India-Pakistan Tensions: Did you know Pakistan once shot down its own F-16 fighter jet? Read the story behind the Pakistani pilots' act of ‘foolishness'
It was in the yaer 1987 when this incident took place, when Pakistan's F-16s shot down another F-16 mid-air. This happened during a time when the Soviet Union was waging war in Afghanistan. Clashes between Soviet aircraft and the Pakistan Air Force often occurred near the Pakistani border. The Afghan Air Force was backed by the Soviet Union, while Pakistan's Air Force, at the behest of the United States, was fighting against Soviet forces in the region. Afghan Air Force Against the Soviet Union
Two F-16 jets from Pakistan Air Force's 14th Squadron were ordered to intercept four Russian MiG-23 aircraft that were on a bombing mission in Afghanistan. As the Pakistani F-16s climbed from low altitude to engage the MiG-23 formation, a critical mistake occurred. One Pakistani pilot mistook the other F-16 as an enemy aircraft.
The operation was led by Wing Commander Amjad Javed, while the second F-16 was being flown by a pilot named Flight Lieutenant Shahid Sikandar. During the attack, an AIM-9P Sidewinder missile fired from Amjad Javed's aircraft struck the right wing of Shahid Sikandar's F-16 instead of targeting a MiG-23.
'Although pilot Shahid Sikandar managed to save his life in time by activating the ejection seat right after the missile struck the F-16, the aircraft was reduced to debris. The most shocking aspect was that, at the time, the F-16 was considered the world's most advanced fighter jet, equipped with state-of-the-art systems. This system identifies targets using an electronic beam and confirms before launching a missile whether the approaching aircraft is an enemy or a friend.
Immediately after the incident, the Afghan Air Force claimed it had shot down the Pakistani F-16. However, when the wreckage was examined, it was discovered that the crash occurred due to the pilot's foolish mistake. The investigation revealed that the jet's sensor, which distinguishes between friendly and enemy aircraft, had failed to function. But Pentagon officials remained skeptical of this theory for a long time
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
8 minutes ago
- Hans India
India Warns Pakistan Of 'Painful Consequences' Over Water War Threats And Hostile Rhetoric
India has issued a stern warning to Pakistan following a series of aggressive statements from Pakistani leadership regarding water rights and the suspended Indus Waters Treaty, cautioning that any hostile action would result in severe repercussions. The Ministry of External Affairs characterized Pakistan's recent rhetoric as part of a deliberate strategy to promote anti-India sentiment and divert attention from domestic challenges. MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal delivered a sharp rebuke during Thursday's press briefing, stating that Pakistan should moderate its inflammatory language as any aggressive move would have devastating consequences, referencing recent military exchanges between the two nations. The diplomatic confrontation intensified after Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif declared on Tuesday that India would not be permitted to take even a single drop of water belonging to Pakistan. Sharif's defiant statement came in response to India's April 23 decision to suspend the 1960 Indus Waters Treaty, implemented one day after the Pahalgam terror attack that claimed 26 lives. Speaking at a ceremony in Islamabad, the Pakistani premier threatened that India would face severe retaliation if it attempted to obstruct water flow, emphasizing that Pakistan considers such actions tantamount to acts of war. The water dispute has become increasingly contentious, with former Pakistani Foreign Minister Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari comparing the treaty suspension to an assault on the ancient Indus Valley Civilization. He warned that Pakistan would not retreat if compelled to engage in armed conflict over water rights, escalating the diplomatic tensions between the neighboring countries. Pakistani Army Chief General Asim Munir further intensified the situation during an address to the Pakistani diaspora in Tampa, Florida, declaring that Islamabad would destroy any dam constructed by India to block water flow. He asserted that the Indus River system does not constitute Indian family property, suggesting military intervention if necessary to protect Pakistan's water interests. India responded forcefully to General Munir's statements, accusing Pakistan of nuclear intimidation tactics and questioning the reliability of its nuclear command structure. The MEA condemned such threats as confirmation of the Pakistani military's connections to terrorist organizations and emphasized that such intimidation would not prevent India from protecting its national security interests. Indian officials