Manipur: 10 NDA MLAs meet governor, seek ‘popular government' in state
A delegation of 10 Manipur MLAs , including seven from the Bharatiya Janata Party, met Governor Ajay Bhalla on Wednesday, to urge the formation of a 'popular government' in the state, The Indian Express reported.
The 10 MLAs are the BJP's Yumnam Radheshyam Singh, Thockchom Radheshyam Singh, Lourembam Rameshwar Meitei, Thangjam Arunkumar, Kh Raghumani Singh, Kongkham Robindro Singh and Paonam Brojen Singh, the National People's Party's Sheikh Noorul Hassan and Janghemliung Panmei and Independent MLA Sapam Nishikanta.
Thockchom Radheshyam Singh has claimed that 44 MLAs support the formation of the government, The Indian Express reported. 'Given the way things have gone and the pressure from the public, we expressed to the governor that it's the right time to install a popular government,' he told the newspaper.
Manipur has been mired in ethnic conflict between the Meitei and the Kuki-Zomi-Hmar communities that broke out in May 2023. The violence has since left at least 260 dead and displaced more than 59,000. There were periodic upticks in violence in 2024.
President's Rule was imposed on February 13 after Chief Minister N Biren Singh resigned earlier that day. Bhalla has been administering Manipur since then.
After meeting with the governor on Wednesday, Thockchom Radheshyam Singh said that the President's Rule was an emergency move and should be the last option. 'If the new popular government fails, you can reimpose President's Rule again in full throttle,' he said, according to The Indian Express .
The BJP MLA claimed that the group has the support of all the legislators in the Assembly except for the 10 from the Kuki-Zo community and five from the Congress.
Seven out of the 10 Kuki-Zo MLAs won their Assembly seats on BJP tickets. Two belong to the Kuki Peoples' Alliance and one is an Independent.
The Manipur Assembly has 60 seats, of which one fell vacant after the death of an MLA.
Independent MLA Sapam Nishikanta Singh said that the delegation submitted a signed document to Bhalla affirming their support for a 'popular government', India Today NE reported. He said that the document had the signatures of 22 MLAs from the BJP-led National Democratic Alliance.
'We expect the formation of the popular government to happen soon,' the Independent MLA said. 'We are appealing to the Governor that we want a popular government. All NDA MLAs in Manipur are very keen to have a popular government installed. We also want the support of the public.'
On April 29, a group of 21 NDA MLAs had written to Union Home Minister Amit Shah urging him to restore a 'popular government' in the state. They had contended that this was the only way to bring back peace and normalcy in Manipur.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scroll.in
14 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
US rejects India's challenge to aluminium, steel tariffs at WTO
The United States has rejected India's notice to the World Trade Organization proposing retaliatory tariffs after Washington increased the import duties on aluminium and steel to 25%, The Indian Express reported on Tuesday. The US argued that it had imposed the tariffs on the grounds of national security and claimed there were procedural errors in India's case. In a note sent to the World Trade Organization on May 23, the US stated that India had wrongly treated the tariffs on aluminium and steel as safeguard measures, the newspaper reported. Washington said that it had imposed the levies under section 232 of the US law, which allows such measures if imports are considered a threat to national security. In response to the challenge made by India, the US told the World Trade Organization that it 'will not discuss the section 232 tariffs under the Agreement on Safeguards as we do not view the tariffs as a safeguard measure', reported The Indian Express. The US also claimed that India had committed procedural errors by not acknowledging Washington's offer to discuss the tariffs in a communication dated April 16. 'Accordingly, India has not complied with the obligations under the Agreement on Safeguards, the agreement that it mistakenly contends applies to the tariffs in question,' the newspaper quoted the US as having said. On May 9, India notified the World Trade Organization that it may impose retaliatory tariffs on the US after Washington increased the import duties on aluminium and steel to 25%. The Donald Trump administration had first imposed higher tariffs on aluminium and steel imports in 2018. This was modified in February to impose duties of 25% on imports of the two metals. The measures took effect in March. Washington also removed country-specific and product-specific exemptions that several countries had managed to negotiate. On Friday, US President Donald Trump announced that his administration will double the tariffs on steel to 50%. While Washington has claimed that the increased tariffs had been taken in the interest of national security and were not safeguard measures, New Delhi argued that the actions were safeguard measures. 