
Fact check: Is France's pensions system costing €55 billion a year?
Prime Minister François Bayrou shocked France when he said in January that the country's pension scheme was haemorrhaging billions.
As part of his government policy statement, in which he outlined his priorities to the French parliament, Bayrou said that pensions were costing France €55 billion a year and that the controversial 2023 pension reform would need another look.
He commissioned France's Cour des Comptes, or Court of Auditors, to carry out a flash report on the country's coffers to provide objective facts and figures for any future changes to the pensions system.
The court published its report on 20 February, revealing that the pensions deficit will sit at some €15 billion by 2035, and then around €30 billion two years later.
It's not quite the €55 billion that Bayrou suggested, but still a dire hole in the country's finances.
As things currently stand, the deficit will stabilise at around €5 billion for the next five years, thanks to the effects of the 2023 pension reform, but it won't be enough: things will quickly start to get worse from there, according to the court.
It said that France's 2045 projected financial outlook for pensions is "worrying" and that two schemes in particular are the problem: the general pension scheme, and that of local authority and hospital employees.
"Neither higher per capita labour productivity than assumed (1% per annum instead of 0.7%), nor the eventual reduction in the unemployment rate to 5% (instead of 7%) would significantly reduce the efforts required to return to balance," the court said.
The debt caused by these two schemes would balloon to €470 billion by 2045, according to the court, which would go against the principle of pay-as-you-go pension schemes — where pensions are paid by the current workforce at a given time.
It did highlight some positive points though: it said that pensions would continue to grow during this period, not accounting for inflation, and that French pensioners would be in a better position than those in other OECD countries.
"In addition, the length of time a person is retired would not decrease compared to the current situation despite the increase in the retirement age linked to the application of the 2023 reform," the court said. "The later retirement age would be offset by an equivalent increase in life expectancy."
It also said that the self-employed wouldn't be adversely affected and that supplementary pension schemes should also rise.
While delivering the results of the report, the court's first president, Pierre Moscovici, said that its objectives were not to provide any recommendations about what the government should do next, but rather reach clear conclusions on the pension system.
Nevertheless, the pension reform, which raised the retirement age from 62 to 64, remains severely unpopular in France. The Court of Auditors' assessment, which suggests it doesn't go far enough in fixing France's overall 6.1% deficit as of the end of 2024, is a blow to calls to get rid of it.
The pension reform was brought in under the government of Élisabeth Borne and passed in March 2023, after the former prime minister used a controversial constitutional tool known as Article 49.3 to force her budget plan through parliament without giving MPs a vote.
The mere tabling of the bill sparked a series of huge, occasionally violent protests all over France, leading to widespread disruption in public services and multiple no-confidence votes against Borne, which she survived.
It's been a similar story for Bayrou since he took office in December, his rocky start mostly caused by the alarming state of France's finances.
The prime minister recently survived his third no-confidence vote in less than a month, after he himself used Artice 49.3 to ram through his 2025 budget.
Surviving the vote means the automatic adoption of the budget plan, which aims to cut an eye-watering €30 billion and raise taxes by €20 billion to limit France's deficit to 5.4% of GDP this year.
Bayrou previously signalled his intention to reopen the debate on the contentious pension reform in an effort to win support from socialist MPs, whose support he needed to fend off the no-confidence votes.
He's said that all options are on the table, including changing the retirement age again, provided they don't harm the pension system's finances even further.
France has been in a state of political paralysis after President Emmanuel Macron dissolved the lower house of parliament following his party's loss in the European elections in June 2024.
