Error in ITR utility: Penal interest is automatically getting added to taxpayers who don't have to pay advance tax, check the details
To give you a brief about Section 234C interest, it is levied when you have a tax liability above Rs 10,000 but failed to pay the minimum amount of advance tax via the four prescribed time schedules.
Bhardwaj said on X, 'Please note that, as per law, interest under section 234C is not applicable when the net tax liability is less than Rs 10,000. However, the current ITR software auto-calculates and populates this interest incorrectly. Requesting @IncomeTaxIndia to kindly review and rectify this issue in the utility and online portal. While the field is editable in the form, we would like to ensure that manually overriding it will not create issues during processing.'
Also read: Wife pays no income tax after selling two houses for Rs 6 crore gifted by her husband, wins case in ITAT Mumbai; here's how it happened What is the error with the ITR utility's Section 234C interest calculation? We have asked experts about this problem and here's what experts said to ET Wealth Online:
Chartered Accountant Abhishek Soni, co-founder, Tax2Win, says: 'Yes, the CA (Aditi Bhardwaj) is right. Interest under section 234C is not applicable if net tax liability is less than Rs 10,000. But the ITR utility is wrongly calculating it, and shows less interest than what is actually to be paid. As per our working, the utility is doing incorrect calculations.'
Chartered Accountant (Dr.) Suresh Surana, says: The concern raised by the CA (Aditi Bhardwaj) regarding the automatic computation of interest under section 234C in the Income Tax Return (ITR) utilities is valid. "As per the second proviso to section 234C(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, interest under this section is not leviable if the net tax liability, after reducing TDS, TCS etc. is less than Rs 10,000. However, it has been observed that the current version of the online ITR utility computes interest under section 234C without considering the effect of such TDS/ TCS credits. As a result, interest is erroneously calculated and populated even in cases where the net tax liability falls below the prescribed threshold (Rs 10,000)."
"Although the field for section 234C interest remains editable in the utility, concerns persist as to whether manual overrides may lead to adverse outcomes during return processing, such as adjustments, CPC notices, or delays in refunds. However, it is pertinent to note that the said issue does not persist in offline Excel utility wherein the TDS and TCS credit are effectively provided." The relevant screenshots of the online Interface and offline Excel utility is provided as below: Excel Utility – ITR 2 (offline)
Suresh Surana ITR-2 excel utility Source: CA (Dr.) Suresh Surana Online Interface – ITR 2
ITR Online utility Source: CA (Dr.) Suresh Surana
What can happen if the tax department does not fix this issue? Surana explains that If the tax department does not fix this issue in the ITR utility, the following can happen: Excess payment of Section 234C interest: 'If this issue is not rectified by the tax department, it may lead to additional tax implications for taxpayers. Firstly, incorrect auto-computation of interest under section 234C, despite net tax liability being below Rs 10,000 may result in excess payment of interest, which is not legally warranted. This increases the effective tax outflow for the assessee without statutory basis.'
'If this issue is not rectified by the tax department, it may lead to additional tax implications for taxpayers. Firstly, incorrect auto-computation of interest under section 234C, despite net tax liability being below Rs 10,000 may result in excess payment of interest, which is not legally warranted. This increases the effective tax outflow for the assessee without statutory basis.' Tax notice: 'Secondly, if taxpayers opt to manually override the pre-filled interest field to reflect the correct amount, there is a risk of mismatches during return processing at CPC, potentially leading to system-generated intimations under section 143(1). These may propose adjustments on the grounds of discrepancy in self-assessment tax or interest computation, even though the taxpayer is in compliance with law.'
'Secondly, if taxpayers opt to manually override the pre-filled interest field to reflect the correct amount, there is a risk of mismatches during return processing at CPC, potentially leading to system-generated intimations under section 143(1). These may propose adjustments on the grounds of discrepancy in self-assessment tax or interest computation, even though the taxpayer is in compliance with law.' Delay in tax refund: 'Additionally, unresolved mismatches can cause delays in refund processing, particularly for salaried individuals or those with TDS or TCS driven refunds. In some cases, taxpayers may be compelled to respond to unnecessary notices or file rectification requests, increasing administrative burden.' Surana says: 'Therefore, timely intervention by the tax department is essential to ensure accurate computation, smooth processing, and reduction in avoidable disputes.'
Also read: Shinde wins Rs 1.4 lakh tax penalty case despite claiming false income tax deductions to reduce income by 50%; Know the details Soni agrees with Surana and adds that if this issue is not fixed immediately then the 'Centralised Processing Center (CPC) may later raise a demand for shortfall in interest under Section 234C, as per correct computation, even though the utility showed a lower amount.' What can taxpayers do? Soni explains that you need to file an recitification request or revised ITR if this issue is not fixed. Soni says: Mismatch with Department's Records: " If the ITR shows less interest than actually payable, it may result in processing mismatches, leading to refunds being withheld or delayed.