expressed particular concern that these inflammatory remarks were delivered from the territory of a friendly third nation. The diplomatic crisis has attracted unusual commentary from unexpected quarters, including actor-turned-BJP leader Mithun Chakraborty, who made bizarre threats involving missile strikes and dam construction. Though he later clarified his remarks targeted Pakistan's establishment rather than its citizens, his comments reflected the heightened tensions surrounding the water dispute. The current confrontation stems from the aftermath of Operation Sindoor, India's military response launched on May 7 against terrorist infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir following the April 22 Pahalgam attack. The operation involved four days of intensive drone and missile exchanges before both countries agreed to cease hostilities on May 10, establishing a temporary truce that now appears increasingly fragile. India's decision to suspend the Indus Waters Treaty represents a significant departure from decades of water-sharing arrangements between the two countries. The treaty, signed in 1960, has survived multiple wars and diplomatic crises, making its suspension particularly significant in bilateral relations. Pakistan has consistently maintained that any interference with water flow constitutes an act of war, while India argues that Pakistan's support for terrorism justifies reviewing all bilateral agreements. The escalating rhetoric over water rights occurs against the backdrop of broader regional tensions, with both countries possessing nuclear weapons and maintaining substantial military forces along their shared border. The Indus River system provides crucial water resources for agriculture and hydroelectric power generation in both nations, making control over these waterways a matter of national survival for Pakistan. The Ministry of External Affairs has characterized Pakistan's recent statements as following a predictable pattern of hostile rhetoric designed to mask internal governance failures and economic difficulties. Indian officials argue that Pakistan's leadership consistently resorts to anti-India propaganda to distract public attention from domestic challenges, including political instability and economic crises. The water dispute represents one of several contentious issues between India and Pakistan, including territorial disputes over Kashmir, cross-border terrorism, and trade relations. The suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty adds another dimension to these longstanding conflicts and raises concerns about potential military escalation between the nuclear-armed neighbors.
Scroll.in
8 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
‘Any misadventure will have painful consequences': MEA warns Pakistan on remarks by its leaders
India on Thursday warned Pakistan to 'temper its rhetoric', adding that 'any misadventure will have painful consequences, as was demonstrated recently', in a reference to the four-day conflict between both countries in May. 'We have seen reports regarding a continuing pattern of reckless, war-mongering and hateful comments from Pakistani leadership against India,' Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said. The foreign ministry said it is a 'well-known modus operandi of the Pakistani leadership to whip up anti-India rhetoric to cover up their own failures'. New Delhi's response came days after comments made by Pakistan Army Chief Field Marshal Asim Munir and the country's former Foreign Minister Bilawal Bhutto Zardari. During a visit to the United States, Munir told members of the Pakistani-American community in Tampa, Florida, 'We are a nuclear nation, if we think we are going down, we'll take half the world down with us.' Munir also warned that if India were to build a dam on the Indus river, Pakistan would destroy it with missiles, The Print reported. In a similar vein, Bilawal Bhutto said that if Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi announces an attack on the Indus river, 'he attacks our history, our culture and our civilisation', the Hindustan Times reported. 'The people of Pakistan have the strength to confront Modi in the event of war,' he said. On April 23, a day after the Pahalgam terror attack in which 26 persons were killed, India suspended the 1960 Indus Waters Treaty on water sharing, citing Islamabad's support for 'sustained cross-border terrorism'. Tensions between New Delhi and Islamabad escalated on May 7 when the Indian military carried out strikes – codenamed Operation Sindoor – on what it claimed were terrorist camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. The Pakistan Army retaliated to Indian strikes by repeatedly shelling Indian villages along the Line of Control in Jammu and Kashmir. At least 22 Indian civilians and eight defence personnel were killed in the shelling. India and Pakistan on May 10 reached an 'understanding' to halt firing following the four-day conflict.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
