OVP 2026 budget ‘feasible' sans confidential funds — Win Gatchalian
At a press conference, Gatchalian said that he will be 'very strict' when it comes to the proposed confidential and intelligence funds under the 2026 national budget, stressing that it 'will no longer be free for all' and will only be limited to enforcement and intelligence agencies.
'From what I have seen, 'yung pinaka-contentious do'n ang confidential funds di ba? And for the 2025 budget wala na 'yun. In fact, bare bones na ang OVP budget, 'yung mga talagang kailangan nila sa kanilang operations and some projects ni Vice President,' the senator said.
(From what I have seen, the confidential funds are the most contentious, right? And for the 2025 budget, the OVP no longer has that. In fact, the OVP budget is bare bones, and they only have a budget for their operations and some projects of the Vice President.)
'So, as long as wala na ang contentious items doon, which is the confidential funds, feasible naman ang budget ngayon ng OVP,' he added.
(So, as long as the contentious items are gone, which is the confidential funds, the OVP budget is now feasible.)
The proposed 2026 budget of the OVP, under the leadership of Vice President Sara Duterte, has increased by P170 million from the current fiscal year—-from P733 million to P903 million, according to spokesperson Ruth Castelo.
Castelo also confirmed that the OVP will not be requesting any confidential funds for next year.
'No confidential funds. Hindi naman na tayo nag-request niyan [we didn't request]… If they want to give, they want to give,' she explained.
Last year, the House decided to reduce the budget of the OVP from the originally proposed P2 billion to P733 million amid Duterte's refusal to answer lawmakers' questions on OVP budget use, including confidential funds.
The Senate retained the House-introduced budget cut despite calls from Duterte's allies to restore some of the OVP's proposed funding for social services.
'Golden age of transparency'
Further, Gatchalian said that amid the public clamor for transparency and accountability, he will push to make more budget documents—-from the National Expenditure Program until it becomes the General Appropriations Act—-available online for the public to easily access it.
'Kung ikaw ay publiko at gusto mo i-analyze ang budget, makikita mo lang ang step 1 at 'yung last step. Pero hindi ko makikita 'yung i-step by i-step…dahil kulang kulang 'yung paga-upload ng documents,' he said.
(If you want to analyze the budget, you can only see step 1 and the last step. But you can't see it step by step because not all documents are being uploaded.)
'So, ire-require namin ngayon ang DBM to go one step further. Meron silang tinatawag na budget preparation form 201. Lahat ng mga requests ng mga ahensya binibigay sa DBM. Ire-request namin ngayon na i-upload rin sa website para malaman ng taumbayan kung ano ba ang nire-request ng mga agencies,' he added.
(So, we will now require DBM to go one step further. They have a budget preparation form 201 which contains the budget requests of all agencies. We will now request for it to be uploaded to the website so that the people will know how much the agencies are requesting us.)
Transparency and accountability. Isinusulong natin na i-upload online ang lahat ng dokumento pagdating sa 2026 national budget. pic.twitter.com/zt99adMnjt — Win Gatchalian (@WinGatchalian74) August 4, 2025
The chairman of the Senate committee on finance also said that they will request the House of Representatives to upload their version of the General Appropriations Bill (GAB) on their website and send a digital format to the Senate.
He said the Senate will also do the same for its own version of the bill. The reconciled version by both chambers will likewise be uploaded online so that the public can scrutinize the changes in the budget before it gets delivered to Malacañang for the President's signature. —AOL, GMA Integrated News
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
GMA Network
8 hours ago
- GMA Network
Chiz to House: Senate not a playground to run after foes
"To these people, I say this, the Senate is not your playground to run after your political enemies. We are not an accomplice in any grand scheme,' Escudero said. Senate President Francis 'Chiz' Escudero on Wednesday asked members of the House of Representatives to refrain from trying to use the Senate as a tool to go after political adversaries. Escudero made the remark as he explained his vote for archiving the articles of impeachment against Vice President Sara Duterte. 'To the House of Representatives I say, do not allow yourselves to be used for the blind hatred and ambition of a few who did things haphazardly, gravely abused their discretion, and violated due process, rights under the Constitution as found by the High Court itself,' the Senate president said. 'In spite of all these, you expect everyone to roll over in obedience. When we did not, you moved hell and high water to destroy personalities, malign reputations, and tarnish institutions," he added. "To these people, I say this, the Senate is not your playground to run after your political enemies. We are not an accomplice in any grand scheme,' Escudero said. Escudero also said that he is not willing to play such politicians' game, stressing that he will 'never bow to a mob [and] never cower to the shrillest of voices.' To recall, the House of Representatives impeached Duterte on February 5, with over 200 lawmakers endorsing the complaint. The Vice President was accused of betrayal of public trust, culpable violation of the constitution, graft and corruption, and other high crimes. Duterte, in return, had entered a 'not guilty' plea in the verified impeachment complaint filed against her, which she called merely a 'scrap of paper.' Recently, the Supreme Court declared the articles of impeachment against Duterte unconstitutional, stressing that it is barred by the one-year rule under the Constitution and that it violates her right to due process. The high court said the Senate cannot acquire jurisdiction over the impeachment proceedings. However, the SC said it was not absolving Duterte from any of the charges against her and that any subsequent impeachment complaint may be filed starting February 6, 2026. The House , through the Office of the Solicitor General, then filed a motion for reconsideration, seeking to reverse the SC decision. The lower chamber argued it should be allowed to perform its exclusive duty to prosecute an impeachable official, and the Senate's to try the case.