The summer vote ended with a hung parliament divided into three blocs with no absolute majority, which quickly led to the collapse of the government under Bayrou's predecessor, Michel Barnier, who became France's shortest-serving prime minister.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fashion Network
an hour ago
- Fashion Network
French Senate to vote on regulating fast fashion
The French Senate is set to vote Tuesday on a bill regulating the fast fashion industry by sanctioning companies and banning advertisements. The bill targets Chinese-founded e-commerce giant Shein, which sells lower-quality clothes at very low prices. Fast fashion companies export large volumes of easily replaceable items to France, causing pollution and saturating markets. The lower house National Assembly adopted the bill in March 2024. The Senate will vote on it later Tuesday and is expected to pass it with government backing and widespread support in the chamber. The vote will not mark the final legislative step. A joint committee of senators and lower house deputies will meet in September to produce a joint text before the law's final adoption. "The text plans to reduce the environmental impact of the textile industry," said Anne-Cécile Violland, the center-right member of parliament who proposed the bill. Fast fashion continues to grow in France. Between 2010 and 2023, the value of advertised products rose from €2.3 billion to €3.2 billion. According to the state environmental agency Ademe, approximately 48 clothing items per person enter the French market each year, while 35 items are discarded every second. "Fast fashion poses a triple threat," said Minister for Ecological Transition Agnès Pannier-Runacher. "It promotes overconsumption, causes ecological disaster and threatens our businesses." The minister condemned an "invasion" of products that "do not last" and expressed hope that the bill would help drive change across Europe. Pannier-Runacher said that once France adopts the bill, the European Commission will review it to ensure compliance with European law. Targeting fast-fashion The Senate, where the right holds a majority, modified the bill to specifically target "ultra" fast fashion companies such as Asian websites Shein and Temu. The Senate's amendments aim to exclude French and European brands that could otherwise be affected, such as Zara, H&M and Kiabi. However, the bill will still require these fashion giants to inform their customers about the environmental impact of their products. "I have no intention of forcing French brands that contribute to our country's economic vitality to pay a single euro," said rapporteur Sylvie Valente Le Hir, a member of the right-wing The Republicans party. The bill will impose stricter sanctions on fast-fashion companies by scoring their "environmental communication," Pannier-Runacher said. This "eco-score" will apply to all fast-fashion companies. Companies that receive the lowest scores will face government-imposed taxes of up to €5 per product in 2025, rising to €10 per product by 2030. This tax cannot exceed 50% of the product's original price. Advertisement ban The bill will also impose sanctions on influencers promoting fast fashion products and ban fast fashion advertisements. "The regulation of the fast fashion industry will only succeed through a collective effort, not by targeting a single actor," Shein spokesperson Quentin Ruffat told RTL radio on Monday. Ruffat warned that the law would introduce "a tax of €10 per sold item of clothing by 2030" and would "impact the purchasing power" of French consumers. Environmental organizations also voiced concerns that lawmakers could misinterpret the bill. "Debates may amount to an interesting framework that still lacks substance," said Green Senator Jacques Fernique. On Monday, the Textiles Industry Union (UIT) recognized the bill as "a first step" and expressed hope for its "rapid adoption ... even if the text does not entirely fit our expectations."


Fashion Network
2 hours ago
- Fashion Network
French Senate to vote on regulating fast fashion
The French Senate is set to vote Tuesday on a bill regulating the fast fashion industry by sanctioning companies and banning advertisements. The bill targets Chinese-founded e-commerce giant Shein, which sells lower-quality clothes at very low prices. Fast fashion companies export large volumes of easily replaceable items to France, causing pollution and saturating markets. The lower house National Assembly adopted the bill in March 2024. The Senate will vote on it later Tuesday and is expected to pass it with government backing and widespread support in the chamber. The vote will not mark the final legislative step. A joint committee of senators and lower house deputies will meet in September to produce a joint text before the law's final adoption. "The text plans to reduce the environmental impact of the textile industry," said Anne-Cécile Violland, the center-right member of parliament who proposed the bill. Fast fashion continues to grow in France. Between 2010 and 2023, the value of advertised products rose from €2.3 billion to €3.2 billion. According to the state environmental agency Ademe, approximately 48 clothing items per person enter the French market each year, while 35 items are discarded every second. "Fast fashion poses a triple threat," said Minister for Ecological Transition Agnès Pannier-Runacher. "It promotes overconsumption, causes ecological disaster and threatens our businesses." The minister condemned an "invasion" of products that "do not last" and expressed hope that the bill would help drive change across Europe. Pannier-Runacher said that once France adopts the bill, the European Commission will review it to ensure compliance with European law. Targeting fast-fashion The Senate, where the right holds a majority, modified the bill to specifically target "ultra" fast fashion companies such as Asian websites Shein and Temu. The Senate's amendments aim to exclude French and European brands that could otherwise be affected, such as Zara, H&M and Kiabi. However, the bill will still require these fashion giants to inform their customers about the environmental impact of their products. "I have no intention of forcing French brands that contribute to our country's economic vitality to pay a single euro," said rapporteur Sylvie Valente Le Hir, a member of the right-wing The Republicans party. The bill will impose stricter sanctions on fast-fashion companies by scoring their "environmental communication," Pannier-Runacher said. This "eco-score" will apply to all fast-fashion companies. Companies that receive the lowest scores will face government-imposed taxes of up to €5 per product in 2025, rising to €10 per product by 2030. This tax cannot exceed 50% of the product's original price. Advertisement ban The bill will also impose sanctions on influencers promoting fast fashion products and ban fast fashion advertisements. "The regulation of the fast fashion industry will only succeed through a collective effort, not by targeting a single actor," Shein spokesperson Quentin Ruffat told RTL radio on Monday. Ruffat warned that the law would introduce "a tax of €10 per sold item of clothing by 2030" and would "impact the purchasing power" of French consumers. Environmental organizations also voiced concerns that lawmakers could misinterpret the bill. "Debates may amount to an interesting framework that still lacks substance," said Green Senator Jacques Fernique. On Monday, the Textiles Industry Union (UIT) recognized the bill as "a first step" and expressed hope for its "rapid adoption ... even if the text does not entirely fit our expectations." with AFP


