logo
Some banks say Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' will be a boon for the U.S. economy

Some banks say Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' will be a boon for the U.S. economy

CNBC01-07-2025
U.S. President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful bill" — or officially, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) — is a controversial piece of legislation, but some banks are in favor of it, saying it's the shot in the arm the economy needs.
It was advanced in a narrow 51-49 vote in the U.S. Senate late Saturday, moving the large spending measure closer to the president's desk.
The bill, which is characterized by sweeping tax reforms and targeted incentives and is forecast to add to the federal deficit, has triggered warnings from credit agencies and drawn criticism.
But some banks say they think the bill could boost the U.S. economy.
In a letter published Sunday, the American Bankers Association it "strongly supports" many provisions within the bill for the "much needed tax relief" they offer.
"I think the OBBB would almost unquestionably be good for the US economy over the next couple of years compared to passing nothing," said David Seif, Nomura's chief economist for developed markets, given that taxes will rise substantially next year following the expiry of many provisions under Trump's 2017 tax bill.
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, passed in 2017, includes lower income tax rates, greater child tax credits and generous deductions for businesses. Without Congressional action, many provisions under the act are set to expire by the end of 2025 — a shift analysts said could shrink household consumption and corporate investment. The short-term appeal of the "Big Beautiful Bill"' lies in its ability to avert a sharp fiscal contraction in 2026, they said.
"The most important thing OBBB does for the next few years is renew most of those expiring tax provisions, preventing a major and sudden fiscal contraction from occurring," Seif told CNBC. "Provisions of OBBB allowing for faster business expensing of capital investments may raise investment over the next couple of years, though likely at the expense of investment in later years," he added.
Citi strategists, likewise, said in a note published last Wednesday the passing of the bill will be an economic tailwind. "In the near term, trade deals (UK, China, eventually Japan, India, Europe, etc) and the passing of the (net stimulatory) Big Beautiful Bill in July should improve growth sentiment," they wrote.
Citi also expects that the Federal Reserve will loosen its monetary policy, bolstering growth sentiment, and said "we do not see a bond vigilante moment during 2025/2026 as the BBB delta is largely funded by tariff revenues."
Others, however, flagged serious drawbacks.
The debt load is a central concern for many critics. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office projects the BBB will add at least $3 trillion to the federal deficit over the next decade.
Although Morgan Stanley noted in early June that the bill's pro-growth tax provisions may benefit businesses and individuals, as well key equity sectors such as communication services, industrials and energy, it said it could raise concerns about fiscal sustainability.
Similarly, Erica York, vice president of federal tax policy at Tax Foundation's Center for Federal Tax Policy, said, "It is fiscally irresponsible, significantly increasing budget deficits and debt even when accounting for growth."
York said many of the tax cuts are complicated and poorly designed, giving tax cuts to certain types of workers and leaving others out.
On top of that, because of the bill, which includes many narrowly tailored tax rules, the Internal Revenue Service will need to spend more time and resources updating forms, guidance and enforcement tools, adding to the administrative burden of an already stretched agency, York said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

3 Republican-led states are deploying National Guard troops to DC: What to know
3 Republican-led states are deploying National Guard troops to DC: What to know

USA Today

time19 minutes ago

  • USA Today

3 Republican-led states are deploying National Guard troops to DC: What to know

The Republican governors of three states are deploying hundreds of National Guard troops to Washington at the request of the administration of President Donald Trump, who has portrayed the city as awash in crime. The announcements on Aug. 16 of troops from hundreds of miles away in West Virginia, South Carolina and Ohio came a day after DC officials and the Trump administration negotiated a deal to keep Mayor Muriel Bowser's appointed police chief, Pamela Smith, in charge of the police department after DC Attorney General Brian Schwalb filed a lawsuit to block the federal takeover of the department. Trump, a Republican, said this week he was deploying hundreds of DC National Guard troops to Washington and temporarily taking over the Democratic-led city's police department to curb what he depicted as a crime and homelessness emergency. Justice Department data, however, showed violent crime in 2024 hit a 30-year low in Washington, a self-governing federal district under the jurisdiction of Congress. West Virginia Governor Patrick Morrisey's office said in a statement he was deploying 300 to 400 National Guard troops to D.C. in "a show of commitment to public safety and regional cooperation." The statement said he also was providing equipment and specialized training. South Carolina Governor Henry McMaster responded to a Pentagon request by announcing that 200 of his state's National Guard troops would be sent. Ohio Governor Mike DeWine said he would send 150 military police members in the coming days, adding none of them were "currently serving as law enforcement officers in the state." After the announcements, Mayor Bowser posted on X: "American soldiers and airmen policing American citizens on American soil is #UnAmerican." Troops to other cities? The National Guard serves as a militia that answers to the governors of the 50 states except when called into federal service. The DC National Guard reports directly to the president. Trump, who has suggested he could take similar actions in other Democratic-controlled cities, has sought to expand the powers of the presidency in his second term, inserting himself into the affairs of major banks, law firms and elite universities. In June, Trump ordered 700 Marines and 4,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles, against the wishes of California's Democratic governor, during protests over mass immigration raids by federal officials. South Carolina's McMaster said his troops would immediately return to South Carolina if needed to respond to a possible hurricane or other natural disaster. Hurricane Erin, now northeast of Puerto Rico, has become a catastrophic Category 5 storm that could bring ocean swells to the U.S. East Coast early next week, the U.S. National Hurricane Center said. National Guard troops often respond to natural disasters and rarely police US civilians. Drew Galang, a spokesperson for West Virginia's Morrisey, said the state's National Guard received the order to send equipment and personnel to D.C. late on Friday and was working to organize the deployment. The White House said on Aug. 16 that DC National Guard members have conducted patrols on foot and in vehicles around the National Mall and Union Station. The White House said the National Guard troops are not making arrests now and that they may be armed. It is not clear how the administration could deploy National Guard troops elsewhere. A federal judge in San Francisco is expected in the coming weeks to issue a ruling on whether Trump violated the law with the Los Angeles deployments. (Reporting by AJ Vicens in Detroit, Richard Cowan in Washington and Bhargav Acharya in Toronto; Editing by Donna Bryson, Matthew Lewis, Paul Simao and William Mallard)

