logo
Mortgage rates stuck in a rut as economy turns gloomy. What's next for the housing market?

Mortgage rates stuck in a rut as economy turns gloomy. What's next for the housing market?

USA Today20-03-2025

Mortgage rates stuck in a rut as economy turns gloomy. What's next for the housing market?
Show Caption
Hide Caption
How far did the US fall in the world happiness rankings?
The U.S. has dropped to its lowest spot yet on the World Happiness Report. The Nordic countries still dominate the top of the list.
Rates for home loans ticked up fractionally but stayed in the same narrow range they've been in for several months.
In the week ending March 20, 30-year fixed-rate mortgages averaged 6.67%, Freddie Mac announced Thursday. That's only slightly up from 6.65% last week, but not low enough to spark major moves in the mortgage market: applications for home loans were down 6.2%, the Mortgage Bankers Association said.
Those figures don't include fees or points, and rates in some parts of the country may be higher or lower than the national average.
If mortgage rates aren't making much headway one way or the other this year, neither is the housing market itself. Sales of previously-owned homes jumped in February, the National Association of Realtors said Thursday, after falling in January.
When it comes to new housing stock, economic indicators are also mixed. Builders broke ground on more new homes than expected in February, the Commerce Department reported earlier this week. The pace set in February was a 12-month high, and may have been an attempt to get ahead of tariffs.
Indeed, a measure of homebuilder sentiment fell to a seven-month low in March.
Many Americans considering buying a home have waited for years for rates to stabilize or inventory to become available. But analysts are increasingly concerned that deteriorating economic conditions will simply sideline many would-be buyers.
'Consumer worries about losing their jobs are at levels normally seen during recessions,' wrote Apollo Global Management Chief Economist Torsten Slok in a note out Sunday. 'A record-high share of consumers think business conditions are worsening,' Slok added. 'The bottom line is that consumer sentiment is deteriorating at an alarming rate.'
Nancy Vanden Houten, lead U.S. economist at Oxford Economics, echoed that view in a note sent after the existing-home sales data. 'A recent downtick in mortgage rates may lend some support to home sales in the months ahead, but that could be countered by growing uncertainty on the part of households about the economy,' she wrote. 'We look for sales to move sideways in 2025.'
In March, homebuilders reported that the number of prospective buyers taking tours was at its lowest in 15 months.
Some observers believe only outside-the-box thinking will solve the affordability crisis in housing. As previously reported, one woman in the Tulsa, Oklahoma area, is building tiny homes in a factory to help mitigate rising costs and lack of inventory.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'America's AI Arsenal Just Went Live': AI Insider Briefs Public on Secret Supercomputer Built by Musk
'America's AI Arsenal Just Went Live': AI Insider Briefs Public on Secret Supercomputer Built by Musk

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

'America's AI Arsenal Just Went Live': AI Insider Briefs Public on Secret Supercomputer Built by Musk

BALTIMORE, June 05, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- A newly surfaced report from bestselling author and tech insider James Altucher outlines the existence of a massive U.S.-based artificial intelligence weapon — one that could redefine America's global standing in the AI arms race. According to Altucher, the project — code-named Project Colossus — is being built by Elon Musk's company xAI, in coordination with recent policy changes made by the Trump administration. Housed in a low-profile facility in Memphis, Tennessee, Altucher says this machine is already operational — and growing more powerful by the day. 'The Fastest Supercomputer on the Planet' The briefing claims the facility is equipped with 200,000 cutting-edge AI chips, making it the most powerful computing center in the Western Hemisphere. 'It contains not just one or two… but 200,000 units of Nvidia's all-powerful AI chips… making it the most advanced AI facility known to man.' 'The fastest supercomputer on the planet.' — Jensen Huang, Nvidia CEO Altucher notes that Musk plans to expand this further in the coming weeks, with rumors of additional hardware that could multiply its power tenfold. Trump Cleared the Runway The report links the timing of Project Colossus to a major political shift. On Day 1 of his second term, Donald Trump reversed Biden-era restrictions on AI development. 'In one of his FIRST acts as President… Donald Trump overturned Executive Order #14110.' Altucher claims this decision allowed developers like Musk to operate 'without red tape or delay' — accelerating America's path toward dominance in the next generation of AI systems. Altucher: This Is 'Artificial Superintelligence' Altucher describes this moment not as another software release — but a seismic shift in how technology operates. 'This second wave of ARTIFICIAL SUPERINTELLIGENCE… Will rival all of the great innovations of the past. Electricity… the wheel… even the discovery of fire.' His report urges Americans to understand what's unfolding — not just in Silicon Valley, but in unmarked warehouses like the one now powering Project Colossus. About James Altucher James Altucher is a computer scientist, entrepreneur, and author who has worked on AI projects for over 40 years. A former IBM consultant and Wall Street technologist, he now focuses on breaking down emerging tech developments for a general audience. His latest briefing examines how Artificial Superintelligence is reshaping U.S. strategy and infrastructure. Media Contact:Derek WarrenPublic Relations ManagerParadigm Press GroupEmail: dwarren@ in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Sen. Mike Lee proposes ousting every member of Congress when inflation rises too high
Sen. Mike Lee proposes ousting every member of Congress when inflation rises too high

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Sen. Mike Lee proposes ousting every member of Congress when inflation rises too high