If the ITR shows less interest than actually payable, it may result in processing mismatches, leading to refunds being withheld or delayed. Penalties or Notices: In rare cases, the department might treat it as under-reporting of tax liability, especially if the shortfall is significant or repetitive.
In rare cases, the department might treat it as under-reporting of tax liability, especially if the shortfall is significant or repetitive. Revised Returns or Rectifications: Taxpayers may have to file rectifications (u/s 154) or revised returns, causing additional compliance burden." Who is liable to pay advance tax? According to the Income Tax Department website, 'Every person, whose estimated tax liability for the Financial Year is Rs 10,000 or more, shall pay his taxes in advance in the form of "advance tax". However, a resident senior citizen (i.e., an individual of the age of 60 years or above) not having any income from a business or profession is not liable to pay advance tax.' When is Section 234C interest levied? If a taxpayer's income tax liability is more than Rs 10,000 then that taxpayer needs to discharge the tax liability by following a specified advance tax schedule.The interest under Section 234C shall be levied if payment of advance tax in an instalment is less than the prescribed percentage (given in the above table). However, the interest shall be levied if: Advance tax paid on or before 15th June is less than 12% of the assessed tax.
Advance Tax paid on or before 15th September is less than 36% of the assessed tax.
Advance Tax paid on or before 15th December is less than 75% of the assessed tax.
Advance Tax paid on or before 15th March is less than 100% of the assessed tax. According to the Income Tax Website, the advance tax is payable by an taxpayer in 4 instalments on or before the prescribed due dates as specified in the below table: Due date for payment of advance tax Advance tax to be payable On or before June 15 of the previous year At least 15% of advance tax On or before September 15 of the previous year At least 45% of advance tax On or before December 15 of the previous year At least 75% of advance tax On or before March 15 of the previous year 100% of advance tax Note : Any tax paid, on or before 31st March, shall also be treated as advance tax paid during the financial year.
N.R. Narayana Murthy
Founder, Infosys Watch Now
Harsh Mariwala
Chairman & Founder, Marico Watch Now
Adar Poonawalla
CEO, Serum Institute of India Watch Now
Ronnie Screwvala
Chairperson & Co-founder, upGrad Watch Now
Puneet Dalmia
Managing Director, Dalmia Bharat group Watch Now
Martin Schwenk
Former President & CEO, Mercedes-Benz, Thailand Watch Now
Nadir Godrej
Managing Director, of Godrej Industries Watch Now
Manu Jain
Former- Global Vice President, Xiaomi Watch Now
Nithin Kamath
Founder, CEO, Zerodha Watch Now
Anil Agarwal
Executive Chairman, Vedanta Resources Watch Now
Dr. Prathap C. Reddy
Founder Chairman, Apollo Hospitals Watch Now
Vikram Kirloskar
Former Vice Chairman, Toyota Kirloskar Motor Watch Now
Kiran Mazumdar Shaw
Executive Chairperson, Biocon Limited Watch Now
Shashi Kiran Shetty
Chairman of Allcargo Logistics, ECU Worldwide and Gati Ltd Watch Now
Samir K Modi
Managing Director, Modi Enterprises Watch Now
R Gopalakrishnan
Former Director Tata Sons, Former Vice Chairman, HUL Watch Now
Sanjiv Mehta
Former Chairman / CEO, Hindustan Unilever Watch Now
Dr Ajai Chowdhry
Co-Founder, HCL, Chairman EPIC Foundation, Author, Just Aspire Watch Now
Shiv Khera
Author, Business Consultant, Motivational Speaker Watch Now
Nakul Anand
Executive Director, ITC Limited Watch Now
RS Sodhi
Former MD, Amul & President, Indian Dairy Association Watch Now
Anil Rai Gupta
Managing Director & Chairman, Havells Watch Now
Zia Mody
Co-Founder & Managing Partner, AZB & Partners Watch Now
Arundhati Bhattacharya
Chairperson & CEO, Salesforce India Watch Now
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Deccan Herald
4 minutes ago
- Deccan Herald
Bollywood actor Shilpa Shetty, husband Raj Kundra booked in fraud case
The couple, and an unknown person, have been accused of cheating Mumbai-based businessman Deepak Kothari of Rs 60.4 crore in a loan-cum-investment deal involving a now-closed company, Best Deal TV Private Limited.
