Nation issues sweeping ban that will have big impact on shipping industry: 'An important step'
Our planet's oceans are set to get a little bit cleaner thanks to a new ban tidying up the shipping industry in Sweden.
As Offshore Energy reported in February, the Swedish government has banned discharges from scrubbers into ocean waters. Scrubbers are a piece of ship-cleaning equipment meant to "clean the ship's exhaust gases so that what is released into the air contains relatively low levels of sulfur." However, they can then wash that pollution right into the water.
Effective July 1, 2025, "discharges from open-loop scrubbers will be prohibited in Swedish territorial waters." These more common scrubbers can send water filled with exhaust gas pollutants into the ocean.
Effective January 1, 2029, even closed-loop scrubbers will be banned in Sweden as they can also release toxic pollutants through drain water.
Per Offshore Energy, most shipowners in Sweden don't even need to use scrubbers because of lower-sulfur fuel options. This new ban should curb the release of hazardous scrubber water from all ships in and passing through the area.
"Emissions from ship scrubbers are — even in very low concentrations — harmful to our marine environment," said Romina Pourmokhtari, Sweden's Minister for Climate and Environment.
"The use of scrubbers also increases total fuel consumption by around 2-3 percent, which also increases carbon dioxide emissions. When the government now bans emissions from scrubbers, we are taking an important step both for a better marine environment and for the climate."
The ban in Sweden is part of a larger global effort to ban emissions from scrubbers and protect open seas worldwide. Finland's government has already decided to prohibit scrubber water from being discharged in the ocean, and Denmark is working toward banning the practice soon as well.
Yet, since oceans have no borders, pollution from scrubbers in one region has the potential to spread all over. Ultimately, a global scrubber discharge ban is needed to address the broader issue and replace heavy fuel oil with more sustainable alternatives.
In addition to banning scrubber pollution, there are many other ways to make ships more sustainable.
Should the government be allowed to control how restaurants run their business?
Never
Only in some cases
Only for chain restaurants
Yes in all cases
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
For example, innovative companies are creating high-tech sails to optimize routes based on wind and reduce ship pollution. Meanwhile, sustainable ships powered by hydrogen fuel systems can lessen the industry's reliance on dirty energy for a greener maritime future.
"Excellent news, and further proof that the pollution from Exhaust Gas Cleaning Systems (EGCS), which turn air pollution into water pollution, simply isn't acceptable anywhere, but especially in sensitive areas such as the Arctic!" Jim Gamble, senior director of the Arctic Program at Pacific Environment, commented on Sweden's ban via LinkedIn.
"A big win for those who are drawing crucial attention to the problem of scrubbers! And now we need more action in the U.S.," another LinkedIn user replied in the comments.
Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 hours ago
- Yahoo
Officials under scrutiny after fragile river system suffers damage with little accountability: 'It's quite a small penalty'
The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation recently reported on a "weak reprimand" handed down to a company that contaminated a river with byproducts from its operations. A coal company responsible for releasing more than a million liters of mine-contaminated wastewater into an Alberta river was fined just 9,000 Canadian dollars (about 6,500 U.S. dollars), which critics say is hardly holding it accountable. In March 2023, CST Canada Coal allowed wastewater from its mine to spill into the Smoky River, a major tributary of the Peace River. The leak lasted at least 17 hours and released roughly 9,000 kilograms of polluting sediment into the water — a known threat to fish species such as the local bull trout and Arctic grayling, not to mention the risk to communities downstream. The Alberta Energy Regulator cited the company, but the fine is being called "a slap on the wrist" by environmental groups and former government officials. "It's quite a small penalty for something that was deemed to have moderate potential for adverse effects downstream," said Tara Russell, program director with the Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society's northern Alberta chapter, per the CBC. Coal mine wastewater often contains toxic materials such as selenium as well as fine particles that damage fish gills and disrupt ecosystems. In this case, regulators found that CST had inadequate reporting protocols, no qualified staff on-site, and no ice removal equipment to repair the frozen valve that led to the spill. This wasn't the first time CST leaked contaminants into the Smoky River, the CBC revealed. In 2022, the company spilled more than 100,000 liters of untreated wastewater in a similar incident and was fined CA$22,000. Aside from damaging ecosystems, the pollution is harmful to local communities that rely on the ecosystem for water, food, irrigation, and more. Letting polluters off the hook easily can mean they may not feel real pressure to do better. "I can't see that this is going to be an effective enforcement tool," said NDP MLA Marlin Schmidt, per the CBC. "It's not an effective deterrent for the companies and it's an extremely expensive process for the Alberta Energy Regulator." Critics say Alberta needs tougher enforcement and escalating penalties for repeat offenders to truly protect waterways, wildlife, and public trust. "Other operators are looking [at] this fine and saying the AER is not credible when it says that they're going to bring the hammer down on bad actors," said Schmidt. Individuals can help hold polluters accountable by supporting organizations that advocate for stronger environmental regulations, including CPAWS and Ecojustice. You can also take local action by pushing for clean energy policies and voting for candidates who prioritize public health over polluter profits. How often do you worry about the quality of your drinking water? Never Sometimes Often Always Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Yahoo
