Looking for Stability? UnitedHealth Group (UNH) Incorporated is a Timeless Buy and Hold Stock
A senior healthcare professional giving advice to a patient in a clinic.
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (NYSE:UNH) is an American multinational healthcare and insurance company. The company is facing short-term challenges, mainly due to rising medical costs, especially in its Medicare Advantage plans. To address this, the company plans to raise premiums— some of which will take effect next year—while also tightening provider networks and improving cost controls. Its Optum segment is also undergoing changes, including pricing adjustments and reducing patient volume.
In addition, UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (NYSE:UNH) is rolling out cost-cutting measures and expanding the use of AI to improve efficiency. Despite current issues, the company expects to return to earnings growth in 2026, with further acceleration in 2027. Former CEO Stephen Hemsley is back at the helm, bringing experienced leadership during this transition.
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (NYSE:UNH) is a solid dividend company. In June, the company declared a 5.2% hike in its quarterly dividend to $2.21 per share. This was the company's 15th consecutive year of dividend growth, which makes it one of the best dividend stocks to invest in. The stock has a dividend yield of 3.54%, as of July 31.
While we acknowledge the potential of UNH as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock.
READ NEXT: and
Disclosure: None.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
CareTrust REIT (CTRE) Q2 Earnings: Taking a Look at Key Metrics Versus Estimates
For the quarter ended June 2025, CareTrust REIT (CTRE) reported revenue of $112.47 million, up 63.3% over the same period last year. EPS came in at $0.43, compared to $0.07 in the year-ago quarter. The reported revenue compares to the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $107.52 million, representing a surprise of +4.6%. The company delivered an EPS surprise of -4.44%, with the consensus EPS estimate being $0.45. While investors scrutinize revenue and earnings changes year-over-year and how they compare with Wall Street expectations to determine their next move, some key metrics always offer a more accurate picture of a company's financial health. As these metrics influence top- and bottom-line performance, comparing them to the year-ago numbers and what analysts estimated helps investors project a stock's price performance more accurately. Here is how CareTrust REIT performed in the just reported quarter in terms of the metrics most widely monitored and projected by Wall Street analysts: Revenues- Rental income: $86.03 million versus $75.75 million estimated by two analysts on average. Compared to the year-ago quarter, this number represents a +55.3% change. Revenues- Interest income from other real estate related investments and other income: $23.55 million versus $25.05 million estimated by two analysts on average. Compared to the year-ago quarter, this number represents a +74.7% change. Net Earnings Per Share (Diluted): $0.35 compared to the $0.36 average estimate based on two analysts. View all Key Company Metrics for CareTrust REIT here>>> Shares of CareTrust REIT have returned +6% over the past month versus the Zacks S&P 500 composite's +0.5% change. The stock currently has a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy), indicating that it could outperform the broader market in the near term. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report CareTrust REIT, Inc. (CTRE) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
eBay Inc. (EBAY)'s Algorithims Are Working, Says Jim Cramer
We recently published . eBay Inc. (NASDAQ:EBAY) is one of the stocks Jim Cramer recently discussed. eBay Inc. (NASDAQ:EBAY) is an eCommerce retailer whose shares have gained 47% year-to-date. Most of these gains are due to an 18.3% jump in July after the firm's second-quarter earnings report. The results saw eBay Inc. (NASDAQ:EBAY) beat analyst second-quarter revenue and EPS estimates of $2.64 billion and $1.30 by posting $2.73 billion and $1.30, respectively. The firm's third quarter revenue guidance of $2.69 billion and $2.74 billion also overshot analyst estimates of $2.66 billion. Here's what Cramer believes about eBay Inc. (NASDAQ:EBAY)'s strong performance: 'Now one David, that I know that you will remember from the old days that really is putting on a good show, would be eBay. They've got their mojo back. It's up 15%, they had very good numbers, and I salute them. They hung in and now their model is working. They've got the algos working so to speak. And a lot of people upgraded it. That's to me, better focus, better focus.' Copyright: rawpixel / 123RF Stock Photo Earlier, Cramer discussed eBay Inc. (NASDAQ:EBAY)'s marketplace and shifting sentiment: 'There's no real theme to the other stocks on the list… eBay's a real shocker. It's come a long way to get back on this list. Now, I've watched this stock get carved up for ages, but now it looks like eBay has stopped being a whipping boy, and people are feeling comfortable buying merchandise second-hand. Has a partnership with Facebook's Marketplace, which has spurred real growth for the company. I like that, by the way, that marketplace section.' While we acknowledge the potential of EBAY as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the . READ NEXT: 30 Stocks That Should Double in 3 Years and 11 Hidden AI Stocks to Buy Right Now. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Study attributes 440 'excess deaths' to January's Los Angeles wildfires
By Steve Gorman LOS ANGELES (Reuters) -Wildfires that devastated parts of the Los Angeles area in January indirectly led to hundreds of deaths in the ensuing weeks, far exceeding the official toll of 31 fatalities, according to a study released on Wednesday. The research, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, or JAMA, estimated 440 "excess deaths" were attributable to the fires from January 5 to February 1, using models that compared predicted mortality under normal circumstances to actual numbers documented during that period. The additional deaths likely reflect a mix of factors, including increased exposure of people with heart and lung disease to poor air quality from smoke and toxins released by the fires, as well as healthcare delays and disruptions, the study said. The findings "underscore the need to complement direct fatalities estimates with alternative methods to quantify the additional mortality burden of wildfires and of climate-related emergencies more broadly," the researchers wrote. Two wind-driven wildfires that erupted during the first week of January on opposite sides of Los Angeles damaged or destroyed nearly 16,000 structures combined - laying waste to much of the seaside district of Pacific Palisades and the foothill community of Altadena. Together, the blazes scorched 59 square miles (152 sq km), an area larger than Paris. The official tally of people who perished as a direct result of the fires stands at 31, after the most recent set of human remains were unearthed in Altadena in July, six months after the fires. Governor Gavin Newsom in February requested nearly $40 billion in wildfire aid from Congress. Some estimates put economic losses from the fires at more than $250 billion, making the conflagration one of the most costly natural disasters in U.S. history. The JAMA study acknowledged some limitations, saying the data may need to be revised upward in the future and the research did not reflect any fire-attributable deaths beyond Feb. 1.