'The measures have not been notified by the United States to the WTO, but are, in essence, safeguard measures,' The Hindu had quoted India as having communicated to the international organisation in May. 'India maintains that the measures taken by the United States are not consistent with the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 and the Agreement on Safeguards.' India argued that it had the right to impose retaliatory tariffs as the US had not held consultations, as are mandatory under the Agreement on Safeguards. India's levies were to take effect a month from the date it notified the World Trade Organization. New Delhi said that the measures it was proposing would be in the form of suspending concessions on select products from the US. This effectively meant an increase in tariffs on the products. The Indian reciprocal tariffs could be imposed on imports worth $7.6 billion from the United States, which would lead to a duty collection of $1.9 billion, The Hindu had quoted the communication as saying.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
16 minutes ago
- First Post
How Ukraine's drone strikes shake Putin's war plans
Ukraine's audacious drone strike targeting Russian airbases, in an operation dubbed Spider Web, has far-reaching implications for the ongoing war. Experts note that even if Kyiv's claims of destroying 41 aircraft aren't completely true, the attack will have a psychological impact on the troops, favouring the Volodymyr Zelenskyy-led nation read more A burning truck that apparently was used to launch Ukrainian drones deep into the heart of Russia as part of Operation Spider Web. AP The day of June 1 will be remembered in history; it will be the day that the rules of modern war were rewritten, courtesy of Ukraine. On Sunday, after meticulous planning of 18 months, Kyiv launched Operation Spider Web — a series of coordinated drone strikes, hitting airfields from eastern Siberia to Russia's western border, damaging dozens of planes with Ukraine estimating the cost of damage being $7 billion. The daring and audacious attack , which Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskky said 'had an absolutely brilliant outcome' dubbed 'Russia's Pearl Harbor' demonstrates Ukraine's capability to hit high-value targets anywhere in Russia, dealing a humiliating blow to the Kremlin and inflicting significant losses to Moscow's war machine. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The question now everyone is asking — how will this affect the ongoing war? How damaging was Ukraine's Operation Spider Web On Sunday, Ukraine, a day before it was to sit down for talks with Russia in Turkey, launched a whopping 117 drones, which had been smuggled into Russia, stored in special compartments aboard freight trucks, driven to at least four separate locations, thousands of miles apart, and launched remotely towards nearby airbases. These drones attacked airfields in five regions stretching across five time zones. According to Ukraine, 41 Russian aircraft were hit at four air bases stretching from the Finnish border to Siberia. One targeted base, in the Irkutsk region, lies more than 2,600 miles from the front lines, making it the farthest target Ukraine has hit during the conflict. The Zelenskyy-led nation has claimed that the coordinated drone strikes took down 41 aircraft used to 'bomb Ukrainian cities', citing the Tu-95 and Tu-22 strategic bombers and the A-50 radar detection and command aircraft. Ukrainian security services said they destroyed 34 per cent of Russian strategic bombers carrying cruise missiles, claiming to have inflicted damages amounting to $7 billion. A Ukrainian drone striking Russian planes deep in Russia's territory. AP As one Ukrainian military blogger Oleksandr Kovalenko noted on his Telegram channel that the 'extent of the damage is such that the Russian military-industrial complex, in its current state, is unlikely to be able to restore them in the near future'. He further added that the loss of the Tu-95, Tu-22, and Tu-160 planes will be keenly felt by Moscow. While Ukraine has claimed significant damage, the true extent of the operation will only be revealed in the months to come. Opposing claims have already emerged with some Russian military bloggers pegging the damage to be far lesser than what the opposite side claims. For instance, influential Russian military blogger, Rybar, put the number of damaged Russian aircraft at 13, including up to 12 strategic bombers. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD However, even if Kyiv says is partially true, then the economics of the war have shifted. Ukraine's drone strikes hurt Russia's pride While Russia and Ukraine may dispute over the extent of the damage, one can't argue that the strikes have hit Moscow psychologically. Many war experts note that the strikes are a significant operational and psychological victory for Ukraine. As Lieutenant General Ihor Romanenko, former deputy head of the Ukrainian military's general staff, told Al Jazeera, 'This is a slap on the face for Russia, for FSB, for Putin.' Even Sven Biscop, a director at the Egmont Institute, a think tank in Brussels, notes that the drone strikes serves as a humiliation to Putin. 