Treuer's top priority with her fellowship is reacquainting herself with the Ojibwe language, which she admits she knew better as a teenager. She plans to take Ojibwe language courses and immerse herself where the language is frequently spoken, such as tribal ceremonies. "It's hard to authentically deliver Anishinaabe justice when you don't have good command of the language," she said. Additionally, Treuer plans to travel to seek mentorship from leaders of Indigenous justice globally. She plans to go to New Zealand, which is governed by the Treaty of Waitangi, the country's founding document between the British Crown and the island's native Maori population, which grants significant rights and recognition to its Indigenous population. Treuer cited one of her mentors, Paul Day, the recently retired chief judge of the Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe, as a source of inspiration for the future of Indigenous law. She said he would often perform ceremonies in the Ojibwe language during court proceedings, such as a family being reunited or a child being adopted. Treuer believes it is her responsibility to follow Day's legacy. "Now that he's retired, and a number of other trailblazers are retiring or moving on, I feel it's incumbent on myself to learn what my predecessors used to do," she said.
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Pam Bondi Hit With Formal Demand to Answer Musk's Claim About Trump and Epstein
House Democrats have urged Attorney General Pam Bondi to respond to a bombshell claim from Elon Musk that Donald Trump is named in the so-called 'Epstein files.' Reps. Stephen Lynch and Robert Garcia, who serve on key congressional oversight panels, sent a letter to Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel obtained by Axios, demanding that they 'immediately clarify whether this allegation is true.' The lawmakers want Bondi and Patel to produce a detailed timeline of the Department of Justice's handling of the Epstein files and to explain why there have been no new disclosures since February, according to the letter. Trump 'is in the Epstein files,' billionaire Tesla and SpaceX CEO Musk wrote in a post on X Thursday, alleging that 'that is the real reason they have not been made public.' Musk signed the post off by writing: 'Have a nice day, DJT!' Musk added in a follow-up post: 'Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out.' He was referring to files related to Jeffrey Epstein, the disgraced late financier and convicted sex offender who died by suicide while in federal custody in New York City in August 2019 as he awaited trial on new sex trafficking charges. Officials in the first Trump administration determined that Epstein's death was a suicide, but conspiracy theories that he was killed to shield high-profile individuals including Trump, Britain's Prince Andrew, and former President Bill Clinton have proliferated nonetheless. The Trump administration in February declassified and released files related to Epstein, but they were highly redacted and did not offer major revelations. The FBI hasn't indicated when more files will be released. Lynch and Garcia want answers about who was involved in the review and redaction process. The Daily Beast has contacted the Department of Justice for comment. 'We write with profound alarm at allegations that files relating to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein have not been declassified and released to the American public because they personally implicate President Trump,' the lawmakers wrote in a three-page letter. 'Musk, one of the President's closest and most influential advisors, alleges that the President may be described in additional files related to this investigation. This allegation implies that the President may be involved in determining which files should be released and whether files will be withheld from the public if he personally chooses to withhold them,' the House Democrats said. Giving a June 20 deadline, the House Democrats asked Bondi and Patel to provide a timeline timeline for the declassification and public release of all remaining files; to describe why the DOJ hasn't released additional files since February; to describe Trump's role in reviewing documents pertaining to the investigation and prosecutions of convicted sex offenders Epstein and his associate Ghislaine Maxwell, as well as his role in determining DOJ's ability to declassify and make public these documents. They also demanded Bondi and Patel provide a list of all personnel whose approval is required to facilitate the declassification and public release of the documents, and to explain why the previously released files 'contained significant redactions.' In a statement to Axios, White House spokesperson Harrison Fields dismissed the letter as 'another baseless stunt that bears no weight in fact or reality.' 'These are the same left-wing lunatics who neglected their oversight duties regarding the Biden administration's lawless actions and concocted hoax after hoax on President Trump during his first term. No one takes them or their petty letters seriously,' said Fields. Musk pushed the explosive claim amid an epic public feud with the president, which centers on the Trump-backed 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act.' Musk has criticized the spending package, describing it as fiscally reckless and a 'disgusting abomination.' He's said the bill would undermine his work with the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) by adding trillions to the U.S. budget deficit. But Trump claimed Thursday that Musk was really upset about the effect the bill will have on his electric vehicle company, Tesla. In their rift Thursday, Musk also suggested Trump be impeached and replaced by Vice President JD Vance, and asked his 220 million followers in a poll on X whether he should create ' a new political party in America that actually represents the 80% in the middle?' Trump has said he's 'very disappointed' in Musk and suggested he has 'Trump Derangement Syndrome.' Reports that pair could be set to make amends as soon as Friday with a Trump team-scheduled call with Musk to broker peace were quickly rebuffed by the president, who said Musk had 'lost his mind' and had no plans to talk to him. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement: 'This is an unfortunate episode from Elon, who is unhappy with the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' because it does not include the policies he wanted.'
