logo
Joe Rogan Tells Texas Dem He Should Run for President

Joe Rogan Tells Texas Dem He Should Run for President

Yahoo19-07-2025
Joe Rogan has thrown his weight behind many different politicians throughout his career, but a suggestion made in the most recent episode of his podcast shows the host is still capable of surprising people.
In an interview with Democratic Texas State Rep. James Talarico on The Joe Rogan Experience, Rogan told Talarico that he should consider running for president.
During a conversation about whether Americans have lost faith in the future of the country, Talarico argued that Americans should keep having faith in their ability to make change.
'That's because you need to run for president,' Rogan said in response. 'We need someone who's actually a good person.' While at 36 years old, Talarico is technically old enough to occupy the Oval Office, he appears to have his sights set on the Texas state senate instead.
The clip of the exchange, as well as other parts of Friday's two-hour-long interview, were shared widely on social media, including by Democratic media personalities like podcaster Brian Tyler Cohen and influencer Harry Sisson.
Talarico is a pastor, former teacher, and current state legislator who represents a district in central Texas. Politico has described him as 'the next big thing in Texas politics.'
Rogan was reportedly motivated to invite the lawmaker on his show when he saw a 2023 viral video of Talarico criticizing a state law that mandated the placement of the Ten Commandments in every Texas public school classroom.
The pair discussed the relationship between politics and religion at length, as well as funding for public education, universal basic income, and engaging young voters.
Talarico joins a growing group of Democratic politicians who have recently appeared on podcasts with conservative-leaning audiences, including Bernie Sanders (who sat down with Rogan last month), Pete Buttigieg, and Gavin Newsom. Incidentally, it's widely believed that the latter two are seriously mulling a 2028 election run.
Solve the daily Crossword
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

HUD drops housing discrimination complaint related to aldermanic prerogative and Chicago zoning
HUD drops housing discrimination complaint related to aldermanic prerogative and Chicago zoning

Chicago Tribune

time29 minutes ago

  • Chicago Tribune

HUD drops housing discrimination complaint related to aldermanic prerogative and Chicago zoning

The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development is dropping its investigation into whether or not aldermanic prerogative, which typically gives Chicago aldermen the final word on zoning decisions in their ward, resulted in housing discrimination. In a letter HUD sent Wednesday to the complaining parties, which was obtained by the Tribune, the agency said it was closing the case to instead focus on 'real concerns regarding fair housing.' 'It is the Department's policy to focus on the original understanding and enforcement of the law and therefore rightfully return such decisions on zoning, home building, and more, to local leaders who are directly responsible for those matters,' the letter says. 'HUD enforcement will continue to prioritize investigations of specific allegations of actual discrimination, rather than dictate or influence land use policy.' ProPublica reported last month HUD was planning to drop the case. What dropping the investigation means for Chicago remains unclear. Advocates hope to negotiate a deal with Mayor Brandon Johnson that will prevent aldermen from discriminating against affordable housing projects and developments. But it's unclear what action Johnson will take, given that he is preparing for a difficult reelection campaign and budget fight. Johnson's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment Wednesday, nor did HUD officials. A 2018 complaint filed by the Shriver Center on Poverty Law on behalf of community organizations alleged that aldermanic prerogative promotes housing discrimination by keeping racial minorities from moving into affluent white neighborhoods. After an investigation, HUD under Democratic President Joe Biden found in 2023 the allegations to be true. The agency found that Chicago had limited the building of income-restricted affordable housing in majority-white neighborhoods by giving aldermen complete veto power. It also found that Chicago had disproportionately harmed Black and Hispanic residents, perpetuated racial segregation and effectuated opposition to affordable housing 'based on racial animus.' HUD offered the parties an opportunity to work with the federal agency on informal settlement negotiations. But the Tribune reported last month that Johnson's administration delayed signing an agreement to resolve the federal complaint. A group of organizations behind the complaint met July 9 with senior mayoral aides Kennedy Bartley and Jason Lee to discuss alternative arrangements that would address the issue while leaving HUD out of the equation and forgoing any action items that would require City Council approval. But the political willpower to approve changes that would address the issue is in danger without HUD's backing. Representatives from organizations behind the complaint said last week they believed HUD will no longer pursue fair housing complaints under Republican President Donald Trump's administration. The affordable and fair housing community locally and nationally have been taking repeated hits from the Trump administration, which has sought to hinder fair housing enforcement and obstruct certain affordable housing developments. Asked last month how the complaining organizations will take on aldermanic prerogative without HUD's backing and the City Council's support, Rod Wilson, executive director of the Lugenia Burns Hope Center, said he thinks there are other routes that don't need City Council approval but declined to share specifics because of the ongoing negotiations with the mayor's team.

