'National security threat': Donald Trump plans 100% tariff on foreign films
Bloomberg
President Donald Trump announced Sunday that he plans to impose a 100% tariff on films produced overseas, extending his restrictive trade policies on US imports to the entertainment sector for the first time.
In a post on Truth Social, the American leader said he was directing the Commerce Department and his trade representative to 'immediately begin the process of instituting' the levy on foreign movies. 'WE WANT MOVIES MADE IN AMERICA, AGAIN!' Trump continued.
Trump's post followed meetings the president had over the weekend with actor Jon Voight and his manager, Steven Paul. They met with Trump at his Mar-a-Lago Club, according to people familiar with their visit who asked to not be identified because the meetings were private.
Voight and Paul presented the president with their plans for more federal tax incentives for US film and TV production. Their proposals include expanding existing tax credits and bringing back ones that have expired. The Voight group didn't propose tariffs as part of their plan, but the president talked about those levies at their meetings. No specifics on the tariffs were discussed.
In January, Trump appointed Voight along with actors Mel Gibson and Sylvester Stallone to be special ambassadors to Hollywood with the goal of boosting US jobs.
It's not clear how such a tariff would work, nor how such movies would be valued for tariff collection purposes. Many films from Hollywood studios involve global production, including shooting locations in foreign countries and post-production work that can be done anywhere in the world. Other unanswered questions include whether the fee applies to films already shot, but not yet released, or only new productions.
Upcoming releases that include extensive foreign locales include Walt Disney Co.'s The Fantastic Four: First Steps, which was shot in the UK and Spain, and Universal Pictures' Jurassic World Rebirth, with locations in Thailand, the UK, Malta and the US.
The action follows a move by China last month to 'moderately reduce' the number of Hollywood films allowed in the country in retaliation for Trump's aggressive tariffs on the US rival. The China Film Administration said in April that the restrictions would 'inevitably further reduce the domestic audience's favorability toward American films.'
While the US film industry is the most influential in the world, foreign films have seen a rise in popularity in recent years, drawing award-winning acclaim. The South-Korean thriller Parasite, for instance, won four Academy Awards, including the coveted Best Picture category in 2020.
The film and TV industry supported some 2.3 million jobs in the US in 2023, according to the Motion Picture Association trade group. The association didn't respond to a request for comment on Trump's tariffs made outside of regular working hours.
Film and TV work in the US has contracted in recent years for a number of reasons. Media companies have cut back on spending in an attempt to boost their profits as they shifted from traditional TV to streaming services. Those streaming services are expanding globally and looking to produce more films for foreign markets.
Spending on film and TV production in the US fell 28% between 2021 and 2024, according to data from the research firm ProdPro. Other countries, such as Canada, Australia, and the UK, are seeing an increase in film and TV production, due in part to attractive tax incentives and lower production costs.
Movie and TV filming in the greater Los Angeles area declined 22% in the first quarter, reflecting California's continued loss of business to other areas.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
25 minutes ago
- Time of India
How Bong Joon Ho's $11 million ‘Parasite' beat Nolan, Fincher, and the rest to become the 21st century's greatest film?
How the List Was Compiled Why Parasite Resonates So Deeply — CinemaTweets1 (@CinemaTweets1) Surprising Snubs and Curious Trends — grecobes (@grecobes) — screentime (@screentime) In an era dominated by Hollywood blockbusters, reboots, and billion-dollar superhero universes, few expected a dark Korean comedy to outshine them all. But that's precisely what Parasite has done. Bong Joon Ho 's Palme d'Or–winning film has clinched the top spot in The New York Times ' list of the 100 greatest films of the 21st century — beating works by Christopher Nolan, the Coen Brothers, and David more, Parasite didn't just impress the critics. It also topped the readers' poll, reaffirming its wide cultural impact. Made on a modest $11 million budget and released globally after rave reviews at Cannes, the film went on to win four Academy Awards — including Best Picture — making history as the first non-English-language film to do mark the first quarter-century of this millennium, The New York Times, in collaboration with The Upshot, reached out to over 500 celebrated figures from the film industry — including directors, actors, and producers — asking each to name ten films released after January 1, 2000, that they considered truly responses were aggregated into a ranked list of 100 films. The final top 10, revealed in late June, has already stirred passionate debate. Participating names included Oscar winners like Bong himself, Pedro Almodóvar, Sofia Coppola, and Guillermo del Toro, as well as actors like Julianne Moore and John its core, Parasite is a razor-sharp commentary on class divisions, disguised as a home-invasion thriller with a comedic twist. The New York Times praised Bong's ability to shift between tones — from darkly funny to horrifyingly tragic — without ever losing narrative control. That genre fluidity, paired