Time Magazine
an hour ago
- Time Magazine
Where Things Stand With the Epstein Files Following Musk's Allegation Against Trump
The breakdown in relations between President Donald Trump and his one-time ally Elon Musk has played out over social media in spectacular fashion, with the two engaging in a tit-for-tat spat. The row initially started over politics. Musk expressed his vehement disapproval of Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill,' calling it a 'disgusting abomination' and encouraging people to 'kill the bill.' Meanwhile, Trump maintained that the fall-out was prompted by Musk being upset over the removal of electric vehicle subsidies —a provision that made Tesla vehicles more affordable. But the fight has since taken a far more personal turn, bolstered by Musk's allegation that Trump is listed in the files related to the late financier and alleged sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. 'That is the real reason they have not been made public,' Musk said in a post shared via his social media platform, X. He did not provide evidence pertaining to this. The accusation has spurred Democrats to chase the full unsealing of the Epstein files. California Rep. Robert Garcia and Massachusetts Rep. Stephen F. Lynch—Democratic members of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform—sent a letter on June 5 to U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi and Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Kash Patel. 'We write with profound alarm at allegations that files relating to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein have not been declassified and released to the American public because they personally implicate President Trump,' read the letter titled 'Is Trump Suppressing The Epstein Files?' The White House responded, saying that the move by the Oversight Committee members was 'another baseless stunt that bears no weight in fact or reality.' Here's what to know about the Epstein files and the renewed push to declassify them following Musk's allegation. What do we know about the Epstein files so far? On Feb. 27, Bondi released more than 100 pages of declassified documents related to Epstein—as part of the Trump Administration's vow to be more transparent regarding the high-profile case. During the presidential election, Trump promised to appease the clamoring for the alleged 'client list' of Epstein's since his arrest and subsequent death by suicide in 2019. Though Bondi called this the 'first phase' of declassified files, people were underwhelmed by the published pages, as much of the text had been redacted. Bondi's release included Epstein's 'black book,' which had previously been published. It featured names like Trump and former President Bill Clinton, but as the New York Times reported, there were people in the book with whom Epstein had never even met, and thus listed names are not necessarily connected to Epstein's activities. One of the only never-before-seen documents included in the release was an 'Evidence List' of catalogued evidence obtained by investigators. Bondi blamed the FBI for the fact that the report was incomplete, suggesting in a published letter to Patel that the FBI had more information related to Epstein. Bondi ordered Patel to deliver the rest of the investigation documents and 'conduct an immediate investigation' to understand why she had only received parts of the files. There is much discussion as to whether a fully-fledged 'Epstein client list' even exists. Jacob Shamsian, Business Insider's legal correspondent who has covered the Epstein case for years, said via social media on Feb. 27: 'I should also point out that the 'Jeffrey Epstein client list' does not exist and makes no sense on multiple levels (you think he made a list???). But if Pam Bondi wants to prove me wrong, I welcome it.' Will the Musk allegations prompt the release of further Epstein files? Musks' allegations have brought the Epstein files back into the spotlight, but there were already calls for them to be published in full. In April, Trump was asked by a reporter about when the next phase of the files are due to be released, to which he responded: 'I don't know. I'll speak to the Attorney General about that. I really don't know.' Since then, Democrats have continued to push for more documents to be released. Democratic Rep. Dan Goldman of New York released a statement in May, 'demanding that [Bondi] promptly release the Jeffrey Epstein Files in full.' Spurred by Musk's allegation, Democrats including Garcia, Goldman, and Lynch are now renewing these calls for more transparency. But it remains to be seen whether or not the pressure will be enough for Bondi, Patel, or Trump to provide more answers. What do we know about Trump's relationship with Epstein? Trump's connection to Epstein dates back decades. In a 2002 interview with New York magazine, he famously said that Epstein was 'a lot of fun to be with.' 'It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side,' Trump told the reporter. In July 2019, NBC News' TODAY released unearthed video footage believed to be from 1992, which showed Trump greeting Epstein at his Mar-a-Lago estate. The two men could be seen laughing as they engaged in conversation. After Epstein's 2019 arrest on federal sex trafficking charges, Trump made strides to distance himself. Speaking to reporters in the Oval Office in 2019, Trump said: 'I had a falling out with him [Epstein]. I haven't spoken to him in 15 years. I was not a fan of his, that I can tell you.'