The Wire
4 minutes ago
- The Wire
Indian Army's Close-Quarter Battle Carbine Procurement Saga Poised to End with KSSL and Adani Deals
Rahul Bedi The process has underscored a key reality – for the MoD and the Indian Army, quick reaction weapons arrive at a glacial pace, if at all. Representative image of an Indian Army soldier with a weapon. Photo: PTI. New Delhi: It has been one of the longest procurement sagas in the Indian Army's history – nearly a quarter-century of tenders floated. scrapped, 'fast-track' acquisition contracts announced and abandoned, and intermediate or 'stopgap' fixes standing in for real solutions. And, finally last month it appeared that the Indian Army's close-quarter battle (CQB) carbine requirement of 425,318 units, pending since the late 1990s is likely to be met, to replace its legacy 9mm 1A1/2A1 sub-machine guns (SMGs) – local versions of the L2A3 Sterling machine gun – developed in England in the mid-1940s, and entering British Army service in 1953. For decades, these two SMG variants were licence-built for decades by the erstwhile Small Arms Factory at Kanpur, part of the erstwhile state-run Ordnance Factory Board, but their manufacture had ceased altogether on grounds of obsolescence by the early 2000s. Thereafter, the Indian Army had largely been operating without a CQB carbine, which operationally was critical to providing troops, much like its description suggests, with a compact, lightweight weapon for rapid, accurate fire in confined or urban environments, mountainous terrain and jungle environments. Since then, every attempt to replace the carbine has marched through the Ministry of Defence's (MoD's) familiar parade – tenders announced, trials held, everything voided, before sinking into the familiar swamp of bureaucratic futility with no weapon system. But industry sources now say that this cycle of ineptness had seemingly ended with the recent shortlisting of Kalyani Strategic Systems Limited and Adani Aerospace & Defence to supply 425,213 5.56×45 mm carbines to the Army in a potential Rs 2,800-crore deal that is expected to be imminently signed. According to the putative arrangement, KSSL, which had emerged as L1, or the lowest bidder, following trials, would supply the Army 60% or 255,190 CQB carbines of the overall tender from either its small arms unit at Jejuri or at Khed, near Pune. Additionally, Adani Defence, which was L2 or the second lowest bidder, is likely to be awarded the deal to provide the remaining 170,023 carbines from its facility at Gwalior, which it had acquired in 2020 from Punj Lloyd Raksha. Industry sources said that, in all likelihood, Adani Defence would match KSSL's L1 bid for the carbines in keeping with MoD standing operating procedures in selling them to the Army. The CQB carbine delivery timelines are expected to stretch over the next few years, with initial batches likely to be employed by Indian Army counter-insurgency units in Kashmir and the Northeast, where the absence of such a compact weapon small arms system has been most acutely felt. For soldiers used to presently lugging full-length assault rifles into tight alleyways or boarding helicopters with unwieldy weapons, the arrival of lightweight, rapid-firing CQB carbines will be more than an operational boost; it will finally usher in a vast operational change in counter-insurgency (COIN) operations. Meanwhile, KSSL will series produce the Joint Venture Protective Carbine (JVPC) engineered by the Defence Research and Development Organisation's (DRDO) Armament Research & Development Establishment (ARDE) in Pune, as part of a public-private partnership (PPP), under the MoD's atmanirbharta or self-reliance rubric. This carbine will also incorporate over 60% of content sourced indigenously. Weighing around three kg, the gas-operated JVPC features an ergonomic, ambidextrous design with a retractable stock and Picatinny rails for optics and accessories. Capable of firing over 700 rounds per minute to an effective range of 200-300m, it reportedly exhibits low recoil and is believed to demonstrate high reliability across extreme temperatures and in varied environments and incorporates a 120mm bayonet for hand-to-hand combat. Its service life is engineered for a service life of 15 years or 15,000 rounds, whichever comes first. Adani Defence, on the other hand, will produce the Israel Weapon Industries (IWI) Galil ACE CQB carbines-locally named 'Jeet', meaning 'victory'. It features a 368 mm long barrel, a weight of 3.2 kg, and a rate of fire between 650-750 rounds per minute to a 300-500 m range. Jeet incorporates a rotating bolt with a short-stroke gas piston, a full-length Picatinny rail for optics, a folding/telescopic stock, ambidextrous controls for quick handling, and compatibility with standard NATO magazines. The ACE CQB has also been deployed for extended periods by the Israel Defence Forces in its numerous COIN operations and other conflicts against Palestinians and many of its neighbours where firefights often occur in confined spaces. The two carbines were shortlisted after technical evaluations and field trials involving other domestic vendors, partnering with overseas small arms makers. These included Jindal Defence and Aerospace – associating with Brazil's Taurus Armas, BSS Material in New Delhi, linking up with Indo-Russian Rifles Private Limited and Bharat Electronics, which had tied up with Italy's Beretta. Over the years, the CQB carbine procurement process has been compelling and concerning, exposing both the Army's and MoD's procurement systems at their most ineffective, bogged down by delays, indecision, and missed opportunities. After acknowledging the operational shortcomings of the aging 9mm Sterling submachine gun in the late 1990s – particularly its limited range, stopping power, and accuracy – the Indian Army adopted a stopgap