India warns Pakistan of ‘painful consequences' to any misadventure
New Delhi: India on Thursday warned Pakistan of 'painful consequences' in the event of any misadventure, responding to 'war-mongering and hateful comments' from Pakistan's civilian and military leadership—particularly army chief field marshal Asim Munir's nuclear threats. On Tuesday, Shehbaz Sharif promised to 'teach India a lesson' if it interferes with Pakistan's water supply. (Representative photo) External affairs ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal, while addressing a weekly media briefing, subtly alluded to India's military response during Operation Sindoor when commenting on recent aggressive rhetoric from Pakistan, including statements by Munir, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, and defence minister Khawaja Asif. 'We have seen reports regarding a continuing pattern of reckless, war-mongering and hateful comments from Pakistani leadership against India,' Jaiswal said. 'Pakistan would be well advised to temper its rhetoric, as any misadventure will have painful consequences, as was demonstrated recently.' He added that it is a 'well-known modus operandi of the Pakistani leadership to whip up anti-India rhetoric time and again to hide their own failures.' Since last week, Pakistan's leadership has escalated its rhetoric over issues ranging from threats to use nuclear weapons to the possibility of war if India restricts the flow of cross-border rivers amid the suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty. Munir, elevated to field marshal following four days of hostilities with India in May, reportedly told the Pakistani diaspora in the US last week that Pakistan could use its nuclear weapons to take down India and 'half the world' in case of an existential threat, and would use missiles to destroy Indian dams on shared rivers. Also read: Outcome of India-Pakistan conflict: Much to be pleased about, much to learn On Tuesday, Shehbaz Sharif promised to 'teach India a lesson' if it interferes with Pakistan's water supply. 'I want to tell the enemy today that if you threaten to stop our water, keep this in mind—you cannot snatch even one drop from Pakistan,' he said. At a related event on Wednesday marking Pakistan's response to Operation Sindoor, Sharif announced the creation of an 'Army Rocket Force Command' to enhance missile combat capabilities. A senior official told Reuters that the force, meant for conventional conflict, 'is obvious that it is meant for India.' Asif stated over the weekend that any violation of Pakistan's sovereignty would provoke a 'swift, surefire and proportionate response.' Meanwhile, former Foreign Minister Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari described India's suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty as an 'attack,' affirming that Pakistan would not back down if forced into war. India initially responded to Munir's nuclear threats by warning that such rhetoric sparks doubts about Pakistan's nuclear command-control integrity, given its military's proximity to terrorist groups. The ministry reiterated that India will not succumb to nuclear blackmail. Also Read: Pakistan took 48 hours to admit intrusion, refused to take back body initially: BSF Following the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack by The Resistance Front (a proxy for Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba), India applied punitive diplomatic and economic measures, including suspending the Indus Waters Treaty and launching Operation Sindoor on May 7. Four days of hostilities followed, ending with a mutual understanding on May 10. Jaiswal also rejected a recent ruling by the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague, which instructed India to 'let flow' waters of western rivers under the Indus Waters Treaty. 'India has never accepted the legality, legitimacy or competence of the so‑called Court of Arbitration. Its pronouncements are therefore without jurisdiction, devoid of legal standing, and have no bearing on India's rights of utilisation,' he said. He added that India rejects Pakistan's 'selective and misleading references to the so-called 'award.'' Referring to India's June 27 statement that the Indus Waters Treaty 'stands in abeyance,' Jaiswal noted it was a sovereign decision motivated by 'Pakistan's continued sponsorship of cross‑border terrorism, including the barbaric Pahalgam attack.' India has not participated in arbitration proceedings since Pakistan challenged components of the Kishanganga (330 MW) and Ratle (850 MW) hydropower projects under the treaty. While the World Bank appointed both a neutral expert and a Court of Arbitration in 2016, India only recognized and engaged with the neutral expert, rejecting the Court of Arbitration.