'At a time when Putin seems to think that he is winning on the battlefield, this demonstrates that his forces are in fact very vulnerable,' he told NBC News. 'This may not change the course of the war, but it does mean that every gain Russia makes will be at high cost.' A satellite image shows damage to aircraft at an airfield in Irkutsk, following Ukrainian drones attack targeting Russian military airfields, in the course of Russia-Ukraine conflict, in Stepnoy, Irkutsk region, Russia. Reuters Others also pointed out that the attack by Ukraine clearly demonstrates just how vulnerable Russia is. The country's economy is largely dependent on a vast network of oil and gas wells pipelines, pumping stations, refineries, storage depots and shipping terminals. And now, Kyiv has shown that they have the weaponry and the know-how on how to destroy all of it. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Impact of strikes on negotiations Ukraine is hoping as Zelenskyy mentioned that the drone strikes will expose Russia's vulnerability and 'that is what will push it toward diplomacy.' Many note that the attack puts Kyiv in a position of power at the negotiating table. In fact, Volodymyr Fesenko, head of the Penta think tank, told Al Jazeera, 'Emotionally, psychologically and politically, the operation strengthens the positions of Ukrainian negotiators.' Fesenko added that Operation Spider Web strongly gives out one message — Ukraine won't give up, won't capitulate. The strikes are also a clear message to the West, especially the US — Kyiv doesn't trust the US. This was clearly evident when Washington said on Monday that the White House wasn't given any heads-up on the attack. Servicemen from the mobile air defence unit of the 115th Separate Mechanised Brigade of the Ukrainian Armed Forces check a combat application for presence of Russian drones in Kharkiv. Reuters George Beebe, a former director of Russia analysis at the CIA, made an interesting observation in an interview with Foreign Policy. He noted that Ukraine was pushing the US to a situation where they are forced to get tougher with Russians. He said, 'In fact, after this operation, Zelenskyy made a public statement saying that it is urgently important that the US toughen sanctions on Russia—that's the only way that Russia will 'come to the negotiating table. So, I think the [Ukrainians'] target audience for this operation was here in Washington, not in Russia.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD But some analysts believe that though the strikes were significant, they would hardly change Putin's calculation of the war. There is no indication as of now that the attack has changed the Kremlin's belief that it holds an advantage over Ukraine. It's now a waiting game to see what happens next but most agree that one could expect a great deal of sound and fury from Moscow. In fact, many pro-Russia commentators have already called for Putin to launch nuclear attacks on Ukraine. As one Russian military blogger, Roman Alekhin, said on Telegram, 'We hope that the response will be the same as the US response to the attack on Pearl Harbor, or even tougher.' With inputs from agencies
India Gazette
21 minutes ago
- India Gazette
"Brazil condemned Pakistan's cross-border terrorism, supported Operation Sindoor": Tejasvi Surya
Brasilia [Brazil], June 3 (ANI): BJP MP Tejasvi Surya, who is a member of all-party delegation led by Congress MP Shashi Tharoor, said that Brazilian leaders during the meeting with the all-party parliamentary delegation, expressed clear support for India's counter-terrorism effort Operation Sindoor and condemned Pakistan's cross-border terrorism. Speaking to ANI, Surya said that the delegation met the Brazilian Parliament President, the Acting Foreign Minister and the India-Brazil Friendship Group Members of Parliament. He said that Brazilian leaders assured the delegation that Brazil is India's all-weather 'ally and friend' and termed it a successful visit to Brazil. He said, 'Today, we met Brazil's Acting Foreign Minister, Brazil Parliament President, meaning speaker equivalent, India-Brazil Friendship Group MPs. In all three meetings, Brazil has clearly expressed support for India. It has condemned Pakistan's cross-border terrorism and supported India's counter-terrorism Operation Sindoor. This is very big for India. Brazil is an essential voice in Latin America and this entire geography. ' 'It is also a strategic partner of India in many groups, be it the G-20, G-4, BRICS, or India-led other global platforms like the International Solar Alliance, Global Alliance for all three meetings, Brazil's top authority has supported India's stance against terrorism, has supported India's counter-terrorism measures. At the conclusion of every meeting, we were given assurance that Brazil is an all-weather ally and