solution. It employed a shortened variant of the locally developed 5.56x45mm Indian Small Arms System (INSAS) assault rifle as part of its customary jugaad, or innovative fix, which only ended up highlighting its significant limitations and rendering it relatively ineffective for such specialised roles. Senior infantry officers said the INSAS rifle was not optimised for CQB scenarios, as its relatively longer barrel and overall dimensions made manoeuvring in confined spaces cumbersome. The absence of features like a folding stock or compact design further hindered its suitability for rapid movement and handling in close and restrained urban situations. Soldiers found it challenging to quickly reposition and engage enemy targets, simply due to the rifle's size and weight. But despite these obvious limitations, these shortened INSAS alternates remained in widespread use for years and continue even today. However, in 2002-3, the first global tender was floated for 44,618 5.56x45mm CQB carbines, with under-barrel grenade launcher compatibility. Several trials took place, involving major overseas small arms makers like the US's Colt, Italy's Beretta and IWI. But in 2007-2008, after extended trials at the Infantry School at Mhow, in Madhya Pradesh, in the Rajasthan desert, Punjab's plains and high altitude regions in Sikkim and Himachal, the contract was terminated due to the Indian Army's 'overreach' in determining the carbines specifications or Qualitative Requirements (QRs) about their add-ons, like thermal-designated laser sights. A follow-on RfP was issued in December 2010 for an equal number of weapons. Then again, in 2013, after a protracted three-year trial process, the carbine procurement was once again thwarted, not by performance issues, but over a minor safety feature. One of the shortlisted carbines included a small, screw-like safety component designed to render the sights "eye safe" during low-intensity engagements, thereby preventing potential retina damage. Yet, this feature was not specified in the original tender's technical requirements, and a three-member, senior Army committee failed in resolving the 'discrepancy', leading again to the contract's cancellation, despite escalating insurgent activities in Kashmir and increasing Army casualties in COIN encounters. Industry sources noted that this time round, the tender was scrapped solely because the "safety screw" had not been included in the original specifications, irrespective of the protection it offered. Subsequently, in March 2018 the MoD issued yet one more RfP – its third in a decade, for 93,895 CQB carbines this time, in which the United Arab Emirates Caracal International's CAR 816 carbine was shortlisted, seven months later for procurement via the MoD's Fast Track Procedure (FTP), having bested its rival F60 model fielded by Thales of Australia in trials. Under the FTP route, through which the CAR 816s were to be procured, the $110 million tender was to have been completed within the mandated 12-14 months or by August 2019. But 13 months later, in September 2020, the MoD opted to arbitrarily ditch the deal for undeclared reasons. 'Processing the carbine purchase via the FTP indicated the operational urgency of the buy, but that too was bafflingly blocked,' said a senior army officer associated with the deal. The entire endeavour was simply incomprehensible and mystifying, he added, declining to be named, as he was not authorised to speak to the media. Conversely, in the ensuing years, the ARDE developed the JVPC in collaboration with KSSL, and Adani Defence partnered successfully with IWI to produce the 'Jeet', ostensibly clinching the CQB carbine buy as things presently stand. But it also underscored the reality that for the MoD and the Indian Army, quick reaction weapons arrive at a glacial pace, if at all. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments. Advertisement
New Indian Express
4 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
588 defunct excise licences to be auctioned
BENGALURU: The state government is shortly going to auction around 588 defunct excise licences to scale up revenue collection and mobilise resources, informed sources told TNIE. Of the 588 odd licences that will go under the hammer 'soon', 288 are 11-C (government-owned Mysore Sales International Limited retail outlet) licences followed by 204 CL-2 (retail liquor shops) and 96 CL-9 (bars & restaurants), said sources on condition of anonymity. 'These licences have not been renewed for whatever reason, and have been lying defunct. The reason behind the auction is to bring them back into the market and generate revenue for the government. The auction is likely to fetch between Rs 500 crore and Rs 600 crore,' said sources. The Excise department is presently working out the modalities; from prospective allocation of these licences to the 40 excise districts in Karnataka to suggesting reserve or base price (minimum price of the bids) etc. The draft will soon be shared with the government to finetune it; address legal hurdles and set the base price of the bids. 'The base price may be pegged at 10 to 15 times higher than the Excise licence fee. No decision has been taken so far on this. The government will take the final decision. Majority of licences, especially CL-9, are likely to be allocated to Bengaluru,' added the sources. 'Out of the 288 MSIL licences under consideration for auction, 64 have not been renewed, rest were not utilised and are being considered to be brought back to the main pool,' said sources. Meanwhile, the liquor industry has responded to the proposed auction with caution. 'Our concern is that multinational companies may end up having an upper hand in these auctions with higher bids. They have the money power to incentivise sales of their brands, which no Indian company or brand will be able to match.
