&w=3840&q=100)
13 security personnel killed in suicide attack in Pak's Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
A suicide bomber rammed an explosives-laden vehicle into a Mine-Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) vehicle belonging to the Bomb Disposal Unit early this morning in Khaddi village in the Mir Ali area of North Waziristan, the sources added.
Among the 24 injured are 14 civilians, including women and children, with several said to be in critical condition.
A curfew was imposed in the area at the time of the incident due to ongoing military movement, sources said.
Security agencies launched a rescue operation following the explosion.
The militant group Usud al-Harb, a sub-faction of the Hafiz Gul Bahadur group, has claimed responsibility for the attack, they added.
Chief Minister of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Ali Amin Gandapur, has strongly condemned the suicide attack.
We salute the brave security personnel and their families who have sacrificed their lives for the nation, said the chief minister.
This incident is being described as one of the deadliest in North Waziristan in recent months and has raised serious concerns about the security situation in the region.
Pakistan has witnessed a surge in terrorist incidents, particularly in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan provinces, following the collapse of the ceasefire agreement between the government and the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan in November 2022.
Militant attacks and counter-terrorism operations surged in March 2025, with the number of terrorist incidents crossing 100 for the first time since November 2014, a Pakistan Institute for Conflict and Security Studies report said.
Pakistan ranked second on the Global Terrorism Index 2025, with terror-related deaths rising by 45 per cent over the past year to 1,081.
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
2 hours ago
- India.com
Pakistan's weakest zone lies exposed: TTP fighters capture several parts of China's CPEC corridor, Asim Munir now forced to...
Shehbaz Sharif and Asim Munir- File image Islamabad: In a matter of bad news for China and the China-Pakistan Economic corridor, the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), which has been a massive point of security concern for the Pakistan government led by Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, has intensified attacks on the Pakistani army in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan. Shifting its focus to the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), the fresh attacks of TTP has raised fresh concerns for China, which has been trying to solidify its presence in the region. Here are all the details you need to know about the recent attacks by the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan and why it is a matter of bad news for China. Why Pakistan Army Chief Asim Munir is under pressure? In a point of huge security risk for Pakistan, the increasing attacks of TTP on the Chinese investments in Pakistan have created double trouble for the government and army of Pakistan because, and as a result of the attacks, the Pakistani Army led by Asim Munir has been forced to divert the military from the border areas to the CPEC region, causing a major security concern for the country. How TTP is giving nightmares to China? In a point of concern for China's Xi Jinping government, media reports suggest that TTP has captured parts of the CPEC corridor in tribal areas, highlighting its expanding influence near the Afghanistan border. Because of the highly significant projects of the Chinese governments in the region, the increasing attacks of TTP can't be ignored. Therefore, we can say that the rise of TTP power, combined with strained Pakistan-Afghanistan relations, has further limited Islamabad's options for a strong military response.
Indian Express
5 hours ago
- Indian Express
North Block is leaving the building, with files, stationery and nostalgia
In its 94-year existence, North Block has seen a lot. It was the seat of power of the colonial British government, the site of spontaneous celebrations when India became Independent in 1947, and, ever since, has been a witness to successive governments shaping policy for the nation. These days, however, the corridors of the building are nearly deserted, with sections roped off, and locks hanging on doors that till recently hid a flurry of activity. The building is in the process of being emptied as part of the government's plan to redevelop the Central Vista area – the stretch from India Gate to Rashtrapati Bhawan. North Block now is to be repurposed as a museum, with key ministries that have operated out of it since 1931 when its construction finished – including Union Ministries of Home Affairs and Finance, and the Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT) – to be moved to a set of 'Kartavya Bhawan' buildings down the road. However, the work of shifting a government can't be hurried up. And in this case is being coordinated by a ministry – Housing and Urban Affairs, which is also spearheading the Central Vista redevelopment. Other ministries have appointed a nodal officer each for the exercise, which began around a month ago. Under their watch, files are being sorted into marked boxes, computers are being packed, and office supplies are going into cardboard containers. Artwork, including many, many photographs of Mahatma Gandhi, is being bubble-wrapped. The packing is being done by office staff, aided by a team of workers hired for the job. Once packed, the boxes are carried by workers down the stairs to a side entrance, and loaded onto tempos and government cars. These then cover the short distance to the new address. An official working in North Block says the move has been fairly smooth so far, particularly when it comes to files, given that nearly all, save the sensitive ones, are now on the government's E-Office portal. Officials in the know say the DoPT has almost entirely moved out. Jitendra Singh, the Minister of State for Prime Ministers' Office, Science and Technology and Personnel, is expected to shift soon, sources said. The Home Ministry has been allotted Kartavya Bhawan 3, and Union Home Secretary Govind Mohan and the Intelligence Bureau were some of the first ones to shift. According to sources, the shifting of some offices to KB3, as the building is referred to, began before its formal inauguration by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on August 6. The Finance Ministry, however, is yet to begin shifting. An officer in the middle of shifting says: 'I'm soaking