with social commentary and unforgettable visuals, has made the film an enduring cultural began as a local story about economic inequality in South Korea quickly became a global parable. Audiences everywhere related to its portrayal of social ladders, survival tactics, and the illusion of behind Parasite was David Lynch's mind-bending Mulholland Drive, followed by Paul Thomas Anderson's There Will Be Blood. Rounding out the top five were In the Mood for Love and Moonlight. Hollywood hits like Get Out, Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, and The Social Network also cracked the top perhaps the biggest surprise came from Interstellar, which was loved by readers — earning a top-five spot in the public poll — but ranked only 89th in the critics' major trends emerged from the list that reflect the evolving cinematic their box office domination, franchise films — Marvel, DC, Star Wars — barely made a dent in the top 100. Hollywood's reliance on sequels, reboots, and IP-driven storytelling may have mass appeal, but it hasn't earned much critical reverence. Although streaming services have redefined how we watch films, their impact on this list was minimal. Only one Netflix original, Alfonso Cuarón's Roma, made the cut — and at number 46. Theatrical cinema still commands more respect in artistic circles, at least for Nolan, with five entries including Inception, Memento, and Oppenheimer , leads the list in terms of volume. Paul Thomas Anderson follows closely with multiple titles, including Phantom Thread and Punch-Drunk Love. Other familiar auteurs like David Fincher and Alfonso Cuarón also received multiple nods, proving that strong directorial vision remains a prized hallmark of 11 of the 100 films were directed by women, highlighting the continuing gender disparity in cinema. Notable entries include Lady Bird by Greta Gerwig and Lost in Translation by Sofia Coppola — yet none of these films made it into the top the most encouraging trend is the prominence of non-English films. The global dominance of Parasite is no anomaly. The list also features French dramas like Anatomy of a Fall and Portrait of a Lady on Fire, Norwegian coming-of-age gem The Worst Person in the World, Spanish-language standout Roma, and German thriller The Zone of Interest. Even hybrid productions like Everything Everywhere All At Once, which blends English, Cantonese, and Mandarin, reflect the modern viewer's growing openness to stories beyond linguistic boundaries.


India.com
42 minutes ago
- India.com
Who is Larry Fink? 'Richer' than Mukesh Ambani, Adani, Bezos, Musk, Bill Gates, Zuckerberg, can buy half of US, his net worth is Rs..., he is...
Who is Larry Fink? 'Richer' than Mukesh Ambani, Adani, Bezos, Musk, Bill Gates, Zuckerberg, can buy half of US, his net worth is Rs…, he is... Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, and Bill Gates are some of the names that dominate the list of billionaires in the world. But did you know there is an American who is richer than these businessmen, including the world's richest, Musk? Larry Fink is the CEO of BlackRock, the largest asset management company in the world. The company is responsible for overseeing assets worth USD 7.4 trillion. BlackRock's market capitalisation surged to Rs 12.808 trillion as of December 2024. It is the 102nd most valuable company on the globe by market cap. Let's know more about Larry Fink.


Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Elon Musk's ‘America Party' idea gets 40% backing in new poll
Around 40% of Americans say they might support a new political party created by Elon Musk, according to a new poll. The survey by Quantus Insights found 14% would be "very likely" and 26% "somewhat likely" to back Musk's proposed 'America Party'. Musk announced this idea during a fight with former ally Donald Trump over a huge government spending bill. He called Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill" – which adds $3.3 trillion to the U.S. debt – 'insane'. Musk argues America needs an alternative to the two major parties, which he claims actually work together as a "uniparty" against regular people's interests. The poll shows clear splits in who likes Musk's idea. Republican men are most interested – 57% said they'd likely support the America Party. Independent men followed at 47%. But Democrats largely dislike the plan, with just 7% of Democratic men saying they'd strongly back it. The survey of 1,000 voters also found deep unhappiness with both main parties: 59% of independents said neither Republicans nor Democrats represent American values well. Experts note this openness to a third party isn't really about Musk himself – it reflects widespread frustration with the current political system. Musk's feud with Trump exploded after the spending bill passed Congress last week. The Tesla CEO had served in Trump's government but quit in May. After Musk criticized the bill, Trump warned he might cancel government contracts for Musk's companies and even suggested deporting him (Musk was born in South Africa). Trump ally Steve Bannon attacked Musk as a "foreigner" trying to split conservative voters. Meanwhile, Musk's poll on X about starting the party got over 1.25 million votes, with 65% saying 'yes'. Even with his $361 billion fortune, experts say Musk would struggle to create a real national party. Each state has different rules for new parties to get on ballots – California alone requires 75,000 registered members or 1.1 million signatures! Election lawyer Brett Kappel explained: 'The state laws... make it as difficult as possible for a third political party'. Campaign funding laws also limit individual donations to parties to just $10,000 per state yearly.