Zelenskiy braces for perilous Trump talks in Washington on Monday
Zelenskiy braces for perilous Trump talks in Washington on Monday

Yahoo

time38 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Zelenskiy braces for perilous Trump talks in Washington on Monday

By Tom Balmforth, Yuliia Dysa and Pavel Polityuk LONDON/KYIV (Reuters) -Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelenskiy flies to Washington on Monday under heavy U.S. pressure to agree a swift end to Russia's war in Ukraine but determined to defend Kyiv's interests - without sparking a second Oval Office bust-up with Donald Trump. The U.S. president invited Zelenskiy to Washington after rolling out the red carpet for Vladimir Putin, Kyiv's arch foe, at a summit in Alaska that shocked many in Ukraine, where hundreds of thousands have died since Russia's 2022 invasion. The Alaska talks failed to produce the ceasefire that Trump sought, and the U.S. leader said on Saturday that he now wanted a rapid, full-fledged peace deal and that Kyiv should accept because "Russia is a very big power, and they're not". The blunt rhetoric throws the onus squarely back on Zelenskiy, putting him in a perilous position as he returns to Washington for the first time since his talks with Trump in the Oval Office in February descended into acrimony. The U.S. president upbraided him in front of world media at the time, saying Zelenskiy did not "hold the cards" in negotiations and that what he described as Kyiv's intransigence risked triggering World War Three. Trump's pursuit of a quick deal defies intense diplomacy by the European allies and Ukraine to convince him that a ceasefire should come first and not - as sought by the Kremlin - once a settlement is agreed. A source familiar with the matter told Reuters that European leaders had also been invited to Monday's meeting between Trump and Zelenskiy, though it was unclear who would actually attend. Trump briefed Zelenskiy on his talks with Putin during a call on Saturday that lasted more than an hour and a half, the Ukrainian leader said. They were joined after an hour by European and NATO officials, he added. "The impression is he wants a fast deal at any price," a source familiar with the conversation said. The source said Trump told Zelenskiy that Putin had offered to freeze the front lines elsewhere as part of a deal, if Ukraine fully withdrew its troops from the eastern Donetsk and Luhansk regions, something Zelenskiy said was not possible. Trump and U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff told the Ukrainian leader that Putin had said there could be no ceasefire before that happened, and that the Russian leader could pledge not to launch any new aggression against Ukraine as part of an agreement. Kyiv has publicly dismissed the idea of withdrawing from internationally recognised Ukrainian land as part of a deal, and says the industrial Donetsk region serves as a fortress holding back Russian advances deeper into Ukraine. Oleksandr Merezhko, head of the Ukrainian parliament's foreign affairs committee, told Reuters by phone that Trump's emphasis on a deal rather than a ceasefire carried great risks for Ukraine. "In Putin's view, a peace agreement means several dangerous things – Ukraine not joining NATO, his absurd demands for denazification and demilitarisation, the Russian language and the Russian church," he said. Any such deal could be politically explosive inside Ukraine, Merezhko said, adding he was worried that Putin's ostracism in the West had ended. SECURITY GUARANTEES Avoiding a repeat of the Oval Office row is critical for Zelenskiy to preserve relations with the U.S., which still provides military assistance and is the key source of intelligence on Russia's military activity. For Ukraine, robust guarantees to prevent any future Russian invasion are fundamental to any serious settlement. Two sources familiar with the matter said Trump and the European leaders discussed potential security guarantees for Ukraine similar to the transatlantic NATO alliance's mutual support pledge during their call. It says, in effect, that an attack on one is treated as an attack on all. One of the two sources, who requested anonymity to discuss sensitive matters, said European leaders were seeking details on what kind of U.S. role was envisaged. Zelenskiy has repeatedly said a trilateral meeting with the Russian and U.S. leaders is crucial to finding a way to end the full-scale war launched by Russia in February 2022. Trump this week voiced the idea of such a meeting, saying it could happen if his talks in Alaska with Putin were successful. "Ukraine emphasizes that key issues can be discussed at the level of leaders, and a trilateral format is suitable for this," Zelenskiy wrote on social media on Saturday. Putin's aide Yuri Ushakov told the Russian state news agency TASS a three-way summit had not been discussed in Alaska. Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store