in the last few days at this building. Many of my former colleagues who have worked here have been dropping by to see the offices one last time.' Like the South Block that stands across it, North Block, designed by British architect Herbert Baker in red sandstone, incorporating Indian features like jaali, chajja and chhattri, is as much a regal structure as a functional one, with plenty of light and ventilation. The new buildings, in comparison, look like any modern corporate office, with glass cabins for officers, open plan seating for most employees and access-control systems. Offices in the South Block, which houses the Prime Minister's Office and the Ministries of Defence and External Affairs, have not started moving out yet. Once both the buildings are emptied, they are to be restored and refurbished, before reopening as Yuge Yugeen National Museum. The government claims it will be the largest museum in the world. The 'charm' of North Block is what those who have worked here keep coming back to in conversations. G K Pillai, who spent seven years in North Block, first as Joint Secretary from 1996 to 2001 and then as Union Home Secretary from 2009 to 2011, recalls the sense of history that permeates the rooms. 'Stalwarts, including Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, worked here. Old-timers would tell us about important meetings that took place in the past,' Pillai, who is now retired, says. The former IAS officer adds that he personally believes that not all the ministries from North Block and South Block should have been shifted to the new quarters. 'Some of them could have stayed. The next generation of officers will lose that sense of history,' says Pillai. Durga Shanker Mishra, a 1984-batch IAS officer who retired as Uttar Pradesh Chief Secretary last year, recalls his time in a ground-floor North Block office as Director (Personnel) in the Home Ministry in 2002-2004. 'I have good memories of that office. Though I was a director in Home, I had been given a room on the Finance Ministry's side. It was a well-sized room.' However, Mishra says: 'As is the case with old buildings, there were challenges. It needed more maintenance over the years.' As Secretary, Housing and Urban Affairs, Mishra was, in fact, part of the deliberations when the Central Vista project was planned and started. He says the new Central Secretariat buildings will change the way the government works, in terms of efficiency and coordination. In fact, while senior officers – who along with ministers had large airy offices – are understandably nostalgic about the high-ceilinged large rooms that they are leaving behind, not all in the North Block will regret the change. A majority of its employees worked in cramped spaces, with partitions created within dingy rooms to accommodate more officials over the years. Mezzanine levels were also added to create space, with the temporary additions doubling the number of rooms in both North and South Blocks over the years. A section official says: 'We are looking forward to the new building. I've heard that the canteen is very nice.' But true to form, the open-plan layout of the new Secretariat also has its share of detractors. On August 5, the Central Secretariat Service Forum, which represents around 13,000 employees, wrote a letter to the Prime Minister's Office expressing concerns about 'the lack of privacy and confidentiality' in the new arrangement.
Indian Express
5 hours ago
- Indian Express
Military Digest: Pakistan Army Chief Asim Munir's thirst for military recognition mirrors that of dictators from the past
Pakistan Army Chief Field Marshal Asim Munir has been in the news recently after having been awarded the second-highest military gallantry honour of Pakistan, Hilal-e-Jurat. That puts him in the pantheon of many dictators from the past, including Field Marshal Ayub Khan, Field Marshal Idi Amin and Saddam Hussein, who had not been shy of awarding themselves top medals and ranks. While such medals are awarded in the name of the President of a country, the citations for the same originate from military headquarters. For a gallantry medal to be awarded to a soldier who has been in action against the enemy, the citation must be vetted by the chain of command, which usually begins with the commanding officer. Several military dictators throughout history have awarded themselves gallantry awards or other high honours, often as a means of self-aggrandisement or to bolster their image as heroic leaders. Prominent among them is Idi Amin, the dictator of Uganda, who declared himself a Field Marshal in 1975 and awarded himself numerous self-created military decorations, including the Victorious Cross (a fabricated award mimicking the British Victoria Cross). He also claimed titles like 'Conqueror of the British Empire' to enhance his image, despite lacking any significant military achievements to justify such honours. Former Pakistani military dictator, Mohammad Ayub Khan, who ruled the country from 1958 to 1969, appointed himself the rank of Field Marshal in 1959, a year after seizing power through a military coup. Like Asim Munir, Ayub Khan also ensured that he was awarded the Hilal-i-Jurat in the late 1950s, after its institution, for his 'bravery' in 1949 against the Indian Army. Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein also frequently awarded himself military honours and titles, including the rank of Field Marshal and the highest award of the Order of the Two Rivers, named after the Tigris and Euphrates rivers, to project an image of a valiant leader. These awards were often tied to his propaganda efforts during conflicts like the Iran-Iraq War, despite his role being more strategic than directly combative. There are several other examples in history of leaders having awarded themselves grand titles and awards, and these include Joseph Stalin of the USSR, Nicolae Ceaușescu of Romania, Kim Jong-il and his son Kim Jong-un of North Korea and Francisco Franco of Spain. Most of these dictators used awards to legitimise their rule, enhance their public image, or create a cult of personality. Gallantry awards, typically reserved for acts of bravery in combat, were often misused by these leaders to symbolise their leadership or fabricated heroism. In his seminal work On The Psychology of Military Incompetence, British psychologist Norman Dixon pens a picture that gives an insight into the personality of those like Asim Munir. '……the man who reaches a position of high command out of a compulsive thirst for personal advancement will tend to lack that creative talent and flexibility of mind so necessary in modern warfare,' Dixon writes.