Euronews
2 hours ago
- Euronews
Two men sentenced to life for links to murder of Maltese journalist
Two men were sentenced to life in prison on Tuesday after being convicted of complicity in the murder of Maltese journalist Daphne Caruana Galizia. Jamie Vella and Robert Agius were accused of supplying the bomb that killed Caruana Galizia in 2017. Both were found guilty of the charges last week and on Tuesday were given the maximum sentence of life in prison. Caruana Galizia, 53, was murdered on 16 October 2017 by a car bomb that was detonated while she was driving near her home. In her career, she had written extensively about suspected corruption in political and business circles in Malta, and her murder shocked Europe and triggered angry protests in the Mediterranean island country. Caruana Galizia's investigative reports had targeted people in then-Prime Minister Joseph Muscat's inner circle whom she accused of having offshore companies in tax havens disclosed in the Panama Papers leak. She also targeted the opposition and at the time of her death was facing more than 40 libel suits. The six-week trial also concerned the separate murder of a lawyer, Carmel Chircop, who was shot and killed in 2015. Two other men, George Degiorgio and Adrian Agius, were convicted and sentenced to life in prison for that murder on Thursday. George Degiorgio and his brother Alfred Degiorgio both pleaded guilty in 2022 to carrying out the murder of Caruana Galizia. They were each sentenced to 40 years in prison. A third man, Vincent Muscat, pleaded guilty in 2021 for his role in the Caruana Galizia murder, and was sentenced to 15 years in prison. He testified in the recent jury trial after being granted a presidential pardon for his role in the Chircop murder on the condition he tell the whole truth. Yorgen Fenech, a prominent Maltese businessman, is currently out of jail on bail awaiting trial on charges of alleged complicity in the Caruana Galizia murder. French leftist MEP Rima Hassan has remained in Israeli custody and was awaiting a hearing on Tuesday before an Israeli judge, after being detained the day before alongside seven other people. Hassan was part of the 'Freedom Flotilla', a group of activists who set off on 3 June from Catania, Italy, to try to deliver humanitarian aid to Gaza by boat but were intercepted by Israel's authorities about 200 kilometres from the coast on Sunday evening. The Israeli Foreign Affairs Ministry said then that the crew of the Madleen vessel had been provided with water and sandwiches but Hassan's team said that after a brief, filmed, distribution of sandwiches during the arrest, no water or food was provided during the 16-hour journey to the port of Ashdod, which the crew was forced to spend on the ship's deck until nightfall. The 12 Freedom Flotilla members were then presented with a document urging them to recognise they had entered Israeli territory illegally. Signing it meant immediate expulsion, while refusal would result in being brought before a judge. Four of them chose the first option, including Swedish activist Greta Thunberg, Spaniard Sergio Toribio, and two French nationals, Baptiste Andre and Omar Faiad. But the other eight refused to sign the document, arguing that the Freedom Flotilla was intercepted in international waters and rejecting the claim that they entered illegally. These eight people are now detained awaiting a new hearing before an Israeli judge, who could order their expulsion in the coming days. Hassan's parliamentary immunity guarantees her freedom of expression and protects her from legal action stemming from any EU member state, but does not apply outside of EU territory. The MEP's team denounced the document presented as 'a propaganda operation aimed at legitimising an illegal arrest and detention' and claimed it is 'a blatant violation of her parliamentary immunity'. 'We strongly affirm that their humanitarian mission to Gaza was legal, necessary, and urgent; the arrest violates international law; the detention is illegal and arbitrary," the statement from Hassan's team also reads. The European Parliament told Euronews on Tuesday that its President Roberta Metsola has been in constant contact with the Israeli authorities to ensure the safety and security of Hassan. 'We will remain in round-the-clock contact with all parties until it is resolved safely," a Parliament spokesperson said. This is not the first time a MEP was detained in a third country. In February 2025, three MEPs - Isabel Serra (Spain), Catarina Martins (Portugal), Jussi Saramo (Finland), all from the Left group - were detained and subsequently expelled from El Aaiún, the main city of the disputed territory of Western Sahara, where they had gone to carry out a human rights observation mission. 'The European Parliament will always insist that all its members are kept safe and treated with respect as elected representatives of the people of Europe wherever they are in the world", the Parliament also said in its statement to Euronews. Her detention and the Freedom Flotilla's seizure have become a much-debated political issue in France and in Brussels. France Unbowed published an appeal calling for the immediate release of the passengers and the lifting of the Israeli blockade on Gaza. Its leader Jean-Luc Mélenchon and MEP Manon Aubry also called for urgent intervention from President Macron and European and international bodies, declaring they bear a moral responsibility to defend these activists. A rally they organised in Paris on Monday to protest against the detention and Israel's actions in Gaza gathered tens of thousands of people, according to Mélenchon. In the European Parliament, The Left, the Socialists and Democrats and the Greens/European Free Alliance co-signed a statement asking for all the activists to be released.