WASHINGTON — Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, said he would introduce a constitutional amendment that would remove all members of Congress 'whenever inflation exceeds 3%,' or the deficit exceeds 3% of GDP, a proposal that has garnered support from figures such as multibillionaire Elon Musk. Under the proposal, lawmakers would be ineligible for reelection if the federal deficit increases above 3% of GDP, reviving a suggestion from Warren Buffett more than 10 years ago suggesting he could 'end the deficit in five minutes' by disqualifying lawmakers based on the nation's economic well-being. 'It's better to disqualify politicians than for an entire nation to suffer under the yoke of inflation,' Lee wrote in a post on X. 'Please let me know what you think. And share if you like the idea.' Musk later reposted Lee's proposal, stating: 'This is the way.' It's unknown when Lee could propose such an amendment, and it's not clear how much support he could garner among members of Congress. Some lawmakers could suggest it would be too complicated to remove all lawmakers from office at once depending on fluctuating inflation rates. The suggestion comes as the annual inflation rate lowered to 2.3% in April, the lowest rate since February 2021. But the inflation rate hovered at about 3% multiple times last year, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Inflation rates were as high as 8.5% in 2022, raising concerns among fiscal conservatives in Congress. Lee has been among the most vocal about the national deficit, urging Republicans to submit massive changes to President Donald Trump's tax reconciliation bill to slash spending for a slate of government programs. Lee is among a handful of Senate Republicans who oppose the current reconciliation package as it is currently written, arguing it does not go far enough to reduce the national deficit. 'Federal spending has become excessive. The resulting inflation harms Americans and weaponizes government,' Lee wrote in a post on X. 'The Senate can make this bill better. It must now do so.' The Senate is set to vote on the reconciliation package in the coming weeks, with Republican leaders pushing to get the bill to Trump's desk before the Fourth of July. However, challenges remain as Republicans internally disagree on which programs to scale back on spending.

Senators warn big bill would make credit harder to get for low-income families
Senators warn big bill would make credit harder to get for low-income families

Axios

time40 minutes ago

  • Axios

Senators warn big bill would make credit harder to get for low-income families

Buried in the " big, beautiful bill" is a provision that would require low-income Americans to pre-certify to get the Earned Income Tax Credit, a half-century old benefit that keeps millions of families out of poverty. Why it matters: Those hurdles would make the credit harder to get, or potentially even dissuade people from filing, say tax experts and Democrats who oppose the bill. State of play: The provision hasn't gotten a lot of attention, compared to changes to Medicaid and SNAP. Now some Democrats, led by Nevada Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto, are demanding Republicans cut it from the final bill. In a letter Thursday, addressed to Senate Majority Leader John Thune and House Speaker Mike Johnson, the Dems note that 20% of eligible recipients already miss out on the credit because they're unaware it exists or believe it's too complicated. The new changes, "only exacerbate the EITC's existing shortcomings by creating more red tape and complexity for workers hoping to claim the credit," they write. "This will lead to fewer eligible workers claiming the EITC, resulting in an effective tax increase on America's working families." Senators Michael Bennet (Colo.), Cory Booker (NJ), Tim Kaine (Va.) and Ron Wyden (Ore.) and a few others signed on. The big picture: The provision is one of a handful in the bill that would impose more administrative hurdles for low-income Americans. There are new and expanded work requirements for Medicaid and SNAP, and a requirement that some adults re-certify for health insurance under the Affordable Care Act twice a year. Tax breaks for higher-income individuals and businesses do not appear to include any such requirements, which impose what some call a "time tax" on working people that ultimately winds up discouraging them from using benefits. How it works: The bill directs the Treasury Department to establish a process for taxpayers to obtain a "qualifying certificate" for each child they're claiming under the deduction. It's not clear how the IRS — already struggling after staffing cuts under DOGE — would do this. The requirement would take effect in 2028. If taxpayers don't have such a certificate, they'd be denied the refundable portion of the tax credit i.e., the money they get back in their refunds. By the numbers: On average, eligible taxpayers got a $2,743 from the credit in 2023, per IRS data, the most recent available. For tax year 2024, it was worth a maximum of $7,830 for families with three or more children. What they're saying: "The IRS will need to handle potentially tens of millions of qualifying child applications, which will likely trigger a deluge of phone calls and requests for assistance," per a report from the Tax Law Center at NYU. "Taxpayers who fail to navigate the system successfully will not receive their credit, even if eligible." The provision is effectively a "backdoor cut" to the EITC, writes the author of the NYU analysis in a Substack post. "[The] bill would increase scrutiny and burden for low-income taxpayers even as its tax cuts for the wealthy have no similar requirements," writes Greg Leiserson, who previously was a senior economist in the Biden Council of Economic Advisers. The other side:"Basic eligibility checks for government programs are not only a reasonable ask of beneficiaries, but a commonsense check against waste, fraud, and abuse," White House spokesman Kush Desai said in a statement. "It's both condescending and out-of-touch for so-called 'experts' to automatically assume that everyday Americans are either too stupid or too lazy to verify their income – as they do every day for a loan, credit card, or new lease application – when thousands of dollars' worth of government benefits are on the line." Flashback: A provision like this was tried decades ago and was later abandoned because it deterred eligible workers from claiming the credit and was costly to implement relative to any savings.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store