Pritzker says ‘no way' FBI can arrest Texas lawmakers in Illinois
Pritzker says ‘no way' FBI can arrest Texas lawmakers in Illinois

The Hill

time29 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Pritzker says ‘no way' FBI can arrest Texas lawmakers in Illinois

Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker (D) in a Wednesday interview said he would block any efforts to arrest Democratic lawmakers in the state who fled Texas to block a GOP effort to pick up five additional House seats in the midterm elections. 'Our state troopers protect everybody in Illinois and anybody who's here in Illinois,' Pritzker said during an appearance on ' News Not Noise ' with Jessica Yellin. 'And so, whether it's federal agents coming to Illinois or state rangers from Texas, if you haven't broken federal law, you're basically unwelcome and there's no way that our state legislators here — the Texas state legislators — can be arrested,' he added. Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) urged FBI Director Kash Patel in a letter this week to help return Democrats to the Lone Star State. President Trump on Tuesday said the federal agency 'may have to' get involved, later adding the GOP was 'entitled' to additional House seats. 'We should have many more seats in California. It's all gerrymandered. And we have an opportunity in Texas to pick up five seats. We have a really good governor, and we have good people in Texas,' the president said during an interview Tuesday on CNBC's 'Squawk Box.' 'And I won Texas. I got the highest vote in the history of Texas, as you probably know, and we are entitled to five more seats,' he added. But Pritzker argued Wednesday that any efforts to force the return of Democratic lawmakers are illegal. 'Look, we follow the law and the law is what I just laid it out to be. But, as you know, Donald Trump does not follow the law. Indeed, he's a convicted felon,' Pritzker told Yellin. 'And in Texas, they are also not following the law. They are thwarting the Constitution with the Voting Rights Act and making threats that they can't carry out. John Cornyn, of course, is running against Ken Paxton for his seat in the U.S. Senate; and so they're fighting, bickering over who can be tougher on this topic,' he added.

KCMO to decide whether earnings tax goes on November ballot
KCMO to decide whether earnings tax goes on November ballot

Yahoo

time35 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

KCMO to decide whether earnings tax goes on November ballot

KANSAS CITY, Mo. — Wednesday at Kansas City City Hall, FOX4 talked to Mayor Quinton Lucas about whether the earnings tax will be decided on by voters in the city in November of 2025. 'It's not currently on the ballot. It's not currently planned for the ballot, and I think we have about two or three weeks to try to figure that out if we were to want to,' Mayor Lucas said. As Mayor Lucas alluded to, figuring that out must happen by August 26. That's the deadline if the city wants it to be on this November's ballot. The 1% earnings tax is levied on anyone who works in the city, regardless of where they live. Popular Kansas City dog bar files for Chapter 7 bankruptcy after closure Mayor Lucas said a lot is going on in Jackson County over the next three months. As of Wednesday, a recall election of Democratic County Executive Frank White was planned for September 30. Tuesday, November 4, Jackson County residents will be deciding on whether they want their assessor to be elected in future elections. 'You want to think about, 'How can you run a campaign?' Mayor Lucas said. 'Can you inform people well enough in time and frankly, what issues are happening right now that you don't want to get pulled into? There is a very robust tax conversation occurring right now in Jackson County and Platte County really, and that being, you know, the majority of Kansas Citians, you may not necessarily want to have a tax chat at the same time.' Besides talking to Mayor Lucas on Wednesday, FOX4 also talked to Show-Me Institute Senior Fellow Patrick Tuohey, who's not a supporter of the earnings tax. Other municipalities around the city don't have this tax. 'Kansas City needs to understand that it is competing with the metro areas around it to draw talent, to draw population, and it's not just the earnings tax that's chasing people away. It's crime. It's schools. It's infrastructure,' Tuohey said. 'If Kansas City is serious about being competitive, it really needs to think about all these things, the earnings tax included.' Mayor Lucas disagrees with the narrative that suburban cities with their new developments are competing with his city because of things like the earnings tax. 2025 primary election results across the Kansas City metro 'You go to a job because people treat you well, because you feel like you're doing outstanding work and because you're interested in what you do, your colleagues and all that surrounds you,' Mayor Lucas continued. 'Kansas City will continue to be a place that attracts great employers because we build great communities, because we invest in downtown, the plaza, so many other areas.' The last time the earnings tax was on the ballot for voters in the city, it easily passed in April of 2021. 77% of voters said yes. Just 23% said no. As of Wednesday afternoon, the earnings tax was not on the Tuesday, August 12, Finance Committee agenda. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store