18 hours ago
- Yahoo
Coca-Cola slammed over latest packaging change amid global backlash: 'Affecting millions of people's livelihoods'
Coca-Cola is facing backlash after a U.N. report slammed the decision to switch from reusable glass bottles to single-use plastic in Samoa. The move has led many to criticize Coca-Cola's claims of environmental stewardship. The U.N. Special Rapporteur for Toxics and Human Rights released a report highlighting how, in 2021, the regional Coca-Cola bottler in Samoa switched from a system of reusable glass bottles to plastic packaging. "[A] pivotal decision was made to abandon the long-standing, effective system of reusable glass bottles in Samoa," Dr. Rufino Varea of the Pacific Island Climate Action Network told Packaging Insights. "For decades, the communities in Samoa participated in a circular system, returning glass bottles for a deposit, which ensured high reuse rates and minimized waste." The criticism has brought renewed attention to Coca-Cola's status as one of the world's largest plastic polluters, if not number one. The presence of single-use plastic and other waste is particularly problematic in Samoa, which lacks the capacity for large-scale recycling programs. "Samoa's small size and population (225,681 in 2023) makes economies of scale for disposal or recycling of certain waste streams non-existent," the U.N. report said. "Samoa, and most Pacific Island states, are grappling with a monumental waste crisis, a significant portion of which is plastic," Varea noted. Plastics have permeated every corner of the globe, from the Arctic, to the top of Mount Everest, to the bottom of the sea, and even our own bodies. "Every year 19-23 million tonnes [20.9 to 25.3 million tons] of plastic waste leaks into aquatic ecosystems, polluting lakes, rivers, and seas," the U.N. Environment Programme noted. "Plastic pollution can alter habitats and natural processes, reducing ecosystems' ability to adapt to climate change, directly affecting millions of people's livelihoods, food production capabilities and social well-being." We are still learning the tremendous number of ways in which plastic pollution impacts our environment, our community, and our health. For example, according to The Washington Post, recent studies have found that the presence of microplastics can interfere with bees and the pollination process. When you think about a product's packaging, which of these factors is more important to you? The way it looks The information it provides The waste it produces I don't think about packaging at all Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Such impacts could have dramatic consequences for the global food supply, which depends heavily on pollination and pollinators. Efforts are underway to significantly curtail the amount of plastic we produce and discard. The U.N. Environment Assembly has adopted a resolution urging the world to work toward a binding international agreement to limit plastic pollution. Some private companies have also been seeking innovative ways to do their part in cutting back on plastic use. Even Coca-Cola, often maligned as the world's biggest producer of plastic waste, developed a 100% plant-based, recyclable PET bottle. While the problem of plastic waste might seem insurmountable, we can all do things to make a difference. For instance, you can choose products that come in non-plastic packaging like glass or cardboard. Better yet, you can forgo unnecessary single-use packaging by carrying a reusable water bottle. Though one small decision might seem inconsequential, multiply that decision by thousands or even millions of people, and we can make a real difference. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Forbes
a day ago
- Forbes
Today's ‘Wordle' #1448 Hints, Clues And Answer For Friday, June 6th
How to solve today's Wordle. Looking for Thursday's Wordle hints, clues and answer? You can find them here: The first full weekend of June is almost here which means it's 2XP Friday for all you Competitive Wordle players out there. Double your points, double your losses. It's a high-risk, high-reward day for Wordlers. Let's solve this one, shall we? The Hint: To instruct or improve. The Clue: This Wordle begins with a vowel. Okay, spoilers below! The answer is coming! FEATURED | Frase ByForbes™ Unscramble The Anagram To Reveal The Phrase Pinpoint By Linkedin Guess The Category Queens By Linkedin Crown Each Region Crossclimb By Linkedin Unlock A Trivia Ladder . . . Today's Wordle Every day I check Wordle Bot to help analyze my guessing game. You can check your Wordles with Wordle Bot right here. While not quite as challenging as yesterday's Wordle, this is still a pretty tricky word. I got off to a mediocre start with CHAIR, leaving me with just one yellow box and 285 words remaining. SLOPE only cut that down to 41, though thankfully DEIGN slashed that to just two. I could only think of one: EDIFY for the win! Today's Wordle Bot I thought surely the Wordle Bot would take four today but it beat me with three. That means I get -1 for losing to the Bot which turns into -2 due to 2XP Friday. The Bot gets 1 point for guessing in three and another for beating me, which ends up being 4 points for 2XP Friday. The narrow game we've been playing this month widens considerably with June tallies now at: Erik: 0 points Wordle Bot: 6 points The verb edify comes from Latin aedificāre 'to build' (itself from aedes 'building' or 'temple' + facere 'to make'). In Late Latin it became edificāre; Old French borrowed it as edifier, and it entered Middle English as edify with the sense 'to instruct' or 'build up (morally or spiritually).' Let me know how you fared with your Wordle today on Twitter, Instagram or Facebook. Also be sure to subscribe to my YouTube channel and follow me here on this blog where I write about games, TV shows and movies when I'm not writing puzzle guides. Sign up for my newsletter for more reviews and commentary on entertainment and culture.