GMA Network
10 hours ago
- GMA Network
Senate archives articles of impeachment vs. Sara Duterte
"Let this chamber be remembered not for the passions we inflamed, but the principles we upheld,' Escudero said. The Senate on Monday voted to transfer to the archives the articles of impeachment against Vice President Sara Duterte, following the decision of the Supreme Court (SC) blocking the impeachment trial of Duterte. In the explanation of his "yes" vote, Senate President Francis Escudero said that he would 'never bow to a mob [and] never cower to the shrillest of voices.' 'Let history, Mr. President, record that in this moment, we chose the Constitution, we chose the rule of law by defending the integrity of the Supreme Court and maintaining the system of checks and balances under our republican system of government," Escudero said. "Let this chamber be remembered not for the passions we inflamed, but the principles we upheld,' he added. Senate Minority Leader Sen. Vicente Sotto III and other members of the minority argued that the Senate should wait for the decision of the Supreme Court on the motion for reconsideration that the Office of the Solicitor General filed on behalf of the House of Representatives To recall, the House of Representatives impeached Duterte on February 5, with over 200 lawmakers endorsing the complaint. The Vice President was accused of betrayal of public trust, culpable violation of the constitution, graft and corruption, and other high crimes. Duterte, in return, had entered a 'not guilty' plea in the verified impeachment complaint filed against her, which she called merely a 'scrap of paper.' Recently, the Supreme Court declared the articles of impeachment against Duterte unconstitutional, stressing that it is barred by the one-year rule under the Constitution and that it violates her right to due process. The high court said the Senate did not acquire jurisdiction over the impeachment proceedings because the articles of impeachment were void. However, the SC said it is not absolving Duterte from any of the charges against her and that any subsequent impeachment complaint may be filed starting February 6, 2026. The House then filed a motion for reconsideration, seeking to reverse the SC decision. The lower chamber argued it should be allowed to perform its exclusive duty to prosecute an impeachable official, and the Senate's to try the case. Before voting on the motion of Sen. Rodante Marcoleta, as amended by Senate Majority Leader Sen. Joel Villanueva, the Senate also voted to dismiss the motion of Senate Minority Leader Sen. Vicente Sotto III "to table" the Marcoleta motion. 'With five affirmative votes, 19 negative votes, the motion to table the motion of Senator [Sotto] is lost,' Senate President Francis 'Chiz' Escudero said. The Senate minority leader voted in favor of his motion, saying he has voted numerous times with the minority. 'I know that it will be a vote in the minority, but I have always voted in the minority on many issues in the Senate since 1992 up to the present. I always prayed I was wrong. Unfortunately, I was always right,' Sotto said. 'May God have mercy on your decision,' he added. The SC previously ruled unanimously that the Articles of Impeachment against Duterte are barred by the one-year rule under Article XI, Section 3(5) of the Constitution. The SC also ruled that the articles violate the right to due process. It said that the Senate did not acquire jurisdiction over the impeachment proceedings and that the Senate did not acquire jurisdiction to constitute itself into an impeachment court. –NB, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
10 hours ago
- GMA Network
Escudero slams ex-justices critical of SC ruling on VP Sara impeachment
Senate President Francis 'Chiz' Escudero on Wednesday slammed retired Supreme Court (SC) justices who are critical of the high court's ruling on the impeachment case against Vice President Sara Duterte. 'Bahagi ako ng Kongresong nagtangka na i-impeach si dating Chief Justice Davide. Bakit ko sinabing tangka? Dahil pinigilan po kami ng Korte Suprema. In-enjoin at nag issue ng TRO ang Korte Suprema at ito ang desisyon na iyon,' he said during the plenary session. (I was part of the Congress that attempted to impeach former Chief Justice Davide. Why did I say attempted? Because we were stopped by the SC. The SC issued an injunction and a TRO, and this is that decision.) Escudero named retired SC justices Conchita Carpio-Morales, Antonio Carpio, and Adolfo Azcuna, as well as former chief justices Reynato Puno and Artemio Panganiban. They all voted in 2003 that the impeachment complaint against then Chief Justice Hilario Davide was barred under Article XI, Section 3(5) of the Constitution. Written by Carpio-Morales, the decision in Francisco vs. House of Representatives said that an impeachment is deemed initiated upon the filing of the impeachment complaint and referral to the House Committee on Justice, or when an impeachment complaint is filed and verified by at least one-third of the membership of the House. (Where are all those who are complaining now and questioning the Supreme Court's decision? The justices who are now questioning it are already retired, they voted in favor of it back then.) 'Subalit ngayon tila nag iba ang posisyon. Ano nga ba ang pinagkaiba kung meron man? Klaro ang pinagkaiba, iba ang pangalan ng nasasakdal,' he added. (But now, it seems their position has changed. What exactly is the difference, if there is any? The difference is clear, the name of the accused is different.) In its July 25, 2025 ruling, the SC declared the articles of impeachment against Duterte unconstitutional, saying that they were barred by the one-year bar rule under Article XI Section 3 paragraph 5 of the Constitution. The high court also found that the articles violated Duterte's right to due process. As a result, the SC said the Senate did not acquire jurisdiction over the impeachment proceedings. The House of Representatives appealed the ruling on Tuesday. The SC meanwhile ordered Duterte to comment on the motion for reconsideration. 1Sambayan coalition, which includes Carpio-Morales and Carpio, previously filed a motion for reconsideration, urging the SC to issue a status quo ante order and set the case for oral arguments. Escudero asked if those critical of the SC ruling are 'truly for accountability' or 'simply anti-Duterte.' 'Remove the name of the vice president in this case, apply the decision of the high court, as Senator Cayetano said earlier, to another impeachable official, would our positions, would your positions be the same?' he said. —VBL, GMA Integrated News