all-weather friend of has been a very successful visit to Brazil. We received immense support for India from Guyana, Panama, and Colombia. This is something, the biggest takeaway for this delegation,' he added. The delegation, led by Shashi Tharoor, includes Members of Parliament from across the political spectrum, reflecting India's vibrant and inclusive democratic character. The delegation comprises Sarfaraz Ahmad, Ganti Harish Madhur, Shashank Mani Tripathi, Bhubaneswar Kalita, Tejasvi Surya, and former Ambassador Taranjit Singh Sandhu. BJP MP Shashank Mani says, 'We are here as a reflection of India-Brazil friendship. We told them that Operation Sindoor is important for India and the world. The people are receiving our message well... We believe that the way our multi-party delegation has come here, Brazil's similar delegation will visit India soon.' Speaking about the meeting with Brazilian leadership, former Ambassador of India to the US and BJP leader Taranjit Singh Sandhu said, 'I think on the South American perspective, we have seen a lot of positivity, starting from Guyana, Panama. Brazil, we have had a traditional relationship with them and this morning we met the chief advisor of the president, who is a former defense minister as well as foreign minister and he underlined against any form of terrorism. And he also emphasized about Prime Minister Modi and Then we also met the president of the Senate and we also had a meeting with the president of the House Foreign Affairs Committee.' 'Both responded very positively on India-Brazil relationship, particularly on terrorism. They were very clear and there is an understanding across South America that terrorism as a policy instrument is a very dangerous aspect and therefore, it needs to be opposed and India is in a way doing, fulfilling the responsibility of the world. And I think after this, the next stop we have is Washington, DC, which will have its own challenges. The South American interaction has gone very well. This delegation had a very clear, out-focused message and led by Foreign Relations Committee Chair Mr. Shashi Tharoor,' he added. BJP MP Bhubaneswar Kalita said that the delegation had a fruitful meeting with the Brazilian leadership. He said that they will hold a meeting with Brazil's Vice President and expressed hope that the meeting would be fruitful. said, 'Parliamentary delegation, which is consisted of opposition as well as ruling party and particularly our delegation is led by an opposition leader, Shashi Tharoor. And we had today very useful and fruitful meetings with the leadership of the Brazilian government. We are also, we have already met the Secretary General of Foreign Affairs, who is looking after, who is the head of the Foreign Affairs Department of the Government of Brazil and we had a very fruitful discussion with the parliamentarians and the president of the Senate. So, we had very good discussion and we could convey our message to them and which they fully accepted and they have shown their solidarity with us. 'And after this, of course, we are going to meet the Vice President and hopefully that meeting will also be very fruitful. And overall, our discussion and interaction with the leadership, the parliamentary leadership as well as the government leadership in these two days have been very fruitful and we could convey the sentiments of India and particularly the war against terror, the Pahalgam incident, which is an act of terror by Pakistan. The government of Brazil and the leadership of Brazil have some solidarity for against terror and on unequivocal terms and they have some solidarity with India,' she added. The delegation also held a meeting with India-Brazil Friendship Front President Nelsinho Trad. Shashi Tharoor said that he appreciates Trad's insightful understanding and strong endorsement of India's perspective on recent events. According to Tharoor, Trad said that they have an ally in him and his colleagues in Parliament in Brazil. 'Excellent & highly productive meeting with Senator Nelsinho Trad, President of the India-Brazil Friendship Front & President of the Senate Foreign Affairs Committee. Deeply appreciate his insightful understanding & strong endorsement of India's perspective on recent events. Such solidarity strengthens the bonds between our democracies,' Tharoor posted on X. The delegation also met the Chief Advisor to Brazil's President, Celso Amorim. Sharing details regarding the meeting, Tharoor on X wrote, 'Our day in Brasilia begins with a visit to the Presidential Palace, where we meet with my old friend the Diplomatic Advisor to the President, Ambassador Celso Amorim (Brazil's longest-serving Foreign Minister twice & Defence Minister once). A full &rewarding discussion followed.' The visit to Brazil is part of India's larger global outreach following the Pahalgam terror attack, aimed at conveying India's zero-tolerance policy on terrorism. The delegation had earlier visited Panama, Guyana, and Colombia and will now travel to the United States to continue their diplomatic outreach. (ANI)
